Objective To summarize and analyze the different views on the lymph node metastasis and the extent of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.Methods The current domestic and foreign reports on lymph node metastasis and lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer were reviewed.Results Lymph node dissection of gastric cancer is based on clinical stage and the location of the tumor. Laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in treatment of gastric cancer is a safe， feasible， effective， and minimally invasive technique with good outcomes for patients. Sentinel lymph node（SLN） in the clinical assessment of early gastric cancer is feasible，besides with high accuracy and sensitivity. Lymphatic mapping is an effective， easy， and safe method to guide lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer. Evidence-based lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer provide a new perspective to the extent. Conclusions It is difficult to evaluate those methods exactly. Researchers over the world should learn from each other and explore further in order to develop guiding principles in the end.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current status and advances of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) technique in breast cancer. MethodsThe pertinent domestic and overseas literatures were reviewed and the localization, harvest, status assessment, indications, and complications of SLNB were analyzed. ResultsSLNB could accurately locate and pick out sentinel lymph node (SLN) in breast cancer. The development on imaging examination and pathological techniques promoted the assessment of SLN, and the indications of SLNB were expanding. The complication rate of SLNB was low and the technique could accurately predict axillary lymph node staging and direct selective axillary lymph node dissection. ConclusionsSLNB has been an important method of surgical therapy in breast cancer, but the operation process needs to be further standardized to decrease the false negative rate. Continuative attentions shall be paid to the problems such as the false positive and controversial indications.
Objective To explore the clinical value of only using blue dye as tracer in the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) of breast cancer. Methods SLNB was performed with the guidance of the combination of blue dye and isotope in all patients enrolled. SLNB data of blue dye only, and the combination method was recorded respectively for analyses. Results Three hundred and eight patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Significant differences were found in the identification rate (IDR, 93.5% vs. 99.4%, P=0.000), the false negative rate (FNR, 14.8% vs. 3.3%, P=0.007), the accuracy rate (AR, 89.6% vs. 97.8%, P=0.006), and the negative predictive value (NPV, 74.0% vs. 93.3%, P=0.012) between the blue dye alone and the combination method. The IDR and the FNR of the two methods were not significantly associated with the patient age, tumor size and location, histopathological type, type of biopsy and breast surgery, or ER, PR, and HER-2 status (all Pgt;0.05). The FNR of blue dye alone was significantly associated with clinically suspicious turgescence of axillary lymph nodes (P=0.042) and decreased followed by the increased number of sentinel lymph nodes obtained (P=0.000). Conclusions Compared with the combination method, SLNB guided with blue dye alone had significantly poorer IDR, AR, and NPV, and higher FNR. It is recommended that the combination of dye and isotope should be adopted for the guidance of SLNB in clinical practice rather than the use of blue dye alone.
Objective To investigate the clinical meanings of lymphangiogenesis, lymph vessel invasion (LVI) and lymph node (LN) micrometastasis in gastric cancer. Methods The expression of D2-40 in 68 patients with gastric cancer of primary lesion and the expressions of CK20 and (or) CKpan in 791 lymph nodes from 51 cases which were detected by immunohistochemical staining were analyzed, as well as their clinicopathologic profiles. The relationship of lymph vessel density (LVD), LVI and LN micrometastasis with LN metastasis and other clinicopathologic parameters was analyzed respectively. Results Positive rate of LVI with HE (LVI-HE) and D2-40 (LVI-IM) staining was respectively 66.2%(45/68) and 76.5%(52/68), P=0.118. The positive rate of LVI-IM was related to deeper tumor invasion (P=0.044), later stage of TNM (P=0.003) and LN metastasis (P=0.000). Average LVD of 68 cases was (18.19±7.44)/HP. The increment of LVD was significantly associated with LVI-HE positive status （P=0.040）, LVI-IM positive status （P=0.001）, venous invasion （P=0.037）, later stage of TNM （P=0.020） and LN metastasis （P=0.001）. The survival rate of the group sharing ≥15/HP of LVD was significantly lower than that in the group sharing ≤14/HP of LVD in early period of follow-up （P=0.032）. The incidence of nodal involvement in 51 patients was increased from 74.5%(38/51) by HE staining to 88.2%(45/51) by CK (CK20 or CKpan) immunostaining. The detection rate of metastasized LN was increased from 32.0%（253/791） by HE staining to 41.5%（328/791） by CK immunostaining (Plt;0.001). The significant difference of LN micrometastasis detection rate between CK20 (8.7%) and CKpan (12.3%) was also identified (P=0.003). The increased number of LN micrometastasis was related to larger diameter of tumor (P=0.001), higher LVI-HE positive rate (P=0.040), deeper invasion of tumor (P=0.018) and later stage of TNM (P=0.012). Both LN stage and TNM stage were changed according to the detection of LN micrometastasis: Seven patients of N0 should be recognized as N1 (N0→N1)， 6 as N1→N2, 1 as N2→N3. Four patients of stage Ⅰb should be recognized as stage Ⅱ (Ⅰb→Ⅱ)， 4 as Ⅱ→Ⅲa， 3 as Ⅲa→Ⅲb， 1 as Ⅲb→Ⅳ. Conclusion Detection of D2-40 and CK in diagnosis of LVI and LN micrometastasis is better than HE staining. The combined detection of CK20 and CKpan may be much easier to find out the LN with micrometastasis. Later stage of TNM the tumor is, more frequently the LN micrometastasis happens. The relationships of LVI-IM, LVD and LN micrometastasis with LN metastasis in gastric cancer has been demonstrated. Patients with higher LVD share a lower survival rate in early period of follow-up.
Objective To understand the current research status of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in colorectal cancer. Methods Literatures about the application of SLN biopsy in the field of colorectal surgery were collected and reviewed. Results The results of SLNs biopsy accurately reflected the status of the nodal basin. Focused examination of the SLNs could identify micrometastases that might otherwise had been missed by standard histopathological analysis, thus upstaged this group of patients. Conclusion SLN biopsy represents a new and effective technique to predict the tumor status of regional lymph nodes, which offers a potential alternative to improve the accuracy of tumor staging in colorectal cancer.
ObjectiveTo review the recent studies about sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.MethodsThe literatures in recent years on the history, concept, technique and clinical application of sentinel lymph node biopsy were reviewed and summarized.ResultsThere was no unified method for sentinel lymph node biopsy. There was a wide range of detection rate and falsenegative rate.ConclusionProspective multicenter random clinical trials will help to evaluate the clinical application of sentinel lymph node biopsy.
ObjectiveTo study the significance of lateral lymph nodes sweeping in lower rectal cancer. MethodsRoutine pathological methods were used to detect the regularity of lateral lymph nodes metastasis and the survival rate of the patient. All the data was analysed by χ2 test. Results①Lateral lymph nodes metastasis was observed in 12.5% rectal cancer below the peritoneum,and it was the main lymph metastatic way. ②Low differented adenocarcinoma and mucous adenocarcinoma had more lateral lymph nodes metastasis than other types. Lateral lymph nodes metastasis was also related with invaded degree of invasion. ③The survival rate of the case with lateral lymph node metastasis was 42.2%.ConclusionLateral lymph nodes should be swept in advanced rectal cancer to prevent remains of lymph nodes remained and increase the survival rate.
Objective To summarize and analyze the different views on the extent of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer, and ways or methods to dissolve the disagreements. Methods The reports and advances on lymphadenectomy in gastric carcinomas were collected and reviewed.Results Eastern and western scholars presented different view on lymph nodes dissection in gastric cancers because of the difference in nationalty,studying method and operating technique.Conclusion Although extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancers are supported by more and more reports, it is difficult to evaluate the role exactly. Searchers over the world should learn from each other and explore further in order to develop guiding principles in the end.
ObjectiveTo study the detection methods of micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) and their clinical significance. MethodsFifty women with breast carcinoma were included. SLN in fifty breast carcinoma was identified by using methylene blue staining to detect and remove them for routine hematoxylin and eosin stain and histological exam. All negative SLNs were examined by serial section (SS) with the section interval of 250 μm and HE stain for microscopic examination and immunohistochemical (IHC) exam was performed with CK19 monoclonal antibody. Then the above three detection methods were analyzed. All patients had axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)，and all none sentinel lymph nodes (NSLN) were examined by Hamp;E staining.ResultsThe SLNs were identified in 45 of 50 patients with a detection rate of 90%. Sixteen SLNs were found positive with routine histological exam, the positive detecting rate was 35.56%, while the other 29 negative SLNs were found 7 and 6 cases of micrometastasis using SS and IHC methods，therefore the positive detecting rate was increased by 15.55% and 13.33%, respectively.Conclusion SS and IHC methods could detect the micrometastasis in negative SLN with routinely histological exam, increasing the positive detecting rate and decreasing the false negative rate.
Objective To identify the feasibility of the lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with breast cancer and to examine whether the characteristics of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) accurately predict the status of axillary lymph node.MethodsFrom March to October 2000, 32 patients with breast cancer were evaluated at the Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital. Lymphatic mapping was performed using Methlene Blue. A SLN was defined as any blue node. Thirtytwo patients, with breast cancer underwent a complete axillary lymph node resection (ALNR) following SLN biopsy. Subsequently, all SLNs and ALNs were examined by both Hamp;E staining as well as immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin. ResultsLymphatic mapping was successful in identifying the SLN in 26/32(81.25%) cases of nodes at level Ⅰ. Of the 26 patients mapped successfully, 10 had metastasis to the SLNs.In 3 cases that SLNs were positive, but other axillary lymph nodes were negative. In 2 cases that the SLNs were negative, but other axillary lymph nodes were positive. The sensitivity of SLNB using Methlene Blue in this study was 77.78%(7/9), accuracy 80.77%(21/26), specificity 82.35%(14/17), and false negative rate 22.22%(2/9). ConclusionSLN can predict the status of the axillary lymph nodes reliably. However, the efficacy of SLNB in the setting of randomized, prospective trials must be tested first before abandoning axillary lymph node resection as the standard of care.