ObjectiveTo summarize the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function.MethodIn this paper, we reviewed and summarized the related literatures about the application of MRI in the field of pancreatic exocrine function evaluation in recent years.ResultsA variety of MRI techniques could be used to detect the pancreatic exocrine function. In addition to conventional MRI techniques, there were also MRI stimulated by pancreatic secretions, cine (dynamic) cholangiopancreatography based on space selective reverse recovery pulse, and so on.ConclusionThe new MRI techniques have potential for semi-quantitative and quantitative evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic value of CT, MRI, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the localization and qualitative diagnosis of biliary obstruction.MethodsA total of 80 patients with biliary obstruction in our hospital from January 2018 to June 2020 were retrospectively collected. The patients were all examined by CT, MRI, and MRCP. The imaging images of all patients were interpreted by two radiologists with more than 5 years of working experience. Taking the results of operation and histopathology as the gold standard, the diagnostic value of CT, MRI+MRCP, CT+MRI+MRCP in the localization and qualitative diagnosis of biliary obstruction lesions were evaluated.ResultsCompared with the location results of surgery and histopathology, the coincidence rates of CT+MRI+MRCP and MRI+MRCP were higher than that of CT (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between CT+MRI+MRCP and MRI+MRCP (P>0.05); compared with the benign and malignant results of surgery and histopathology, the coincidence rates of CT, CT+MRI+MRCP and MRI+MRCP were close, and there was no statistical significance among them (P>0.05).ConclusionsMRI+MRCP and CT+MRI+MRCP have the same value in the localization and qualitative diagnosis of biliary obstruction. However, MRI+MRCP have the advantages ofnon-radiation or contrast media, it is more suitable for patients who are worried about the impact of radiation, have contrast media allergy or renal insufficiency.