Eight patients treated with modified radical mastectomy and fenestration of pectoralis muscle to preserve pectoral, nerves are reported and the practical procedure is introduced. The results indicate that this method can overcome the disadvantage of mastectomy (Auchincloss) in that only dissection of fatty tissue and lymph nodes in the lateral part of axilla is carried out. With fenestration of pectoralis major muscle, not only the pectoral nerves can be perserved but also the fatty tissue and lymph nodes, including of those medial to the pectoralis minor, subclavicular and interpectoral nodes can be dissected. This method almost reached Halsted’s demand and it can be used for stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ, and even stage Ⅲ breast cancer if no infiltration to pectoralis major muscle is found.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility, oncological safety, and aesthetic result of skin-spring mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-spring mastectomy (NSM) in breast reconstruction of implant (permanent gel or expander) for breast cancer patients who were not fit for the breast conserving surgery (BCS). Methods Between October 2005 and July 2011, 89 women with breast caner underwent SSM or NSM, with an average age of 42.4 years (range, 19-55 years) and an average disease duration of 5.7 months (range, 1-24 months). The pathological examination revealed invasive ductal carcinoma in 55 cases, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 15 cases, invasive ductal carcinoma + DCIS in 8 cases, DCIS with infiltration in 10 cases, and occult breast cancer in 1 case. According to tumor staging criterion of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), 15 cases were rated as stage 0, 51 cases as stage I, 22 cases as stage II, and 1 case as unclear. Finally, 33 patients underwent SSM and 56 patients underwent NSM according to the location and diameter of tumor and the infiltration of tumor to nipple. Secondary breast reconstruction was performed with permanent gel replacement after axillary lymph node dissection in 9 patients with positive sentinel lymph node and 1 patient with occult breast cancer; immediate breast reconstruction was performed with permanent gel in the other patients. All the patients received the chemotherapy or/and radiotherapy according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline. Results Complications occurred in 5 patients undergoing breast reconstruction of permanent gel after NSM, including 1 case of haemorrhage, 2 cases of infection, and 2 cases of local skin necrosis. Primary healing of incision was obtained in the others. No nipple necrosis was observed in patients undergoing NSM. All the patients were followed up 14-88 months (median, 40 months). At 10 months after operation, the aesthetic results were excellent in 40 cases, good in 33 cases, fair in 14 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 82%. No recurrence or metastasis was found during follow-up. Conclusion The SSM or NSM is feasible and oncological safe for patients who are not fit for BCS, with satisfactory aesthetic result.
Objective To investigate the results of skinsparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with transverse rectus abdomins musculotaneous(TRAM) flap or latissimus dorsi musculocutaneousflap plus placement of a mammary implant.Methods From June 1997 to June 2002, 11 patients were proven to have ductal carcinoma in situor huge breast carcinoid by pathological examination. The site of the biopsy incision was around the areola. The patients underwent mastectomy with skin sparing by a circumareolar incision and immediate breast reconstruction withTRAM flap or latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap plus placement of mammary implant.Autogenous tissue was used to fill the skin envelop. The second stage operation of nipple-areola reconstruction was performed on the replaced skin.Results Eleven patients were followed up 1 month to 6 years.The operative result was good and all patients had no relapse. The reconstructed breast achieved good results in shape, colour, sensation, symmetry and incision scar. Conclusion The skin sparing mastectomy and immediate autograft tissue breast reconstruction is an ideal reconstructive method for the patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ or huge breast carcinoid in condition that there were strict operative indication and relapse can be prevented.
From 1985 through May of 1989, a total of 6 cases of breast carcinomas underwent primary reconstruction of breast immediately following radical mastectomy by using transposition of vaseularized latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of breast. The re- sults of all these 6 cases were satisfactory. The design of the operation and the operative technique were detailed. The importance of the reconstruction of breast immediately after the radical mastectomy and the advantages of using vascularized latissimus dousi myocutanous flap for reconstruction were discussed.
The report of brachial plexus injuries following radical mastectomy in patients with breast cancer was rare even though the operation was a main measure in treating with breast cancer. Nine patients treated from Oct. 1989 to Feb.1991 were summarized. The results were not ideal.
Objective To explore the interaction of postmastectomy radiotherapy （PMRT） and breast reconstruction， and elucidate how to choose the type and timing of breast reconstruction. Method Literatures about PMRT and breast reconstruction were reviewed. Results PMRT might increase the incidence of complications and impair the cosmetic satisfaction of breast reconstruction. Breast reconstruction might also compromise the effect of PMRT. Conclusions In patients who will receive or have already received PMRT， the optimal approach is delayed autologous tissue reconstruction after PMRT. If PMRT appears likely but may not be required at the time of mastectomy，delayed-immediate reconstruction may be considered， or immediate autologous tissue reconstruction may be considered in case of patients awareness of the increased complications and impaired cosmetic outcomes from PMRT.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical application value of immediate breast reconstruction using silicon implant after skin-sparing modified radical mastectomy for patients with breast cancer. MethodsA total of 28 patients with breast cancer undergoing immediate breast reconstruction using silicon implant after skin-sparing modified radical mastectomy from January 2006 to December 2009 were included in this study. The perioperative results, breast appearance evaluation and followup results were analyzed. ResultsAll 28 patients received axillary lymph node dissection and the number of lymph node dissected was 14-32 (median 21). The operation time was 117-140 min (mean 126 min), blood loss was 82-124 ml (mean 98 ml), and the time to drainage tube removal was 3-5 d. No wound infection, skin necrosis, and foreign body reaction occurred in all the patients, especially in 22 patients underwent nippleareola complex-sparing mastectomy, no ischemia or necrosis occurred in nippleareola complex. For evaluation of breast appearance, excellent was in ten cases and good in 18 cases, thus, the excellent and good rate was 100%. All patients were followed up for 12-48 months (median 24 months) after operation, and distant metastasis, local recurrence, upper extremity edema, and dysfunction were not found. No fiber kystis contracture was found and all patients were satisfied with breast appearance and good handfeels. ConclusionsImmediate breast reconstruction using silicon implant after skinsparing modified radical mastectomy has the advantage of minimal invasion, safety, simple operation, and quick postoperative recovery for patients with breast cancer and the appearance of reconstructed breast is excellent, which can be clinically used widely.
Objective To evaluate the value of extended latissimus dorsi flap (ELDF) in immediate breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer after modified radical mastectomy. Methods Thirty-six patients with breast cancer who accepted modified radical mastectomy and 12 patients with breast cancer who accepted immediate breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy from January 2008 to June 2009 were included. The complications, cosmetical results and quality of life of these patients were compared. The shape of breast reconstruction was also evaluated. Results All of 12 patients succeeded in proceeding immediate breast reconstruction with ELDF. The evaluation of shape of breast reconstruction was good in 6 cases, secondary in 4 cases, and bad in 2 cases, which was beyond that in patients of radical operation group (Plt;0.001). There was no statistical difference in operation complications as hydrops, necrosis, affecting limb shoulder joint motion, drainage time, hospital stay, and starting time for adjuvant therapy between two groups (Pgt;0.05). The patients in breast reconstruction group had a better quality of life compared with the patients in radical operation group (Plt;0.001). In breast reconstruction group, 10 patients received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and no necrosis was showed in local flap grafting. After the follow-up of 2-17 months (median 8 months), no local recurrence and metastasis was demonstrated in two groups patients. Conclusions There are good cosmetic results after immediate breast reconstruction with ELDF, and it is easy to operate. It is a safe and feasible therapeutics method for early breast cancer.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo review the status and controversy on skinsparing mastectomy (SSM) for breast cancer. MethodsThe pertinent literatures about SSM published recently to comprehend its relevant techniques and improvements in comparison with nonskinsparing mastectomy (NSSM) were analyzed and also the safety of SSM by analyzing the relationships between SSM and ductal carcinoma in situ, restrict nippleareola complex reservation, and postmastectomy radiotherapy were discussed. ResultsSkinsparing mastectomy combined with immediate breast reconstruction is a safe operative modality for T1/T2 tumor without skin adhesion, multicentric tumors, and ductal carcinoma in situ. What is more, it does not defer adjuvant therapy. However, it may be prudent to reserve the nippleareola complex only for peripherally located T1/T2 tumors and some other less serious invasion degree. Since the effect of SSM and immediate breast reconstruction on postmastectomy radiotherapy is confusing, there are still controversies on whether the patients who have already been operated should take radiotherapy. ConclusionSSM is a safe operative modality for selected patients with breast cancer, and delayed reconstruction may be a good choice for patients who would take postmastectomy radiotherapy.
ObjectiveTo compare the differences in preventing subcutaneous effusion, skin flap necrosis, and patient comfort between simple negative pressure drainage and negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging after radical mastectomy for breast cancer. MethodsOne hundred and ninety-six patients underwent radical mastectomy for breast cancer from January 2010 to December 2012 in this hospital were collected.The simple negative pressure drainage (SNPD group, n=84) and negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging (NPD+CB group, n=112) after radical mastectomy for breast cancer were used to prevent postoperative subcutaneous effusion.The postoperative complications, postoperative 3 d drainage volume, and patient comfort were compared in two groups. ResultsOne hundred and ninety-six patients with breast cancer were females.The differences of general clinical data were not statistically significant in two groups (P > 0.05).The differences of chest wall mean extubation time, axillary mean extubation time, postoperative 3 d mean drainage volume, and incidences of subcutaneous effusion and skin flap necrosis were not statistically significant in two groups (P > 0.05).The rate of comfort satisfactory in the SNPD group was significantly higher than that in the NPD+CB group [76.2%(16/84) versus 22.3%(25/112), P < 0.001].The chemotherapy was not affected after operation in two groups. ConclusionsComparing with negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging, simple negative pressure drainage do not increase postoperative subcutaneous effusion and skin flap necrosis, but it greatly improves the patients satisfactory rate.