ObjectiveTo summarize the common mouse models and the latest research progress in the basic research of colorectal cancer, introducing advantages, disadvantages and applications of these various models, provide references for the researchers in the selection of mouse models for their experiments.MethodRetrieved the related literatures from databases including PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI and WanFang, and after reading the literatures, different methods were sorted out, analyzed and summarized.ResultsThe mouse models commonly used in colorectal cancer research include the cell-derived xenograft (CDX), patient-derived xenograft (PDX), chemical reagent-induced tumor in situ, transgenic mice (ApcMin/+ mice), tumor cells derived from mice themselves were inoculated to the normal mice, and models of colorectal metastatic tumors (including liver, lung, abdomen and bone metastases, etc.). The CDX model cost shorter time to establish, and the PDX model restored the authentic phenotype of the tumor in patients, but the tumor were both colonized under the skin of nude mice, which lacked authenticity tumor microenvironment. The colorectal cancer in mice induced by chemical reagents and genetically engineered mice imitated the development of colorectal tumor in the situ intestine of mouse, but both of them were time-consuming. The model established by the tumor of mouse own was convenient for basic immune research of colorectal cancer, but the disadvantage was the unreal tumor microenvironment. The colorectal cancer metastasis model was an essential model for the study of the mechanism and treatment in metastasis colorectal tumor, but its establishment required higher operating skills and required the image examination to determine the whether the metastasis tumor was successfully generated or not.ConclusionsDifferent mouse models of colorectal cancer have different emphases, advantages and disadvantages. Researchers need to make accurate selection according to the research purpose and design needs.
Objective To summarize the research progress on rodent models of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods The relevant domestic and foreign literature in recent years was reviewed, the methods of establishing the rodent models of cervical SCI and the evaluation methods of behavior, imaging, neuroelectrophysiology, and histology were summarized. Results Cervical SCI involves primary and secondary injuries. Primary cervical SCI can be simulated with contusion, contusion compression, fracture dislocation, spinal cord traction, and spinal cord transection; scondary cervical SCI can be simulated with photochemical model and excitotoxicity model. Certain evaluation methods such as behavior, imaging, neuroelectrophysiology, and histology are used to evaluation during model building and research. Conclusion Different rodent models of cervical SCI have different advantages and application directions, and it is critical importance for the study of cervical SCI to establish effective animal models.