Objective To observe the clinical features and outcomes of vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy (DR) with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods A total of 192 patients (241 eyes) with proliferative DR (PDR) who underwent vitrectomy were enrolled in this study. All the patients were diagnosed as vitreous hemorrhage (VH) because of suddenly decreased vision. There were 93 eyes with tractional retinal detachment (TRD) and six eyes with neovascularization of iris (NVI). The patients were divided into PDR with CRVO group (group A, 41 eyes) and PDR group (group B, 200 eyes) according to the results of fundus examination. All patients received vitrectomy with silicone oil and C3F8 gas tamponade. There were 138 eyes with silicone oil tamponade which including 30 eyes in group A and 108 eyes in group B. The difference of number in silicone oil-filled eyes in two groups was statistically significant (chi;2=5.110,P＜0.05). There were 38 eyes with C3F8 gas tamponade which including six eyes in group A and 32 eyes in group B. There was no difference in C3F8 gas-filled eyes numbers in two groups (chi;2=0.048, P＞0.05). The follow-up ranged from one to 60 months, with the mean of (28.69plusmn;17.28) months. The corrected vision, retinal reattachment, persisting macular edema (ME), neovascular glaucoma (NVG) and repeated VH after surgery were comparatively analyzed. Results Of 241 eyes, there were 41 eyes (17.0%) with CRVO. Before surgery, the differences of corrected vision (Z=-0.138), intraocular pressure (t=0.966), whether there was TRD or not (chi;2=0.412), whether underwent panretinal photocoagulation or not (chi;2=1.416) were not statistically significant (P＞0.05), but the difference of whether NVI were present or not was statistically significant (chi;2=31.724,P＜0.05) between two groups. After surgery, the corrected vision improved in both two groups (Z=2.319, 4.589; P＜0.05). There was no difference of corrected vision after surgery between two groups (Z=0.782,P＞0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 94 eyes, including 26 eyes in group A and 68 eyes in group B. The differences of incidence of reoperation (chi;2=0.498), retinal reattachment (chi;2=0.818), persisting ME (chi;2=2.722) between two groups after surgery were not statistically significant (P＞0.05). The incidence of repeated VH (chi;2=5.737) and NVG (chi;2=6.604) in group A were higher than those in group B (P＜0.05). Conclusions CRVO is commonly found to coexist with DR in T2DM patients with VH. Combined with CRVO patients are more likely to suffer NVI. Vitrectomy can improve the visual function in PDR with CRVO patients.
Objective To investigate the efficacy and the safety of external therapy of ultrasound (ETUS) enhancing thrombolysis on the experimental retinal vein occlusion. Methods The effect of ETUS enhanced thrombolysis and the impact of ultrasound energy and exposure were investigated respectively after both eyes of 51 rabbits with retinal branch vein occlusion created by photodynamic initiated thrombosis were divided into 4 groups. The first 2 groups are the ETUS groups, including one group (15 rabbits) underwent intravenous injection with urokinase (UK) (1700-2200 UK dissolved into 20 ml normal saline), and other group (12 rabbits) underwent intravenous injection with normal saline. In these 2 groups, each rabbit received ETUS treatment (1.0 W/cm2, 20 min) in one eye and the fellow eye did not which was as the control. The latter 2 groups are the energy and duration of ultrasound groups, and 12 rabbits in each group underwent ETUS with the energy of 0.7 and 1.0 W/cm2 respectively. Each of the 2 groups was divided into 3 subgroups (8 rabbits in each) according to the radiated durations (8, 14, and 20 minutes). All of the eyes except the control ones underwent ETUS with 1 MHz ultrasound and 100 Hz pulsed ultrasound once a day for 3 days. Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) was used to detect the vascular condition 4 days after ETUS, and at the 15th day, retinal light microscopy and electron microscopy were performed. Results The vascular recanalization rate in ETUS+UK treatment group was 66.7%, which is obviously higher than which in single UK group (20.0%, P=0.025), normal saline group (8.3%, P=0.005), and ETUS+ normal saline group (8.3%, P=0.005). The vascular recanalization rates in groups with different energy of ultrasound increased obviously as the radiated durations increased (P=0.006, 0.001), while no apparent effect of energy of ultrasound on the vascular recanalization rate was found in the groups with different radiated duration (Pgt;0.05). The eyes which had undergone ETUS treatment had retinal tissue damage and ultrastructure changes of the retinal ganglion cells (RGC), and deteriorated as the radiated duration increased. Conclusion ETUS may enhance the thrombolysis induced by urokinase in experimental retinal vein occlusion. Simultaneously, ETUS can lead to the damage of retinal tissue and changes of the ultrastructure of RGC. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2007, 23: 166-169)
Objective To study and compare the clinical efficacy between intravitreal conbercept injection and (or) macular grid pattern photocoagulation in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods Ninety eyes of 90 patients diagnosed as macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO were enrolled in this study. Forty-eight patients (48 eyes) were male and 42 patients (42 eyes) were female. The average age was (51.25±12.24) years and the course was 5–17 days. All patients were given best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, slit lamp with preset lens, fluorescence fundus angiography (FFA) and optic coherent tomography (OCT) examination. The patients were divided into conbercept and laser group (group Ⅰ), laser group (group Ⅱ) and conbercept group (group Ⅲ), with 30 eyes in each group. The BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) in the three groups at baseline were statistically no difference (F=0.072, 0.286;P=0.930, 0.752). Patients in group Ⅰ received intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml of 10.00 mg/ml conbercept solution (conbercept 0.5 mg), and macular grid pattern photocoagulation 3 days later. Group Ⅱ patients were given macular grid pattern photocoagulation. Times of injection between group Ⅰ and Ⅲ, laser energy between group Ⅰ and Ⅱ, changes of BCVA and CMT among 3 groups at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment were compared. Results Patients in group Ⅰ and Ⅲ had received conbercept injections (1.20±0.41) and (2.23±1.04) times respectively, and 6 eyes (group Ⅰ) and 22 eyes (group Ⅲ) received 2-4 times re-injections. The difference of injection times between two groups was significant (P＜0.001). Patients in group Ⅱ had received photocoagulation (1.43±0.63) times, 9 eyes had received twice photocoagulation and 2 eyes had received 3 times of photocoagulation. The average laser energy was (96.05±2.34) μV in group Ⅰ and (117.41±6.85) μV in group Ⅱ, the difference was statistical significant (P=0.003). BCVA improved in all three groups at last follow-up. However, the final visual acuity in group Ⅰ and group Ⅲ were better than in group Ⅱ (t=4.607, –4.603;P＜0.001) and there is no statistical significant difference between group Ⅲ and group Ⅰ (t=–0.802,P=0.429). The mean CMT reduced in all three groups after treating for 1 week and 1 month, comparing that before treatment (t=–11.855, –10.620, –10.254;P＜0.001). There was no statistical difference of CMT between group Ⅰand Ⅲ at each follow up (t=0.404, 1.723, –1.819, –1.755;P=0.689, 0.096, 0.079, 0.900). CMT reduction in group Ⅰ was more than that in group Ⅱ at 1 week and 1 month after treatments (t=–4.621, –3.230;P＜0.001, 0.003). The CMT in group Ⅲ at 3 month after treatment had increased slightly comparing that at 1 month, but the difference was not statistically significant (t=1.995,P=0.056). All patients had no treatment-related complications, such as endophthalmitis, rubeosis iridis and retinal detachment. Conclusions Intravitreal conbercept injection combined with macular grid pattern photocoagulation is better than macular grid pattern photocoagulation alone in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO. Combined therapy also reduced injection times comparing to treatment using conbercept injection without laser photocoagulation.
Embolus occlusion in the retinal artery is the most common cause of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), while hypertension is the most common risk factor of CRAO, and ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis is the most significant risk factor in CRAO. Current clinical treatments include conservative treatments such as dilation of blood vessels and lowering the intraocular pressure (IOP), as well as aggressive treatments like intravenous thrombolysis and Nd:YAG laser. Both thrombolysis and Nd:YAG laser treatment can improve the visual acuity of CRAO patients, but because of its lack of randomized controlled trials, further clinical studies are needed to determine their efficacy and safety. CRAO patients may have vascular embolism at other sites in the body, and may cause different degrees of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. The probability of secondary ocular neovascularization following the occurrence of these events is 2.5% to 31.6%. In addition to eye care, clinicians should also focus more on preventing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and focus on the screening and active treatment of systemic risk factors to reduce the incidence and mortality of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.
Objective To observe the effectiveness of combined therapy of intravitreal injections of ranibizumab and macular grid laser photocoagulation for branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with macular edema (ME).Methods Forty-six patients of BRVO with ME were enrolled in this study. All the patients were examined for corrected visual acuity of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), slit lamp microscope, direct ophthalmoscope, intraocular pressure, fundus color photography, fundus fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography. The patients were divided into three groups by different treatments: injection group (18 eyes) received intravitreal injections of ranibizumab only, joint group (17 eyes) received intravitreal injections of ranibizumab combined with grid laser photocoagulation, and laser group (11 eyes) received laser photocoagulation only. The follow-up ranged from three to 15 months, with a mean of (8.0plusmn;3.2) months. The same equipment and methods were used to return visit in follow-up period. Repeated injections were adopted in injection group and joint group according to the results of subsequent visits. Then the repeated times of injection in two groups were compared. The visual acuity, macular retinal thickness (CRT) and ocular and systemic adverse reactions about drugs and treatments were followed up. The last follow-up time was considered as the judgment time for the therapeutic effects. Results The mean repeat times of injection in the injection group was 5.4plusmn;0.4, which more than that in the joint group 3.2plusmn;0.6 (t=12.17,P＜0.05). No ocular or systemic adverse events were observed in follow-up period. ETDRS visual acuity of injection group, joint group and laser group increased by 7.30plusmn;8.68,8.50plusmn;6.04,1.55plusmn;6.85 letters respectively after treatment. The differences were statistically significant before and after treatment in injection group and joint group (t=3.58, 5.78;P＜0.05), but there was no significant difference in laser group (t=0.75,P＞0.05). The difference was not statistically significant between injection group and joint group (t=0.45,P＞0.05). The difference was statistically significant between injection group and laser group, but also between joint group and laser group (t=2.13, 2.81;P＜0.05). CRT of injection group, joint group and laser group decreased by (110.56plusmn;43.08), (125.47plusmn;35.19), (50.73plusmn;19.68) mu;m respectively after treatment, with statistically significant differences (t=-10.89,-14.70, -8.55;P＜0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of BRVO with ME, intravitreal injection of ranibizumab combined with macular grid laser photocoagulation can reduce repeat times of injection, improve visual function and relieve ME.
ObjectiveTo investigate the therapeutic effects of thrombolysis infusion via microcatheter on the treatment of central retinal artery occlusion(CRAO). MethodsUrokinase (UK) was directly infused via ophthalmic artery (OA) by microcatheter (6 patients) or via intravenous (7 patients) to dissolve the thrombus. The patency of the artery was evaluated by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), and the effect of fibrinolytic activity on the systemic changes was observed by blood biochemical examination simultaneously. ResultsIn 6 patients in the microcatheter group, 5 had completely and 1 had partly reopened OA on the morrow of UK infusion with the patency rate of 83.33%, while in 7 patients in vein group, 3 completely reopened, 2 partly reopened and 2 obstructed OA were found with the patency rate of 42.86%. The difference between the two groups was significant. No obvious change of index of blood coagulation system was found in catheter group, which had great disparity compared with the vein group.ConclusionUrokinase infusion via microcatheter in CRAO has better therapeutic impact and smaller effect on systemic action. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:16-19)
Objective lt;brgt;To inspect the rate of success of anastomosis and tissue damage with different power levels of photocoagulation in the treatment of experimental branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) by laser induced chorioretinal venous anastomosis. lt;brgt;Methods lt;brgt;Forty pigmented rabbits (80 eyes) were divided into four groups in random, and 10 (20 eyes) in each. Chroioretinal venous anastomosis was attempted to create using the krypton red laser with 4 different power levels (group A: 400 mW,group B: 600 mW,group C: 800 mW,group D: 1000 mW) in these animals in which BRVO had previously been created photodynamically. Fundus photography and fundus fluorescein angiography were performed at various times after the treatment and histological examination was taken at the end of the study. lt;brgt;Results lt;brgt;The model of BRVO was successfully set up. At the lowest power of 400 mW there was an absence of anastomosis formation and the damage to the retina and choroid was mild, Bruch′s membrane showed no evidence of rupture. At the power levels of 600 mW and 800 mW an anastomosis formed in 15% and 55% respectively and the damage was medium in degree. At the highest power level of 1 000 mW a 80% rate of success was obtained, however, the damage to the retina and choroid tended to be severe.The difference of the rate of success of anastomosis between different groups was highly significant (P=0.001), the difference between group B and group C was also highly significant (PBC=0.008), and the difference between group A and group B, group C and group D was not significant (PAB=0.072、PCD=0.091). lt;brgt; lt;brgt;Conclusion lt;brgt;The optimal power level of krypton red laser induced chorioretinal venous anastomosis is 800 mW, 0.1 s, 50 μm in our study. lt;brgt; lt;brgt;(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,2002,18:13-16)
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of repeated intravitreal conbercept injection in patients with macular edema (ME) of retinal vein occlusion (RVO), guided by optic coherence tomography (OCT). Methods It is a retrospective case study. Forty patients (40 eyes) diagnosed as ME secondary to RVO were enrolled in this study. There were 19 males (19 eyes) and 21 females (21 eyes), with the mean age of (53.58±13.19) years and the mean course of 1.5 months. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), indirect ophthalmoscopy, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and OCT were performed. The mean baseline of BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT) were 0.25±0.18 and (509.48±170.13) μm respectively. All the patients were treated with 10.00 mg/ml conbercept 0.05 ml (including conbercept 0.5 mg). Follow-up of these patients was 1 to 6 months after treatments, the BCVA, fundus manifestations, OCT were retrospectively observed by every month, the FFA was retrospectively observed by every 3 months. When there was retinal edema or CMT ≥50 μm by OCT during follow-up, those patients were retreated with intravitreal conbercept injection. The changes of the BCVA, CMT were evaluated before and after treatment. Meanwhile, complications in eyes related to medicine and treatment methods were evaluated too. Results At the 6 months, the BCVA was improved (increase≥2 lines) in 25 eyes (62.50%), stabilized (±1 line) in 13 eyes (32.50%) and decreased 2 lines in 2 eyes (5.00%). Retinal hemorrhage and exudates were absorbed in most patients. FFA showed no fluorescein leakage in 11 eyes (27.50%), minor fluorescein leakage in 26 eyes (65.00%), and retinal capillary non-perfusion in 3 eyes (7.50%). OCT showed absorption of the subretinal fluid. The mean CMT were (235.20±100.44) μm at 6 months. Intravitreal injection of conbercept was applied for 4 times in 8 eyes (20.00%), 3 times for 18 eyes (45.00%), and 2 times for 14 eyes (35.00%). The mean number of intravitreal injection was 2.85 times. There were no ocular or systemic adverse events observed in all patients. Conclusion Intravitreal conbercept injection is an efficacy and safe treatment for the patients with ME of RVO guided by OCT. It can stabilize and improve the visual acuity.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the therapeutic effects of super-selective arterial catheterization with thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).MethodsThe clinical data of 16 patients with CRAO were collected. Aortic arch angiography with the catheterization through femoral artery firstly, and then the selective internal carotid artery angiography had been performed on all of the patients, including 12 ones who had undergone the urokinase thrombolysis therapy.ResultsIn the 16 patients, 3 with the severe straitness of the internal carotid artery and 1 with occlusion of incision of the ocular artery had not been treated by thrombolysis; and the others with occlusion of arterial trunk and CRAO had undergone thrombolysis therapy successfully. After the treatment, the visual acuity of the patients had improved in different degree and no systemic side effect had been found during the treatment.ConclusionsSuper-selective arterial catheterization with thrombolysis for CRAO may improve the visual acuity of the patients. The effects and risks of this treatment should be evaluated in further study.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:20-21)
Macular edema is a common cause of visual loss in patients with retinal vascular diseases represented by diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion. Laser photocoagulation has been the main treatment for this kind of diseases for decades. With the advent of antagonist of vascular endothelial growth factor and dexamethasone implant, diabetic macular edema and macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion have been well controlled; the use of laser therapy is decreasing. However, considering possible risks and complications, lack of extended inspection of efficacy and safety of intravitreal pharmacotherapy, laser therapy cannot be replaced by now. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of laser therapy will improve by sober realization of role of photocoagulation and proper selection of treatment indication.