Objective To analyze the therapeutic effect of the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage on lumbarspondylolisthesis. Methods From February 2003 to March 2006, 37 lumbar spondylolisthesis patients were treated with this operation, including21 males and 16 females and aging 3969 years.The affected lumbars were L3(3cases)，L4(23 cases), and L5(11 cases). According to the Meyerdingevaluating system, 12 cases were lassified as degree Ⅰ, 20 cases as degree Ⅱ,and 5 cases as degree Ⅲ. Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index were measured before operation, and 2 weeks and 3 months after operation. Results All patients were followed up 336 months. There were statistically significant differences in Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index between before operation and 2 weeks after operation (P＜0.05),and no statistically significant differences between 2 weeks and 3 months afteroperation(P＞0.05). According to Dewei Zhou’s creterior for scoring, the results were excellent in 27 cases， good in 8 cases，and fair in 2 cases. Theexcellent and good rate was 94.6%. All of the embedded osseous were fused. Thefusing time was from 3 to 8 months (mean 3-9 months). There were no breakageof screw and rod. The position and configuration of the whole cages were good. Conclusion Applying the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage may achieve synergism in the treatment of lumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis. Above procedure is served as solid internal fixationand offers a satisfactory reduction, and can improve the fusion rate of the spine. So it is an ideal procedure and worthily recommended method for treatment oflumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of cortical bone trajectory screw (CBTS) and conventional pedicle screw for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of single segment lumbar degenerative disease. Methods Between May 2013 and May 2016, a total of 97 patients with single segment lumbar degenerative disease were treated with PLIF. Fifty-one patients were fixed with CBTS in PLIF (trajectory screw group) and 46 with pedicle screw (pedicle screw group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, lesion segment, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, bed rest time, length of hospital stay, serum creatine kinase (CK) concentration, total amount of diclofenac sodium, perioperative complications, ODI, VAS score, and interbody fusion rate were recorded and compared between 2 groups. Results All patients were followed up 12 months. The patients in trajectory screw group had a significantly less operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and serum CK concentration when compared with the patients in pedicle screw group (P<0.05). Thirty-five patients (68.6%) in trajectory screw group and 46 patients (100%) in pedicle screw group were given diclofenac sodium within 48 hours after operation, showing significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=89.334, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications between trajectory screw group and pedicle screw group (3.9% vs. 8.7%, P=0.418). There was no significant difference in the VAS score, ODI, and interbody fusion rate at 12 months after operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For the single segment degenerative lumbar disease, the use of CBTS or conventional pedicle screw for PLIF can obtain satisfactory clinical function and interbody fusion rate. But the former has the advantages of less blood loss, less intraoperative muscle damage, less perioperative pain, shorter length of hospital stay and bed rest time.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of domestic minimally-invasive percutaneous screw system for thoracolumbar fractures without neurological damage. MethodsSixty patients suffering from unstable thoracolumbar fractures without obvious neurologic deficits treated from January 2011 to April 2012 were studied retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups:group A (domestic minimally-invasive percutaneous screw system) and group B (imported minimally-invasive percutaneous screw system). Perioperative parameter, pre-and post-operative imaging indexes, visual analog scale (VAS) and modified MacNab evaluation standard were studied for comparison. ResultsAll the patients were followed up from 6 to 18 months with an average of (12.2±3.0) months. The Cobb's angle and anterior height of the fracture vertebral body changed significantly in each group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in incision size, surgical time, postoperative improvement of Cobb's angle, anterior height of the fracture vertebral body and accuracy of pedicle screw placement between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionDomestic minimally-invasive percutaneous screw system is reliable with minimal invasion, which is comparable to imported minimally-invasive percutaneous screw system.
ObjectiveTo investigate reliability and short-term effectiveness of axis laminar screws for reducible atlantoaxial dislocation (RAAD).MethodsA clinical data of 41 patients with RAAD who were admitted between February 2013 and February 2018 and met the inclusion criteria was retrospectively analyzed. The atlases in all patients were fixated by lateral mass screws, and the axes were fixed by laminar screws in 13 cases (LS group) and by pedicle screws in 28 cases (PS group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, and preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The effectiveness was estimated by post-operative JOA score; and the accuracy of the axis screw, atlantoaxial bone graft fusion, and the fixation stability were examined by X-ray film and CT.ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-17 months (mean, 13.8 months) in LS group and 12-20 months (mean 14.1 months) in PS group, and the difference in follow-up time was not significant (Z=−0.704, P=0.482). At last follow-up, JOA scores were 13.9±1.6 in LS group and 14.3±1.8 in PS group, which significantly improved when compared with the pre-operative scores in the two groups (t=−9.033, P=0.000; t=−15.835, P=0.000); while no significant difference was found between the two groups (t=−0.630, P=0.532). Twenty-five screws of 26 screws in LS group and 54 screws of 56 screws in PS group were implanted accurately, with no significant difference in the accuracy of the axis screw between the two groups (Z=−0.061, P=0.951). All patients obtained atlantoaxial bone graft fusion, except 1 case in PS group. There was no significant difference in the atlantoaxial bone graft fusion between the two groups (Z=−0.681, P=0.496).ConclusionFor RAAD, Axis laminar screws can maintain the atlantoaxial primary stability and had a good short-term effectiveness. So, it could be an alternative and reliable technique for axis screw.
Objective To explore some operative problems of correcting paralytic scoliosis(PS) by using vertebral pedicle screwsrods system. Methods From May 2000 to May 2005, 18 patients with PS were corrected by screwsrods system which were made of titanium alloy.There were 10 males and 8 females, aging from 11 to 26 years. The primary disease included poliomyelitis in 13 patients and myelodysplasia (MS) in 5 patients (2 cases for second correction) with scoliosis of an average 85° Cobb angle (55-125°). The pelvic obliquity was found in all patients with an average 24° angle (355°).Of the 18 patients,3 cases were given perioperative halo-pelvic traction, 2 cases were given vertebral wedge osteotomy and correction and fixation, the other patients were purely underwent the treatment of pedicle screwrods system implants. Fusion segment at operation ranged from 6 to 15 sections, applied screws the most was 16,the fewest was 6. Results There were no wound infections and neurologic complications, all wounds healed by the first intention. Allscoliosis obtained obvious correction (P＜0.001), the correction rate averaged 52.95% (44%-81%); the majority of lumbar kyphosis and pelvic obliquity were apparently corrected. The average clinical follow-up (16 cases) was 21 months(6-36 months),there was no implants failure. One patient with MS had a worse Cobb magnitude, the other patients had no curve progression (P＞0.05). Conclusion The use of vertebral pedicle screwsrods fixation to multiple vertebral bodys and short segment fusion for PS, the treatment method is reliable and the outcome is satisfactory. While performing the correcting operative procedures, the spinal, pelvic and lower extremity deformities and functions should be all considered as a whole.
Accurate placement of pedicle screws is a key factor of spinal surgery. Investigation of a new real-time intra-operative monitoring method is an important area of clinical application research which makes a contribution to planting pedicle screw accurately. Porcine spines were chosen as experimental objects.The changes of reduced scattering coefficient (μ's) along normal puncture path, medial perforation path and lateral perforation path were measured and studied. A conclusion is drawn that there are two distinct peaks throughout the puncture process, appearing at the junction of cancellous bone and cortical bone, at the beginning and at the end, respectively. The reduced scattering coefficient is proved to be a good monitoring factor which can identify whether the screw is about to reach the critical position of the spine puncture. Moreover, the variation provides an important reference for spinal surgical navigation process.
Objective To investigate the safety and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw implantation in the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery. Methods The clinical data of 46 patients with AIS who were treated with orthopedics, bone graft fusion, and internal fixation via posterior approach between June 2018 and December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 22 cases were treated with robot-assisted pedicle screw implantation (robot group) and 24 cases with manual pedicle screw implantation without robot assistance (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, Lenke classification, and preoperative Cobb angle of the main curve, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, pedicle screw implantation time, intraoperative pedicle screw adjustment times, and VAS and JOA scores after operation were recorded. The Cobb angle of the main curve was measured on X-ray film and the spinal correction rate was calculated. The screw position and the accuracy of screw implantation were evaluated on CT images. Results The operation completed successfully in the two groups. The intraoperative blood loss, pedicle screw implantation time, and pedicle screw adjustment times in the robot group were significantly less than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was 1 case of poor wound healing in the robot group and 2 cases of mild nerve root injury and 2 cases of poor incision healing in the control group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P=0.667). All patients in the two groups were followed up 3-9 months (mean, 6.4 months). The VAS and JOA scores at last follow-up in the two groups were superior to those before operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the difference of pre- and post-operative scores between the two groups (P>0.05). The imaging review showed that 343 screws were implanted in the robot group and 374 screws in the control group. There were significant differences in pedicle screw implantation classification and accuracy between the two groups (89.5% vs 79.1%)(Z=−3.964, P=0.000; χ2=14.361, P=0.000). At last follow-up, the Cobb angles of the main curve in the two groups were significantly lower than those before operation (P<0.05), and there was significant difference in the difference of pre- and post-operative Cobb angles between the two groups (t=0.999, P=0.323). The spinal correction rateswere 79.82%±5.33% in the robot group and 79.62%±5.58% in the control group, showing no significant difference (t=0.120, P=0.905). Conclusion Compared with manual pedicle screw implantation, robot-assisted pedicle screw implantation in AIS surgery is safer, less invasive, and more accurate.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of cervical pedicle screw implantation technique under regional method.MethodsThe clinical data of 85 patients who met the selection criteria between April 2010 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 57 males and 28 females, aged 35-68 years, with an average of 57.6 years. Among them, there were 10 cases of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, 68 cases of cervical spondylosis with multilevel stenosis, 3 cases of cervical tumor, 1 case of congenital malformation, and 3 cases of cervical trauma; the lower cervical spine lesions involved C3-C7. Preoperative Frankel spinal cord injury grading: 2 cases of grade C, 51 cases of grade D, and 32 cases of grade E. Cervical pedicle screw implantation technique under regional method was performed with a total of 618 pedicle screws. Postoperative changes in neurological symptoms were observed; cervical mouth opening anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and cervical CT examinations were performed to evaluate the pedicle screws position.ResultsThe operation time was 2.5-4.0 hours, with an average of 3.0 hours. The intraoperative blood loss was 180-550 mL, with an average of 345 mL. No intraoperative vascular or nerve injury occurred. The patients with neurological symptoms were relieved to varying degrees. There were 2 cases of superficial incision infection after operation, the wound healed after enhanced dressing change. The postoperative hospital stay was 5-14 days, with an average of 8.4 days. At discharge, Frankel neurological grading was grade D in 26 patients and grade E in 59 patients. All the patients were followed up 6-24 months, with an average of 13 months. At last follow-up, cervical X-ray films showed the good pedicle screw fixation without loosening. Cervical CT evaluated the position of pedicle screws: 523 pedicle screws (84.7%) in grade Ⅰ, 80 (12.9%) in grade Ⅱ, and 15 (2.4%) in grade Ⅲ; the accuracy rate of the screw position was 97.6%.ConclusionCervical pedicle screw implantation technique under regional method can significantly improve the success rate of screw implantation. It is easy to operate, does not destroy the bone cortex, and has stable fixation.
Objective To evaluate the biomechanical stability of a newly-designed Y type pedicle screw (YPS) in osteoporotic synthetic bone. Methods The osteoporotic synthetic bone were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=20). A pilot hole, 3.0 mm in diameter and 30.0 mm in deep, was prepared in these bones with the same method. The YPS, expansive pedicle screw (EPS), and bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw (CICPS) were inserted into these synthetic bone through the pilot hole prepared. X-ray film examination was performed after 12 hours; the biomechanical stability of YPS, EPS, and CICPS groups was tested by the universal testing machine (E10000). The test items included the maximum axial pullout force, the maximum running torque, and the maximum periodical anti-bending. Results X-ray examination showed that in YPS group, the main screw and the core pin were wrapped around the polyurethane material, the core pin was formed from the lower 1/3 of the main screw and formed an angle of 15° with the main screw, and the lowest point of the inserted middle core pin was positioned at the same level with the main screw; in EPS group, the tip of EPS expanded markedly and formed a claw-like structure; in CICPS group, the bone cement was mainly distributed in the front of the screw and was dispersed in the trabecular bone to form a stable screw-bone cement-trabecular complex. The maximum axial pullout force of YPS, EPS, and CICPS groups was (98.43±8.26), (77.41±11.41), and (186.43±23.23) N, respectively; the maximum running torque was (1.42±0.33), (0.96±0.37), and (2.27±0.39) N/m, respectively; and the maximum periodical anti-bending was (67.49±3.02), (66.03±2.88), and (143.48±4.73) N, respectively. The above indexes in CICPS group were significantly higher than those in YPS group and EPS group (P<0.05); the maximum axial pullout force and the maximum running torque in YPS group were significantly higher than those in EPS group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the maximum periodical anti-bending between YPS group and EPS group (P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with EPS, YPS can effectively enhance the maximum axial pullout force and maximum rotation force in the module, which provides a new idea for the design of screws and the choice of different fixation methods under the condition of osteoporosis.
ObjectiveTo investigate the accuracy of progressive three-dimensional navigation template system (abbreviated as progressive template) to assist atlas-axial pedicle screw placement. MethodsThe clinical data of 33 patients with atlas-axial posterior internal fixation surgery between May 2015 and May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different methods of auxiliary screw placement, the patients were divided into trial group (19 cases, screw placement assisted by progressive template) and control group (14 cases, screw placement assisted by single navigation template system, abbreviated as initial navigation template). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, damage segments, damage types, and preoperative Frankel classification between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of the two groups were compared. The safety of screw placement was evaluated on postoperative CT by using the method from Kawaguchi et al, the deviation of screw insertion point were calculated, the angular deviation of the nailing on coordinate systems XOZ, XOY, YOZ were calculated according to Peng’s method. ResultsAll patients completed the operation successfully; the operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the trial group were significantly less than those in the control group (t=–2.360, P=0.022; t=–3.006, P=0.004). All patients were followed up 12–40 months (mean, 25.3 months). There was no significant vascular injury or nerve injury aggravation. Postoperative immediate X-ray film and CT showed the dislocation was corrected. Postoperative immediate CT showed that all 76 screws were of grade 0 in the trial group, and the safety of screw placement was 100%; 51 screws were of grade 0, 3 of gradeⅠ, and 2 of gradeⅡ in the control group, and the safety of screw placement was 91.1%; there was significant difference in safety of screw placement between the two groups (χ2=7.050, P=0.030). The screw insertion point deviation and angular deviation of the nailing on XOY and YOZ planes in the trial group were significantly less than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in angular deviation of the nailing on XOZ between the two groups (t=1.060, P=0.290). ConclusionCompared with the initial navigation template, the progressive navigation template assisting atlas-axial pedicle screw placement to treat atlas-axial fracture with dislocation, can reduce operation time and intraoperative blood loss, improve the safety of screw placement, and match the preoperative design more accurately.