ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous retrograde pubic screw implantation assisted by hollow pedicle opener in pubic branch fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 42 patients with pubic branch fractures treated by hollow screw fixation between March 2008 and March 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the operation method, they were divided into the traditional operation group (20 cases in group A, fixed with traditional retrograde pubic screws) and the modified operation group (22 cases in group B, fixed with percutaneous retrograde pubic screws assisted by hollow pedicle opener). There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the two groups in terms of gender, age, cause of injury, fracture classification, comorbidity, and time from injury to operation. The operation time, blood loss, incision length, screw length, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The fracture reduction was evaluated according to Matta standard on the next day after operation, and the function was evaluated by Majeed score at 12 months after operation.ResultsThe operation was successfully completed in both groups. The operation time, blood loss, and incision length of group B were significantly less than those of group A (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in screw length between the two groups (t=0.793, P=0.437). All patients were followed up 8-24 months, with an average of 16.8 months. There was no complication in the two groups, such as injury of blood vessels and nerves, fracture of internal fixation, screw entering into joint cavity, and nonunion of fracture. There was no significant difference in the fracture healing time between the two groups (t=−1.068, P=0.299). There were 2 cases of incision infection, 1 case of incision fat liquefaction, 2 cases of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in group A, the incidence of complications was 25.0%; there was only 1 case of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in group B, the incidence of complication was 4.5%, which was lower than that in group A, but the difference was not significant (χ2=2.104, P=0.147). In group A, 1 case was found to be dislocated, but in group B, there was no dislocated fracture. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the evaluation of Matta imaging on the next day after operation and the evaluation of Majeed function at 12 months after operation (P>0.05).ConclusionPercutaneous retrograde pubic screw implantation assisted by hollow pedicle opener is effect for the pubic branch fractures with the advantage of smaller incision, shorter operation time, and less bleeding compared with traditional methods.
Objective To explore the effectiveness of the percutaneous parallel screw fixation via the posterolateral “safe zone” for Hawkins type Ⅰ-Ⅲ talar neck fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data from 35 patients who met the selection criteria of talar neck fractures between January 2019 and June 2021. According to the surgical method, they were divided into a study group (14 cases, using percutaneous posterolateral “safe zone” parallel screw fixation) and a control group (21 cases, using traditional open reduction and anterior cross screw internal fixation). There was no significant difference in gender, age, affected side, Hawkins classification, and time from injury to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, bone healing time, complications, and Hawkins sign were recorded, and the improvement of pain and ankle-foot function were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot score at last follow-up. The overall quality of life was assessed by the short form of 12-item health survey (SF-12), which was divided into physical and psychological scores; and the satisfaction of patients was evaluated by the 5-point Likert scale. Results The operation time in the study group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05). All patients werefollowed up 13-35 months, with an average of 20.6 months; there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups (P>0.05). The time of bone healing in the study group was shorter than that in the control group, and the positive rate of Hawkins sign (83.33%) was higher than that in the control group (33.33%), and the differences were significant (P<0.05). In the control group, there were 2 cases of incision delayed healing, 7 cases of avascular necrosis of bone, 3 cases of joint degeneration, 1 case of bone nonunion, and 3 cases of internal fixation irritation; while in the study group, there were only 2 cases of joint degeneration, and there was a significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P<0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups (P>0.05), but the SF-12 physical and psychological scores, AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores, and patients’ satisfaction in the study group were significantly better than those in the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionThe treatment of Hawkins type Ⅰ-Ⅲ talar neck fractures with percutaneous parallel screw fixation via the posterolateral “safe zone” can achieve better effectiveness than traditional open surgery, with the advantages of less trauma, fewer complications, faster recovery, and higher patient satisfaction.