ObjectiveTo summarize the occurrence and development of hepatocirrhosis complicated with portal vein thrombosis (PVT), and summarize the status and prospect of anticoagulant treatment.MethodThe literatures and guidelines on the treatment of hepatocirrhosis complicated with PVT were collected and reviewed.ResultsPVT was one of the most common complications in patients with hepatocirrhosis. Its pathogenesis was complicated, and the coagulation function of patients with hepatocirrhosis was poor. In addition, patients with severe complications such as esophageal and gastric varicose bleeding (EVB) were often complicated. According to the current study, the formation of PVT was mainly related to the coagulation mechanism of patients, hemorheology changes of blood vessels, and their own factors. Treatment methods included drug therapy, interventional therapy, and surgical treatment. However, there was still controversy on anticoagulant therapy for hepatocirrhosis with PVT, and there was no complete consensus on anticoagulant indications, drug selection, course of treatment, and safety monitoring.ConclusionPVT should be treated with anticoagulant therapy under certain indications, but to ensure its safety and effectiveness, prospective large sample randomized controlled trials are still needed.
ObjectiveTo summarize the pathogenesis, epidemiology, and risk factors of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy, and combined with the latest advances in clinical prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy, so as to provide some references for clinical prevention and treatment in the future.MethodLiteratures on portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy were collected and reviewed.ResultsThe incidence of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy was high and its occurrence was the result of multiple factors. It was mainly related to the change of splenic venous blood flow mechanics after splenectomy. In terms of diagnosis, enhanced CT scan was the first choice. Currently, there was no consensus on treatment options, which mainly focused on individualized treatment and emphasized that preventive anticoagulant use of low-molecular-weight heparin may reduce the risk of portal vein thrombosis.ConclusionThe concept of tertiary prevention of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy should be established, and individualized treatment should be adopted in combination with the patient’s condition.
Portal vein blood flow is very important for the normal function of transplanted liver. The author reviewed the management methods of different portal vein thrombosis classification in the liver transplantation (LT). The prognosis of LT in the patients with Yerdel 1–3 thrombosis is similar to that the patients without thrombosis. The portal vein reconstruction of the patients with Yerdel 4 thrombosis can be realized by varicose vein to portal anastomosis, renoportal anastomosis or cavoportal hemitransposition. When anastomosis is made at the proximal side of a spontaneous shunt between the portal and cava system, the blood shunted from portal system can be reintroduced into the donor liver, which is crucial for the management of Yerdel 4 thrombosis. The establishments of artificial shunt by distal splenic vein, mesenteric vein or “multiple to one” anastomosis are effective attempts to drain the blood from portal system to the donor liver. For more severe diffuse thrombosis of portal vein system, multivisceral transplantation, including liver and small intestine, should be considered. The cases of LT in the patients with complex portal vein thrombosis are increasing, however the prognosis remains to be determined after accumulation of the cases.
Objective To observe the recovery of recipients with complex portal vein thrombosis (CPVT) underwent “multiple to one” anastomosis and patency of portal vein blood flow during liver transplantation, and to ensure the reliability of this method. MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of the recipients with CPVT underwent “multiple to one” anastomosis in the Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University were collected retrospectively. The “multiple to one” portal vein reconstruction was defined as the anastomosis of multiple vessels of portal venous system with the portal vein of graft, or the anastomosis that connected the blood vessel of portal venous system and the left renal vein/inferior vena cava to the portal vein of graft. ResultsA total of 5 patients were collected, including 1 patient with Yerdel grade 3 thrombosis and 4 patients with Yerdel grade 4 thrombosis. In 3 cases, the left renal vein, inferior vena cava, left renal vein were combined with the parabiliary vein, respectively, in the anastomosis to the donor portal vein. In another 2 cases, portal vein and left renal vein were combined with gastric coronary vein, respectively, in the anastomosis to the donor portal vein. During the follow-up period of 162–865 d, all patients had the stable portal vein blood flow without any symptom of portal hypertension. One patient had thrombosis at the anastomosis with varicose vein, while the anastomosis with left renal vein was unobstructed, which did not affect the donor liver function. ConclusionMultiple blood supply of portal vein is established after “multiple to one” anastomosis, and stability of portal vein blood flow can be maintained after a blood redistribution of portal venous system following liver transplantation.
ObjectiveTo analyze the platelet (PLT) count, coagulation function, and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in the patients underwent splenectomy due to different etiologies. MethodsThe patients who underwent splenectomy in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2013 to December 2022 were collected. According to the etiology, the patients were assigned into the occupying group (splenic and pancreatic occupying lesions), hypersplenism group (portal hypertension and hypersplenism), and splenic rupture group (traumatic splenic rupture). The changes of PLT, white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC), neutrophils (Neut), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen (Fib), D-dimer (DD), and PVT were observed after splenectomy. ResultsA total of 166 patients were collected, including 42 in the occupying group, 22 in the hypersplenism group, and 102 in the splenic rupture group. There were no statistically significant differences in the age and preoperative Child-Pugh score among the patients of the three groups (P>0.05). There were 12 (7.2%) patients with PVT, including 2 in the occupying group, 6 in the hypersplenismn group, and 4 in the splenic rupture group. The PVT incidence among the three groups had a statistical significant difference (Fisher exact test, P=0.003), which in the hypersplenismn group was higher than the occupying group (P=0.016) and the splenic rupture group (P=0.002), while there was no statistically significant difference between the occupying group and the splenic rupture group (P=1.000). The overall trend was that the PLT, RBC, WBC, and various coagulation function indicators such as PT, APTT, and Fib among the three groups all showed an upward trend immediately after splenectomy, but the postoperative peak time and change trends had no markedly regular among the three groups. The PLT of the patients with and without PVT changed over time during the observation period (patients without PVT: F=60.238, P<0.001; patients with PVT group: F=9.700, P=0.043), and which showed a continuous upward trend after surgery, reaching a peak on the 14th day and then beginning to decline in the patients of both 2 groups. However, there was no statistically significant intergroup effect between the 2 groups (F=0.056, P=0.816). ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that the peak value of PLT in the hypersplenism group is lower as compared with the occupying group and the splenic rupture group, and the PVT is more likely to occur. However, no difference of the PLT level is found in the patients without and with PVT.