ObjectiveTo observe the effect of kinesio tape (KT) combined with progressive resistance training (PRT) in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS), and to explore whether the direction of KT affects the therapeutic effect of SIS.MethodsBetween May 2017 and March 2019, 90 participants with SIS in West China Hospital, Sichuan University were randomly divided into three groups, with 30 participants in each group. Participants were treated with KT combined with PRT, and the direction of the KT is from the proximal end of the rotator cuff muscles to the distal end in group A. Participants were treated with KT combined with PRT, and the direction of the KT is from the distal end of the rotator cuff muscles to the proximal end in group B. Participants were treated with PRT alone in group C. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain in patients at rest, during movement and at night; range of motion (ROM) of shoulder and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire were used to measure the physical function before treatment and after 1 week and 2 weeks.ResultsAfter 1 week of treatment, ROM of shoulder abduction, internal rotation and DASH scores in group A were significantly improved compared with those in group B and C (P<0.05). After 2 weeks of treatment, the nighttime VAS score, ROM of shoulder abduction, internal rotation and DASH score scores in group A were significantly improved compared with those in group B and C (P<0.05). The VAS score during movement, nighttime VAS score, ROM of shoulder (except external rotation) and DASH score in group A were significantly improved after 1 week and 2 weeks of treatment (P<0.05); and after 2 weeks of treatment, the nighttime VAS score, ROM of shoulder flexion and internal rotation in group B were significantly improved compared with those before treatment (P<0.05). After 2 weeks of treatment, the VAS score during movement, nighttime VAS score, ROM of shoulder (except external rotation) in group C were significantly improved compared with those before treatment (P<0.05).ConclusionKT combined with PRT is more effective than PRT alone in the treatment of SIS, and the therapeutic effect is related to the direction of the tape.
Objectives To systematically analyze the effect of high-intensity and low-intensity resistance training on glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Web of science, Wanfang, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chongqing VIP were searched to collect randomized controlled trials of resistance training intervention in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. The search time limit was from the establishment of the database to August 28, 2021, and the RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.0 software were used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 415 patients in 8 articles were included in this study. A subgroup analysis based on control measures showed that compared with the resistance training group, the HbA1c level effect value of the non- training group was weighted mean difference (WMD) = −0.54% [95% confidence interval (CI) (−1.06%, −0.03%), P=0.04)], the HbA1c level effect value of the flexibility training group was WMD=−0.47% [95%CI (−1.05%, 0.12%), P=0.12], the HbA1c level effect value of the aerobic training group was WMD=−0.10% [95%CI (−0.71%, 0.51%), P=0.75]. Subgroup analysis of resistance strength showed that compared with the flexibility or non-resistance training group, both high-intensity [WMD=−0.99%, 95%CI (−1.16%, −0.81%), P<0.00001] and low- and medium-intensity resistance training [WMD=−0.29%, 95%CI (−0.58%, −0.01%), P=0.05] can reduce HbA1c. Compared with the high-intensity resistance training, the HbA1c level effect value of the low- and medium-intensity resistance training was WMD=0.03% [95%CI (−0.33%, 0.39%), P=0.88]. Compared with the low- and medium-intensity resistance training, the HbA1c level effect value of the low- and medium-intensity aerobic training was WMD=−0.10% [95%CI (−0.71%, 0.51%), P=0.75]. Among all the included studies, only the high-intensity resistance training group reported multiple adverse events.ConclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that elderly patients with type 2 diabetes are more suitable to choose low-to-medium-intensity resistance training to control HbA1c. It is recommended that elderly patients with type 2 diabetes take 60% to 75% of the maximum muscle strength of medium-intensity resistance training.
As an innovative training method, blood flow restrictive exercise has gradually received extensive attention and application in rehabilitation medicine in recent years. Blood flow restrictive exercise can be combined with low-load, low-intensity training to promote individual muscle hypertrophy and enhance muscle strength to prevent muscle atrophy, which provides an alternative for those who cannot perform high-load, high-intensity training. However, the clinical use strategy and clinical application effect of blood flow restriction exercise are still unclear. This article will mainly introduce the operation methods, use risks, and application methods of blood flow restrictive exercise, in order to provide a reference for the clinical application and research of blood flow restrictive exercise.
Objective To explore the effect of low-load resistance training on physical fitness in aged adults. Methods Select the aged adults who will go to the outpatient Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of Peking Union Medical College Hospital between June 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021. The aged adults were randomly divided into three groups by using the method of random number table: medium intensity aerobic training group (aerobic training group), standard-load resistance training group (standard-load group) and low-load resistance training group (low-load group). The basic information, exercise endurance (peak power, peak oxygen uptake), exercise cardiopulmonary function [peak heart rate, predicted peak heart rate, peak minute ventilation (VE), ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide at anaerobic threshold (EqCO2 during AT)], muscle strength, and muscle oxygen related indexes were collected blindly before the first exercise and after 12 weeks of training, respectively. To compare the differences of the indexes before and after training. Results A total of 90 patients were enrolled, 30 in each group. There was no significant difference in age, sex, height, weight and body mass index among the three groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in cardiopulmonary endurance, cardiopulmonary function, muscle strength, muscle oxygen related indexes between the groups before and after training (P>0.05). Except for the indexes related to cardiac function (peak heart rate, predicted peak heart rate) and resting muscle oxygen level (P>0.05), other indexes related to pulmonary function, cardiopulmonary endurance, muscle strength, and time of muscle oxygen falling to the valley in the three groups were statistically significant compared with those before training (P<0.05). Except for peak power, peak oxygen uptake and time of muscle oxygen falling to the valley (P>0.05), the difference of muscle strength before and after training in the three groups was statistically significant (P<0.05), including grip strength, chest push, sitting rowing, leg extension, hip abduction, body bending and horizontal push and push, and the low-load group was better than the aerobic training group (P<0.05), but the improvement of body bending and horizontal push and push in the standard-load group was better than the low-load group (P<0.05). Conclusions Low-load resistance training, standard-load resistance training and aerobic training have almost the same effect on improving the physical fitness of the elderly. Low-load resistance training is superior to medium intensity aerobic training in improving muscle strength, which is an effective method to improve the physical fitness of the aged adults.