west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "self-gripping mesh" 3 results
  • The Clinical Application of Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Herniorrhaphy with Laparo-scopic Technique Using An Innovative Self-Gripping Mesh

    ObjectiveTo compare the efficiency of total extraperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy with laparoscopic technique using an innovative self-gripping mesh and polypropylene mesh. MethodsThe clinical data of 142 cases of unilateral inguinal hernia who underwent total extraperitoneal prosthesis (TEP) in our hospital form June 2012 to March 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. the operation type was total extraperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy with laparoscopic technique. Depending on the kind of mesh, all patients were divided into two groups from the self-gripping mesh group (n=60) and the polypropylene mesh group (n=82). ResultsThere was no significant difference in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and The Visual Analogue Score of post-operative (at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after operation) between the 2 groups (P>0.05). On the post-operative complications, there was no significant difference in incidences of total complication, scrotal edema, seroma, bladder injury, vascular injury of abdominal, and urinary reten-tion too (P>0.05). All the patients were followed up for 3-36 months (the median time was 19-month), and no recurrence occurred during the follow-up period. ConclusionInnovative self-gripping mesh is safe and effective, and maybe a good direction of mesh for material development.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Efficacy comparison between ProGrip self-gripping mesh and polypropylene mesh for retromuscular repair of incisional hernias

    Objective To compare the efficacy of retromuscular repair of incisional hernia by using ProGrip self-gripping mesh and conventional polypropylene mesh. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on clinical data of 83 cases of incisional hernia between May 2012 and May 2016. Of 83 cases, ProGrip self-gripping mesh was used in 46 cases (self-gripping mesh group) and conventional polypropylene mesh (conventional mesh group) in 37 cases. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, types of incision hernia, hernia ring diameter, course of disease, and associated disease between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operative time, hospital stays, and visual analogue scale (VAS) were recorded and compared between 2 groups. Results The self-gripping mesh group was significantly lower than conventional mesh group in operative time and hospital stays (t=2.977,P=0.004;t=2.270,P=0.026). Primary healing of incision was obtained in 2 groups, with no seroma and mesh infection. The VAS score of self-gripping mesh group was significantly lower than that of conventional mesh group at 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days after operation (P<0.05). The follow-up time was 5-53 months (mean, 25.8 months) in 43 patients of self-gripping mesh group, and was 7-54 months (mean, 27.4 months) in 33 patients of conventional mesh group. No chronic pain or hernia recurrence was found in both groups during follow-up time. Conclusion It is a safe and feasible curative way to use ProGrip self-gripping mesh for retromuscular repair of incisional hernia as it can reduce operative time, hospital stays, and postoperative pain.

    Release date:2017-04-01 08:56 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • A randomized controlled trial between self-gripping mesh and ordinary polypropylene mesh in women’s Lichtenstein hernioplasty

    ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes after self-gripping mesh repair to ordinary polypropylene mesh secured with sutures in women’s Lichtenstein hernioplasty.MethodsThe clinical data of 116 female patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2014 to January 2017 were prospectively analyzed. A randomized controlled trial was performed based on a random number table. All patients were allocated into self-gripping mesh group (PG group) and ordinary polypropylene mesh group (PL group). The outcomes included operative time, post-operative pain score, analgesic used, hospital stay, urinary retention, wound infection, and seroma were recorded. Patients were followed-up after 1 week, 1 months, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years after operation. Follow-up data included chronic pain, foreign body feeling, affect daily activities, and recurrence.ResultsNinety-nine participants completed follow-up. There were 48 patients in the PG group and 51 participants in the PL group. The operative time of the PG group was significantly shorter than that of the PL group (P=0.045), but there was no significant difference in analgesic used, hospital stay, incidence of urinary retention and wound infection, visual analogue scale (VAS) of wound pain at rest at 1 week postoperatively, VAS of wound pain on coughing at 1 week postoperatively between the two groups (P>0.05). At 1 month after operation, the incidence of foreign body feeling in the PG group was significantly higher than that of the PL group (P=0.031), while there was no significant difference in ratio of VAS≥3 and incidence of affect daily activities (P>0.05). At 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years after operation, there was no significant difference in incidences of foreign body feeling, chronic pain, and affect daily activities between the two groups (P>0.05). There was one recurrence in the PL group and none in the PG group, without a significant difference (P=0.248).ConclusionThe surgical outcomes of self-gripping mesh are comparable to the ordinary polypropylene mesh with a reduced operation time in women’s Lichtenstein hernioplasty.

    Release date:2019-06-05 04:24 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content