摘要:目的:探讨有机磷农药中毒患者阿托品使用方法,提高抢救成功率。方法: 对2005年6月至2009年6月我院收治的有机磷农药中毒病人281例进行分组,所有患者均使用阿托品疗法,A组为2007年以后132例序贯阿托品疗法患者,B组2007年以前为常规使用静推继之肌注阿托品疗法149例患者,根据有机磷农药对胆碱酯酶复能剂的疗效分为高效组和低效组,并结合病情严重程度共分为重度有机磷农药中毒胆碱酯酶复能剂高效组、重度有机磷农药中毒胆碱酯酶复能剂低效组,轻度有机磷农药中毒胆碱酯酶复能剂高效组、轻度有机磷农药中毒胆碱酯酶复能剂低效组4组,分别从达到阿托品化时间、维持阿托品化效果、反跳和中间综合征发生率、开始撤药平均时间、总住院费用、总住院平均时间、护士劳动强度进行总结和分析。结果: 维持阿托品化疗效Ａ组与B组间有显著差异,P值lt;0.01,开始撤药平均时间、总住院平均时间、总住院费用、护士劳动强度Ａ组与B组间均有差异,P值lt;0.05,发生反跳和中间综合征发生率、达到阿托品化时间在高效组间比较无差异,低效组间比较无差异,高效组与低效组比较有显著差异,P值lt;0.01,主要与中毒药物种类和病情严重程度有关,其次与阿托品治疗方法有关。 结论: 序贯阿托品疗法治疗有机磷农药中毒优于常规使用静推继之肌注阿托品疗法。Abstract: Objective: To discussion of atropine in organophosphorus pesticide poisoning patients with the use of two different methods to improve the success rate. Methods: For June 2005 to June 2009 inour hospital a total of organophosphorus pesticide poisoning 281 cases were divided into A group and B group, All patients were using atropine therapy, 132 cases of sequential therapy in patients with atropine is divided into A group, 149 cases of routine use of intravenous injection and intramuscular injection of atropine group patients were divided into B group, From the following aspects were analyzed and summarized, They are the maintenance of the effect of atropinization, the average time for the beginning of withdrawal, the total hospitalization costs, the total average time for hospitalization and nurses labor intensity. According to the organic phosphorus pesticide on the efficacy of cholinesterase agents are divided into efficient and inefficient groups groups, From the types of poisons, toxic ways, poisoning performance and Complications for stratified, They were divided into 4 groups, severe organophosphorus pesticide poisoning and cholinesterase reactivator can be highly effective group, severe organophosphorus pesticide poisoning and cholinesterase reactivator Lowefficacy group, mild organophosphorus pesticide poisoning and cholinesterase reactivator can be highly effective group, mild organophosphorus pesticide poisoning and cholinesterase reactivator Lowefficacy group, Correlation analysis Antijumping and the incidence of intermediate syndrome and atropinization time.Results:Maintain the efficacy of atropine of A group and B were significantly different between groups, Plt;0.01, the average time began to withdraw drugs, the total average time for hospitalization, total hospital charges, nursing labor intensity of A group and B are differences between the two groups, P＜0.05. Rebound occurs and the incidence of intermediate syndrome, to atropinization time high between the two groups showed no difference between the two groups showed no differences between inefficient and efficient group and inefficient group were significantly different, Plt;0.01, mainly related to poisoning by drug type and severity of illness, followed with atropine therapy. Conclusion:Atropine sequential therapy is superior to organophosphorus pesticide poisoning by conventional atropine treatmen.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of debridement-vacuum sealing drainage (VSD)-modified external fixation antibiotic-impregnated cement semi-open technique in treatment of chronic ulcer wounds. MethodsClinical data of 43 patients with chronic ulcer wounds who met the selection criteria and admitted between January 2019 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 23 cases were treated with debridement-VSD-modified external fixation antibiotic-impregnated cement semi-open technique (improved group), and 20 cases were treated with debridement-VSD-traditional antibiotic-impregnated cement technique (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, constituent ratio of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, constituent ratio of patients with smoking history, body mass index, wound site, and other baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The healing quality and healing time, the positive rate of bacterial culture after bone cement coating, the loosening rate of bone cement, the number of operations, the number of hospitalizations, the length of hospitalization, and the cost of hospitalization were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the positive rate of bacterial culture after bone cement coating and the loosening rate of bone cement in the improved group was significantly lower, as well as the number of operations, the number of hospitalizations, the length of hospitalization, and hospitalization cost significantly reduced (P<0.05). Wound repair was completed in both groups without amputation. The wound healing quality of the improved group was better than that of the control group and the wound healing time was shorter, the differences were significant (P<0.05). All patients were followed up 1-5 years (mean 3.4 years), and no ulcers recurred during follow-up. ConclusionDebridement-VSD-modified external fixation antibiotic-impregnated cement semi-open technique in the treatment of chronic ulcer wounds can effectively reduce the loosening rate of bone cement, facilitate the induced membrane formation and wound healing, and significantly reduce the number of operations and shorten the length of hospital stay.