Objective To investigate the effects of percutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD) and percutaneous cement interbody fusion (PCIF) on spinal stability by in vitro biomechanical tests. Methods Biomechanical test was divided into intact (INT) group, percutaneous lumbar discectomy (PLD) group, PCD group, and PCIF group. Six specimens of L4, 5 (including vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs) from fresh male cadavers were taken to prepare PLD, PCD, and PCIF specimens, respectively. Before treatment and after the above treatments, the MTS multi-degree-of-freedom simulation test system was used to conduct the biomechanical test. The intervertebral height of the specimen was measured before and after the axial loading of 300 N, and the difference was calculated. The range of motion (ROM) and stiffness of the spine in flexion, extension, left/right bending, and left/right rotation under a torque of 7.5 Nm were calculated. Results After axial loading, the change of intervertebral height in PLD group was more significant than that in other three groups (P<0.05). Compared with INT group, the ROM in all directions significantly increased and the stiffness significantly decreased in PLD group (P<0.05). Compared with INT group, the ROM of flexion, extension, and left/right rotation in PCD group significantly increased and the stiffness significantly decreased (P<0.05); compared with PLD group, the ROM of flexion, extension, and left/right bending in PCD group significantly decreased and the stiffness significantly increased (P<0.05). Compared with INT group, ROM of left/right bending in PCIF group significantly decreased and stiffness significantly increased (P<0.05); compared with PLD group, the ROM in all directions significantly decreased and the stiffness significantly increased (P<0.05); compared with PCD group, the ROM of flexion, left/right bending, and left/right rotation significantly decreased and stiffness significantly increased (P<0.05). Conclusion Both PCD and PCIF can provide good biomechanical stability. The former mainly affects the stiffness in flexion, extension, and bending, while the latter is more restrictive on lumbar ROM in all directions, especially in bending and rotation.