糖皮质激素在甲型H1N1流感中的应用探讨
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of long-term inhaled salmeterol / fluticasone combined with low-dose oral erythromycin in patients with bronchiectasis. Methods Sixty-two patients with bronchiectasis after exacerbation and maintained stable were randomly divided into three groups. Group A was treated with low-dose oral erythromycin, group B inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone, and group C inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone plus low-dose oral erythromycin. The study duration lasted for 6 months. The clinical symptoms, dyspnea scale, exacerbation frequency, and pulmonary function parameters were measured and compared. Results Fifty-four patients completed the whole study and 8 cases withdrew. The results showed that 6 months of low-dose erythromycin therapy can improve the clinical symptoms, whille exacerbation frequency was also decreased. Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone improved lung function, however, had no effect on cough, expectoration and exacerbation frequency. Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone combined with erythromycin was more significantly effective in improving lung functions as well as symptoms. Conclusions Long-terminhaled salmeterol/fluticasone combined with low-dose oral erythromycin can improve the clinical symptoms and lung function, decrease the frequency of exacerbation in patients with bronchiectasis. It may be as an alternative to the maintenance treatment of bronchiectasis.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy and safety of etofenamate gel (foscavir+tramadoli hydrochloridum+gabapentin) in the treatment of acute herpes zoster. MethodsForty patients with acute herpes zoster neuralgia treated between January 2013 and June 2014 were randomly divided into two groups:control group and treatment group, with 20 in each. The patients had a visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of seven or higher. Patients in the control group accepted conventional treatment, while those in the treatment group were treated with conventional treatment combined with etofenamate gel. Two weeks after treatment, VAS score, quality of life and sleep score, and the degree of improvement in skin paresthesia were evaluated and compared between the two groups. ResultsThe VAS score decreased significantly in both the two groups after treatment (P < 0.05), and the decrease in the treatment group was significantly more obvious (P < 0.05). The quality of life, sleep score and the degree of improvement in skin paresthesia were ameliorated significantly after treatment (P < 0.05), and the amelioration in the treatment group was significantly greater (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe early application of Ordofen can strengthen analgesia effect of the conventional treatment, improve the quality of life and sleep, and reduce skin paresthesia.
ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid and antiviral agents for idiopathic facial nerve paralysis (IFNP) by network meta-analysis.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, WangFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of corticosteroid and antiviral agents for IFNP from inception to January 31th, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. The meta-analysis was performed by R 3.3.3 and Stata 13.0 software.ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 3 061 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that: for the facial function recovery rates, corticosteroid plus antiviral agents was superior to placebo and antiviral agents alone at 3-month follow-up. Corticosteroid plus antiviral agents was superior to placebo, antiviral agents or corticosteroid alone at 6-month follow-up (if the satisfactory recovery was defined as a House-Brackmann grade class Ⅱ or below). When the follow-up exceeded 6 months, corticosteroid alone was superior to placebo and antiviral agents alone, corticosteroid plus antiviral agents was superior to placebo and antiviral agents alone. All of the differences above were statistically significant. For the sequelae, corticosteroid plus antiviral agents and corticosteroid alone were superior to placebo and antiviral agents alone. Corticosteroid plus antiviral agents was superior to corticosteroid alone. The differences were statistically significant. For the adverse events, there were no significant differences between any other pairwise comparisons of these different interventions.ConclusionConsidering the efficacy and safety, patients with IFNP treated corticosteroid plus antiviral agents are more likely to have a better recovery of facial function and less likely to develop sequelae, followed by corticosteroid alone. More high-quality, large scaled and multicenter RCTs are required to verify the conclusions above, and focus on the treatment of children and patients with severe facial paralysis.
Objective To investigate the percentage of CD4 + CD25 + Treg cells and expression of Foxp3 mRNA in asthmatic patients and the impacts of inhaled steroids.Methods The percentages of CD4 +CD25 + Treg cells was assayed by flow cytometry and the expression of Foxp3 mRNA was detected by RT-PCR in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from the patients with chronic persistent asthma before and after steroids inhalation in comparison with healthy control. The forced expired volumin one second/predicted value( FEV1% pred) and peak expired flow( PEF) were measured by spirometry. Results The level of CD4 + CD25 + Treg cells and the expression of Foxp3 mRNA were lower in asthmatics before steroids treatment than those in control ( P lt; 0. 05) which were increased significantly after steroids treatment ( P lt; 0. 05) .FEV1% pred and PEF were declined significantly than those in control but improved markedly after treatment ( P lt; 0. 05) . Conclusions The insufficiency of amount and function of immue-suppressive CD4 + CD25 +Treg cells may play a role in the pathogenesis of asthma. Inhaled steroids can improve the lung function of asthmatics by upregulating the level of CD4 + CD25 + Treg and Foxp3.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the clinical efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids, acetaminophen and antimicrobial drugs in the treatment of intrapartum fever in labor analgesia. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, VIP, and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of glucocorticoids, acetaminophen, and antimicrobial drugs for intrapartum fever in labor analgesia from inception to June 30, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included literature. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 1 337 women were included. Meta-analysis showed that the use of glucocorticoids reduced the incidence of intrapartum fever in women with labor analgesia compared with the control group (OR=0.52, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.82, P<0.01). But there was no statistically significant difference between acetaminophen or antimicrobial drugs and the control group. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the use of glucocorticoids can reduce the incidence of intrapartum fever in labor analgesia, but the use of acetaminophen and antimicrobial drugs cannot reduce the incidence of intrapartum fever. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To formulate an evidence-based treatment for a patient with pulmonary tuberculosis combined with tuberculous meningitis and tuberculous pericarditis. Methods According to the principles of evidencebased clinical practice, we searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2008), Ovid-Reviews (1991 to 2008), MEDLINE (1950 to 2008), and http://www.guideline.org. to identify the best evidence for treating a patient with pulmonary tuberculosis combined with tuberculous meningitis and tuberculous pericarditis. Results Nine guidelines, 2 systematic reviews, and 11 randomized controlled trials were included. The evidence showed that corticosteroids could help reduce the risk of death and disabling residual neurological deficiencies in patients with tuberculous meningitis. After adjusting for age and gender, the overall death rate of patients with tuberculous pericarditis was significantly reduced by prednisolone (P=0.044), as well as the risk of death from pericarditis (P=0.004). But for patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, there was still a controversy about the use of corticosteroids. Given the evidence, the patient’s clinical conditions, and his preferences, dexamethasone was used for the boy in question. After 7 weeks of treatment, his cerebrospinal fluid returned to normal and pericardial effusion disappeared. Conclusion Corticosteroids should be recommended in HIV-negative people with tuberculous meningitis or/and tuberculous pericarditis. The difference in the effectiveness of various corticosteroids such as dexamethasone, prednisolone, or methylprednisolone and the optimal duration of corticosteroid therapy is still unknown.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on tennis elbow.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on NSAIDs for tennis elbow from inception to May 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 8 RCTs involving 595 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the therapeutic effect between NSAIDs and the placebo group (RR=1.10, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.35, P=0.39) or non-placebo control group (RR=0.88, 95%CI 0.77 to 1.00, P=0.06). Compared with non-placebo control group, NSAIDs group had lower VAS score difference (MD=−1.41, 95%CI −2.28 to −0.53, P=0.002).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the effect of NSAIDs on tennis elbow is still uncertain. The improvement of symptoms with NSAIDs may be superior to placebo, but inferior to other treatment methods. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusions are required to be verified by more high-quality studies.
Objective To assess the efficacy of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs （NSAIDs） in the treatment of osteoarthritis （OA）. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scientific Citation Index, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, CBMdisc and abstracts from conference were searched from 1966 to March 30, 2005. Randomized controlled trials （R.CT） comparing topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug （NSAIDs） with placebo or oral NSAIDs in OA were induded. Effect size （ES） was calculated for pain, function and stiffness. Relative risk （RR） was calculated for dichotomous data such as clinical response rate and adverse effect rate. Number needed to treat to obtain the clinical response was estimated. The quality of trials was assessed and sensitivity analyses were undertaken. Results Topical NSAIDs were superior to placebo in relieving pain due to osteoarthritis only in the first 2 weeks of treatment; ES （95% CI） were 0.41 （0. 16 to 0.66） and 0.40 （0.15 to 0.65） at week 1 and 2 respectively. However, the effects were short-lived and no benefit was observed over placebo at the third and fourth week. A similar pattern was observed with function, stiflhess and clinical response RR and number needed to treat. Topical NSAIDs were inferior to oral NSAIDs at week 1, and associated with more local side effects such as rash, itch or burning （RR 5.29, 95% CI 1.14 to 24. 51 ）. Conclusions Only very shortterm （less than 4 weeks） RCTs have assessed topical NSAID efficacy in OA ; after 2 weeks no efficacy above placebo has been obsevrved. There are no trial data to support the long-term use of topical NSAIDs in osteoarthritis.
Objective To analyze the risk factors for postoperative cognitive confusion in a surgical intensive care unit. Methods A total of 388 consecutive patients in Surgical Intensive Care Unit of General Hospital of PLA were retrospectively studied. We posed clinical questions according to the patients with older age and large dosage corticosteroid. Using “Postoperative cognitive confusion” and“Intensive Care” as key words, we searched for evidence from MEDLINE (1968-2004). Results We found 3.1% (10/388) of the patients developed postoperative cognitive confusion. Of the 10 postoperative cognitive confusion patients, 9 were over 65 years old. 6.6% (9/136) of the patients (≥ 65 years old) developed postoperative cognitive confusion. While 0.4%(1/252) of the patients (＜65 years old) developed postoperative cognitive confusion. Older age (≥ 65 years old) may induce more postoperative cognitive confusion (P＜0.05). While 7.0% (5/71) of the patients treated by large dose corticosteroids (≥1 000 mg) developed postoperative cognitive confusion. And 1.65% (5/317) of the patients received corticosteroid with large dosage (＜1 000 mg) developed postoperative cognitive confusion. Large dosage corticosteroid (≥1 000 mg) may induce more postoperative cognitive confusion (P＜0.05). Conclusion Older age (≥ 65 years old) and high dose corticosteroid (≥1 000 mg) may be the two main risk factors for postoperative cognitive confusion.