Objective To evaluate the postoperative effects of different thoracoscopic sympathectomy on palmar hyperhidrosis patients. Methods We searched the Wanfang Database, CNKI, Weipu, CBM, PubMed, Cochrane Library (from inception to March 2016) to identify studies about thoracoscopic sympathectomy on palmar hyperhidrosis patients. Quality of the included studies was evaluated. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan5.3 software. Results A total of 15 studies (9 randomized controlled trials, 3 cohort studies, and 3 retrospective studies) involving 2 542 patients were included. The result of meta-analysis suggested that there was statistical difference in postoperative compensatory hyperhidrosis (OR=4.88, 95% CI 1.88 to 12.68,P=0.001) between T2 sympathectomy and T3 sympathectom. Compared with T2-4 sympathectomy patients, the risk of postoperative compensatory hyperhidrosis in T2-4 sympathectomy group was significantly lower (OR=5.13, 95% CI 2.91 to 9.02,P<0.000 01). Compared with T3 sympathectomy group, the risk of postoperative compensatory hyperhidrosis and hand dry in the T4 sympathectomy group was significantly lower (OR=2.91, 95% CI 2.06 to 4.12,P<0.000 01;OR=14.60, 95% CI 3.06 to 69.63,P=0.000 8), respectively. Conclusion The rate of postoperative compensatory hyperhidrosis or hand dry is lower on T4 sympathectomy patients and supposed to be the best segment for the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis patients.
Objective To analyze the efficacy of no-touch technique and traditional technique in drawing great saphenous vein during coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods We searched the literatures on no-touch technique versus traditional technique in drawing great saphenous vein during coronary artery bypass grafting in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Wanfang database between January 1997 and November 2017. Jadad scale was used for quality verification. RevMan 5.0 was used for analysis. Results Six studies were included. Jadad scale for both 6 randomized controlled trials was 5 points. Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in postoperative mortality between the two groups with RR=0.68 and 95%CI 0.11 to 4.11(P=0.67). There was no statistical difference in leg wounds with RR=1.46 and 95%CI 0.23 to 9.16 (P=0.68). There was no statistical difference in short-term cardiogenic death with RR=0.33, 95%CI 0.10 to 1.03 ( P=0.06). The no-touch group’s long-term cardiogenic death was significantly lower than the traditional group withRR=0.36, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.79(P=0.01). Postoperative no-touch group’s short-term patency rate was significantly better than that of the traditional group with MD=3.08 and 95%CI 1.58 to 5.99 (P<0.01). The long-term patency rate in the no-touch group was also higher than that of the traditional group withMD=3.08 and 95%CI 1.58 to 5.99 (P<0.01). Conclusion Compared with the traditional group, the no-touch group increases postoperative long-term survival rate, short-term and long-term patency rate.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the risk factors of acute kidney injury after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.MethodsWe searched the CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP, PubMed, Web of science, Cochrane Library (from inception to January 2019) to identify studies about the risk factors of acute kidney injury after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Quality of the included studies was evaluated by Kars-Ottawa scale. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 16 case-control studies were included involving 1 728 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that gender (OR=1.58, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.89, P<0.001), body mass index (OR=1.05, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.45, P<0.001), hypertension (OR=1.58, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.26, P=0.010), smoking history (OR=1.71, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.61, P=0.010), preoperative serum creatinine level (OR=30.26, 95% CI 20.17 to 40.35, P<0.000 01), preoperative white blood cell (OR=1.73, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.20, P=0.020), extracorporeal circulation time (OR=25.60, 95% CI 21.13 to 30.08, P<0.000 01), aortic occlusion time (OR=13.24, 95% CI 10.27 to 16.22, P<0.001), deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) time (OR=2.58, 95% CI 0.86 to 4.29, P=0.003), arch replacement (OR=2.31, 95% CI 1.31 to 4.07, P=0.004), intraoperative blood transfusion (OR=1.27, 95% CI 0.29 to 2.24, P=0.010), postoperative mean arterial pressure (OR=–2.41, 95% CI –4.59 to –0.24, P=0.030), reoperation due to postoperative hemorrhage (OR=4.19, 95% CI 2.04 to 8.63, P<0.001), postoperative acute respiratory insufficiency (OR=6.61, 95% CI 3.21 to 13.60, P<0.001), postoperative mechanical ventilation time (OR=48.51, 95% CI 21.94 to 75.09, P<0.001) were associated with acute kidney injury after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that gender, body mass index, hypertension, smoking history, preoperative serum creatinine level, preoperative white blood cell, extracorporeal circulation time, aortic occlusion time, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) time, arch replacement, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative mean arterial pressure, postoperative hemorrhage reoperation, postoperative acute respiratory insufficiency and postoperative mechanical ventilation time were risk factors for acute kidney injury after surgery for type A aortic dissection. Medical staff can strengthen perioperative management of patients with acute type A aortic dissection combined with the above factors, so as to reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury after operation and improve the clinical prognosis of patients.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis (TAV) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).MethodsA computer-based search in PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang databases from their date of inception to March 2019 was conducted. Two reviewers independently screened the articles, extracted data and evaluated their quality. RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.0 softwares were used for meta-analysis.ResultsThe selected 15 cohort studies contained 45 770 patients, including 1 500 of BAV patients and 44 270 of TAV patients. The results showed that no statistical difference was found in postoperative in-hospital mortality [OR=1.29, 95%CI (0.91, 1.83), P=0.15], 30-day mortality [OR=1.23, 95%CI (0.86, 1.77), P=0.25], and 1-year mortality [OR=1.14, 95%CI (0.87, 1.50), P=0.33] between the two groups. The surgical success rate [OR=0.57, 95%CI (0.44, 0.74), P<0.01], postoperative bleeding events [OR=0.72, 95%CI (0.58, 0.91), P<0.01] and postoperative vascular injury [OR=0.68, 95%CI (0.47, 0.97), P=0.03] of patients in the BAV group were lower than those in the TAV group. The incidence of paravalvular leak in the BAV group was higher than that in the TAV group [OR=1.47, 95%CI (1.13, 1.90), P<0.01]. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of conversion to surgery, postoperative myocardial infarction, postoperative renal failure, postoperative neurologic events, postoperative valve gradient difference and pacemaker implantation.ConclusionCompared with TAV, the application of TAVR in BAV patients is feasible and effective.
ObjectiveTo explore the correlation of preoperative D-dimer (DD) level with prognosis in Chinese esophageal cancer patients.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, SinoMed databases were searched to identify potential studies which assessed prognostic value of preoperative DD level in Chinese esophageal cancer patients from the establishment date of each database to March 20, 2019. The Stata 12.0 software was applied to conduct the meta-analysis and the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was combined to evaluate the relation between preoperative DD level and survival of Chinese esophageal cancer patients.ResultsA total of 5 studies involving 1 277 patients were included. The quality score of each study was ≥6 points. The results showed that the elevated preoperative DD level was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS, HR=1.49, 95%CI 1.05-2.10, P=0.025) and cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR=1.83, 95%CI 1.39-2.42, P<0.001). However, no significant relation of preoperative DD with disease-free survival (DFS) was observed (HR=1.55, 95%CI 0.89-2.70, P=0.125).ConclusionHigh preoperative DD level may be an independent prognostic factor for Chinese patients with esophageal cancer. More prospective studies with bigger sample sizes are still needed to verify our results.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of tubular stomach and whole stomach reconstruction in the treatment of esophageal cancer.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP and CBM databases to collect the randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies on the efficacy comparison between tubular stomach and total gastric reconstruction of esophagus in esophagectomy from their date of inception to May 2019. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of Twenty-nine RCTs were included, and 3 012 patients were involved. The results of meta-analysis showed that the postoperative complications such as anastomotic fistula [RR=0.64, 95%CI (0.50, 0.83), P=0.000 6], anastomotic stenosis [RR=0.65, 95%CI (0.50, 0.86), P=0.002], thoracic gastric syndrome [RR=0.19, 95%CI (0.13, 0.27), P<0.001], reflux esophagitis [RR=0.23, 95%CI (0.19, 0.30), P<0.001], gastric emptying disorder [RR=0.39, 95%CI (0.27, 0.57), P<0.001] and pulmonary infection [RR=0.44, 95%CI (0.31, 0.62), P<0.001] were significantly reduced, and the postoperative quality of life score and satisfaction were higher at 6 months and 1 year in the tubular stomach group (P<0.05). In terms of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay, they were better in the tubular stomach group than those in the whole stomach group (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operation time, postoperative gastrointestinal decompression time, postoperative closed drainage time, postoperative 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rate, postoperative quality of life score at 3 weeks and 3 months, and postoperative life satisfaction at 3 weeks.ConclusionThe tubular stomach is more advantageous than the whole stomach in the reconstruction of esophagus after esophagectomy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of unilateral antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (UASCP) compared to bilateral antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (BASCP) in aortic surgery.MethodsPubMed, EBSCO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang Database were searched from establishment of each database to January 2019 to identify clinical studies on prognosis of UASCP versus BASCP in aortic surgery patients. The quality of randomized controlled trials was assessed by Cochrane risk assessement tool. The quality of non-randomized controlled trials was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale ( NOS). Meta-analyses were presented in terms of odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsSixteen eligible studies including 3 randomized controlled trials, 2 propensity matching score studies, and 11 retrospective case control studies including4 490 patients were identified. The 3 randomized controlled trials were with high bias risk. The NOS score of the other 13 studies was more than 6 stars. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference between the UASCP and BASCP groups in terms of permanent neurological dysfunction (PND) (OR=0.93, 95%CI 0.74 to 1.18, P=0.57), temporary neurological dysfunction (TND) (OR=1.26, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.69, P=0.12), acute kidney injury rate (OR=1.11, 95%CI 0.79 to 1.55, P=0.55), 30-day mortality (OR=0.94, 95%CI 0.67 to 1.32, P=0.72), length of ICU stay (OR=–0.64, 95%CI –1.66 to 0.37, P=0.22) and hospital stay (OR=–0.35, 95%CI –2.38 to 1.68, P=0.74).ConclusionThis meta-analysis shows that UASCP and BASCP administration do not result in different mortality and neurologic morbidity rates. However, more studies with good methodologic quality and large sample are still needed to make further assessment.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the risk factors for hypoxemia after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).MethodsEight electronic databases including PubMed, EMbase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, VIP and Wanfang data were searched by computer to collect cochort and case-control studies about CABG and hypoxemia published from inception to March 2020. Two authors independently assessed the quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and a meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 15 studies involving 4 277 patients were included in this study and among them 1 273 patients suffered hypoxemia. Meta-analysis showed that age (OR=1.55, 95%CI 1.22 to 1.96, P=0.000 3), smoking (OR=3.22, 95%CI 2.48 to 4.17, P<0.000 01), preoperative chronic pulmonary diseases (OR=4.75, 95%CI 3.28 to 6.86, P<0.000 01), diabetes (OR=2.49, 95%CI 1.86 to 3.33,P<0.000 01), left ventricular ejection fraction (OR=3.15, 95%CI 2.19 to 4.52, P<0.000 01), number of coronary artery lesions (OR=2.20, 95%CI 1.63 to 2.97, P<0.000 1) were independent risk factors for hypoxemia after CABG; body mass index (OR=1.31, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.77, P=0.08) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR=3.40, 95%CI 0.72 to 15.94, P=0.12) were not associated with hypoxemia.ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that age, preoperative chronic pulmonary diseases, smoking, diabetes, left ventricular ejection fraction, number of coronary artery are risk factors for hypoxemia after CABG, which can be used to identify high-risk patients and provide guidance for medical staff to develop perioperative preventive strategies to reduce the incidence of hypoxemia. The results should be validated by large-scale standard studies in the future.
ObjectiveTo compare the complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) between aortic valve stenosis (AS) patients ≥90 years and patients <90 years, and to explore the efficacy and safety of TAVR in AS patients ≥90 years.MethodsDatabases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, Medline, CNKI, Wanfang Data and China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc) were searched by computer from inception to May 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data and evaluated the quality of the included studies. RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.0 were used for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 12 cohort studies were included, including60 186 patients (11 350 patients ≥90 years and 48 836 patients <90 years). Meta-analysis showed that compared with the patients <90 years, those ≥90 years had higher all-cause mortality in the hospital (OR=1.51, 95%CI 1.37 to 1.66, P<0.000 01),on postoperative 30 d (OR=1.68, 95%CI 1.50 to 1.89, P<0.000 01) and at postoperative 1 year (OR=1.36, 95%CI 1.25 to 1.48, P<0.000 01), and had higher incidence of stroke (OR=1.31, 95%CI 1.18 to 1.46, P<0.000 01), bleeding events (OR=1.14, 95%CI 1.07 to 1.20, P<0.000 01) and vascular complications (OR=1.31, 95%CI 1.18 to 1.46, P<0.000 01). ConclusionAll-cause mortality and the incidence of some complications after TAVR in AS patients ≥90 years are higher than those in patients <90 years, but this difference is clinically acceptable. Therefore, TAVR treatment is safe and effective for elderly patients.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the prognosis of interventional treatment with covered stent graft for retrograde Stanford type A aortic dissection and intramural hematoma by single-arm meta-analysis.MethodsRelated studies on treating retrograde Stanford type A aortic dissection and intramural hematoma with covered stent graft were retrieved from the databases by computer, including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Wanfang Data, VIP, CNKI and CBM, from inception to January 2020. Literatures were screened by researchers step by step according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality of the enrolled literatures was evaluated, and data were extracted from the included studies. Afterwards, single-arm meta-analysis was carried out by the R3.6.3 software.ResultsA total of 12 English and 5 Chinese studies were included, which were all case series, and the quality of all literatures was moderate evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). After analyzing the clinical prognosis of 260 patients, the 30-day mortality was 6% (95%CI 0.04 to 0.11, P=0.97), the late mortality was 8% (95%CI 0.05 to 0.14, P=0.78), the incidence of endoleak was 21% (95%CI 0.16 to 0.29, P=0.06), the incidence of stroke was 5% (95%CI 0.03 to 0.09, P=0.99), the incidence of new aortic dissection was 7% (95%CI 0.04 to 0.11, P=0.96), the incidence of dissection progression was 10% (95%CI 0.07 to 0.16, P=0.24), and the absorption rate of intramural hematoma was 84% (95%CI 0.37 to 1.00, P<0.01).ConclusionInterventional treatment with covered stent graft for retrograde Stanford type A aortic dissection and intramural hematoma can obtain good early treatment results for some patients, and can be used as a safe and effective treatment for aged patient with high risk who cannot tolerate surgery. Endoleak, stroke and new aortic dissection are the early serious complications of this method.