ObjectiveTo systematically review the teaching effects of Seminar teaching model versus lecture-based learning (LBL) teaching model on clinical medical students in China.MethodsPubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet, WanFang Data and VIP database were electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on Seminar versus LBL applied in clinical medical students in China, from the establishment of database to October 2017. The Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software.ResultsA total of 12 RCTs with 741 students were enrolled, including 380 in Seminar teaching group and 361 in LBL teaching group. The results of Meta-analysis demonstrated that the basic theory score [standard mean difference (SMD)=1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.72, 1.62), P<0.000 01], the clinical skill score [SMD=1.33, 95%CI (0.82, 1.83), P<0.000 01], the classroom atmosphere score ［SMD=1.51, 95%CI (1.13, 1.90), P<0.000 01］, the team score [SMD=0.86, 95%CI (0.50, 1.22), P<0.000 01], and the autonomous learning ability score [SMD=2.25, 95%CI (0.31, 4.18), P=0.02] of Seminar teaching group were superior to those in the LBL teaching group.ConclusionThe Seminar teaching model is superior to the LBL teaching model in clinical medical students.
ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness of BOPPPS method in teaching of evidence-based medicine for undergraduates.MethodsTwo classes from the first and second clinical medical college of Lanzhou University were randomly selected as BOPPPS group and traditional teaching group, respectively. The examination scores and questionnaire were used in combination to evaluate the teaching effectiveness. EpiData 3.1 software was used for data entry. SPSS 23.0 software was used for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 25 students were in BOPPPS group and 26 in traditional teaching group. Baseline characteristics such as gender, age, participation in scientific researches, publication of articles were balanced between two groups. The score of the BOPPPS group was higher than that of the traditional teaching group, and there was a significant difference between two groups in evidence searching, evidence evaluation and total score (P<0.05). Compared with traditional teaching group, more students from BOPPPS group deem that study interest, learning initiative, problem analysis and solving capability, self-study capability, communication between teachers and students, information acquisition capability, information analysis and utilization capability, speech capability and so on are improved, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).ConclusionsThe BOPPPS teaching mode is beneficial for undergraduates to improve innovative and practical capability, and improve quality and effectiveness of evidence-based medicine teaching.
Objective To explore the application effect of virtual reality simulation technology (VRST) combined with problem-based learning (PBL) mode in knee arthroscopy teaching in sports medicine department. Methods A total of 76 trainees in sports medicine at Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital from June 2021 to June 2022 were retrospectively selected. According to the different teaching modes, they were divided into the research group and the control group with 38 trainees in each group. The traditional teaching mode was implemented in the control group, while VRST and PBL mode were implemented in the research group. The objective assessment results and teaching effect feedback of the two groups were compared. Results There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the average theoretical score of the trainees (91.35±1.05 vs. 90.94±1.12, P>0.05). The scores of the three manipulating parts of the research group (9.03±0.24, 9.12±0.31, and 9.24±0.27, respectively) were higher than those of the control group (8.76±0.36, 8.44±0.57, and 8.35±0.51, respectively), moreover, trainees in the research group had higher scores for study enthusiasm, teaching satisfaction, three-dimensional space sense, and virtual reality conversion degree (9.12±0.16, 9.67±0.11, 9.34±0.22, and 9.56±0.18, respectively) than those of the control group (8.89±0.27, 9.16±0.34, 8.67±0.37, and 8.42±0.23, respectively), and the differences were all statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion VRST combined with PBL mode could improve trainees’ ability to operate arthroscopy significantly, and stimulate trainees’ subjective learning ability to improve teaching effect.