ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of surgical and traditional treatments for multiple rib fractures through systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsCNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, OVID, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Thieme and Springer Link database for information from inception to July 2019 were screened by computer. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of surgical and conventional methods for the treatment of multiple rib fractures were screened, assessed and extracted. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.ResultsTwelve studies were included, including 1 039 patients. There were 512 patients in the operation group and 527 patients in the traditional treatment group. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was a significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of pneumonia (RR=0.41, 99%CI 0.29 to 0.58, P<0.000 01), incidence of atelectasis (RR=0.24, 99%CI 0.06 to 0.94, P=0.007), duration of mechanical ventilation (SMD=–2.64, 99%CI –4.38 to –0.91, P<0.000 1), duration of intensive care unit stay (SMD=–1.33, 99%CI –2.26 to –0.40, P=0.000 2), duration of hospital stay (SMD=–2.25, 99%CI –3.30 to –1.19, P<0.000 01)and incidence of chest wall deformity (RR=0.08, 99%CI 0.04 to 0.17, P<0.000 01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the hospital mortality (RR=0.75, 99%CI 0.23 to 2.46, P=0.53), incidence of tracheostomy (RR= 0.69, 99%CI 0.39 to 1.21, P=0.09), ventilator support rate (RR=0.65, 99%CI 0.41 to 1.05, P=0.02) and chest drainage time (SMD=–2.58, 99%CI –6.41 to 1.25, P=0.08).ConclusionSurgical treatment of multiple rib fractures can reduce pulmonary complications, shorten hospital stay, and reduce the incidence of chest wall deformity, which is conducive to rapid recovery and improves quality of life.
Objective To investigate whether an internet-based neck-specific training program can alleviate pain and disability in participants with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Methods Patients diagnosed with CSR at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between March 2022 and September 2022 were randomly allocated to either an telehabilitation group or a traditional treatment group. The primary outcome measures included Visual Analogue Scale, Neck Disability Index, and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcome measures included the Euroqol group’s 5-Domain questionnaire, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Tanaka Jingjiu cervical spondylosis symptom scale (20 points) and satisfaction. Quantitative outcome measures were collected at baseline, 12th and 24th weeks after the first intervention, while qualitative outcome measures were collected at 24th weeks after the first intervention. Results A total of 90 patients were included, with 45 in each group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender and other demography characteristics and general data (P>0.05). There is no interaction effect (group × time) for the Tanaka Jingjiu cervical spondylosis symptom scale (20 points) (P>0.05), the interaction effects (group × time) for other quantitative outcome measures were statistically significant (P<0.05). The time effect showed significant statistical differences across all quantitative outcome measures (P<0.001), while the group effect did not exhibit any significant statistical differences (P>0.05). The comparison results within the group showed that at different time points, the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.001). There were no significant statistical differences between the two groups in terms of qualitative outcome measures (P>0.05) . Conclusions An internet-based neck-specific training program or traditional treatment for 12 weeks can effectively reduce pain and disability among CSR patients, with significant long-term effects. There was no significant difference in treatment effectiveness between the two groups.