1. |
Horton R. Surgical research or comic opera: Questions, but few answers. Lancet, 1996, 347(9007): 984-985.
|
2. |
McCulloch P, Feinberg J, Philippou Y, et al. Progress in clinical research in surgery and IDEAL. Lancet, 2018, 392(10141): 88-94.
|
3. |
Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, et al. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet, 2009, 374(9695): 1097-1104.
|
4. |
McCulloch P, Cook JA, Altman DG, et al. IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: The idea and development stages. BMJ, 2013, 346: f3012.
|
5. |
Ergina PL, Barkun JS, McCulloch P, et al. IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: Observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages. BMJ, 2013, 346: f3011.
|
6. |
Cook JA, McCulloch P, Blazeby JM, et al. IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: Randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage. BMJ, 2013, 346: f2820.
|
7. |
Hirst A, Philippou Y, Blazeby J, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: Evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(2): 211-220.
|
8. |
喻佳洁, 陕飞, Peter McCulloch, 等. 外科创新技术/器械临床研究方法学—临床研究方框架与推荐系列文章之一: IDEAL框架与推荐介绍. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2021, 28(2): 131-136.
|
9. |
喻佳洁, Allison Hirst, Peter McCulloch, 等. 外科创新技术/器械临床研究方法学—IDEAL 框架与推荐系列文章之二: IDEAL 报告规范解读. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2021, 28(3): 263-270.
|
10. |
Pennell CP, Hirst AD, Campbell WB, et al. Practical guide to the Idea, Development and Exploration stages of the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations. Br J Surg, 2016, 103(5): 607-615.
|
11. |
Elsanousi OM, Mohamed MA, Salim FH, et al. Selective devascularization treatment for large hepatocellular carcinoma: Stage 2A IDEAL prospective case series. Int J Surg, 2019, 68: 134-141.
|
12. |
Park YK, Song SK, Kim BW, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular invasion in tumor stage for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol, 2017, 15(1): 225.
|
13. |
Powerski MJ, Erxleben C, Scheurig-Münkler C, et al. Hepatopulmonary shunting in patients with primary and secondary liver tumors scheduled for radioembolization. Eur J Radiol, 2015, 84(2): 201-207.
|
14. |
Metcalfe C, Avery K, Berrisford R, et al. Comparing open and minimally invasive surgical procedures for oesophagectomy in the treatment of cancer: The ROMIO (Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) feasibility study and pilot trial. Health Technol Assess, 2016, 20(48): 1-68.
|
15. |
Blencowe NS, Strong S, McNair AG, et al. Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after oesophagectomy: A systematic review. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(4): 658-666.
|
16. |
Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir, 2009, 64(2): 135-146.
|
17. |
Avery KNL, Metcalfe C, Berrisford RG, et al. The feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer—The ROMIO (Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) study: Protocol for a randomized controlled trialsive or Open) study: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 2014, 15: 200-209.
|
18. |
de Salis I, Tomlin Z, Toerien M, et al. Qualitative research to improve RCT recruitment: Issues arising in establishing research collaborations. Contemp Clin Trials, 2008, 29(5): 663-670.
|
19. |
Sarker S, Chang A, Albrani T, et al. Contructing hierarchical task analysis in surgery. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(1): 107-111.
|
20. |
Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials. URL: https://www.comet-initiative.org/. Accessed on 2021-07-09.
|