ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between O-EA angle and lower cervical curvature in patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation undergoing occipitocervical fusion, and to analyze the effect of O-EA angle on lower cervical curvature.MethodsThe clinical data of 61 patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation undergoing occipitocervical fusion who were admitted between April 2010 and July 2018 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. There were 32 males and 29 females, with an age of 14-76 years (mean, 50.7 years). The fixed segment included 19 cases of C0-C2, 27 cases of C0-C3, 14 cases of C0-C4, and 1 case of C0-C5. The O-EA angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, and T1 tilt angle were measured before operation and at last follow-up. According to the O-EA angle measured at last follow-up, the patients were divided into <95° group (group A), 95°-105° group (group B), and >105° group (group C), and compared the differences of gender, age, fixed segment (short segment was at C3 and above, long segment was beyond C3), and C2-7 Cobb angle. Correlation analysis between the O-EA angle and C2-7 Cobb angle before operation and at last follow-up, as well as the changes of O-EA angle and C2-7 Cobb angle between before operation and at last follow-up were analyzed.ResultsAll 61 patients were followed up 12-24 months, with an average of 22.4 months. There was no significant difference in O-EA angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, and T1 tilt angle before operation and at last follow-up (P>0.05). According to the last follow-up O-EA angle grouping, there were 14 cases in group A, 29 cases in group B, and 18 cases in group C. There was no significant difference in age, gender composition, and fixed segment composition among the three groups (P>0.05); the differences in C2-7 Cobb angles among the three groups were significant (P<0.05), groups A, B, and C showed a gradually increasing trend. The O-EA angle was positively correlated with C2-7 Cobb angle before operation and at last follow-up (r=0.572, P=0.000; r=0.618, P=0.000); O-EA angle change at last follow-up was also positively correlated with C2-7 Cobb change (r=0.446, P=0.000).ConclusionThe O-EA angle of patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation is positively correlated with C2-7 Cobb angle. Too large O-EA angle should be avoided during occipitocervical fixation, otherwise it may accelerate the degeneration of the lower cervical spine.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate surgical reconstruction of stability of lower cervical spine in children suffering trauma, tuberculosis and tumor. METHODS: From January 1998 to September 2001, 8 cases of unstable lower cervical spine were treated by operations, of anterior decompression, massive iliac bone grafting, posterior fixation with spinous process tension band wiring, and fusion with heterogeneous iliac bone grafting. RESULTS: With an average following up of 1 year and 9 months (6 months to 4 years and 3 months), 3 cases recovered excellently, 4 cases recovered well and 1 case died of pulmonary infection. CONCLUSION: The above results indicate that anterior decompression, massive iliac bone grafting, posterior fixation with spinous process tension band wiring and fusion with heterogeneous iliac bone grafting can be used as one of the methods to reconstruct the stability of lower cervical spine in children.
Objective To discuss the selection of anterior or posterior or a combination of anterior and posterior surgical treatment of lower cervical dislocation. Methods A retrospectively study was performed on 28 patients with lower cervical dislocation who received operative treatment between January 2005 and October 2008. There were 19 males and 9 femaleswith an average age of 38 years (range, 19-57 years), including 21 cases of fresh dislocation and 7 cases of old dislocation. The time from injury to hospitalization was 3 hours to 58 days. According to Allen classification, all cases had flexion injury, including 19 cases of degree I dislocation, 2 cases of degree II, 5 cases of degree III, and 2 cases of degree IV. At admission according to Frankel classification, 7 cases were rated as grade A, 4 as grade B, 9 as grade C, 3 as grade D, and 5 as grade E. All patients received open reduction, internal fixation, and il iac bone graft spinal fusion. Of them, combined anterior and posterior approach operation were given in 4 cases, single anterior operation in 22 cases, and single posterior operation in 2 cases. Results All operations were completed successfully and the spinal cord injury did not deteriorate after operation. Esophageal fistula occurred in 1 case receiving anterior approach operation and was cured after 1 month. Infection of wound occurred in 1 case and was cured after dressing change. The other incisions healed by first intention. One case (Frankel grade A) died of pulmonary infection 6 weeks after operation. Twenty-seven patients were followed up 21-38 months. Two cases suffered from shoulder pain 12 months after operation. X-ray films showed complete reduction, normal height of vertebral space and normal sequence of cervical spine after operation. All cases obtained bone fusion after 3.5-6.0 months of operation (4.2 months on average). Frankel grades were improved in different degrees after operation. Conclusion The operation plan of lower cervical dislocation should be determined by the neurologic status of the patient, and the classification of the injury as a unilateral or bilateral dislocation. Anterior cervical discectomy, fusion, and fixation were available in the lower cervical dislocation.
ObjectiveTo observe the in vivo three-dimensional (3-D) transient motion characteristics of the subaxial cervical spine in healthy adults. MethodsSeventeen healthy volunteers without cervical spine related diseases were recruited for this study, including 8 males and 9 females with a mean age of 26 years (range, 23-41 years). The vertebral segment motion of each subject was reconstructed with CT, and Rhinoceros 4.0 solid modeling software were used for 3-D reconstruction model of the subaxial cervical spine. In vivo cervical vertebral motion in flexionextension, left and right bending, left and right rotation was observed with dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS). Coordinate systems were established at the vertebral center of C3-7 to obtain the intervertebral range of motion (ROM) and displacement at C3, 4, C4, 5, C5, 6, and C6, 7. The X-axis pointed to the left along the coronal plane, the Y-axis pointed to the back along the sagittal plane, and the Z-axis perpendicular to the X-Y plane pointed to the head. The ROM along X, Y, and Z axises were represented by rotation in flexion-extension (α), in left-right bending (β), and in left-right twisting (γ) respectively, and the displacement in left-right direction (x), in anterior-posterior direction (y), and in proximaldistal direction (z), respectively. ResultsIn flexion and extension, the displacement in anterior-posterior direction of C6, 7 was significantly less that of other segments (P<0.05), but the displacements in left-right direction and in proximaldistal direction showed no significant difference between segments (P>0.05); the ROM values in flexion-extension of C4, 5 and C5, 6 were significantly larger than those of C3, 4 and C6, 7 (P<0.05), and the ROM value in left-right twisting of C4, 5 was significantly larger than those of C5, 6 and C6, 7 (P<0.05), but the ROM value in left-right bending showed no significant difference between segments (P>0.05). In left and right bending, there was no significant difference in the displacement between other segments (P>0.05) except that the displacement in anterior-posterior direction of C3, 4 was significantly larger than that of C4, 5 (P<0.05), and that the displacement in proximal-distal direction of C6, 7 was significantly less than that of C3, 4 and C4, 5 (P<0.05); no significant difference was shown in the ROM value between segments (P>0.05), except that the ROM value in left-right twisting of C3, 4 was significantly larger than that of C5, 6 and C6, 7 (P<0.05). In left and right rotation, the ROM value in left-right twisting of C3, 4 was significantly larger than that of C4, 5 and C6, 7 (P<0.05), and the displacement and ROM value showed no significant differece between other segments (P>0.05). ConclusionThe intervertebral motions of the cervical spine show different characters at different levels. And the 6-degree-of-freedom data of the cervical vertebrae are obtained, these data may provide new information for the in vivo kinematics of the cervical spine.
Objective To establ ish sophisticated three-dimensional finite element model of the lower cervical spine and reconstruct lower cervical model by different fixation systems after three-column injury, and to research the stress distribution of the internal fixation reconstructed by different techniques. Methods The CT scan deta were obtained from a 27-year-old normal male volunteer. Mimics 10.01, Geomagic Studio10.0, HyperMesh10.0, and Abaqus 6.9.1 softwares were usedto obtain the intact model (C3-7), the model after three-column injury, and the models of reconstructing the lower cervical spine after three-column injury through different fixation systems, namely lateral mass screw fixation (LSF) and transarticular screw fixation (TSF). The skull load of 75 N and torsion preload of 1.0 N•m were simulated on the surface of C3. Under conditions of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation, the Von Mises stress distribution regularity of internal fixation system was evaluated. Results The intact model of C3-7 was successfully establ ished, which consisted of 177 944 elements and 35 668 nodes. The results of the biomechanic study agreed well with the available cadaveric experimental data, suggesting that they were accord with normal human body parameters and could be used in the experimental research. The finite element models of the lower cervical spine reconstruction after three-column injury were establ ished. The stress concentrated on the connection between rod and screw in LSF and on the middle part of screw in TSF. The peak values of Von Mises stress in TSF were higher than those in LSF under all conditions. Conclusion For the reconstruction of lower cervical spine, TSF has higher risk of screw breakage than LSF.
This study aims to develop and validate a three-dimensional finite element model of inferior cervical spinal segments C4-7 of a healthy volunteer, and to provide a computational platform for investigating the biomechanical mechanism of treating cervical vertebra disease with Traditional Chinese Traumotology Manipulation (TCTM). A series of computed tomography (CT) images of C4-7 segments were processed to establish the finite element model using softwares Mimics 17.0, Geromagic12.0, and Abaqus 6.13. A reference point (RP) was created on the endplate of C4 and coupled with all nodes of C4. All loads (±0.5, ±1, ±1.5 and ±2 Nm) were added to the RP for the six simulations (flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation). Then, the range of motion of each segment was calculated and compared with experimental measurements of in vitro studies. On the other hand, 1 Nm moment was loaded on the model to observe the main stress regions of the model in different status. We successfully established a detail model of inferior cervical spinal segments C4-7 of a healthy volunteer with 591 459 elements and 121 446 nodes which contains the structure of the vertebra, intervertebral discs, ligaments and facet joints. The model showed an accordance result after the comparison with the in vitro studies in the six simulations. Moreover, the main stress region occurred on the model could reflect the main stress distribution of normal human cervical spine. The model is accurate and realistic which is consistent with the biomechanical properties of the cervical spine. The model can be used to explore the biomechanical mechanism of treating cervical vertebra disease with TCTM.
ObjectiveTo introduce and interpret ABCD classification system for subaxial cervical spine injury. MethodsThe literature related to subaxial cervical spine injury classification system was extensively reviewed, analyzed, and summarized so as to introduce the ABCD classification system. ResultsThe ABCD classification system for subaxial cervical spine injury consists of 3 parts. The first part of the proposed classification is an anatomical descri ption of the injury; it del ivers the information whether injury is bony, ligamentous, or a combined one. The second part is the classification of nerve function, spinal stenosis, and spinal instabil ity. The last part is optional and denotes radiological examination which is used to define injury type. Several letters have been used for simplicity to del iver the largest amount of information. And a treatment algorithm based on the proposed classification is suggested. ConclusionThe ABCD classification system is proposed for simplification. However further evaluation of this classification is needed.