Objective To assess the clinical efficacy of stroke unit (SU) of integrated traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine in the treatment of acute cerebral stroke. Methods Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs or q-RCTs) were identified from CBM (1978-2009), CNKI (1994-2009), VIP (1989-2009), PubMed (1966-2009), MEDLINE (1978-2009), Scifinder (1998-2009), and The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2009), and relevant journals from Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were also hand searched. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently with a designed extraction form. RevMan5.0.23 software was used for data analyses. Results A total of 12 RCTs and q-RCTs involving 2 316 patients were included. Meta-analyses showed that, stroke unit of integrated traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine was superior to general medicine treatment (Plt;0.05) in case fatality rate one month after stroke (RR= 0.34, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.54), discharge NIHSS score (WMD= –1.01, 95%CI –1.52 to –0.51) and discharge OHS score (WMD= –0.48, 95%CI –0.78 to –0.18); and it was superior to SU of western medicine (Plt;0.05) in NIHSS score one week after stroke (WMD= –2.38, 95%CI –4.08 to –0.68), NIHSS score one month after stroke (WMD= –1.52, 95%CI –2.32 to –0.73) NIHSS score three months after stroke (WMD= –1.77, 95%CI –2.59 to –0.95), difference value of NIHSS score of hospital admission and discharge (WMD= –1.94, 95%CI –2.54 to –1.34), OHS score one month after stroke (WMD= –0.56, 95%CI –0.95 to –0.17) and OHS score three months after stroke (WMD= –1.05, 95%CI –1.44 to –0.66). Conclusion The current limited evidence shows that there is a significant difference between stroke unit of integrated traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine and general medicine treatment. Although there is no significant difference compared with SU of western medicine, it is superior in improving the functional impairment of nerve as well as disability of injury. More large-scale RCTs with high quality are required to verify the effect of stroke unit of integrated traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine in the treatment of acute cerebral stroke.
Clinical practice guidelines need to be based on evidence, but traditional Chinese medicine, especially integration of traditional Chinese and Western medicine guidelines, inevitably need to combine clinical research evidence, ancient literature, and expert experience and consensus. In the process of formulating, there are deviations in understanding and application of the expert consensus method and expert experience, resulting in opaque of the recommendations, unclear of the details of the diagnosis and treatment strategy, less prominent of the advantages and value of traditional Chinese medicine, which affects the scientificity, transparency, applicability, promotion and application of the guidelines of traditional Chinese medicine or integration of traditional Chinese and Western medicine. This study discusses the guiding principle of "evidence as a core, consensus as a supplement, and experience as a reference" that was generally followed and puts forward detailed methodological suggestions to the formulation of guidelines for traditional Chinese medicine and integration of traditional Chinese and Western medicine.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to revise the perioperative recovery scale for integrative medicine (PRSIM) based on item response theory (IRT). MethodsUnder the guidance of IRT, a total of 349 patient data collected during the development of the original version of PRSIM at Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine were used. Principal component analysis was performed using SPSS 18.0 software to test the unidimensionality. The R language was utilized for parameter estimation, including discrimination coefficient, difficulty parameters and information content, as well as drawing item characteristic curves to assess item quality and estimate item functioning differences. A comprehensive screening process was carried out by combining expert consultations, patient evaluations, and discussions within a core group. ResultsThe degree of discrimination of all items ranged from −0.535 to 2.195. The difficulty coefficient ranged from −10.343 to 5.461, and the average information content of all items ranged from 0.043 to 1.075. Based on the criteria for parameter selection, nine items were retained. The results of expert consultations indicated the removal of 5 items and the modification of 7 items. After discussion within the core group, a final decision was made to remove 5 items. ConclusionBased on a synthesis of IRT and expert consultation feedback, and following discussions within the core group, a revised version comprising 15 items is retained and modified from the original 20 items.
Integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine has been used to treat acute pancreatitis (AP) for more than 50 years. It has become a dominant and specialized disease treated by integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine. After many years of clinical practice, a relatively mature and complete treatment system has been formed. Therefore, it was proposed by the Chinese Society of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, the Chinese Medical Association, and the Chinese Association of Traditional Chinese Medicine to update and formulate the “Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine” (2021) group standards in 2022, and “Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis” finally published. The guideline condenses 25 kinds of important clinical issues, which guide to explain the diagnosis and treatment of AP in detail, focusing on the integration of traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine in the management of AP, such as staging and syndrome differentiation, early fluid therapy, pain management, and organ function support in early stage. The advantages and the timing of early intervention of traditional Chinese medicine in AP are emphasized. This guideline also proposes suggestions on nutritional support, management of causes, treatment of late local complications and infections, as well as prevention of recurrence and follow-up strategies for long-term complications. This paper provides an interpretation of this guideline.
Objective To explore the condition and quality of domestic clinical therapeutic studies on integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine for posthepatitic cirrhosis in recent 30 years. Methods Jadad scale was used to score 121 literatures selected from January 1980 to January 2010 in periodicals of domestic authoritative resources databases, such as CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, and CBM. Systematic reviews were conducted to 39 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) literatures of treating posthepatitic cirrhosis with integrated traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine scored two or more points. Results In 30 years, the main problems existing in domestic posthepatitic cirrhosis clinical research of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine were as follows: the design of clinical RCTs was not strict enough; there was deficiency in the use of blind method; the standardized and uniformed research standard were insufficiency; the sample content was low without specific estimation methods; there was lack of analyses in compliance with cases falling off or without follow-up; and the report of adverse reaction and the quality of life research was neglected. Conclusion Posthepatitic cirrhosis therapy of integrated traditional Chinese and western medical is of “personalized” and “diversified” characteristics. Its therapeutic effects are significantly better than those of pure western medicine and worthy to be popularized in the clinic. However, the quality and level of its clinical scientific research methods still need further improvement.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of combined traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). MethodsA total of 180 KOA patients treated between January 2012 and June 2015 were randomly assigned to 3 groups: Chinese medicine group (group A, n=60) with acupuncture and irradiation therapy of specific electromagnetic wave therapeutic apparatus , western medicine group (group B, n=60) with oral glucosamine hydrochloride tablets and knee joint cavity injection of sodium hyaluronate, and integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine group (group C, n=60) with treatments combining those in both group A and B. The treatment course was 6 weeks. The Western Ontario & McMaster University (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index score and total effective rate were evaluated before treatment and 2 weeks after treatment, end of treatment and 5 months after treatment. ResultsAfter treatment, the average improvement of WOMAC scores in the three groups was significantly different (P ＜ 0.05) . The total effective rate was 78.33% in group A, 83.33% in group B, and 91.67% in group C. The difference of total effective rate between group C and A, and between group C and B was statistically significant (P＜0.05) ; and it was also statistically significant between group A and B (P ＜ 0.05) . There were two cases of adverse reactions in group A, two in group B, and two in group C, and the reactions were all relatively mild without any serious adverse events. ConclusionsChinese medicine and western medicine are both effective and safe for the treatment of KOA. When they are combined, the effect is further enhanced with no increase of adverse reactions.