Infective endocarditis is one of the severest valvar diseases, commonly affecting the mitral valve. Currently, valvuloplasty and replacement are the main surgical options for mitral infective endocarditis. However, the complexity of the infectious lesions has caused a raging debate on which surgical approach offers more benefits. With the development of surgical treatment for endocarditis, mitral valvuloplasty may be a superior solution. It can preserve the integrity of the valve structure, avoiding complications caused by replacement. However, there is a lack of evidence from randomized clinical trials and other evidence-based medical supports. Furthermore, issues regarding the timing of surgery, repair methods, and material choices for mitral valvuloplasty in these patients have not been standardized. Therefore, this article summarizes existing literature to assist clinicians in making appropriate treatment decisions.
ObjectiveTo examine the cause of failure of mitral valve repair. MethodWe retrospectively anal-yzed the clinical data of 89 consecutive patients with non-rheumatic mitral valve diseases who underwent reoperation for failure of mitral valve repair in our hospital from January 2009 through January 2016. There were 54 males and 35 females at age of 36.2±17.4 years. ResultsThere were 16 patients with reoperation of mitral valve repairs and 73 patients of mitral valve replacements. The failure reasons of initial mitral valve repair were technique-related in 63 patients (70.8%) and valve-related in 18 patients (20.2%). Technique-related causes of repair failure included leaflet suture dehiscence (20 patients, 22.5%), edge-to-edge procedure (11 patients, 12.4%), leaflet thickening or retraction (11 patients, 12.4%), ring dehiscence (8 patients, 9.0%), inappropriate annuloplasty (6 patients, 6.7%), incomplete repair (4 patients, 4.5%), and chordal elongation or rupture (3 patients, 3.4%). Median interval since previous repair was 4.0 (0.04-18.0) years for the technique-related failure group, and 9.7 (0.21-35.6) years for valve-related failure group (P < 0.05). ConclusionTechnique-related factors are main causes of repair failure, which include leaflet suture dehiscence, edge-to-edge procedure, and leaflet thickening or retraction. Reoperation for technique-related failure needs to be adopted early.
ObjectiveTo compare short- and medium-term effects of Leonardo da Vinci robot-assisted and traditional mitral valvuloplasty.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 74 patients who underwent mitral valvuloplasty in our hospital from January 2015 to March 2017. The patients were divided into two groups according to the mode of operation: a da Vinci group (n=29, 13 males, 16 females at an average age of 52 years) and a routine group (n=45, 18 males, 27 females at an average age of 53 years). The perioperative data of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsThere was no significant difference in sex, age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), cardiac function (NYHA), hypertension, diabetes, postoperative blood transfusion and postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The tracheal intubation time, ICU retention time, hospital stay time, blood loss and postoperative drainage in the da Vinci group were shorter or less than those in the routine group (P<0.05). The operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic clamping time in the da Vinci group were longer than those in the routine group (P<0.05). Different surgical procedures had no significant effect on left atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and mitral regurgitation (MR) 3 years after operation. There was no interaction between the mode of operation and the time of follow-up. There was no significant difference in echocardiographic evaluation in the same period (P>0.05).ConclusionDa Vinci operation shortens the rehabilitation process of patients compared with traditional surgery. For short- and medium-term follow-up results, there is no difference between Leonardo da Vinci and traditional mitral valve surgeries, and the clinical effect of da Vinci robot-assisted mitral valvuloplasty is satisfactory, which is worthy of further clinical promotion.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of early outcomes of mitral valvuloplasty (MVP)for the treatment of degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR). MethodsClinical data of 132 DMR patients who underwent MVP in Fu Wai Hospital between January 1, 2011 and November 1, 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 114 patients (86.4%)were followed up after discharge with their mean age of 51.21±12.78 years, including 76 males (66.7%). Preoperative risk factors of early outcomes of MVP were analyzed. ResultsAmong those patients, there were 25 patients with atrial fibri-llation (AF)(21.9%). Preoperative ejection fraction was 63.88%±6.93%. Preoperative echocardiography showed left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD)was 31.61±5.51 mm/m2. There were 66 patients (57.9%)with tricuspid regurg-itation, and 34 patients (29.8%)underwent concomitant tricuspid valvuloplasty including 10 patients (8.8%)who received tricuspid annuloplasty rings. Two patients died postoperatively, 2 patients underwent re-operation of mitral valve replacement or MVP respectively. Postoperative echocardiography showed moderate or severe mitral regurgitation in 15 patients. Preoperative risk factors of early outcomes of MVP included AF (36.8% vs. 18.9%, P=0.035), large LVEDD (34.02±3.76 mm/m2 vs. 31.15±5.68 mm/m2, P=0.042)and functional mitral regurgitation (15.8% vs. 1.1%, P=0.007). Multivariate analysis showed greater postoperative LVEDD reduction significantly lowered the incidence of postoperative events (HR 0.002, 95% CI < 0.001-0.570, P=0.031). ConclusionsEnlargement of the left ventricle is an independent preoperative risk factor for early outcomes of MVP for DMR patients. Greater postoperative LVEDD reduction significantly lowers the incidence of postoperative events.
Objective To compare the mid- and long-term clinical results of mitral valve plasty (MVP) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) in the treatment of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). MethodsPatients with FMR who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from 2012 to 2021 were collected. The patients who underwent MVP were divided into a MVP group, and those who underwent MVR into a MVR group. The clinical data and mid-term follow-up efficacy of two groups were compared. Results Finally 236 patients were included. There were 100 patients in the MVP group, including 53 males and 47 females, with an average age of (61.80±8.03) years. There were 136 patients in the MVR group, including 72 males and 64 females, with an average age of (61.29±8.97) years. There was no statistical difference in baseline data between the two groups (P＞0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the extracorporeal circulation time, aortic occlusion time, postoperative hospital and ICU stay, intraoperative blood loss, or hospitalization death (P＞0.05), but the time of mechanical ventilation in the MVP group was significantly shorter than that in the MVR group (P=0.022). The total follow-up rate was 100.0%, the longest follow-up was 10 years, and the average follow-up time was (3.60±2.55) years. There were statistical differences in the left atrial diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic diameter and cardiac function between the two groups compared with those before surgery (P<0.05). The postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction in the MVP group was statistically higher than that before surgery (P=0.002), but there was no statistical difference in the MVR group before and after surgery (P=0.658). The left atrial diameter in the MVP group was reduced compared with the MVR group (P=0.026). The recurrence rate of mitral regurgitation in the MVP group was higher than that in the MVR group, and the difference was statistically significant (10.0% vs. 1.5%, P=0.003). There were 14 deaths in the MVP group and 19 in the MVR group. The cumulative survival rate (P=0.605) and cardiovascular events-free survival rate (P=0.875) were not statistically significant between the two groups by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Conclusion The safety, and mid- and long-term clinical efficacy of MVP in the treatment of FMR patients are better than MVR, and the left atrial and left ventricular diameters are statistically reduced, and cardiac function is statistically improved. However, the surgeon needs to be well aware of the indications for the MVP procedure to reduce the rate of mitral regurgitation recurrence.
Objective To compare the clinical outcomes and safety of minimally invasive and routine mitral valve repair or replacement for patients with single mitral valve disease. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 67 patients with single mitral valve disease （without aortic valve and tricuspid valve lesion or other heart diseases including atrial septal defect） who underwent mitral valve repair or replacement in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University between January and July 2011. The patients were divided into two groups according to different surgical approaches：the minimally invasive surgery group （n=29，8 males and 21 females，age 51.4±9.4 years） underwent minimally invasive mitral valve repair or replacement via right mini-thoractomy；and the routine surgery group （n=38，11 males and 27 females，age 53.6±11.9 years） underwent mitral valve repair or replacement via middle sternotomy. In the minimally invasive surgery group，9 patients underwent mitral valve repair while the other 20 patients underwent mitral valve replacement. And no patient underwent transition to routine operation. In the routine surgery group，15 patients underwent mitral valve repair and 23 patients underwent mitral valve replacement. Clinical outcomes and safety of the operations were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in operation time between the two groups （207.9±18.1 min versus 198.4±27.5 min，P=0.076）. The amount of postoperative drainage （126.7±34.5 ml versus 435.6±87.2 ml，P=0.000） and blood transfusion （red blood cell 1.4±0.8 U versus 2.3±1.1 U，P=0.000；blood plasma 164.3±50.4 ml versus 405.6±68.9 ml，P=0.000） of the minimally invasive surgery group were significantly lower than those of the routine surgery group. The cardiopulmonary bypass time （81.7±23.9 min versus 58.7±13.6 min，P=0.000） and aortic-clamping time （51.6±12.7 min versus 38.4±11.7 min，P=0.000） of the minimally invasive surgery group were significantly longer than those of the routine surgery group. The length of ICU stay （22.5±3.6 h versus 31.7±8.5 h，P=0.000），mechanical ventilation （7.4±3.2 h versus 11.2±5.1 h，P=0.000） and postoperative hospitalization （7.1±1.6 d versus 13.5±2.4 d，P=0.000） of the minimally invasive surgery group were significantly shorter than those of the routine surgery group. There was no statistical difference in postoperative complications between the two groups. Minimally invasive surgery group patients were followed up for 5.3±2.4 months with a follow-up rate of 72.4%（21/29）. Routine surgery group patients were followed up for 5.5±3.8 months with a follow-up rate of 71.0%（27/38）. There was no significant complication during follow-up in both two groups. Conclusion Minimally invasive mitral valve operation via right mini-thoracotomy is effective and safe with a good cosmetic result. Compared with routine operation，patients undergoing minimally invasive operation recover better and faster.
Abstract: Objective To summarize the clinical results of homemade flexible annuloplasty ring in mitral valve repair, in order to discuss the appropriate ring size. Methods Sixtysix patients (55 males,and 11 females with a mean age of 44.62±15.94 years) with mitral insufficiency underwent mitral valve repair with homemade flexible annuloplasty ring from April 2002 to November 2009 in Fu Wai Hospital. In order to choose the ring with an appropriate size, we made and kept to the following principles: if the intercommissural distance was bigger than size 30, we chose a ring 2size smaller; if the measured distance was smaller than size 30, 1size smaller ring would be chosen. Patients were followed by echocardiography to observe the mitral valve function. Results All patients were cured and discharged from the hospital. The results of echocardiography showed mild to moderate regurgitation in 1 patient, mild regurgitation in 11 patients, and normal mitral function or trace regurgitation in the rest 54 patients. Mitral valve forward velocity was 1.40±0.30 m/s with no mitral stenosis or systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the anterior mitral leaflet. Fiftyone patients were followed up from 2 months to 7 years(24.60±25.90 months). The results of echocardiography on 38 patients showed that 1 patient had moderate regurgitation, 5 patients had mild to moderate regurgitation, 9 patients had mild regurgitation and others had normal mitral function or trace regurgitation. For these 38 patients included in the followup study, mitral valve forward velocity was 1.50±0.40 m/s with no mitral stenosis, SAM or left ventricular outlet tract obstruction. During the followup, the left atrium size (43.19±10.48 mm vs. 48.59±9.40 mm, t=4.524, P=0.000) and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (52.64±7.35 mm vs. 6269±8.77 mm, t=7.607, P=0.000) decreased significantly than the preoperative size and diameter respectively. The application of restrictive homemade flexible annuloplasty ring in mitral valve annuloplasty had satisfactory, durable and stable clinical results.