Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of enteral immunonutrition for patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about enteral immunonutrition for patients with acute pancreatitis were searched in following databases: PubMed (1966 to August 2012), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to August 2012), CENTRAL (Issue 3, 2012), CBM (1978 to August 2012), CNKI (1979 August 2012), VIP (1989 to August 2012), and WanFang Data (1977 to August 2012). The relevant materials and each reference of literature were also searched manually. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data and assessed the quality, and then the meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 6 RCTs involving 197 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the enteral immunonutrition group and the routine enteral nutrition group in following aspects: infectious complications and mortality rate, length of stay, level of C-reactive protein and numeration of leucocyte after treatment, and APACHE II score. Conclusion At present, no evidence shows enteral immunutrition is superior to routine enteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis. For the quantity and quality limitation of the included studies, more high-quality and large-sample RCTs are required to investigate the proper ingredients and dosage of enteral immunonutrition suitable for patients with acute pancreatitis.
Objective To systematically review the effects of enteral immunonutrition (EIN) on postoperative infection and the length of hospital stay in patients with gastrointestinal cancer after surgery, in order to provide high quality evidence for the rational perioperation nutrition plan for patients with malignant gastrointestinal tumor. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English about application of EIN vs. general treatment for gastrointestinal surgery published from Jan. 1st, 1997 to Oct. 31st 2012 were retrieved in the following databases: PubMed, Ovid, and EMbase. References of the included studies were also retrieved. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. Results 19 RCTs involving 2 298 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no significant difference between the postoperative EIN group and the control group in reducing the risk of postoperative infection (OR=0.91, 95%CI 0.56 to 1.47, P=0.70); But postoperative and perioperative EIN had reduced the risk of postoperative infection with a significant difference (OR=0.57, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.82, P=0.002; OR=0.52, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.76, P=0.000 9). Additionally, the results of sensitivity analysis revealed that: no matter when EIN was used (during preoperative, postoperative, or perioperative periods), it reduced the length of postoperative hospital stay with significant differences, compared to the standard nutrition group (OR= −2.39, 95%CI −3.28 to −1.49, Plt;0.000 01; OR= −2.42, 95%CI −4.07 to −0.78, P=0.004; OR= −2.76, 95%CI −3.46 to −2.06, Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion Current evidence shows that perioperative EIN can decrease postoperative infection and reduce the length of hospital stay of patients with malignant gastrointestinal tumor. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, high quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To study the effects and mechanisms of major immune nutrients and to introduce the progresses of clinical applications about enteral immunonutrition. Methods The related literatures about the effects and clinical applications of enteral immunonutrition were reviewed. Results Infection rate can be reduced and the hospitalization can be shortened as a result of the improved nutritional status and immune competence of patients which can be enhanced by reasonable enteral immune nutrition. Most of the patients suffering from serious diseases can benefit from enteral immunonutrition, such as gastrointestinal cancers, post-transplantation complications, chronic liver disorders, acute pancreatitis and so on. However, as a new nutrition therapy, the clinical use of enteral immunonutrition in critically ill patients is still controversial. Conclusions Enteral immunonutrition plays an important role in the nutritional support of patients with serious diseases, such as gastrointestinal cancers, organ failures. However, much work remains to be done.
目的 探讨围手术期强化免疫营养素肠内营养支持对胃癌患者免疫功能和营养状况的影响。 方法 将2007年3月－2012年12月间24 例胃癌术后患者随机分为肠内免疫营养组（研究组）和常规肠内营养组（对照组），每组12例，进行等氮等热量营养支持，术前5 d至术后7 d。测定营养支持前后的血清白蛋白、前白蛋白、转铁蛋白、T淋巴细胞亚群及血清免疫球蛋白等指标变化。临床观察胃肠功能恢复时间。 结果 术后两组患者血清蛋白水平和免疫指标多有下降，但研究组术后8 d的血清前白蛋白水平和IgG、CD4/CD8比值较对照组明显增加，研究组胃肠功能恢复时间早于对照组。 结论 围手术期应用强化免疫肠内营养支持可改善胃癌患者术后营养和免疫状况，促进肠道功能恢复。
Objective To study effects of enteral immunonutrition and econutrition on intestinal mucosa barrier function in wounded rats. Methods Forty Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups, with ten rats in each group 〔ie.control group, enteral nutrition (EN) group, enteral immunonutrition (EIN) group and enteral econutrition (EEN) group〕. After gastrostomy, rats in each group were treated with the isocaloric and isonitrogenous nutritional formulas for 7 days, respectively. The morphology of ileum membrane was studied, and the quantities of IgA+, CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells (each HP) of ileum membrane were determined. Results The villus height, crypt depth, mucosal thickness (except EN group) and villus surface area of ileum were increased in EN, EIN and EEN group compared with control group (P＜0.05), but there was no significant difference among the former three groups (Pgt;0.05). The numbers of IgA+, CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells were increased in EN, EIN and EEN group compared with control group (P＜0.05), and those numbers in EN group were lower than those in EIN and EEN group (P＜0.05). Conclusion EIN and EEN may improve intestine mechanical barrier function and promote restoration of small intestine mucous membrane barrier function in rats. EIN and EEN also improve intestine immune barrier function and strengthen its immune function.
Objective To investigate the impact of immunonutrition in organ transplantation.Methods The literatures of recent years on the studies of immunonutrition in organ transplantation were reviewed. Results Immunonutrition including ω-3 fatty acid and special amino acids etc could reduce inflamation and supress immunal response following organ transplantation markably. Conclusion Application of immunonutrition associated with immunosupress could take the place of traditional steroids completely in the treatment following organ transplantation, even shorten clinical course of immunosupress.
ObjectiveTo study the clinical application of enteral microecopharmaceutics immunonutrition in the peroperation of colorectal cancer. MethodsLiteratures about enteral microecopharmaceutics immunonutrition published in China and abroad were collected and reviewed. ResultsEarly clinical application of enteral microecopharmaceutics immunonutrition in the perioperation can greatly improve the nutritional status of patients with colorectal cancer, increase the patients' immune function, reconstruct the intestinal flora, and reduce the incidence of complications. ConclusionsThe clinical application of enteral microecopharmaceutics immunonutrition in the perioperation of colorectal cancer can obviously improve patients' nutritional status and immune function, reduce the stress response, and improve its prognosis, but the use of best dose still need further study.
Malnutrition is associated with many adverse clinical outcomes, including increased deaths and complications in perioperative period. The immunonutrition support plays an important role in the recovery process of patients with nutritional risk. Reasonable support can efficiently improve the condition of these cases and strongly suppress the inflammatory response. The immuno-nutrients include glutamine, ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, arginine, nucleotides and so on. More and more evidences show that different kinds of immuno-nutrients play a regulatory role in metabolism and inflammatory response in patients with different disease stages and courses, and affect clinical outcomes and prognosis. Nowadays, there is an urgent need to standardize immunonutrition support in clinical work. In this paper, the related literatures about immunonutrition in recent years were reviewed. Our goal is to reduce the number of irregularities in the nutrition support practice, and to help nutritional risk patients achieve better clinical outcomes.
ObjectiveTo retrospectively investigate the correlation between tumor immune nutritional indexes and the resectability in patients with pancreatic cancer.MethodsWe selected pancreatic patients with pathological diagnosis who admitted to Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University from January 2015 to December 2018. The clinical data of patients were retrospectively analyzed. Nutritional and inflammatory hematological parameters at one week before operation were carefully collected, the parameters including: the neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, monocyte count, hemoglobin (Hb), platelet count, albumin (Alb), prealbumin (PA), cholesterol, and serum tumor markers (CEA and CA19-9). The ratio of neutrophil count to lymphocyte count (NLR), ratio of platelet count to lymphocyte count (PLR), ratio of lymphocyte count to monocyte count (LMR), prognostic nutrition index (PNI), nutritional risk score (GNIR), and controlled nutritional status score (COUNT) were calculated. The receiver working characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to evaluate the predictive value of various indexes in radical resection of pancreatic cancer.ResultsOf the 55 patients with pancreatic cancer, 22 received radical surgery and 33 did not. There was no significant difference in gender, BMI, neutrophil count, monocyte count, platelet count, hemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin, cholesterol, and tumor location between the radical operation group and the non-radical operation group (P>0.05), but there were significant differences in age, lymphocyte count, CEA, and CA19-9 between the two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the area under the curve (AUC) of neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, monocyte count, hemoglobin, platelet count, albumin, prealbumin, cholesterol, NLR, PLR, LMR, PNI, and GNIR to predict the resectability of pancreatic cancer (P>0.05), but there was statistical significance in COUNT score, CEA, and CA19-9 (P<0.05). The AUC values of COUNT, CEA, and CA19-9 were 0.700, 0.705, and 0.739 respectively, the sensitivity corresponding to the best critical point cutoff value were 59.09%, 80.00%, and 100%, as well as the specificity were 87.88%, 66.67%, and 42.42%, respectively. The specificity of COUNT was high, but the sensitivity was poor. The sensitivity of CEA and CA19-9 were high and the specificity were poor.ConclusionsThe COUNT is a simple and useful predictor to predict the resectability of pancreatic cancer. The combination of COUNT and serum tumor markers of CEA and CA19-9 can help to better predict the surgical indications of pancreatic cancer.