Objective To summarize the outcomes and clinical features for surgical treatment of nonischemic heart valve disease(HVD) combined with coronary artery disease(CAD), so that to get better surgical result. Methods From January 2000 to June 2007, 105 patients with the mean age of 61.96±7.61 years (range 36-79 years), underwent the combined procedures.The etiology of HVD included: 59 rheumatic valve disease, 24 degenerative mitral lesion, 13 calcified aortic valve lesion, and 9 other aortic valve disease. CAD was preoperatively diagnosed by coronary arteriongraphy in 98 patients, and intraoperatively identified in 7 patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 50% or less in 45 patients. The total number of bypass grafts was 216 with the mean of 2.06 grafts per patient. Valve procedures included: 36 mitral valve valve replacement, 15 mitral repair,43 aortic valve replacement, 11 mitral valve and aortic valve replacement. Results There were 6 postoperative deaths with the mortality of 5.7%. The causes of death were 3 low cardiac output syndrome, 2 renal failure, and 1 heart arrest resulting in multiple organs failure. Ninety-three survivals were followed up from 1 month to 7 years, 6 patients were missed on follow-up. There were no late death. New York Heart Association class Ⅰ was observed in 25 patients, class Ⅱ53, class Ⅲ 10 and class Ⅳ 5. One patient still had existential chest pain. Conclusion There were no typical angina in majority of patients with nonischemic HVD combined with CAD, coronary arteriongraphy must be taken in patients with the age of 50 years and more, or with the risk factors for CAD.Intraoperative myocardial protection is very important because CAD further deteriorates myocardial dysfunction caused by HVD.The decreased left ventricular function is the important factor affecting the surgical results and it is hard to evaluate the underlying cause before the operation.
Objective To summarize and analyze the clinical experience and surgical results of re-do coronary artery bypass grafting (Re-CABG) for reconvert coronary artery disease. Methods Eighteen patients who underwent Re-CABG in this hospital between June 2001 and December 2006 were analyzed. There were 15 males and 3 females aged from 65 to 78 years old. Seven patients were in class III angina(CCS) and 11 patients were in class IV. Coronary artery angiography showed stenosis or occlusion of great saphenous vein grafts in 16 patients, occlusion of left internal mammary artery(LIMA) grafts in 2 patients and new significant stenosis of the native coronary artery in 6 patients. All Re-CABG were done through re-sternotomy. Fifteen patients underwent cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB for their Re-CABG and 3 patients underwent off-pump Re-CABG. The concomitant procedures included left ventricular aneurysmectomy in 1 patient, mitral valve repair in 3 patients, combined aortic and mitral valve replacement and carotid endarterectomy in 1 patient. Bilateral IMA were used in 4 patients, LIMA in 12 patients, radial artery in 3 patients, and the rest of the grafts consisted of great and lesser saphenous vein. Results In on-pump Re-CABG, the aortic cross clamp time was 57±26min (range 45 to 112 min), the CPB time was 78±24min (range 66 to 140 min).The mean number of distal anastomosis per patient was 3.11(range 1 to 5). Intraoperative flow study of the grafts by Medi-Stim Butterfly showed a mean flow rate of 27.0±12.5 ml/min with pulsatility index( PI)less than 4.2. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was used in 1 patient who underwent concomitant aortic and mitral valve replacement and carotid endarterectomy. Post-operatively this patient developed renal failure and expired 6 days later. There was no residual angina and peri-operative myocardial infarction in the remain 17 patients.The post-operatively mechanical ventilation time varied from 5 to 15 hours, chest drainage varied from 290 to 1 040ml. Seventeen patients were discharged uneventfully. Follow-up from 6 months to 4.5years in 17 patients showed no evidence of recurrent angina. Postoperative coronary artery angiography in 4 patients showed patent grafts. Conclusion Re-CABG can be performed as safely and effectively as primary CABG in spite of the fact that it is more demanding. Selecting the proper target vessels, satisfactory blood flow of grafts, complete revascularization and proper peri-operative management are all key factors to a successful Re-CABG.
Objective To summarize the essential of perioperative therapy and improve the prognosis of coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） and transmyocardial laser revascularization （TMLR） through analyzing 1405 patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. Methods From May 1997 to January 2006, 1 405 patients were treated in our hospital. On-pump CABG were performed in 825 patients, single CABG were performed in 666 patients, CABG with cardiac valvular operation in 98 patients, CABG with cardiac ventricular aneurysm resection in 55 patients, CABG with ventricular septal defect repairment in 2 patients; CABG with left atrium gelatinous tumor resection in 2 patients, CABG with ascending aorta repairment in 1 patient, and mediastinal septum tumor resection in 1 patient. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting （OPCAB） were performed in 500 patients; single TMLR were performed in 30 patients, CABG＋TMLR were performed in 50 patients. Results The number of bridge vessel was 2.9±1.0. Forty-two patients（3.0%） died of bleeding, myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome, renal failure, multiple organ failure（MOF） and so on. Various complications were occurred in 70 patients（5.0%）, including bleeding, low cardiac output syndrome, myocardial infarction, renal failure and so on. All of them were recovered after treatment. There were 1 177 patients of angina in grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ （CCS） before operation, 1 154 of them （98.0%） changed in grade 0-Ⅰ （CCS） postoperatively. There were 857 patients （62.9%） in follow-up for 8.3±2.9 months postoperatively. There was no angina in 788 patients（91.9%） 6 months after surgery. The ultrasonic graphic showed that left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.66±0.10 and raised 7.9% than that before operation. The quality of life was better than before. Conclusion CABG has become the most potent routine operation in the therapy of coronary artery disease. It can extend the applications of CABG and improve the operative prognosis, if the indications are correctly mastered and the perioperative management are enhanced.
Objective To explore the impact of diabetes on coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） in clinical representations, operative morbidity and mortality in this hospital. Methods Data was collected as a part of prospective registry of CABG through Sep. 2001 to Jul. 2003. Four hundreds and eighty-two patients were recruited. They were divided into diabetic group （n= 135） and non-diabetic group （n=347） depended on if the patients with diabetes or not. All patients were treated with insulin for hyperglycemia. Clinical representations, operative morbidity and mortality in this hospital between two groups were compared by using chi-square tests, t tests and logistic regression. Results Re-exploration in diabetic group was higher than that in non-diabetic group （4.4% vs. 0. 9%; x2= 6. 769, P = 0. 009）. There was no significant difference in the operative morbidity and mortality in hospital between two groups. Multi-variance logistic regression showed that the lower left ventricular ejection fraction （〈 0. 40,OR 15.96）, re-exploration （OR 32. 77） and re-intubation （OR 124.17） were the predictors of perioperative mortality in hospital. Conclusions There are no significant difference in the operative mortality and complication between patients with diabetes and patients with non-diabetes. Strict glucose control in perioperative period would reduce hospital mortality and morbidity.
Technical advances both in cardiac surgery and relating to anesthesia,cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardial protection have significantly improved the prognosis for patients combined with coronary heart disease and heart valve disease. In addition to technology, variable factors that affect operative survival following combined operation include the severity of valvular disease, the number of coronary vessels affected, impairment of left ventricular function and both age and gender differences. In this article, we review the outcome of surgical intervention for heart valve disease combined with coronary heart disease and discuss future prospects in this field.