west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "封闭式负压引流技术" 20 results
  • 封闭式负压引流技术在下肢毁损伤中的应用

    目的 总结封闭式负压引流(vacuum sealing drainage,VSD)技术在下肢毁损伤早期治疗中的应用效果。 方法 2008 年7 月- 12 月,收治13 例下肢毁损伤患者。男10 例,女3 例;年龄4 ~ 40 岁,中位年龄37.3 岁。致伤原因:机器损伤5 例,交通事故伤8 例。软组织缺损范围35 cm × 10 cm ~ 40 cm × 20 cm。下肢损伤程度采用四肢损伤分级标准评分平均10.7 分。伴膝关节周围骨折9 例,股骨中段骨折2 例,胫、腓骨中段骨折2 例。受伤至入院时间为6 ~ 20 h,平均10 h。采用VSD 治疗后,4 例保肢失败,截肢术后创面直接缝合;9 例保肢成功,其中8 例游离植皮修复,1 例采用腓肠神经营养血管蒂皮瓣修复,供区游离植皮修复。 结果 患者应用VSD 治疗 1 ~ 3 次。术后植皮及皮瓣均顺利成活,创面均Ⅰ期愈合。供区切口Ⅰ期愈合,植皮成活。患者均获随访,随访时间10 ~ 17 个月,平均14 个月。植皮创面均愈合良好,未出现破溃、感染。皮瓣色泽正常,无臃肿。X 线片检查示骨折均愈合,愈合时间7 ~ 12 个月。 结 论 VSD 技术可降低下肢毁损伤创面感染几率,促进创面内肉芽生长,为植皮及皮瓣移位修复提供良好的组织条件。

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:48 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 皮肤回植联合封闭式负压引流技术治疗四肢皮肤脱套伤

    目的 总结封闭式负压引流技术(vaccum sealing drainage,VSD)联合一期皮肤回植治疗四肢皮肤脱套伤的临床效果。 方法 2009 年3 月- 2010 年3 月,采用VSD 联合一期皮肤回植修复25 例四肢皮肤脱套伤患者。男16 例,女9 例;年龄9 ~ 53 岁,中位年龄32 岁。致伤原因:交通事故伤19 例,高处坠落伤3 例,重物砸伤3 例。部位:手背3 例,前臂6 例,小腿10 例,足踝及足背 6 例。脱套范围为14 cm × 9 cm ~ 42 cm × 23 cm。合并骨折8 例,血管、神经损伤2 例。受伤至入院时间4 ~ 8 h。 结果  22 例经7 ~ 10 d VSD 治疗后,回植皮肤顺利成活;3 例经VSD 治疗10 d 后仍有点状坏死,经换药后愈合。25 例均获随访,随访时间3 ~ 12 个月,平均9 个月。全厚皮片回植后颜色接近正常皮肤,弹性良好,质地柔软,小腿两点辨别觉2 ~ 3 cm;中厚皮回植后部分颜色发暗,质地较硬,小腿两点辨别觉6 ~ 8 cm。8 例合并骨折者骨折愈合时间3 ~ 8 个月,平均5 个月;1 例尺神经断裂者6 个月后骨间肌萎缩,另1 例血运、感觉、运动均较好。 结 论 急诊VSD 在治疗四肢皮肤脱套伤中能充分引流、均匀加压、改善血循环、促进脱套皮肤成活。

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:42 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • REPAIR OF SKIN AND SOFT TISSUE DEFECTS OF LOWER LIMBS WITH VACUUM SEALING DRAINAGE COMBINED WITH FLAPS

    Objective To explore the feasibil ity, indications, and effects of vacuum seal ing drainage (VSD) combined with flaps for repairing skin and soft tissue defects of lower l imbs. Methods From June 2006 to November 2009, 15 patients with skin and soft tissue defects of lower l imbs were treated with VSD combined with flaps (VSD group, n=5) and only flaps (non-VSD group, n=10). In VSD group, there were 3 males and 2 females with an average age of 46 years (range, 32-69 years), including 3 cases of traffic accident injury, 1 case of skin necrosis after amputation, and 1 case of plate exposureafter operation. The locations were lower leg in 1 case, ankle in 2 cases, dorsum of foot in 1 case, and forefoot in 1 case. The defect size ranged from 6.5 cm × 6.0 cm to 23.0 cm × 17.0 cm. The disease course ranged from 2 hours to 2 months. In non- VSD group, there were 5 males and 5 females with an average age of 50 years (range, 23-58 years), including 6 cases of traffic accident injury, 1 case of crush injury in earthquake, 1 case of osteomyel itis, and 2 cases of plate exposure after operation. The locations were lower leg in 1 case, ankle in 3 cases, forefeet and dorsum of feet in 4 cases, and heel in 2 cases. The defect size ranged from 4 cm × 4 cm to 20 cm × 12 cm. The disease course ranged from 1 hour to 2 months. There was no significant difference in general data between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results In VSD group, the preoperative hospital ization days, postoperative hospital ization days, and total hospital ization days were (11.8 ± 9.5), (35.4 ± 28.3), and (47.2 ± 35.8) days, respectively; the size of flap was (232.8 ± 142.0) cm2; and the infection rate after VSD-use was 0. In non-VSD group, the preoperative hospital ization days, postoperative hospital ization days, and total hospital ization days were (25.8 ± 12.4), (33.9 ± 28.1), and (59.7 ± 32.4) days, respectively; the size of flap was (97.3 ± 93.6) cm2; and the infection rate after 8 to 14 days of regular therapy was 80%. There were significant differences in the preoperative hospital ization days and the size of flap between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). All flaps were al ive except 3 partial necrosis (1 case in VSD group, 2 cases in non-VSD group). The 3 flaps healed by skin grafting and suturing. The donor sites healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 5-41 months (22.1 months on average). All flaps were good in color, texture, and wear abil ity. Conclusion It is effective to apply VSD combined with proper flap to repair skin and soft tissue defects of lower l imbs, which can cut down infection rate, improve blood supply, shorten the preoperative hospital ization days, and facil itate heal ing, but whether it can shorten the postoperative hospital ization days and total hospital ization days need further research.

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:48 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 封闭式负压引流技术联合腓肠神经营养血管皮瓣治疗跟腱部软组织缺损

    目的 总结封闭式负压引流技术(vacuum sealing drainage,VSD)联合腓肠神经营养血管皮瓣治疗跟腱部软组织缺损的临床疗效。 方法 2008 年1 月- 2010 年6 月,收治14 例跟腱中下部软组织缺损患者。男9 例,女5 例;年龄18 ~ 67 岁,平均46 岁。交通事故伤6 例,重物砸伤4 例,炸伤2 例。受伤至入院时间为2 ~ 6 h,平均3.5 h;外院清创缝合后感染致皮肤坏死2 例。软组织缺损部位:跟腱部软组织缺损11 例,其中4 例伴跟腱断裂;跟腱及跟骨结节处软组织缺损3 例。创面范围为3 cm × 3 cm ~ 8 cm × 6 cm。入院后先行VSD 治疗,待创面有新鲜肉芽组织后,采用大小为4.5 cm × 4.0 cm ~ 10 cm × 8 cm 的腓肠神经营养血管皮瓣修复创面。供区直接缝合或植皮修复。 结果 采用VSD 治疗1 次11 例,2 次2 例,3 次1 例。术后第8 天1 例发生皮瓣远端周缘坏死,经换药后10 d 愈合;其余皮瓣及植皮均顺利成活,创面Ⅰ期愈合。患者术后均获随访,随访时间6 ~ 20 个月,平均12 个月。皮瓣外形、质地良好,无臃肿,局部无明显瘢痕挛缩,耐磨性良好。术后6 个月踝关节功能采用美国足踝外科学会(AOFAS)评分系统,获优9 例,良3 例,可1 例,差1 例,优良率为85.7%。 结论 VSD 能有效预防和控制感染,促进肉芽生长,为皮瓣修复提供良好条件;腓肠神经营养血管皮瓣是修复跟腱中下部软组织缺损的有效方法。

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:44 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 封闭式负压引流技术应用于植皮术的临床疗效

    目的 通过与传统打包加压植皮法比较,分析封闭式负压引流技术(vaccum sealing drainage,VSD)应用于骨科植皮手术的临床效果。 方法 2006 年8 月- 2010 年6 月,收治106 例四肢各种组织损伤合并皮肤缺损者,其中57 例采用VSD 联合植皮术治疗(试验组),49 例采用传统打包加压植皮法治疗(对照组)。试验组:男31 例,女26例;年龄18 ~ 52 岁,平均35.6 岁;植皮部位:上臂1 例,前臂8 例,手背8 例,大腿3 例,小腿25 例,足踝12 例;创面范围7 cm × 6 cm ~ 25 cm × 20 cm;伤后至植皮术时间8 ~ 26 d,平均12.7 d。对照组:男28 例,女21 例;年龄16 ~ 59 岁,平均38.3 岁;植皮部位:上臂1 例,前臂5 例,手背7 例,大腿2 例,小腿25 例,足踝9 例;创面范围5 cm × 5 cm ~ 15 cm ×13 cm;伤后至植皮术时间7 ~ 38 d,平均14.6 d。两组患者一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P gt; 0.05),具有可比性。 结果 试验组:术后植皮均成活,成活率100%;植皮愈合时间(8.8 ± 3.2)d。对照组:术后9 d 11 例出现皮片局部感染,5 例出现皮片缺血性坏死,成活率67.3%;植皮愈合时间(15.9 ± 5.8)d。两组植皮成活率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=19.440,P=0.000);植皮愈合时间比较,差异有统计学意义(t=1.730,P=0.000)。患者均获随访,随访时间3 ~ 18 个月, 平 均7.6 个月。试验组植皮区外观良好,瘢痕组织较对照组少。 结论 VSD 可使皮片与创面充分、紧密接触,加压均匀,提高了植皮术后皮片成活率。

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:42 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • TREATMENT OF TIBIAL TRAUMATIC OSTEOMYELITIS WITH VACUUM SEALING DRAINAGE COMBINED WITH OPEN BONE GRAFT

    ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) combined with open bone graft for tibial traumatic osteomyelitis. MethodsBetween June 2007 and December 2012, 23 cases of tibial traumatic osteomyelitis were treated, including 15 males and 8 females with an average age of 32.5 years (range, 22-48 years). The time from injury to admission was 7-18 months (mean, 8.6 months). There was local bone scarring in 15 cases, the size ranged from 8 cm×4 cm to 15 cm×8 cm. The CT multi-planar reconstruction was carried out preoperatively. Eleven cases had segmental bone sclerosis with a length of 1.5 to 3.8 cm (mean, 2.6 cm); 12 cases had partial bone sclerosis with a range of 1/3 to 2/3 of the bone diameter. On the basis of complete debridement, infection was controlled by VSD; bone defect was repaired by VSD combined with open bone graft. After there was fresh granulation tissue, the wound was repaired by free skin graft or local skin flap transfer. ResultsNail infection occurred in 2 cases, which was cured after the use of antibiotics. The wound healed at the first stage after repairing. All cases were followed up 10-18 months (mean, 13.5 months). In 11 cases of segmental bone sclerosis, the infection control time was 7-14 days (mean, 8.8 days); the bone healing time was 32-40 weeks (mean, 34.4 weeks); and the frequency of VSD was 3-6 times (mean, 4.5 times). In 12 cases of partial bone sclerosis, the infection control time was 7-12 days (mean, 8.3 days); the bone healing time was 24-31 weeks (mean, 27.3 weeks); and the frequency of VSD was 3-5 times (mean, 3.6 times). Infection recurred in 1 case, and the patient gave up the therapy. No infection recurrence was observed in the other patients. ConclusionThe VSD combined with open bone graft is an effective method for the treatment of tibial traumatic osteomyelitis.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Treatment OF OPEN TILE TYPE C PELVIC FRACTURES BY OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION THROUGH ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR APPROACHES AT EARLY STAGE

    ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of open reduction and internal fixation through anterior and posterior approaches in treatment of open Tile type C pelvic fractures at early stage. MethodsBetween January 2009 and April 2012, 12 patients with open Tile C pelvic fractures were treated. There were 7 males and 5 females, aged 6-53 years (median, 31 years). Of 12 cases, 4 were classified as Tile type C1, 6 as Tile type C2, and 2 as Tile type C3; 5 were rated as Gustilo type Ⅱ and 7 as Gustilo type Ⅲ. The injury severity score was 18-57 (mean, 37.2). The interval of injury and admission ranged from 15 minutes to 3 days (median, 50 minutes). The debridement and external fixation were performed at first stage; then open reduction and internal fixation were used through anterior approach (reconstruction plate) and posterior approach (cannulated lag screws). The vacuum sealing drainage was performed during treatment until the wounds healed. ResultsDelayed healing of incison was obtained in 12 cases because of wound infection. Anatomical reduction or approximate anatomical reduction was achieved in all 12 cases. The patients were followed up 3-39 months (median, 18 months). No loosening of internal fixation or fracture displacement was observed during follow-up. The fracture healing time was 7-13 weeks (mean, 9.7 weeks). At last follow-up, according to the Matta standard, the outcome was excellent in 10 cases and good in 2 cases; according to Majeed score, the results were excellent in 9 cases, good in 1, and poor in 2. ConclusionEarly internal fixation operation of open Tile type C pelvic fractures can effectively restore the pelvic anatomical structure and stability, reduce the complication, and achieve satisfactory effectiveness.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 改良封闭式负压引流技术在骨科创面治疗中的应用

    【摘 要】 目的 通过与常规封闭式负压引流技术(vacuum sealing drainage,VSD)进行比较,探讨改良VSD在骨科创面治疗中的优越性。 方法 2008年3月-2010年4月,共治疗37例42处创面,其中17例20处创面采用常规VSD治疗(常规组);20例22处采用改良VSD治疗(改良组),即在常规VSD敷料中加入1根冲洗管,进行持续灌注冲洗。两组患者性别、年龄、病程、创面部位及创面范围等一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P gt; 0.05),具有可比性。 结果 改良组泡沫敷料维持时间较常规组长(t=2.70,P=0.01)。常规组术后15例(88%)进行注射器冲管,改良组仅1例(5%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.80,P=0.04)。改良组术后更换泡沫敷料次数为(1.0 ± 0.1)次,较常规组(2.2 ± 0.6)次少(t=2.90,P=0.01)。改良组费用为(6 330 ± 550)元,较常规组(12 990 ± 1 120)元少(t=2.70,P=0.01)。 结论 改良VSD延长了泡沫敷料使用时间,减少了患者更换敷料的次数,降低了治疗费用。

    Release date:2016-08-31 04:21 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • EFFECTIVENESS OF VACUUM SEALING DRAINAGE COMBINED WITH ANTI-TAKEN SKIN GRAFT FORPRIMARY CLOSING OF OPEN AMPUTATION WOUND

    Objective To observe the effectiveness of vacuum seal ing drainage (VSD) combined with anti-takenskin graft on open amputation wound by comparing with direct anti-taken skin graft. Methods Between March 2005 andJune 2010, 60 cases of amputation wounds for limbs open fractures were selected by using the random single-blind method.The amputation wounds were treated with VSD combined with anti-taken skin graft (test group, n=30) and direct anti-takenskin graft (control group, n=30). No significant difference was found in age, gender, injury cause, amputation level, defect size,preoperative albumin index, or injury time between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). In test group, the redundant stump skin was usedto prepare reattached staggered-meshed middle-thickness skin flap by using a drum dermatome deal ing after amputation,which was transplanted amputation wounds, and then the skin surface was covered with VSD for continuous negative pressuredrainage for 7-10 days. In control group, wounds were covered by anti-taken thickness skin flap directly after amputation, andconventional dress changing was given. Results To observe the survival condition of the skin graft in test group, the VSDdevice was removed at 8 days after operation. The skin graft survival rate, wound infection rate, reamputation rate, times ofdressing change, and the hospital ization days in test group were significantly better than those in control group [ 90.0% vs.63.3%, 3.3% vs. 20.0%, 0 vs. 13.3%, (2.0 ± 0.5) times vs. (8.0 ± 1.5) times, and (12.0 ± 2.6) days vs. (18.0 ± 3.2) days, respectively](P lt; 0.05). The patients were followed up 1-3 years with an average of 2 years. At last follow-up, the scar area and grading, and twopointdiscrimination of wound in test group were better than those in control group, showing significant differences (P lt; 0.05).No obvious swelling occurred at the residual limbs in 2 groups. The limb pain incidence and the residual limb length were betterin test group than those in control group (P lt; 0.05). Whereas, no significant difference was found in the shape of the residual limbs between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). In comparison with the contralateral limbs, the muscle had disuse atrophy and decreasedstrength in residual limbs of 2 groups. There was significant difference in the muscle strength between normal and affected limbs(P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found in affected limbs between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Comparedwith direct anti-taken skin graft on amputation wound, the wound could be closed primarily by using the VSD combined withanti-taken skin graft. At the same time it could achieve better wound drainage, reduce infection rate, promote good adhesion ofwound, improve skin survival rate, and are beneficial to lower the amputation level, so it is an ideal way to deal with amputationwound in the phase I.

    Release date:2016-08-31 04:23 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 封闭式负压引流技术联合腓肠神经营养血管逆行岛状皮瓣修复下肢皮肤软组织大面积缺损

    目的 总结封闭式负压引流技术(vacuum sealing drainage,VSD)联合腓肠神经营养血管逆行岛状皮瓣修复下肢皮肤软组织大面积缺损的临床疗效。 方法 2008 年1 月- 7 月,收治25 例下肢皮肤软组织大面积缺损患者。男13 例,女12 例;年龄15 ~ 54 岁,平均34.4 岁。机器绞伤15 例,交通伤9 例,爆炸伤1 例。损伤部位:小腿中下段8 例,踝部4 例,足背部5 例,足跟部及跟腱部8 例。创面范围为9 cm × 4 cm ~ 12 cm × 9 cm。受伤至手术时间为1 ~ 12 h,平均6.2 h。先行VSD 治疗待创面肉芽组织新鲜、感染控制后,采用大小为10 cm × 7 cm ~ 13 cm × 11 cm 的腓肠神经营养血管逆行岛状皮瓣修复创面。供区直接缝合或游离植皮修复。 结果 皮瓣修复术后2 例出现皮瓣切口远端皮缘坏死,1 例静脉危象,经对症处理后成活;其余皮瓣均顺利成活,创面Ⅰ期愈合。供区切口均Ⅰ期愈合,游离植皮成活。25 例均获随访,随访时间11 ~ 14 个月,平均13 个月。皮瓣与周围皮肤色泽相似,无臃肿,质地佳;皮瓣受力处无破溃。 结论 VSD 治疗能降低创面感染几率,为皮瓣修复提供良好组织床。腓肠神经营养血管逆行岛状皮瓣是修复下肢及远端足跟部皮肤软组织缺损的有效方法之一。

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:47 Export PDF Favorites Scan
2 pages Previous 1 2 Next

Format

Content