Objective To introduce the research progress on the relationship between gut microbiota dysbiosis and osteoarthritis (OA), focus on the possible mechanism of gut microbiota dysbiosis promoting OA, and propose a new therapeutic direction. Methods The domestic and foreign research literature on the relationship between gut microbiota dysbiosis and OA was reviewed. The role of the former in the occurrence and development of OA and the new ideas for the treatment of OA were summarized. Results The gut microbiota dysbiosis promotes the development of OA mainly in three aspects. First, the gut microbiota dysbiosis destroys intestinal permeability and causes low-grade inflammation, which aggravate OA. Secondly, the gut microbiota dysbiosis promotes the development of OA through metabolic syndrome. Thirdly, the gut microbiota dysbiosis is involved in the development of OA by regulating the metabolism and transport of trace elements. Studies have shown that improving gut microbiota dysbiosis by taking probiotics and transplanting fecal microbiota can reduce systemic inflammation and regulate metabolic balance, thus treating OA. Conclusion Gut microbiota dysbiosis is closely related to the development of OA, and improving gut microbiota dysbiosis can be an important idea for OA treatment.
Objective To summarize the research progress of bioactive scaffolds in the repair and regeneration of osteoporotic bone defects. Methods Recent literature on bioactive scaffolds for the repair of osteoporotic bone defects was reviewed to summarize various types of bioactive scaffolds and their associated repair methods. Results The application of bioactive scaffolds provides a new idea for the repair and regeneration of osteoporotic bone defects. For example, calcium phosphate ceramics scaffolds, hydrogel scaffolds, three-dimensional (3D)-printed biological scaffolds, metal scaffolds, as well as polymer material scaffolds and bone organoids, have all demonstrated good bone repair-promoting effects. However, in the pathological bone microenvironment of osteoporosis, the function of single-material scaffolds to promote bone regeneration is insufficient. Therefore, the design of bioactive scaffolds must consider multiple factors, including material biocompatibility, mechanical properties, bioactivity, bone conductivity, and osteogenic induction. Furthermore, physical and chemical surface modifications, along with advanced biotechnological approaches, can help to improve the osteogenic microenvironment and promote the differentiation of bone cells. ConclusionWith advancements in technology, the synergistic application of 3D bioprinting, bone organoids technologies, and advanced biotechnologies holds promise for providing more efficient bioactive scaffolds for the repair and regeneration of osteoporotic bone defects.
Objective To summarize the effect of cartilage progenitor cells (CPCs) and microRNA-140 (miR-140) on the repair of osteoarthritic cartilage injury, and analyze their clinical prospects. Methods The recent researches regarding the CPCs, miR-140, and repair of cartilage in osteoarthritis (OA) disease were extensively reviewed and summarized. Results CPCs possess the characteristics of self-proliferation, expression of stem cell markers, and multi-lineage differentiation potential, and their chondrogenic ability is superior to other tissues-derived mesenchymal stem cells. CPCs are closely related to the development of OA, but the autonomic activation and chondrogenic ability of CPCs around the osteoarthritic cartilage lesion cannot meet the requirements of complete cartilage repair. miR-140 specifically express in cartilage, and has the potential to activate CPCs by inhibiting key molecules of Notch signaling pathway and enhance its chondrogenic ability, thus promoting the repair of osteoarthritic cartilage injury. Intra-articular delivery of drugs is one of the main methods of OA treatment, although intra-articular injection of miR-140 has a significant inhibitory effect on cartilage degeneration in rats, it also exhibit some limitations such as non-targeted aggregation, low bioavailability, and rapid clearance. So it is a good application prospect to construct a carrier with good safety, cartilage targeting, and high-efficiency for miR-140 based on articular cartilage characteristics. In addition, CPCs are mainly dispersed in the cartilage surface, while OA cartilage injury also begins from this layer, it is therefore essential to emphasize early intervention of OA. Conclusion miR-140 has the potential to activate CPCs and promote the repair of cartilage injury in early OA, and it is of great clinical significance to further explore the role of miR-140 in OA etiology and to develop new OA treatment strategies based on miR-140.
Objective To introduce the characteristics of tetrahedral framework nucleic acids (tFNA), focusing on its application in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) and relationship with microRNA (miRNA), and prospect the application of tFNA in the treatment of OA and the new idea of constructing miR-tFNA functional complex to treat OA. Methods Recent studies were extensively reviewed to analyze the mechanism of tFNA and its relationship with OA and miRNA. Results tFNA, a new type of new carrier, can not only play an indirect role in the treatment of OA as a small molecular carrier with therapeutic effect, but also play a direct role through the regulation of chondrocytes. It can bind with the miRNA that can regulate OA. The therapeutic effect of constructing tFNA functional complex loaded with miRNA has been verified in various diseases, and tFNA has advantages compared with other vectors. Conclusion tFNA, a novel framework nucleic acid structure, plays an important role in the treatment of OA. Constructing miR-tFNA functional complex may be an innovative idea in the treatment of OA.
ObjectiveTo summarize research progress of change in bone mineral density (BMD) after knee arthroplasty and its diagnostic methods, influencing factors, and drug prevention and treatment.MethodsThe relevant literature at home and abroad was reviewed and summarized from research status of the advantages and disadvantages of BMD assessment methods, the trend of changes in BMD after knee arthroplasty and its influencing factors, and the differences in effectiveness of drugs.ResultsThe central BMD and mean BMD around the prosthesis decrease after knee arthroplasty, which is closely associated with body position, age, weight, daily activities, and the fixation methods, design, and material of prosthesis. Denosumab, bisphosphonates, and teriparatide et al. can decrease BMD loss after knee arthroplasty.ConclusionBMD after knee arthroplasty decreases, which is related to various factors, but the mechanism is unclear. At present, some inhibitors of bone resorption can decrease BMD loss after knee arthroplasty. However, its long-term efficacy remains to be further explored.