ObjectiveTo discuss the risk of abortion related to lamotrigine (LTG) and its safety profile during pregnancy. MethodsRetrospectively studied pregnant women in our epilepsy clinics who took LTG from 2011 to 2015 as monotherapy and experienced embryo damage or abortion. Here, we present an extensive review of related literatures regarding possible mechanisms, clinical features and safty of LTG during pregnancy. ResultsIn our study, fourty-five pregnancies were administered monotherapy LTG, and three of these patients suffered embryo damage. ConclusionsAlthough LTG is considered safe for pregnant women and the embryo or fetus,it also has risk of embryo damage or abortion, which should be carefully considered before prescription. Using monotherapy and the lowest effective drug dose, monitoring LTG serum concentrations during pregnancy, supplementing folate administration before and after conception and conducting regular prenatal diagnostic tests might reduce the risk of abortion.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the association between the level of blocking antibody and recurrent spontaneous abortions.MethodsPubMed, CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched online to collect case-control studies on the association between the level of blocking antibody and recurrent spontaneous abortions from inception to May, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 12 case-control studies involving 3 413 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was a strong association between the blocking antibody negative and recurrent spontaneous abortions with statistical significance (OR=6.10, 95%CI 2.40 to 15.51, P=0.000 1).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the blocking antibody negative is a risk factor for recurrent spontaneous abortions. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
目的:探讨米索前列醇片在初次早早孕(≤42天)人工流产术前应用的可行性、有效性及安全性。方法:将300例初次妊娠,孕周≤6周,拟行人工流产的妇女随机分为口服米索组100例(A组)、阴道放置米索组100例(B组)、未使用米索对照组(C组)。A组术前2h口服米索前列醇片400 μg,B组术前2h阴道放置米索前列醇片400 μg。观察并比较术前用药的两组不良反应发生率、宫颈扩张效果、术中出血量、手术时间及术后宫颈粘连发生情况。结果:B组不良反应发生率低于A组,差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.01);A、B两组间术中宫颈扩张效果、术中出血量、手术时间及术后宫颈粘连发生率差异均无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05),但与C组比较差异有统计学意义。结论:米索前列醇片口服和阴道放药都可作为初次早早孕人工流产术前的给药方法。更推荐不良反应较小的阴道放药。
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of different low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in improving pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent abortion. MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the objectives from inception to July 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 25 RCTs involving 4 631 patients were included. Enoxaparin, dalteparin, nadroparin, and tinzaparin were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that the live birth rate of the tinzaparin was higher than that of enoxaparin and dalteparin. The live birth rate in nadroparin was higher than that in enoxaparin and dalteparin. The cumulative sorting probability showed that tinzaparin ranked best for improving the live birth rate, nadroparin ranked best for reducing the miscarriage rate, and enoxaparin ranked best for reducing the preterm birth rate. ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that tinzaparin and nadroparin may be the best choice for improving pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent abortion. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To investigate the preventive effect of rapid preoxygenation technique on hypoxia caused by respiratory depression during outpatient obstetrics-gynecology operations. Methods According to a computer-generated random sequence, a total of 120 ASA I-II patients undergoing outpatient obstetrics-gynecology operations were randomly allocated into the trial group or the control group, 60 in each group. Patients in the control group received preoxygenation with tidal volume breathing. Patients in the trial group received preoxygenation with eight deep breaths (DB) in 1 min before anesthesia. All patients were induced with midazolam 1 mg, fentanyl 1μg /kg and propofol 2 mg/kg, and were maintained with propofol when needed. The following parameters were observed, including the incidences of respiratory depression and apnea, the onset time of anesthesia, the total doses of propofol as well as the changes in PetCO2 and SpO2. Results No significant differences were observed in demographic characteristics, the onset time of anesthesia, the total doses of propofol, and the incidences of respiratory depression and apnea between the two groups (P gt;0.05). However, the SpO2 in the control group was decreased significantly with a higher incidence of hypoxia (Plt;0.05). Conclusions Rapid preoxygenation technique may increase the oxygen reserves and improve the tolerance to hypoxia. It is effective in avoiding hypoxia caused by respiratory depression and apnea during outpatient obstetrics-gynecology operations.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the association between C677T and A1298C polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene and the risk of unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from inception to May 2015 to collect case-control studies about the association between the MTHFR gene C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and the risk of URSA. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 and Stata 12.0 software. ResultsA total of 42 case-control studies involving 3 970 URSA patients and 5 297 controls were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that MTHFR C677T polymorphism was associated with the increased risk of URSA (T vs. C: OR=1.34, 95% CI 1.16 to1.54, P < 0.000 01; TT vs. TC+CC: OR=1.70, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.12, P < 0.000 01; TT+TC vs. CC: OR=1.34, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.62, P=0.002; TC vs. CC: OR=1.19, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.43, P=0.061; TT vs. CC: OR=1.95, 95% CI 1.48 to 2.56, P < 0.000 01). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity indicated that the MTHFR C677T polymorphism was associated with the increased risk of URSA in east Asians (T vs. C: OR=1.61, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.87, P < 0.000 01; TT vs. TC+CC: OR=2.05, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.71, P < 0.000 01; TT+TC vs. CC: OR=1.76, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.19, P < 0.000 01; TC vs. CC: OR=1.53, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.94, P < 0.000 01; TT vs. CC: OR=2.77, 95% CI 1.94 to 3.97, P < 0.000 01) but was not associated with the increased risk of URSA in Caucasians. The results of meta-analysis also showed that there was no significant association between the MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and the URSA in all population. ConclusionCurrent evidence indicates that significant association is found between MTHFR C677T mutation and URSA in east Asians but not in Caucasians. Further study indicates that women carrying TT or TC gene significantly increases the risk of URSA and TT mutant gene carriers have a higher URSA risk. There is no significant association between MTHFR A1298C mutation and URSA in all population. Due to the quantity and quality limitations of included studies, more high quality case-control or cohort studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.
Objective More and more women without child and female adolescents are undergoing medical abortion (MA), MA effect on subsequent pregnancy has been brought into focus. This research will evaluate the effect of MA on subsequent pregnancy. Methods To searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomed-database, correlative websites and nine Chinese medical journals. The studies that were included in the reference list were additionally searched. Only RCTs (randomized control trials), CCTs (clinical control trials) and prospective cohort studies were included. Two researchers evaluated the quality of the literature and combined the evidence independently. Revman 4.1 was used for meta-analysis. Results Eight prospective cohort studies with 2 934 cases were included. The incidences of miscarriage, postpartum hemorrhage and placental abnormality occurred in MA group were significantly lower than those occurred in SA group, and their OR (with 95%CI) were 0.42 (0.22 to 0.83), 0.58 (0.39 to 0.85) and 0.68 (0.54 to 0.87), respectively. No other significant differences were observed between the two artificial abortions groups. Though the tendency indicates that medical abortion has a probable influence on subsequent pregnancy, there was no significant difference about subsequent pregnancy between MA and first pregnancy. Conclusion Unnecessary abortion should be avoided. MA is safer than SA on subsequent pregnancy, so MA is the preferred option for women without child and female adolescent to terminate their unwilling pregnancy. However, as all the studies included were prospective cohort studies, further high-quality RCTs should be conducted.