ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of probiotics for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) infection in children. MethodsWe electronically searched The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about probiotics for the treatment of H.pylori infection in children from inception to January 2015. The references of included studies and conference proceedings were manually searched for additional studies. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of include studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of twelve RCTs were included, involving 1 227 patients. The result of meta-analysis showed that the probiotics adjuvant therapy group was superior to the control group in H.pylori eradication rates (OR=2.23, 95%CI 1.66 to 2.99, P<0.000 01) and the incidence of adverse effect (OR=0.31, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.53, P<0.000 1). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that probiotics adjuvant therapy may be a new effective and safe solution in the treatment of H.pylori infections in children. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more higher quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Bacterial biofilms are associated with at least 80% of human bacterial infections. The clinical treatment of biofilm infection is still arduous, and therefore many new treatment options are under study, such as probiotics and their derivatives, quorum sensing inhibitors, antimicrobial peptides, phage therapy, organic acids, light therapy, and plant extracts. However, most of these schemes are not mature, and it is important to develop new research directions of anti-biofilms.
目的:評价益生菌在预防和治疗儿童喘息性疾病中的效果。方法:将393例喘息性疾病患儿分为观察组206例,对照组187例,对照组187例常规治疗,观察组206例在对照组187例常规治疗的基础上给予口服双歧杆菌三联活菌肠溶胶囊。结果:观察组治愈时间明显少于对照组,两组比较差异有显著性(Plt;005),观察组总复发率为342%,对照组总复发率为433%,两组比较差异有显著性(Plt;005)。结论:添加益生菌对预防和治疗儿童喘息性疾有积极的效果。
Slow wound healing has been a troublesome problem in clinic. In China, traditional methods such as antibiotics and silver sulfadiazine are used to treat skin wound, but the abuse use has many disadvantages, such as chronic wounds and pathogen resistance. Studies have shown that the microorganisms with symbiotic relationship with organisms have benefits on skin wound. Therefore, the way to develop and utilize probiotics to promote wound healing has become a new research direction. In this paper, we reviewed the studies on the bacteriotherapy in the world, described how the probiotics can play a role in promoting wound healing through local wound and intestine, and introduced some mature probiotics products and clinical trials, aiming to provide foundations for further development of bacteriotherapy and products.
Objective To systematically evaluate the preventative effect of probiotics for infantile eczema and atopic eczema. Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, MEDLINE (Ovid), CENTRAL, CBM and CNKI were searched from inception to February 2012, so as to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on probiotics in preventing infantile eczema and atopic eczema. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, evaluated quality and cross-checked. Then the meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.0 software. Result A total of 15 RCTs involving 3 179 infants were included. The results of meta-analyses on 8 high quality RCTs showed that: the incidence of infantile eczema was lower in the probiotics group than the placebo group, with a significant difference (RD=–0.06, 95%CI –0.10 to –0.03, Plt;0.05). Probiotics had no preventative effect on infantile atopic eczema (RD=–0.02, 95%CI –0.08 to 0.03, Pgt;0.05), and had preventative effects on both high risk population (RD=–0.09, 95%CI –0.15 to –0.03, Plt;0.05) and general population (RD=–0.05, 95%CI –0.10 to 0.00, Plt;0.05) of infantile eczema. Conclusion Probiotics have certain preventative effects on infantile eczema. Due to the differences of probiotics in the aspects such as probiotic strain, dosage, treatment course, etc., its specific effects on infantile eczema and atopic eczema should be further tested.
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in digestive system diseases, but long-term use of PPI may cause Clostridium difficile infection, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and gastrointestinal barrier dysfunction. Probiotics can improve the digestive tract microecological disorder caused by the application of PPI by inhibiting the colonization of bacteria in the intestinal tract, regulating the body’s immunity, reducing the pH value of the intestinal tract, and enhancing the barrier function of the intestinal mucosa. This article elaborates on the influence of PPI on the microecology of the digestive tract and the regulation of probiotics on the microecology of the digestive tract, aiming to provide some ideas for the digestive tract microecological disorders caused by the application of PPI in clinical practice and their intervention strategies.
Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder that affect patients' cognitive function and their mental health, imposing a huge burden on families and society. There are approximately 50 million epilepsy patients worldwide, with a prevalence rate of 4‰~7‰ in China, including about 6 million active epilepsy patients. Although scientists have been devoted to the research and exploration of epilepsy, the causes and pathological mechanisms of epilepsy are still poorly understood. The effectiveness of anti-seizure drugs is limited, and more effective methods is needed. With the deepening of microbiological research, many studies have found significant differences in the composition of the intestinal microbiota of epilepsy patients compared to healthy individuals. Analysis of the intestinal microbiota of epilepsy patients through sequencing has shown significantly lower abundances of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes compared to the normal population. Many related clinical studies have found that adopting a ketogenic diet, taking probiotics orally, using antibiotics, or fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) can effectively control epilepsy by normalizing the intestinal microbiota. Various studies suggest a possible connection between the intestinal microbiota and epilepsy, recognizing that the intestinal microbiota can have an impact on the central nervous system. As a result, gut-brain axisis gradually recognized by scientists. Therefore, the role of the intestinal microbiota in epilepsy is gradually being recognized, and recent clinical studies have confirmed that supplementing probiotics can effectively reduce seizure frequency and improve comorbidities, which may become a new method for treating epilepsy.
目的:探讨益生菌联合营养支持对胃肠外科术后患者肠功能和肠道菌群的影响。方法:36例胃肠道中等以上手术的患者,随机分为研究组和对照组,每组18例。两组术后均接受等氮等能量的营养支持,研究组患者于术后第3天开始每天加用益生菌制剂(6.6 × 10.7 colony forming units),共7天。监测治疗期间患者的胃肠道症状、生命体征、腹泻情况和菌群比例等。结果:两组患者术后腹痛、腹胀、肠鸣音异常等胃肠道症状均无显著差异 (Pgt;0.05),两组患者在术后第8和9天的腹泻比例和腹泻评分差异有显著性意义(Plt;0.05)。治疗结束后,研究组患者肠道双歧杆菌和乳酸杆菌计数均较对照组高,两组间差异有显著性意义(Plt;0.05)。 结论:在胃肠外科术后患者中应用益生菌可改善胃肠道症状、减轻腹泻程度和纠正肠道菌群失调。
Objective To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics in prevention and treatment of bronchial asthma. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of probiotics in prevention/treatment of asthma compared with placebo were searched in PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, OVID and The Cochrane Library published before August 2011. The quality of the included RCTs was evaluated and the data were extracted by two assessors independently. Meta-analyses were performed with RevMan 5.1 software. Results Eleven RCTs on probiotics preventing asthma (n=3 656) and 5 RCTs on probiotics treating asthma (n=430) were identified. The Meta-analyses on preventing asthma showed that probiotics didn’t statistically decease the incidence of asthma (RR=0.76, 95%CI 0.47 to 1.22, P=0.25) and asthma-like wheezing (RR=0.92, 95%CI 0.62 to 1.39, P=0.71) compared with placebo. The Meta-analyses on treating asthma indicated that probiotics could prolong free episodes of asthma (RR=1.48, 95%CI 1.20 to 1.76, Plt;0.000 1) in comparison with placebo. No severe adverse events were found in all included studies. Conclusion The present evidence is not b enough to prove that probiotics is effective to prevent asthma, but it may prolong free episodes of asthma. Although it seems to have the effect on improving lung function, it fails to reduce the acute onset of asthma and has no have the advantage of improving immune function.
Objective To compare the clinical therapeutic effect of probiotic agents in treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) by Meta-analysis. Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched from January 2001 to October 2011, and the domestic conference proceedings and relevant papers published in recent 1 year were also searched manually. All domestic randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on probiotic agents in treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) were collected, which were then selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were extracted, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed, and the Meta-analysis was performed with Revman5.0. Results A total of 11 RCTs involving 1 065 patients were included. The total effective rate of the probiotic agents plus conventional treatment group was superior to that of the conventional treatment (trimebutine meleate/ pinaverium bromide) group (RR=1.26, 95%CI 1.18 to 1.34, Plt;0.000 01), it could effectively relieve abdominal pain (RR=1.10, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.18, P=0.004) and diarrhea (RR=1.15, 95%CI 1.07 to 1.24, P=0.000 3). But there was no significant difference between the two groups in alleviating abdominal distention (RR=1.08, 95%CI 0.95 to 1.24, P=0.25). The effectiveness of probiotic agents used alone was similar to that of the conventional treatment used alone, without significant differences (RR=0.85, 95%CI 0.66 to 1.09, P=0.19). Conclusion Probiotic agents combined with conventional drugs can improve the total therapeutic effect of IBS, especially in alleviating abdominal pain, diarrhea and so on. But the effectiveness of probiotic agents used alone is similar to that of the conventional treatment used alone. For the possibility of bias due to the lower quality of the included studies and unclear implementation of RCTs, this conclusion should be verified with more large-scale and high-quality RCTs.