Objective To explore primary surgical treatment experience of typeⅣ hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Methods From April 2008 to April 2011，20 patients with type Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma were enrolled into the same surgical group in Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University.The intra- and post-operative results were analyzed.Results The total resection rate was 75%，which was consisted of 10 cases of radical excision and 5 cases of non-radical excision.Seven patients received left hepatic trisegmentectomy and caudate lobe resection including anterior and posterior right hepatic duct reconstruction，hepatojejunostomy，and Roux-en-Y jejunojejunostomy.Six patients received enlarged left hepatic trisegmentectomy and caudate lobe resection including left intrahepatic and extrahepatic duct reconstruction，hepatojejunostomy，and Roux-en-Y jejunojejunostomy. Two patients received quadrate lobe resection including two cholangioenterostomies after anterior and posterior right hepatic duct reconstruction，and left intrahepatic and extrahepatic duct reconstruction.After percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage （PTCD） and portal vein embolization （PVE），two patients with total bilirubins ＞400 mmol/L received radical excision and non-radical excision，respectively.Three patients only received PTCD during operation due to wide liver and distant metastasis，and two patients received T tube drainage during operation and postoperative PTCD due to left and right portal vein involvement. All 15 patients who received lesion resection survived more than one year， whereas another five patients whose lesions can not been resec ted only survived from 3 to 6 months with the mean of 4.2 months.No death occurred during the perioperative period. Conclusions For patients with type Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma， preoperative evaluation and tumor resection shall conducted so as to relieve obstruction of biliary tract，otherwise PTCD and PVE prior to the final lesion resection shall be performed.
目的 总结分析普通B超监测引导PTCD方法改进后的优点及经验。方法 用普通B型超声诊断仪，腹部扇扫探头和国产配套的专用PTCD套针及引流管，改进监测引导PTCD的方法，总结分析其方法的优越性。结果 95例梗阻性黄疸患者PTCD成功率为100%，引流效果良好，并发症发生率为零。结论 用改进普通B超监测引导的方法进行PTCD，能克服在X线下进行PTCD的盲目性，对碘过敏者无禁忌，避免了长时间X线对人体的伤害。同时具有定位准确、费时少、成功率高、并发症少、价格便宜、适宜在基层医院推广应用等优点。
ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic efficacy of biliary tract stent placing for malignant obstruction of biliary tract by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). MethodsPTC approach: choosing the expansion intrahepatic bile duct which had a large angle traveling with common bile duct at the ultrasound-guided, we performed bile duct puncture and inserted the drainage pipe into it, then stent was placed with 68 cases (2 cases among the total were failure of ERC approach) after a week drainage. ERC approach: inserting drainage tube into the common bile duct by duodenal endoscopic retrogradely, the angiography showed obstruction site, the guide wire inserted through the obstruction site, then stent was placed along the guide wire with 53 cases. ResultsThe achievement ratio of stent placing by PTC was 100%(68/68), and which by ERC was 96.2%（51/53）. The complications (bleeding, bile leakage) didn’t happen in two groups. 1-18 months (average 12.4 months) of follow-up, the died cases of PTC group and ERC group were 7 and 5 cases within 6 months, respectively; the survive cases of which were 17 and 9 cases after 18 months of treatment, respectively. ConclusionsThe biliary tract stent placing is a safe and effective method to the malignant obstruction of biliary tract patients who can not drainage tube be treated by operation. It can relieve biliary obstruction efficiency, and can increase live time and life quality for patients. We can choose the stent placing method by ERC for cases whose obstruction site is at the inferior of common bile duct or duodenal ampulla, and the cases whose obstruction site is at the above of hepatic porta should be chosen by PTC.
目的 总结超声引导下经皮经肝穿刺胆管引流术(PTCD)的优、缺点,为临床治疗重症急性胆管炎（SAC）提供参考。方法 回顾性分析我院1994年8月至2008年7月期间对156例老年SAC患者行在超声引导下的PTCD治疗的临床资料。结果 156例行PTCD均获成功,1次穿刺成功140例，其成功率达89.7%（140/156）; 16例首次穿刺失败后再次穿刺均成功。无一例发生腹腔出血、胆汁性腹膜炎等并发症。本组引流效果较好,中毒危象缓解，黄疸减退，肝功能改善。结论 PTCD较外科手术创伤小、操作简单、快速,具有微创的特点,对老年、有严重合并症及复杂疾病不能耐受手术及麻醉的SAC患者，其作为紧急抢救措施切实可行,并为后期施行根治性手术争取了时间。
Objective To discuss the value of biliary stent in treatment of malignant biliary obstruction with different pathways of bile duct stent insertion. Methods Fourty-two cases of malignant biliary obstruction whose biliary stent insertions were through operation (n=18), PTCD (n=17) and ERCP (n=7) respectively were reviewed retrospectively. Results The bile duct stents were successfully inserted in all patients through the malignant obstruction and achieved internal biliary drainage. Compared with the level of the bilirubin before operation, it decreased about 100 μmol/L one week after the stent insertion in all patients. Compared with the levels of glutamic oxalacetic transaminase, glutamic pyruvic transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and glutamyltranspeptidase before operation, they decreased 1 week after the stent insertion （Plt;0.05). The median survival time was 22 weeks. The average survival time was (32.89±33.87) weeks. Two patients died in hospital after PTCD, and the mortality was 4.76%. Complications included 8 cases of cholangitis, 3 cases of bile duct hemorrhage and 2 cases of hepatic failure. Conclusion The bile duct stent insertions through operation, PTCD and ERCP are all effective in relieving the bile duct construction with malignant biliary obstruction. Each method should be chosed according to the systemic and local condition for every patient so as to improve the safety and efficiency, and to decrease the occurrence of complications.
目的 观察内镜治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎（ABP）的疗效及其并发症。方法 30例ABP患者在抗炎、抑酶等综合治疗基础上，经内镜（1～3 d 内）逆行胰胆管造影（ERCP）及经内镜十二指肠乳头括约肌切开（EST）或鼻胆管引流（ENBD）等治疗。结果 内镜治疗后22 例（73.3%）轻症急性胆源性胰腺炎（MABP）患者3～5 d 体温恢复正常； 8例（26.7%） 重症急性胆源性胰腺炎（SABP）患者3～8 d 腹部体征好转，血常规、淀粉酶及血生化1~2周内基本恢复，平均住院18.7 d，3例死亡（10.0%）。内镜治疗过程中5例出现十二指肠乳头括约肌切口少量出血，经简单治疗止血，未再出现其他并发症。与同期开腹手术治疗相比较，症状体征缓解、血常规、淀粉酶、血生化恢复正常及住院的时间更短，死亡率无明显差异。结论 ABP早期ERCP 及内镜治疗安全有效。
ObjectiveTo compare clinical effect of biliary metallic stent implantation via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) approaches in treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice. MethodsOne hundred and thirty-six patients with malignant obstructive jaundice who received the biliary metallic stent implantation from June 2010 to June 2015 in this hospital were selected. There were 53 cases via ERCP approach (ERCP group), in which 44 patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice, 9 patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice. There were 83 cases via PTCD approach (PTCD group), in which 24 patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice, 59 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice. The surgical success rate, effective rate, incidence of postoperative complications, hospital stay, and hospitalization expenses were compared in these two groups. Results① The total surgical success rate had no significant difference between the ERCP group and the PTCD group (P > 0.05). The surgical success rate of the patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice had no significant difference between the ERCP group and PTCD group (P > 0.05), which of the patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05). ② The total effective rate had no significant difference between the ERCP group and PTCD group (P > 0.05), which of the patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05), which of the patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05). ③ The hospital stay of the ERCP group was significantly shorter than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05). The hospitalization expenses had no significant difference between the ERCP group and PTCD group (P > 0.05). ④ The total incidence of complications in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05), which of the patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05), which of the patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice in the ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the PTCD group (P < 0.05). ConclusionsThe biliary metallic stent implantation via ERCP and PTCD approaches in treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice could all obtain a better clinical efficacy. It has more advantages in patients with low malignant obstructive jaundice via ERCP approach and in the patients with high malignant obstructive jaundice via PTCD approach.
ObjectiveTo summarize experience of surgical treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. MethodsFrom January 2009 to July 2011, 87 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma were enrolled into the department of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. The intra-and post-operative results were analyzed. ResultsOut of 87 cases, the resection rate was 67.8% (59/87). The radical (R0) resection rate was 48.3% (42/87), R1 resection rate was 11.5% (10/87), palliative (R2) resection rate was 8.0% (7/87). The patients were successfully got through the perioperative period, threre was no operative mortality. 1-year, 3-year, 5-year survival rates of the R0 resection group were 92.9% (39/42), 31.0% (13/42), 19.0% (8/42), respectively. No patient was alive more than 3 years in the groups of R2 resection and internal or external drainage. 1-year and 2-year survival rates of the R1 resection group were 70.0% (7/10) and 20.0% (2/10), respectively. 1-year survival rate of the R2 resection group was 57.1% (4/7). 1-year survival rate of the internal or external drainage group was 35.7% (10/28). 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates of the R1 resection group and R2 resection group were significantly lower than those of the R0 resection group (P<0.05). ConclusionFor hilar cholangiocarcinoma, radical resection is the only method to cure. Preoperative evaluation, percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage so as to relieve obstruction of biliary tract, proper liver resection and intraoperative pathology for resection margin are imperative guarantees lead to radical resection. Palliative resection might prolong survival time and improve quality of life.