Objective To review the latest progress in classification system of thoracolumbar fractures and its surgical treatment with posterior approaches. Methods Recent l iterature about classification system of thoracolumbar fractures and its surgical treatment was reviewed. Results For the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture, the surgeon first should decide whether the surgical treatment was necessary. Recently, a new classification system had been developed to help the surgeon make the right decision. The surgical methods included short segment internal fixation and long segment internalfixation with or without fusion, and minimally invasive internal fixation. Conclusion The progress in the surgical treatmentof thoracolumbar fracture will help spinal surgeon decide the necessary surgery beneficial for the patients. The most appropriate and effective surgical method with the minimum damage should be used to treat the fracture. The advantages of non-fusion surgical treatment still need a further study.
目的:探讨经后路椎弓根钉棒系统内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。方法: 对本组35例胸腰椎骨折行后路椎弓根钉棒系统内固定,其中20例行术中后路减压, 8例经椎弓根行病椎植骨。35例均行关节突及横突间植骨。并测量术前、术后伤椎前后缘平均高度(百分比)和Cobb’s角,椎管截面积.结果: 术后伤椎前后缘平均高度(百分比)和Cobb’s角,椎管截面积各项指标与术前相比较,差异有显著性 (Plt;0.01)。术后随访9~21个月,平均13.2个月。无一例出现神经症状加重,2例出现内固定断裂并完整取出。结论: 经后路椎弓根钉棒系统内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折疗效确切,是治疗胸腰椎骨折的一种创伤小,操作简单,固定可靠的手术方法。
目的 探讨经伤椎椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。 方法 2008年5月－2010年12月，选择38例胸腰椎骨折患者，采用椎弓根螺钉固定伤椎及相邻上下椎体。其中男28例，女10例；年龄21～65岁，平均36.5岁。骨折部位：胸8 1例，胸9 2例，胸10 4例，胸11 8例，胸12 7例，腰1 10例，腰2 4例，腰3 2例。受伤至手术时间3～7 d，平均4.5 d。对患者手术前后椎体高度、矢状面后凸Cobb角、神经功能Frankel分级变化等指标进行测量并随访。 结果 术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合。38例获随访12～18个月，平均15个月。骨折均获得骨性融合，无钉棒断裂、无死亡或神经损伤加重患者。术后神经功能Frankel分级较术前有明显改善（P＜0.05）。术后X线片复查示伤椎高度恢复达90%以上，外形正常；CT复查示椎管内有效矢状径恢复满意，椎管前方无明显骨性压迫，伤椎椎体骨愈合良好。术后1、12个月时伤椎前、后缘高度及后凸Cobb角均较术前显著改善（P＜0.05）；术后12个月随访椎体高度无丢失。 结论 经伤椎椎弓根钉复位、减压、内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折具有创伤小、固定节段少、脊柱稳定性好、能有效矫正及预防脊柱后凸畸形等优点。
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) in anterior approach surgery for thoracolumbar fractures.MethodsFrom January 2017 to January 2020, a total of 68 thoracolumbar fracture patients undergoing anterior approach surgery were included and randomly divided into TXA group (n=33) and control group (n=35). Patients in the TXA group were given a dose of 15 mg/kg of TXA by intravenous infusion during 30 min before skin incision and an additional 15 mg/kg of TXA intravenously at 8 h after the first infusion, while the ones in the control group were given 15 mg/kg of normal saline at the same time. Basic data of the patients were collected. The hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, coagulation and fibrinolysis indexes of the patients were monitored preoperatively, 24-hour postoperatively, and 72-hour postoperatively. The intraoperative blood loss and wound drainage of the patients were recorded. The incidence of blood transfusion and thrombotic events were collected. Statistical analysis was performed.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, sex, body mass index, operation time, fracture location distribution, anesthesia classification of American Society of Anesthesiologists, neurologic grade of American Spinal Injury Association, injury time, or length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with those in the control group, the total blood loss [(1 398.49±312.24) vs. (1 642.30±357.78) mL, P=0.003], intraoperative blood loss [(432.83±74.76) vs. (486.31±86.51) mL, P=0.008], and wound drainage [(276.73±89.42) vs. (389.24±125.71) mL, P<0.001] in the TXA group reduced. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the preoperative hemoglobin or hematocrit (P>0.05), but the 24-hour postoperative hemoglobin concentration [(112.67±20.59) vs. (102.64±19.41) g/L, P=0.042] and hematocrit [(32.25±4.12)% vs. (30.13±4.28)%, P=0.042] in the TXA group were higher than those in the control group. The incidence of allogeneic blood transfusion in the TXA group was lower than that in the control group (6.1% vs. 25.7%, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative, 24-hour postoperative, or 72-hour postoperative prothrombin time, international standardized ratio, activated partial prothrombin time, platelet count, fibrinogen, d-dimer, or fibrinogen degradation products between the two groups (P>0.05), and no thrombotic complications were found.ConclusionTXA has good efficacy and safety in the anterior approach surgery for thoracolumbar fractures.
Objective To study the effectiveness of transpedicular intervertebral bone graft and pedicle screws fixation in injured vertebrae for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Methods Between February 2007 and January 2009, 25 patients with thoracolumbar fractures were treated by posterior short-segment fixation combined with transpedicular intervertabral bone graft and pedicle screw fixation in injured vertebrae. There were 18 males and 7 females with a mean ageof 46 years (range, 28-63 years). The injured vertebrae were located at T10 in 1 case, T11 in 2 cases, T12 in 8 cases, L1 in 6 cases, L2 in 6 cases, L3 in 1 case, and L4 in 1 case. According to Denis classification, there were 14 cases of burst fractures and 11 cases of compression fractures. Based on Frankel classifications, 2 cases were rated as grade A, 4 cases as grade B, 8 cases as grade C, 7 cases as grade D, and 4 cases as grade E. The time between injury and operation was 6 hours to 7 days (mean, 4.6 days). The X-ray film was taken to measure the relative height of fractured vertebrae and Cobb angle, and Frankel classification was conducted to evaluate the function recovery of the spinal cord. Results The operations were performed successfully, and incisions healed primarily. All the patients were followed up 12-25 months (mean, 16 months). CT and X-ray films showed good bone graft heal ing and no loosening or breakage of screws and rods. The relative height of fractured vertebrae were 56.8% ± 15.6% at preoperation, 91.2% ± 10.7% immediately after operation, and 89.6% ± 10.3% at 1 year after operation, showing significant differences between preoperation and postoperation (P lt; 0.01), while no significant difference between immediately after operation and 1 year after operation. The Cobb angles were (18.2 ± 2.6), (7.5 ± 1.4), and (8.7 ± 1.1)°, respectively, showing significant differences between preoperation and postoperation (P lt; 0.01), while no significant difference between immediately and 1 year after operation. At 1 year after operation, the neural function in 16 cases was improved 1-3 grades. ConclusionTreatment of thoracolumbar fractures with transpedicular intervertebral bone graft and pedicle screw fixation in injuredvertebrae has satisfactory effectiveness, which can reconstruct vertebral body height, increase the stabil ity of anterior and middle
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety of TiRobot-guided percutaneous transpedicular screw implantation.MethodsThe medical records of 158 patients with thoracolumbar fractures and lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent percutaneous transpedicular screw implantation were retrospectively analyzed between January 2018 and December 2020. The patients were divided into trial group (TiRobot-guided screw implantation, 86 cases) and control group (fluoroscopy-guided screw implantation, 72 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, pathology, lesion segment, and the average number of screw implantation per case (P>0.05). The operation time, fluoroscopic dose, fluoroscopic time, and fluoroscopic frequency were compared between the two groups. One day postoperatively, the convergence angle was measured and the penetration of the pedicle cortex was evaluated according to Gertzbein-Robbins classification standard.ResultsThe operation time, fluoroscopic dose, fluoroscopic time, and fluoroscopic frequency of the trial group were significantly lesser than those of control group (P<0.05).One day postoperatively, the convergence angle of trial group was (21.10±4.08)°, which was significantly larger than control group (19.17±3.48)° (t=6.810, P=0.000). According to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification standard, 446 pedicle screws were implanted in trial group, trajectories were grade A in 377 screws, grade B in 46 screws, grade C in 23 screws, and the accuracy of screw implantation was 94.8%; 380 pedicle screws were implanted in control group, trajectories were grade A in 283 screws, grade B in 45 screws, grade C in 44 screws, grade D in 6 screws, grade E in 2 screws, and the accuracy of screw implantation was 86.3%. There was significant difference in the accuracy of screw implantation between the two groups (χ2=25.950, P=0.000). ConclusionCompared with traditional percutaneous transpedicular screw implantation, TiRobot-guided percutaneous transpedicular screw implantation can improve the accuracy of screw implantation, reduce radiation exposure, and improve surgical safety, which has a good application prospect.
Objective To design a new extracorporeal reduction device for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar fractures (short for “new reduction device”), and to evaluate its effectiveness. Methods According to the mechanism of thoracolumbar fractures and biomechanics characteristic of reduction, a new reduction device was designed and used in a combination with long U-shaped hollow pedicle screw system. Between January 2014 and January 2016, 36 patients (group A) with single segment thoracolumbar fracture without neurological complications underwent percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, and the clinical data were compared with those of another 39 patients (group B) with thoracolumbar fracture underwent traditional open pedicle screw fixation. There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, classification of fractures, segments of fractures, injury to operation interval, height percentage of injury vertebrae, and kyphotic angle between 2 groups (P>0.05). The 2 groups were compared in terms of operation time, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, drainage volume, visual analogue scale (VAS) at postoperative 24 hours, fluoroscopy frequency, ambulation time, height percentage of injury vertebrae, kyphotic angle and correction. Results Group A was significantly better than group B in the operation time, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, drainage volume, VAS score at postoperative 24 hours, and ambulation time (P<0.05). However, fluoroscopy frequency of group B was significantly less than that of group A (P<0.05). All patients were followed up 11.2 months on average (range, 7-15 months). There was no intraoperative and postoperative complications of iatrogenic nerve injury, infection, breakage of internal fixation. Mild pulling-out of pedicle screws occurred in 1 case of group A during operation. The kyphotic angle and height percentage of the fractured vertebral body were significantly improved at 3 days after operation when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups at 3 days after operation (P>0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive extracorporeal reduction device for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is an effective and safe treatment of thoracic vertebrae and lumbar vertebrae fractures, because of little trauma, less bleeding, and quicker recovery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of sagittal top compression reduction technique in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 59 patients with thoracolumbar vertebral fractures who met the selection criteria and were admitted between November 2018 and January 2022. Among them, 34 patients were treated with sagittal top compression reduction technique (top pressure group), and 25 patients were treated with traditional reduction technique (traditional group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05), including gender, age, fracture segment, cause of injury, AO classification of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures, thoracolumbar injury classification and severity (TLICS) score, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading, surgical approach, preoperative vertebral body index, height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra, injured vertebra angle, segmental kyphosis angle, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry disability index (ODI). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of complications between the two groups were recorded and compared. After operation, VAS score and ODI were used to evaluate effectiveness, and X-ray and CT examinations were performed to measure imaging indicators such as vertebral body index, height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra, injured vertebra angle, and segmental kyphosis angle. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). No complication such as dural sac, nerve root, or vascular injury was found during operation, and all incisions healed by first intention. Patients in both groups were followed up 6-48 months, with an average of 20.6 months. No loosening, breakage, or failure of internal fixation occurred during follow-up. The imaging indicators, VAS score, and ODI of the two groups significantly improved at 1 week and last follow-up when compared to preoperative ones (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the VAS score and ODI further significantly improved when compared to 1 week after operation (P<0.05). At 1 week after operation and last follow-up, the vertebral body index, segmental kyphosis angle, injured vertebra angle, and ODI in the top pressure group were significantly better than those in the traditional group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS score and height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra between the two groups at 1 week after operation (P>0.05), but the two indicators in the top pressure group were significantly better than those in the traditional group at last follow-up (P<0.05). Conclusion The treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures with sagittal top compression reduction technique can significantly improve the quality of vertebral reduction, and is superior to traditional reduction techniques in relieving pain and improving spinal function.
Thoracolumbar injury is a common injury in clinic. Accurate diagnosis and classification is of great significance for guiding treatment. Although there are many typing systems, no typing system has been widely accepted and used to guide clinical practice. Denis classification, spinal load classification, thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score or thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score and AO classification have great influence in clinical practice, but they all have some shortcomings. In recent years, the classification of thoracolumbar injury has been updated, modified and supplemented constantly. When using these fracture types in clinical practice, different people often have some deviation. This paper reviews the widely used thoracolumbar injury classification system, discusses the main viewpoints, advantages and disadvantages of each classification system, and looks into the future research direction based on the current research progress.