ObjectiveTo systematically review the diagnostic value of T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON-TB (QFT-GIT/QFT-Plus) in active tuberculosis (ATB). MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect diagnostic accuracy studies comparing QFT-GIT/QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB from inception to February 8, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 20 studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB and QFT-GIT were 0.89 (95%CI 0.85 to 0.92) and 0.84 (95%CI 0.79 to 0.89), the pooled specificity were 0.85 (95%CI 0.68 to 0.93) and 0.86 (95%CI 0.72 to 0.94), the area under the curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) were 0.93 (95%CI 0.84 to 0.97) and 0.90 (95%CI 0.56 to 0.99), respectively. The pooled sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB and QFT-Plus were 0.93 (95%CI 0.81 to 0.97) and 0.93 (95%CI 0.89 to 0.96), specificity were 0.99 (95%CI 0.39 to 1.00) and 0.94 (95%CI 0.67 to 0.99), the AUC of SROC were 0.99 (95%CI 0.67 to 1.00) and 0.98 (95%CI 0.65 to 1.00), respectively. ConclusionBoth T-SPOT.TB and QFT have high diagnostic accuracy for ATB, and the diagnostic sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB is better than QFT-GIT. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To evaluate whether the paper titled “Application of tumor type M2 pyruvate kinase in the diagnosis of lung cancer” met the standards set in the STARD statement. Methods Based on each of the 25 items of STAndards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD statement), the paper titled “Application of tumor type M2 pyruvate kinase in the diagnosis of lung cancer” was checked and evaluated. Results In the paper titled “Application of tumor type M2 pyruvate kinase in the diagnosis of lung cancer”, the reporting of 1 item of the STARD statement was adequately standardized, 7 items were relatively standardized, 5 items were inadequately standardized, 2 items were not standardized, and the other 10 were not reported. Conclusion Generally speaking, the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies has not been standardized adequately in China. The methodological quality and applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies should be improved.
Receiving the amount of true positives, false positives, false negatives and true negatives is necessary when conducting meta-analysis of diagnostic tests. Advanced methods of data extraction are required if these data could not be directly obtained from a literature. We introduced three methods and discussed the theories. An example was then given to illustrate how to apply the methods.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the diagnostic value of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). MethodsThe CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched to collect diagnostic test on OCTA for POAG from inception to February 2024. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata 15.0 software. ResultsA total of 12 diagnostic tests involving 993 subjects were included. Meta-analysis results showed that the sensitivity/specificity of OCTA for diagnosing peripapillary vessel density, retinal vessel density, and optic nerve fiber changes in patients with POAG were 0.77/0.92, 0.56/0.92, and 0.85/0.91, respectively, and the AUC of the SROC curve was 0.94, 0.92 and 0.95, respectively. ConclusionOCTA has high diagnostic accuracy for POAG. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
The Standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) 2015 is a revision of the STARD 2003 on the checklist and flow chart, on the basis of the new evidences of potential bias and applicability, to better guide the application of diagnostic test in clinical practices. Currently, the interpretation and application in China is still based on STARD 2003. This review will describe the application status of the original version and introduce the updated standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.
The approaches of rating the quality of evidence of systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy tests are different from systematic reviews of interventional studies. This article systematically introduces the application of GRADE in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy tests by a case interpretation and analysis. In this article we present rating workflow in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy tests and introduce how to use the GDT website to display the rating results, and interpret the conclusion of systematic reviews based on GRADE results.
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 ( sTREM-1) as a diagnostic index for ventilator-associated pneumonia ( VAP) . Methods We searched the PubMed, EMBase, Cochrane Library,Wanfang Database, CNKI and VIP for clinical trials which assessed the diagnosis accuracy of sTREM-1 for VAP. The methodological quality of each study was assessed by the quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy ( QUADAS) tool. The Meta-disc software was used to conduct merger analyses on sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio. The heterogeneity test was performed and summary receiver operating characteristic ( SROC) curve was completed. Results 8 studies were included ( 180 VAP patients and 224 non-VAP patients) . The value of merger sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0. 80, 0. 74, and 13. 89, respectively. The area under of SROC curve was 0. 857, with Q point at 0. 788. Conclusion sTREM-1 showed moderate accuracy for VAP diagnosis in adult mechanically ventilated patients, which should be combined with other diagnostic markers to further improve the sensitivity and specificity.
The standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy for studies in journal or conference abstracts (STARD for Abstracts) was developed for guiding the reporting of abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies, which was published in BMJ in August 2017. The study mainly introduced and interpreted the items of STARD for Abstracts, in order to help domestic researchers to perform and report the abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies by STARD for Abstracts.
The PRISMA-DTA Statement is an expanded checklist of the original PRISMA, which is aimed at improving the reporting quality of the systematic review or meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. It was published on JAMA in January 2018. This paper explained it and provided reference for improving the reporting quality of systematic review/meta-analysis of DTA for Chinese authors.