Objective To explore the methods， clinical effects， and application value of laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization. Methods The clinical data of 23 patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension who performed laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization between july 2009 and july 2012 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectivly. Results In 23 cases， 2 cases were converted laparotomy due to bleeding， 21 cases were successfully performed laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization. The operative time was 230-380 minutes （average 290 minutes）. The intraoperative blood loss was 300-1 500 mL （average 620 mL）. The postoperative fasting time was 1-3 days （average 2 days）. The postoperative hospital stay was 8-14 days （average 10 days）. Conclusion Laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization is a feasible， effective， and safe procedure as well as minimally invasive hence is applicable for patients with portal hypertension and hypersplenism．
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of rebleeding after laparoscopic selective pericardial devascularization combined with splenectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 147 cases of portal hypertension treated by the laparoscopic selective devascularization combined with splenectomy from February 2014 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The univariate analysis was used to find the difference between the rebleeding group (n=20) and the non-bleeding group (n=127), then the multivariate logistic regression analysis was selected for screening out the most closely related risk factors for the rebleeding.ResultsThe rebleeding occurred in 20 of 147 patients (13.6%). There were differences in the platelet count, prothrombin time, serum albumin, diameter of main portal vein, classification of liver function, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and portal hypertensive gastropathy between the rebleeding group and the non-bleeding group (P<0.050). The classification of liver function ［OR=3.444, 95% CI (1.211. 9.793）, P=0.020］, ascites ［OR=2.859, 95% CI (1.069, 7.645), P=0.036］, hepatic encephalopathy ［OR=4.265, 95% CI（1.121, 16.230）, P=0.033］, and portal hypertensive gastropathy ［OR=6.744, 95% CI (1.675, 27.156), P=0.007］, and platelet count ［OR=4.744, 95% CI (1.073, 20.969), P=0.040］ were the independent factors for the postoperative rebleeding by the logistic regression analysis.ConclusionFor patients with risk factors of rebleeding, preoperative treatment should be actively taken and postoperative prevention of rebleeding should be highly vigilant.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the operative technique and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) combined with esophagogastric devascularization in treatment of portal hypertension induced by liver cirrhosis. MethodsTwelve cases with esophageal and gastric varices induced by portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis were treated by the LS combined with esophagogastric devascularization in our department from March 2009 to August 2010, which clinical data were analyzed and summarized retrospectively. ResultsThe splenic artery was ligated before the treatment of splenic pedicle in 12 cases, LS combined with pericardial devascularization was successfully performed in 10 cases, 7 cases of which were treated by the level two transection method of splenic pedicle, and 2 cases were converted to open surgery due to intraoperative bleeding. In 10 cases, the operative time was 180-300 min (average 210 min), and intraoperative blood loss was 200-1 000 ml (average 480 ml). The postoperative hospital stay was 8-15 d (average 9 d)， the postoperative complications included plural effusion （lt;300 ml） in 2 cases， mild ascites （lt;300 ml） in 2 cases, and mild pancreatic leakage in 1 case， but all were cured eventually， and no mortality occurred. Followup was conducted in 12 patients for 4 to 20 months (average 7 months), and no rebleeding occurred. ConclusionsLS combined with pericardial devascularization is relatively safe and effective methods in treatment of portal hypertension induced by liver cirrhosis. The keys to success include ligation of splenic artery, and the use of harmonic scalpel combined with ligasure to treat splenic pedicle.
ObjectiveTo investigate the predictive factors of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) before and after splenectomy and gastroesophageal devascularization for liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension. MethodsSixty-one cases of liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension who underwent splenectomy and gastroesophageal devascularization were enrolled retrospectively. The patients were divided into PVT group and non-PVT group based on the presence or absence of postoperative PVT on day 7. The clinical factors related with PVT were analyzed. ResultsThere were 25 cases in the DVT group and 36 cases in the non-DVT group. The results of univariate analysis showed that the preoperative platelet (P=0.006), activated partial thromboplastin time (P=0.048), prothrombin time (P=0.028), and international normalized ratio (P=0.029), postoperative fibrin degradation product (P=0.002) and D-dimer (P=0.014) on day 1, portal venous diameter (P=0.050) had significant differences between the DVT group and non-DVT group. The results of logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that the preoperative platelet (OR=0.966, 95% CI 0.934-1.000, P=0.048) and postoperative fibrin degradation product on day 1(OR=1.055, 95% CI 1.011-1.103, P=0.017) were correlated with the PVT. The PVT might happen when preoperative platelet was less than 34.5×109/L (sensitibity 80.6%, specificity 60.0%) or postoperative fibrin degradation product on day 1 was more than 64.75 mg/L (sensitibity 48.0%, specificity 91.7%). ConclusionPreoperative platelet and postoperative fibrin degradation product on day 1 might predict PVT after splenectomy and gastroesophageal devascularization for liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension.
目的探讨近端脾肾分流联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬变门脉高压症的疗效。方法回顾分析我院1994~2004年10年期间应用近端脾肾分流联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗62例肝硬变门脉高压病例。结果本组无手术死亡，随访56例，随访时间4~56个月，随访结果： 26例肝功能较前有所改善，49例静脉曲张明显减轻，无静脉破裂出血； 发生吻合口血栓5例，肝性脑病3例，因肝衰死亡3例。结论近端脾肾分流联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬变门脉高压症效果好，疗效满意。
ObjectiveTo evaluate long-term therapeutic effect of esophagogastric devascularization without splenectomy in treatment of portal hypertension with esophagogastric varices hemorrhage. MethodsThe patients who took esophagogastric devascularization without splenectomy from 2008 to 2013 were followed-up in clinic or through phone. The remission of esophagogastric varices, rebleeding, survival and long-term postoperative complications were observed. ResultsA total of 32 patients were taken esophagogastric devascularization without splenectomy in Peking University People's Hospital from 2008 to 2013. One patient died during the perioperative period. Twenty-three patients were followed-up for 10-81 months with an average 45.5 months, of whom 7 patients had rebleeding, 5 patients died, 3 patients had new onset portal vein thrombosis, 2 patients had esophageal anastomotic strictures. ConclusionEsophagogastric devascularization without splenectomy is an effective method in treatment of portal hypertension with esophagogastric varices hemorrhage in selected patients.
目的评价将直线切割缝合器应用于脾切除贲门周围血管离断术中的安全性及效果。 方法前瞻性收集2013年6月至2014年5月期间于笔者所在医院行脾切除贲门周围血管离断术的46例肝炎后肝硬变继发门静脉高压症患者的临床资料，根据脾切除贲门周围血管离断术中直线切割缝合器的应用情况分为对照组18例（术中未使用直线切割缝合器）和观察组28例（术中使用直线切割缝合器），比较2组患者的疗效指标。 结果2组患者均顺利完成手术，无围手术期死亡及肝性脑病发生。对照组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术中输血比例及术后24 h引流量均长于（或大于）观察组（P＜0.05），而2组患者的术后住院时间比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。术后所有患者均获访，随访时间为4 d～10个月，平均4个月。随访期间所有患者均无消化道再出血发生，脾功能亢进得到完全纠正，生活质量满意。 结论将直线切割缝合器应用于脾切除贲门周围血管离断术是安全而有效的，其简化了手术操作，减少了手术创伤，值得临床推广应用。
ObjectiveTo summarize the recent development of surgical treatment for portal hypertension with hypersplenism. MethodsThe related literatures on various operation treatment of hypertension with hypersplenism at home and abroad in recent years were collected and reviewed. ResultsThere are many operation treatment methods of hypertension with hypersplenism, includes the pericardial devascularization, subtotal splenectomy, partial splenic embolization, spleen radiofrequency ablation, splenic artery ligation, distal splenorenal shunt, and so on. The different operation methods each has its advantages and disadvantages, but there are a certain percentage of the incidence of complications. At the same time, due to the limited understanding of the function of the spleen in portal hypertension, the treatment of "resecting" or "reserving" spleen has always been the hot spot of the academic dispute. ConclusionFor what kind of operation method is the most suitable for the treatment of hypertension with hypersplenism is no fixed conclusion.