【摘要】 目的 〖JP2〗研究质子泵抑制剂（PPI）是否为危重患者发生医院获得性肺炎的危险因素。 方法 收集2002年6月-2009年6月收治的198例重症患者资料，分为使用PPI组（96例）和未使用PPI组（102例）。采用logistic回归分析PPI使用情况和医院获得性肺炎的关系。 结果 使用PPI组肺炎的发生率较高（26.9%），尤其是PPI使用时间超过7 d者（37.5%）。在不同的多变量logistic回归模型中，分别用APACHE Ⅱ评分和入住重症监护室原因校正后，使用PPI以及使用天数均是医院获得性肺炎发生的危险因素（P=0.031，OR＝2.230，95%CI：1.957~2.947；P=0.002，OR＝1.824，95%CI：1.457~2.242）。 结论 长时间应用PPI可能是增加ICU患者发生医院获得性肺炎的一种风险因素。【Abstract】 Objective To identify whether proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is a risk factor of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in critical patients. Methods The clinical data of the critical patients admitted to ICU from June 2002 to June 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 198 patients were divided into two groups: 96 in PPI group and 102 in non-PPI group. The relationship between PPI and HAP was analyzed by logistic regression. Results The patients in PPI group had a higher risk of HAP (26.9%), especially who were treated with PPI more than 7 days (37.5%). Adjusted by APACHE Ⅱ score and reason for admission to ICU, PPI therapy and the using duration of PPI were both the risk factors of HAP in different multiple logistic models (P=0.031, OR=2.230, 95%CI: 1.957-2.947; P=0.002, OR=1.824, 95%CI: 1.457-2.242). Conclusion Long-term use of PPI is a risk factor of HAP.
Acute kidney injury is a common complication and is associated with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome among critically ill patients in intensive care unit. Once renal replacement therapy in required, the mortality rate was high. Using slow and uninterrupted clearance of retained fluid and toxins, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can avoid hemodynamic instability while provide acid-base, electrolytes, and volume homeostasis. For decades, CRRT has become the dominant form of renal replacement therapy as well as multiple organ support in critically ill patient with acute kidney injury. However, there remains wide practice variation in the CRRT care when clinicians take into account the needs of individual patients, available resources, and limitations unique to an institution or type of practice, despite evidences to guide practice. In addition, CRRT is a complex technology that is resource-intensive, costly, and requires specialized training by health providers.Taiwan Society of Critical Care Medicine organized a group of experts in critical care and nephrology to review the recommendations and provide their clinical practice and concerns to write this operational manual. The purpose of this manual is to provide step-by-step instructions on the practice of CRRT and troubleshooting. In addition, it is designed to help the newbies to carry out this complex treatment correctly and efficiently. We hope that this operational manual is of value to improve clinical skills, quality of care, and patient safety.
Objective To determine the incidence of vitamin B1 deficiency in critically ill patients, to compare vitamin B1 levels between septic and non-septic patients, and to explore the relationship between vitamin B1 levels and lactate levels. Methods Using a retrospective study method, critically ill patients admitted to the Department of Intensive Care of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from February 2022 to November 2022 were included in the study, and the patients were divided into sepsis and non-sepsis groups according to the admission diagnosis, and the differences in the vitamin B1 levels of the patients between the two groups were analyzed, as well as the correlation between the vitamin B1 levels and the lactic acid levels. Results There was a significant difference in serum vitamin B1 levels between the sepsis patients and the non-sepsis patients [(1.6±0.3)ng/mL vs. (2.1±0.2)ng/mL, P=0. 009]. For all patients, there was no correlation between vitamin B1 levels and lactate levels. But when the patient was in a hyperlactate state (lactate level ≥2 mmol/L), vitamin B1 levels were significantly negatively correlated with lactate levels (r=–0. 229, P=0. 004). Conclusions Vitamin B1 deficiency is prevalent in critically ill patients and is strongly correlated with whether or not the patient is septic. Vitamin B1 levels are significantly and negatively correlated with lactate levels when the patient's lactate level is ≥2 mmol/L.
ObjectiveTo compare the indirect calorimetry (IC) measured resting energy expenditure (MREE) with adjusted Harris-Benedict formula calculating resting energy expenditure (CREE) in the mechanically ventilated surgical critically ill patients and to evaluate the relationship between the resting energy expenditure (REE) with the severity of illness. MethodsTwenty-one patients undergonging mechanical ventilation for critical illness in the intensive care unit of general surgery between August 2008 and February 2010 were included in this study. Data during the study period of nutrition support were collected for computation of the severity of critical illness by acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ scores (APACHE Ⅱ scores) and organ dysfunction scores (Marshall scores). MREE was measured by using IC of the MedGraphics CCM/D System within the first 7 d after nutrition therapy. CREE was calculated by using the HarrisBenedict formula adjusted with correction factors for illness at the same time. According to APACHE Ⅱ scores on admission, the enrolled patients were divided into two groups: APACHEⅡ score ≥20 scores group (n=8) and APACHE Ⅱ score lt;20 scores group (n=13), and the differences between MREE and CREE of patients in two groups were determined. ResultsThe reduction of variation tendency in CREE other than MREE in the enrolled patients within the first week of nutritional support was statistical significance (Plt;0.001). The CREE of patients 〔(1 984.49±461.83) kcal/d〕 was significantly higher than the MREE 〔(1 563.88±496.93) kcal/d〕 during the first week of nutritional support (Plt;0.001). The MREE on the 0, 1, 2, and 4 d after nutrition therapy were statistically significant lower than CREE at the same time interval in these patients (Plt;0.01), and the differences at the other time points were not significant (Pgt;0.05). There was a trend towards a reduction in APACHE Ⅱ and Marshall scores within the first week of nutrition therapy that reached statistical significance (Plt;0.001). During the first week of nutrition therapy, APACHEⅡ and Marshall scores of patients in ≥20 scores group were significantly higher than those in lt;20 scores group, respectively (Plt;0.05 or Plt;0.01), and the reductions of APACHE Ⅱ scores and Marshall scores were significant in patients of two groups (Plt;0.001). A significant positive correlation was found between CREE with APACHE Ⅱ scores (r=0.656, Plt;0.001) and Marshall scores (r=0.608，Plt;0.001) in patients within the first week after nutrition support. Although no statistically significant correlation was observed between MREE and APACHEⅡ scores (r=-0.045， P=0.563), a significant positive correlation was observed between MREE and Marshall scores (r=0.263, P=0.001) within the first week after nutrition therapy. There was no correlation between MREE and CREE (r=0.064, P=0.408) in patients at the same time interval. The reduction of MREE of patients in ≥20 scores group other than in lt;20 scores group was statistically significant within the first week after nutrition therapy (P=0.034). In addition, the MREE of patients in ≥20 scores group were not significantly different from those in lt;20 scores group (Pgt;0.05), and the mean CREE was not different in two groups patients within the first week of nutritional therapy 〔(1 999.55±372.73) kcal/d vs. (1 918.39±375.27) kcal/d, P=0.887〕. CREE was significantly higher than MREE of patients in ≥20 scores group within the first week except the 3 d and 5 d after nutrition therapy (Plt;0.05), while in lt;20 scores group CREE was significantly higher than MREE in patients only within the first 3 d after nutrition therapy (Plt;0.05 or Plt;0.01). MREE and CREE of patients in ≥20 scores group were not different from those in lt;20 scores group, respectively (Pgt;0.05).
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the treatment of choice for critically ill patients with hemodynamic instability who require renal replacement therapy. This review summarizes the impact of CRRT treatment on nutritional support in critically ill patients, including: energy increase caused by citrate-based anticoagulants, energy loss caused by glucose-free replacement fluid and dialysate, a large amount of amino acids loss in the effluent, and the influences on the way of lipid emulsion administration, capacity, electrolyte, vitamins, and trace elements. It is hoped that the intensive care unit doctors, nephrologists, and nutritionists can fully cooperate to determine the CRRT prescription and the nutritional support prescription.
ObjectiveTo investigate the species and resistance phenotypes of the pathogens causing catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) in critically ill patients in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and to provide the basis for the prevention and treatment of this kind of infection. MethodsThe clinical data and findings of the laboratory examination of the patients, who were admitted to intensive care units and suffered from CAUTI in our hospital during January 2012 to December 2014, were retrospectively analyzed. The pathogens isolates from the urine specimens of the patients with CAUTI and their resistance phenotypes were analyzed. ResultsThree hundred and seventy patients suffering from CAUTI were included in this study. Five hundred and seventeen strains of pathogens were isolated from the urine specimens of these patients, including 222 isolates (42.9%) of fungus, 181 isolates (35.0%) of gram negative bacteria, and 114 isolates (22.0%) of gram positive bacteria. In terms of species distribution, Candida albicans (105 isolates, 20.3%), C.glabrata (78 isolates, 15.1%) and C.glabrata (30 isolates, 5.8%) were the predominant fungus. Among the gram negative bacteria, Escherichia coli (81 isolates, 15.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (37 isolates, 7.2%), and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (23 isolates, 4.4%) were the main species. Enterococcus faecium (79 isolates, 15.3%) and E.faecalis (13 isolates, 2.5%) were the frequently isolated gram positive bacteria. Analysis of the resistance phenotype showed that the resistance rates to itraconazole, voriconazole and fluconazole of Candida spp. were above 10%. Thirty percent of the isolates of E.coli and K.pneumoniae, and 60% of the isolates of A.calcoaceticus-Baumannii complex were resistant to many of the regular antibiotics. Imipenem resistance rate of A.calcoaceticus-Baumannii complex was 60.8%. Sixty percent of the isolates of E.faecium and E.faecalis were resistant to many of the regular antibiotics. The vancomycin-resistant isolates accounted for 16.5% of E.faecium and 31.0% of E.faecalis. ConclusionCandida species are the major pathogens for CAUTI in critically ill patients in our hospital and show the resistance to azoles. We should focus on the drug resistance of gram negative bacteria and gram positive bacteria. The rational use of antibiotics and application of effective infection control measures are important to decrease the CAUTI.
ObjectiveTo analyze the correlation between the vaccination status of inpatients with Omicron variant infection and the risk of Omicron critical illness. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of patients with Omicron infection admitted to a designated hospital for COVID-19 in Chengdu from December 1, 2022 to January 31, 2023. Patients were divided into critical group and non-critical group according to their condition and the "COVID-19 Diagnosis and Treatment Program (Tenth Edition)". According to the vaccination status, the patients were divided into incomplete vaccination group, full vaccination group and booster vaccination group. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between vaccination, symptoms and signs at admission, and the risk of critical illness. ResultsA total of 3 603 inpatients with Omicron infection were included, including 730 cases (20.3%) in the critical group and 2 873 cases (79.7%) in the non-critical group. There were 2 399 people (66.6%) in the incomplete vaccination group, 433 people (12%) in the full vaccination group, and 771 people (21.4%) in the booster vaccination group. Compared with the incomplete vaccination group, the proportion of critical illness in the full vaccination group and booster vaccination group was lower, and the critical illness rate increased with age (P<0.05). After adjusting for age, gender, and underlying diseases, the results of multivariate logistic analysis showed that full vaccination (OR=0.67, 95%CI 0.50 to 0.89) and booster vaccination (OR=0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.94) were significantly associated with a reduced risk of critical illness. ConclusionFull vaccination and booster dose can effectively reduce the risk of critical illness after infection.
ObjectiveTo investigate and analyze the strategies for choosing venous access devices for critically ill patients. MethodsThe medical staffs in ICU were required to fulfill a questionnaire on the knowledge and application of venous access devices in critically ill patients in May 2015.A descriptive statistical analysis was carried out on the answers generated from the questionnaire using SPSS 19.0 software. ResultsA total of 50 questionnaires were distributed randomly and 46 valid questionnaires were recovered.The effective response rate was 92.0%.The proportion of junior, intermediate and senior medical staffs was 80.4%, 13.0% and 6.6%, respectively.The proportion of doctors and nurses was 39.1% and 60.9%, respectively.The average seniority was (5.7±4.9)years.The proportion of ICU medical staffs who were acquainted with PIV, ACVC, PICC, TCVC, PORT and Midline was 100.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 69.6%, 43.5% and 13.0%, respectively.The proportion of ICU medicial staffs who would take the styles of drug, the time of treatment, the patients' condition and the costs into consideration when choosing venous access devices was 100.0%, 100.0%, 64.0% and 18.0%, respectively.91.3% and 39.1% of ICU medical staffs would choose PIV and ACVC respectively if the time of treatment was less than 1 week.56.5%, 69.6% and 26.1% of ICU medical staffs would choose PIV, ACVC and PICC respectively if the time of treatment was between 1 and 4 weeks.30.4%, 39.1%, 82.6% and 32.6% of ICU medical staffs would choose PIV, ACVC, PICC and PORT respectively if the time of treatment was more than 4 weeks.52.2% of ICU medical staffs were acquaint with the styles and the indication of antibiotic coating central venous catheter.The main reasons for infusion failure were poor vascular condition (91.3%), old age (52.2%), skin lesions (39.1%) and pipeline plugging (26.1%).The main reasons for choosing the peripheral vein were lower risk of infection (87.0%), short-term treatment (82.6%), common transfusion (78.3%) and antibiotic treatment (47.8%).The main reasons for choosing central venous infusion were irritant drugs (82.6%), peripheral vascular puncture difficulty (69.6%), long-term infusion (65.2%) and hemodynamic monitor (56.5%). ConclusionsIt is difficult to establish a vascular access for critically ill patients.The ICU medical staffs are experienced to PIV, ACVC and PICC but not to Midline, TCVC and PORT.A comprehensive evaluation is essential to choose a suitable and reliable venous access device for critically ill patients.