Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of nedaplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) for advanced esophageal cancer. Methods Such databases as PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched from the date of their establishment to May 4th, 2012 to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about nedaplatin combined with 5-Fu versus cisplatin combined with 5-Fu for advanced esophageal cancer. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 15 RCTs invloving 863 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis suggested that, compared with cisplatin combined with 5-Fu, nedaplatin combined with 5-Fu could improve short-term effects (RR=1.31, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.52, P=0.000 2) and reduce gastrointestinal reaction and renal function impairment, but it was associated with aggravated myelosuppression, increase of thrombocytopenia and leukopenia, and decrease of hemoglobin. There were no significant differences between the two groups in liver function impairment, diarrhea and peripheral neurovirulence. Conclusion Nedaplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil can increase short-term effects and reduce gastrointestinal reaction and renal function impairment. However, nedaplatin is associated with aggravated myelosuppression, so it should be applied in clinic with cautious. Nedaplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil can be used as a replacement chemotherapy regimen for advanced esophageal cancer, but the evidence about long-term effects and safety is still required. For the quality and quantity limitation of the included studies which decreases the level of evidence, so the conclusion of this systematic review only provides some references for clinical practice and research.
ObjectiveTo study the gastric function of vagus-preserved patients after esophagectomy, and to evaluate the significance of keeping vagus and the value of gastric tube with vagal-sparing esophagectomy. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 15 patients in West China Hospital between June 2012 and January 2014. They were divided into two groups. There were 8 patients with 6 males and 2 females with average age of 57 years ranging from 44 to 77 years, in a gastric pull-up group with vagal-sparing esophagectomy. There were 7 patients with 6 males and 1 female at average age of 60 years ranging from 50 to 70 years in a gastric tube group with vagal-sparing esophagectomy. We chose 8 patients with 7 males and 1 female at average age of 62 years ranging from 47 to 69 years as a control group with a classical esophagectomy and a gastric pull-up. Then we evaluated the function of the vagal nerves and gastric reservoir after vagal-sparing esophagectomy. ResultsAll 23 surgeries were successfully performed. In subjective symptom, diarrhea was rare in the vagal-sparing esophagectomy patients and statistically more common in patients with a standard esophagectomy. Dumping and early satisfaction situation were similar among 3 groups. The 60 minutes gastric emptying rate was much better in the vagal-sparing group than that in the control group. And the esophageal manometry of the vagal-sparing group was statistically hihger than that in the control group. The gastroscope showed that the incidence of reflux esophagitis in the vagal-sparing group was statistically lower than that of the control group. There was no statistic difference in weight in the vagus-preserved group before and after the surgery while the weight decreased statistically in the control group. ConclusionsFor both esophageal replacement and gastric tube, preserving the vagus can reduce the functional dyspepsia after esophagectomy.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) esophagectomy and routine operation on the short-term quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer. MethodsFrom January 2012 through January 2014, 157 esophageal cancer patients were classified into a VATS group (n=42) and a routine operation group (n=115) in our hospital. All patients in the two groups completed the Chinese versions of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and QLQ-OES18 at one, six and 12 months after operation separately. ResultsAt the end of 6, 12 months after operation, the evaluation on global health status was higher in the VATS group(68.8±12.3 vs. 62.7±13.7, P<0.05; 76.2±10.4 vs. 68.6±8.8, P<0.05). At the end of 1, 6, 12 months after operation, the scores of symptom pain were less significantly in the VATS group than those in the routine operation group (P<0.05). One month after operation, the score of active ability in the VATS group was higher (P<0.05). At the end of 6, 12 months after operation, the score of emotional function and social role in the VATS group was higher (P<0.05). At the end of 12 months after operation, the score of role function and cognitive function in the VATS group was also higher (P<0.05). ConclusionVATS is of better effect on improving short-term quality of life of esophageal cancer patients compared with routine operation.
ObjectiveTo investigate the expression of tumor metastasis associated genes-1 (MTA1) and vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and the relationship between them and lymphangiogenesis. MethodA total of 107 patients who received excision for ESCC in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Department of Suining Central Hospital from March 2013 through January 2014 were enrolled. And the paraffinembedded esophageal tissues in 56 healthy persons were collected. The expression of MTA1 and VEGF-C in ESCC was detected using the immunohistochemical method. And D2-40 was used to label the micro-lymphatic endothelial cells of the tumor tissues while the micro-lymphatic vessel density (LVD) was counted. Meanwhile, a statistical analysis was performed for the relationship between MTA1 with VEGF-C and clinical pathological parameters. ResultsThe expression rates of MTA1 protein and VEGF-C protein in ESCC (50.4% and 58.8%, respectively) were higher than those in normal esophageal tissues with a statistical difference (P<0.05). Besides, their high expression rates in stage T3/T4 ESCC and lymph node metastasis group were significantly higher than those in stage T1/T2 ESCC and metastasisfree group, with statistical differences (P<0.05). The high expression rates of MTA1 and VEGF-C protein in ESCC with different TNM stages were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test with statistical differences (P<0.05). Moreover, a positive correlation existed in the expression level between MTA1 protein and VEGF-C protein of ESCC (Spearman coefficient r=0.512, P=0.000). And LVD of the high expression group for MTA1 protein and VEGF-C protein was statistically different from that of the low expression group (P<0.05). ConclusionThe expression of MTA1 is positively correlated with the expression of VEGF-C in ESCC. And they may co-promote lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis in ESCC. Therefore, both can be used as the laboratory indicators to determine the prognosis of ESCC.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the impact of side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis on postoperative anastomostic leak, fibrosis stricture and stroesophageal reflux. MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4 2015), Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang Database and VIP up to April 2015. Randomized controlled trials involving the complications after side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis were included. Data were extracted and methodological quality was evaluated by two reviewers independently with a designed extraction form. Then RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 7 studies involving 684 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that comparing with traditional anastomosis, side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis could reduce the incidence of fibrosis stricture with RR=0.20 and 95% CI 0.11 to 0.36 (P<0.000 01). There was no statistical difference in incidence of postoperative anasotmostic leaks with RR=0.71 and 95% CI 0.43 to 1.19 (P=0.19) or stroesophageal reflux with RR=0.74 and 95% CI 0.50 to 1.11 (P=0.15) between the two groups. ConclusionComparing with traditional anastomosis, side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis could reduce the incidences of fibrosis stricture, but there is no statistical difference in anastomostic leak or stroesophageal reflux.
目的总结左胸骨旁小切口微创封堵分流方向偏向流出道的室间隔缺损（VSD）的初步经验。 方法2014年2～8月广州医科大学附属第一医院对15例分流方向偏向流出道的VSD患者施行左胸骨旁小切口微创封堵手术，其中男7例，女8例；年龄10个月～19岁（4.5±4.6）岁；体重5.5～54.0（14.6±14.1）kg；其中干下型6例，嵴内型6例，膜周部型3例；缺损直径2.5～6.5（4.0±1.2）mm，距主动脉瓣环距离≤1 mm 9例，≤2 mm4例，>2 mm 2例；合并主动脉瓣右冠瓣轻度脱垂5例；采用左胸骨旁第2或第3肋间1.5～2.5 cm切口，在经食管超声心动图（TEE）监视下在右心室流出道表面选择适当的穿刺点，建立VSD输送轨道并置入封堵器，观察有无残余分流、主动脉瓣反流；术后3个月复查经胸超声心动图。 结果15例均成功封堵，无中转开胸，无残余分流和心律失常，新发主动脉瓣轻微反流2例，围手术期输血1例；手术时间30～120（58±28）min，术中出血量5～200（26±50）ml；术后住院时间3～13（4.3±2.6）d，无二次开胸止血、Ⅲ°房室传导阻滞、主动脉瓣反流加重、溶血、切口感染等并发症；术后3个月返院复查经胸超声心动图13例，无新发主动脉瓣反流和封堵器脱落；2例术中新发主动脉瓣反流加重，其中1例出现残余分流。 结论左胸骨旁小切口封堵分流方向偏向流出道VSD 手术安全、切口小、操作简单，近期效果尚满意；对合并主动脉瓣轻度脱垂VSD 需慎重施行外科微创封堵手术。
Objective To assess the value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in the prognosis of esophageal cancer. Methods PubMed and EMbase were searched for collecting retrospective cohort studies on the correlation between VEGF expression and prognosis of esophageal cancer, and relevant articles were also retrieved from inception to June, 2012. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality. Then the meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan5.0 software, and the publication bias of literature was evaluated by means of Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s method. Results Finally 10 cohort studies involving 811 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that, patients with high level of VEGF had poor overall survival (HR=1.55, 95%CI 1.25 to 1.91). The results of subgroup analyses including VEGF subtype, critical value of VEGF and source of patient showed that: a) there was no correlation between patient’s prognosis and high level of VEGF-C; b) The high level of VEGF subtype in cancer tissue indicated a higher risk of death when the critical value was 10%, while it was not related to the prognosis when the critical value was 30%; and c) The high level of VEGF in cancer tissue was more valuable to predict the prognosis of esophageal cancer for Chinese patients rather than non-Chinese patients. Conclusion The level of VEGF’s expression in cancer tissue is valuable to predict the prognosis of esophageal cancer.
Objective To systematically review the correlation between epidermal growth factor (EGF) 61A/G polymorphism and the risk of esophageal carcinoma. Methods Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, CJFD, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were electronically searched from inception to January 1st, 2013, to collect case-control studies on the correlation between epidermal growth factor (EGF) 61A/G polymorphism and the risk of esophageal carcinoma. Two reviewers independently identified the literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 and Stata 12.0 software. Results A total of six studies involving 1 448 cases and 1 728 control subjects were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, there was no significant association between EGF 61A/G polymorphism and the risk of esophageal carcinoma (dominant model: AG+GG vs. AA: OR=1.22, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.65; and recessive model: GG vs. AG+AA: OR=1.35, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.94; AG vs. AA: OR=1.12, 95%CI 0.93 to 1.35; GG vs. AA: OR=1.43, 95%CI 0.83 to 2.47). The results of subgroup analysis grouped by ethnicity showed that, EGF 61A/G polymorphism increased the risk of esophageal carcinoma of the White population (dominant model: AG+GG vs. AA: OR=1.39, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.71; and recessive model: GG vs. AG+AA: OR=1.75, 95%CI 1.37 to 2.25; GG vs. AA: OR=1.93, 95%CI 1.47 to 2.55). However, it had no correlation to the risk of esophageal carcinoma of Asian population. Conclusion Current studies showed that, EGF 61A/G polymorphism is not associated with susceptibility to esophageal carcinoma , but it may increase the risk of esophageal carcinoma in White population. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, the above conclusion needs to be verified by more studies with large sample size.
Objective To investigate the relationship between cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene polymorphism and genetic susceptibility to esophageal cancer. Methods The PubMed and EMbase databases were searched from the date of their establishment to January 1st, 2011 to collect the case-control studies on COX-2 polymorphism and susceptibility to esophageal cancer. For the population genotype distributions of both esophagus cancer group and control group, their odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were taken as the effect indexes, either the fixed or random effect model was applied to conducted Meta-analysis in homozygote comparison, dominant and recessive genetic models, and the publication bias was assessed then. All statistical analyses were conducted with Stata11.0 software. Results A total of five case-control studies were included. The results of meta-analyses showed for the COX-2-765Ggt;C polymorphism, the CC+GC genotype was associated with the risk of esophageal cancer in a dominant genetic model (CC+GC vs. GG: OR=1.806, 95% CI 1.050 to 3.106); for the COX-2-1195Ggt;A polymorphism, the AA genotype was associated with the risk of esophageal cancer in homozygote comparison and recessive genetic models, the AA+GA genotype was associated with the risk of esophageal cancer in a dominant genetic model. Conclusion It is suggested that COX-2 polymorphism may be associated with genetic susceptibility to esophageal cancer.
Objective To formulate the treatment of Barrett esophagus and provide evidence-based solutions for doctors and patients. Methods We attempted to obtain evidence for treating Barrett esophagus by searching MEDLINE (1978 to 2005), CBMdisc (1978 to 2005) and The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2005). The quality of the retrieved evidence was evaluated. Results The therapies for Barrett esophagus include dietary intervention, change of life style, drug therapy, endoscopic therapy and surgery. We should choose different therapies according to the specific conditions of patients. Conclusions Endoscopic therapy has been developed a lot in recent years. The combination of two or more therapies may produce better effects.