ObjectiveTo review the research progress of location methods and the best femoral insertion position of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction of femoral tunnel, and provide reference for surgical treatment.MethodsThe literature about femoral insertion position of the MPFL reconstruction in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of MPFL, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of femoral tunnel positioning methods were summarized.ResultsThe accurate establishment of the femoral anatomical tunnel is crucial to the success of MPFL reconstruction. At present, there are mainly two kinds of methods for femoral insertion: radiographic landmark positioning method and anatomical landmark positioning method. Radiographic landmark positioning method has such advantages as small incision and simple operation, but it can not be accurately positioned for patients with severe femoral trochlear dysplasia. It is suggested to combine with the anatomical landmark positioning method. These methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no unified positioning standard. In recent years, the use of three-dimensional design software can accurately assist in the MPFL reconstruction, which has become a new trend.ConclusionFemoral tunnel positioning of the MPFL reconstruction is very important. The current positioning methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Personalized positioning is a new trend and has not been widely used in clinic, its effectiveness needs further research and clinical practice and verification.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of modified single patellar tunnel medial patella femoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation. MethodsBetween January 2023 and June 2023, a total of 61 patients with recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent MPFL reconstruction with autologous semitendinosus were enrolled and divided into 2 groups using random number table method. In the patellar anchor group, 31 patients were treated with MPFL reconstruction with double medial patellar anchors, and 30 patients in the patellar tunnel group were treated with MPFL reconstruction with single patellar tunnel. The femoral ends of both groups were fixed with absorbable compression screws. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, side, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG), Q angle, Caton-Deschamps index, number of dislocation, and preoperative Kujala score, preoperative patellar inclination angle (P>0.05). Patellar tunnel, patellar anchor position, patellar reduction, and the patellar inclination angle were measured by CT scan after operation. Kujala score was used to evaluate the function of knee joint before operation, at 2 weeks and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after operation. Incision aesthetic satisfaction score was performed at 3 months after operation. The signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) of the transplanted tendon was measured by knee MRI at 12 months after operation to compare the maturity of the graft between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). Knee CT reexamination showed that the patellar tunnel and the patellar anchor position were consistent with the intraoperative fluoroscopy. There was no significant difference in the difference of the patellar inclination angle between the two groups before and after operation (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-14 months (mean, 12.8 months). There was 1 case of patellar anchor suture rejection in patellar anchor group, and the wound healed after debridement and dressing change. During the follow-up, there was no complication such as recurrence of patellar dislocation, infection and postoperative stiffness. The Kujala scores of the two groups significantly improved at each time point after 1 month of operation when compared with those before operation (P<0.05), and the Kujala scores of the two groups returned to normal levels at 3 months after operation. The Kujala score in the patellar tunnel group was significantly higher than that in the patellar anchor group in the very early stage (2 weeks) (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05). Patients in the patellar tunnel group were significantly better than those in the patellar anchor group in the score of incision aesthetic satisfaction at 3 months after operation and the SNQ at 12 months after operation (P<0.05). Conclusion Modified single patellar tunnel MPFL reconstruction was used to treat patients with recurrent patellar dislocation without pathological TT-TG. The slide-fixation structure formed by single patellar tunnel positioning provides a variable degree of freedom for the reconstructed MPFL, which shows good effectiveness in the very early stage of the rehabilitation process.
Objective To investigate whether the outlet of the femoral tunnel will cause iatrogenic injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) during posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) and estimate the safe angle of femoral tunnel placement. MethodsThirteen formaldehyde-soaked human knee joint specimens were used, 8 from men and 5 from women; the donors’ age ranged from 49 to 71 years, with an average of 61 years. First, the medial part of the femur was carefully dissected to clearly expose the region of the MCL course and attachment on the femoral medial aspect and to outline the anterior margin of the region with a marked line. The marked line divided the medial femoral condyle into an area with an MCL course and a bare bone area which is regarded relatively safe for no MCL course. Then, the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) was cut to identify the femoral attachment of the PCL. After the knee joint was fixed at a 120° flexion angle, the process of femoral tunnel preparation for the PCL single-bundle reconstruction was simulated. The inside-out technique was used to drill the femoral tunnel from the PCL femoral footprint inside the knee joint with an orientation to exit the medial condyle of the femur, and the combination angle of the two planes, the axial plane and the coronal plane, was adapted to the process of drilling femoral tunnels at different orientations. The following 15 angle combinations were used in the study: 0°/30°, 0°/45°, 0°/60°, 15°/30°, 15°/45°, 15°/60°, 30°/30°, 30°/45°, 30°/60°, 45°/30°, 45°/45°, 45°/60°, 60°/30°, 60°/45°, 60°/60° (axial/coronal). The positional relationship between the femoral tunnel outlet on the femoral medial condyle and the marked line was used to verify whether the tunnel drilling angle was a risk factor for MCL injury or not, and whether the shortest distance between the femoral exit center and the marked line was affected by the various angle combinations. Furthermore, the safe orientation of the femoral tunnel placement would estimated. ResultsWhen creating the femoral tunnel for PCLR, there was a risk of damage to the MCL caused by the tunnel outlet, and the incidence was from 0 to 100%; when the drilling angle of the axial plane was 0° and 15°, the incidence of MCL damage was from 69.23% to 100%. There was a significant difference in the incidence of MCL damage among femoral tunnels of 15 angle combinations (χ2=148.195, P<0.001). By comparison between groups, it was found that when drilling femoral tunnels at 5 combinations of 45°/45°, 45°/60°, 60°/30°, 60°/45°, and 60°/60° (axial/coronal), the shortest distances between the tunnel exit and the marked line were significantly different than 0°/45°, 0°/60°, 15°/45°, 15°/60°, and 30°/30° (axial/coronal) (P<0.05). Additionally, after comparing the median of the shortest distance with other groups, the outlets generated by these 5 angles were farther from the marked line and the posterior MCL. ConclusionThe creation of the femoral tunnel in PCLR can cause iatrogenic MCL injury, and the risk is affected by the tunnel angle. To reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury, angle combinations of 45°/45°, 45°/60°, 60°/30°, 60°/45°, and 60°/60° (axial/coronal) are recommended for preparing the femoral tunnel in PCLR.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of I.D.E.A.L technique and transtibial (TT) technique in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods A clinical data of 60 patients with ACL injury, who were admitted and met the selection criteria between January 2020 and September 2022, was retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with autologous tendon. During operation, the femoral tunnel was prepared by using I.D.E.A.L technique in 30 cases (I.D.E.A.L group) and using TT technique in 30 cases (TT group). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as age, gender, body mass index, cause of injury, injured side, interval from injury to operation, constituent ratio of combined cartilage and meniscus injury, and preoperative Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, anterior tibial translation difference, and Blumensaat angle between the two groups (P>0.05). The length of hospital stay and the occurrence of early and late complications were recorded. During follow-up, the Lysholm score, IKDC score, and VAS score were used to evaluate knee joint function and pain degree, and the anterior tibial translation difference was measured. MRI reexamination was performed to observe the healing of the graft, and the signal to noise quotient (SNQ) values of the femoral end, middle section, and tibial end of the graft, as well as the Blumensaat angle of the knee joint were measured. The differences in tibial anterior translation difference and Blumensaat angle before and after operation (change values) were calculated and compared between the two groups. Results The incisions in both groups healed by first intention after operation, and there was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-18 months, with an average of 14.9 months. The Lysholm score and IKDC score of the knee joint in both groups after operation increased when compared with those before operation, and the VAS score decreased. Compared to preoperative scores, except for the VAS score of the TT group at 1 week after operation (P>0.05), there were significant differences in all scores at different time points postoperatively in the two groups (P<0.05). The above scores in both groups showed a further improvement trend with the prolongation of time after operation. There were significant differences in Lysholm score and VAS score among 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation in the two groups (P<0.05). The IKDC score of both groups at 1 month after operation was significantly different from that at 1 week after operation (P<0.05). At 1 week after operation, the Lysholm score and IKDC score in the I.D.E.A.L group were significantly higher than those in the TT group (P<0.05), and the VAS score was significantly lower (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the two groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P>0.05). At 12 months after operation, the anterior tibial translation differences in both groups were significantly lower than those before operation (P<0.05); and the change value in the I.D.E.A.L group was significantly higher than that in the TT group (P<0.05). The incidences of early and late complications in the I.D.E.A.L group were significantly lower than those in the TT group (P<0.05). At 12 months after operation, MRI examination showed that the grafts of the knee joint in both groups survived well, and the Blumensaat angles of both groups were significantly smaller than those before operation (P<0.05). The change value of the Blumensaat angle in the I.D.E.A.L group was significantly higher than that in the TT group (P<0.05). The SNQ values of the femoral end, middle section, and tibial end of the graft in the I.D.E.A.L group were significantly higher than those in the TT group (P<0.05). Conclusion The early effectiveness of ACL reconstruction by using the I.D.E.A.L technique is better, the knee joint is more stable, and the incidence of postoperative complication is lower. However, the maturity of the graft after reconstruction using the TT technique is higher.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction via transtibial (TT) and transportal (TP) techniques after 10 years follow-up. Methods A clinical data of 103 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with a single bundle of autologous hamstring tendon between March 2006 and March 2009 was retrospectively analyzed, among which 57 patients were reconstructed with TT technique (TT group) and 46 patients were reconstructed with TP technique (TP group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, interval between injury and operation, preoperative pivot shift test, preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and KT-2000 side-to-side difference (SSD) between the two groups (P>0.05). At 10 years after operation, Lachman test was used to evaluate the forward joint stability and pivot shift test to evaluate the rotational stability of the knee; KT-2000 SSD was used to measure tibial anterior displacement; IKDC score and Lysholm score were used to evaluate knee function; MRI examination was performed to observe graft healing and measure coronal inclination angles of the tibia and femoral tunnels. The rate of return to sports was also calculated. Results The incisions healed by first intention in the two groups, and no early complication occurred after operation. All patients were followed up 10-13 years, with an average of 11.5 years. During the follow-up period, there was no limitation of knee extension and flexion, no discomfort of donor site or graft failure in either group. MRI examination showed that the graft healed well. The IKDC score, Lysholm score, and KT-2000 SSD in the two groups were significantly improved after 10 years (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at 10 years after operation (P>0.05). There were significant differences in coronal inclination angles of femoral tunnel and tibial tunnel between the two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Lachman test and pivot shift test between the two groups (P>0.05). The rate of return to sports of patients was 61.40% (35/57) in TT group and 63.04% (29/46) in TP group, showing no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.29, P=0.87). Conclusion TT and TP techniques can both achieve good effectiveness in ACL reconstruction.
ObjectiveTo compare the strength difference between the interfacial screw and the interfacial screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology to fix the tibial end of ligament during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction through the biomechanical test.MethodsTwenty fresh frozen pig tibia were randomly divided into two groups (n=10) to prepare ACL reconstruction models. The graft tendons in the experimental group were fixed with interfacial screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology, and the graft tendons in the control group were fixed with interfacial screw. The two groups of specimens were fixed in the high-frequency dynamic mechanics test system M-3000, and the length change (displacement), ultimate load, and stiffness of graft tendons were measured through the reciprocating test and load-failure test.ResultsThe results of reciprocating test showed that the displacement of the experimental group was (3.06±0.58) mm, and that of the control group was (2.82±0.46) mm, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.641, P=0.529). The load-failure test results showed that the stiffness of the experimental group and the control group were (95.39±13.63) and (91.38±14.28) N/mm, respectively, with no significant difference (t=1.021, P=0.321). The ultimate load of the experimental group was (743.15±173.96) N, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (574.70±74.43) N (t=2.648, P=0.016).ConclusionIn ACL reconstruction, the fixation strength of tibial end with interface screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology is obviously better than that of interface screw alone.
To observe the histology change of the insertion using different diamertrical bone tunnel in anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Ninety Japanese rabbits were selected, wihout female and male l imit, weighing 2.5-3.0 kg, and were randomly divided into 3 groups, 30 in each group. The ratio of transplantation l igament diameter and bone tunnel diameter was 1/1 (group A), the ratio was 1/1.5 (group B), and the ratio was 1/2 (group C). Bone tunnel observation and histology observation were carried out in the 4th, 8th and 16th weeks postoperat ively. Results Wound healed well in 3 groups. The mean time of walking functional recovery was 1.5, 2.0 and 3.5 days in groups A, B and C respectively. After 4 weeks of operation, more soft tissues at tunnel entry were observed in group A and group B than in group C; after 8 weeks of operation, there was no crevice at bone-tunnel entry of the groups A and B, there was no improvement in group C; after 16 weeks of operation, groups A and B showed the normal insertion, group C had no normal insertion. Histology observation: in groups A, B and C, bone-tunnel was filled with loose connective tissue after 4 weeks of operation; group A and group B emerged the discontinuation ACL insertion tidal l ine after 8 weeks of operation, group C had no insertion; groups A and B emerged the similarity normal ACL insertion tidal l ine structure after 16 weeks of operation, but group C had no this structure. The results of ultimate tensile strength in groups A, B and C were (75.44 ± 7.06), (91.37 ± 6.14) and (126.91 ± 4.61) N respectively at 4 weeks; the results were (74.31 ± 4.81), (88.30 ± 7.46) and (124.34±8.44) N respectively at 8 weeks; and the results were (62.20 ± 5.32), (71.53 ± 5.99) and (83.62 ± 5.69) N respectively at 16 weeks. There was no significant difference between group A and group B (P gt; 0.05), and there were significant differences between groups A, B and group C (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion In the ACL reconstruction, the ratioof transplantation l igament diameter and bone tunnel diameter being 1/1.5 will not affect the insertion outcome, but if theratio less than the l imit it will affect the insertion outcome.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of the femoral tunnel angle on the femoral tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in rabbits. MethodsFifty-four healthy 4-5 months old rabbits (weighing, 1.8-2.3 kg, male or female) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=18). The ACL reconstruction models of the right knee were established in 3 experimental groups using its Achilles tendons, and the left knee served as the control group. On the coronal position, the angle between the femoral tunnel and the femoral shaft axis was 30°, 45°, and 60°. The level of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) in the synovial fluid at 1, 2, and 4 weeks, the maximum load of the ligament and the rate of bone tunnel enlargement at 4, 8, and 12 weeks were detected. ResultsThe level of TNF-α significantly increased, and the maximum load of the ligament significantly decreased in the 3 experimental groups when compared with ones in the control group (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found among 3 experimental groups (P>0.05). The bone tunnel enlargement was observed in 3 experimental groups at each time point and reached the peak at 4 weeks, but no significant difference was shown among 3 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThe 30-60° angle between the femoral tunnel and the femoral shaft axis in the coronal position has no significant effect on the femoral tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction in rabbits.
Objective To review the research progress of Schöttle’s method in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR), and provide the latest knowledge and suggestions for surgical treatment. Methods The studies on Schöttle’s method at home and abroad in recent years were extensively collected, then summarized the problems affecting the accuracy of Schöttle’s method and the new ideas to improve the accuracy of localization. Results It’s vital to accurately locate the femoral tunnel during MPFLR. Malposition of the femoral tunnel is the main cause of postoperative complications and surgical failure. Schöttle’s method is the most well studied and most reproducible method for femoral tunnel localization, which is widely used as the “gold standard”. However, there are still problems that affect the accuracy of Schöttle’s method, including the impact of the internal/external rotation and varus/valgus of the knee on localization accuracy, unclear requirements for X-ray imaging and anatomical landmark reference line drawing standards, no suitable for patients with anatomical variations, and lack of further research on pediatric patients. In recent years, some new ideas are proposed to improve the Schöttle’s method to improve the localization accuracy. ConclusionFuture research should combine new technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) printing and intraoperative navigation to develop personalized and intelligent Schöttle’s method, further improving their localization accuracy.
ObjectiveTo compare the incidence of chondral injury using Rigidfix femoral fixation device via the anteromedial approach and the tibial tunnel approach during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. MethodsEighteen adult cadaver knees were divided randomly into 2 groups, 9 knees in each group. Femoral tunnel drilling and cross-pin guide insertions were performed using the Rigidfix femoral fixation device through the anteromedial approach (group A) and the tibial tunnel approach (group B). ACL reconstruction simulation was performed at 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 70, 80, and 90°in the horizontal position. The correlation between incidence of chondral injury and slope angles was analyzed, and then the incidence was compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThe correlation analysis indicated that the chondral injury incidence increased with the increasing of the slope angle (r=0.611, P=0.000; r=0.852, P=0.000). The incidence of chondral injury was 69.1% (56/81) and 48.1% (39/81) in groups A and B respectively, showing significant difference (χ2=7.356, P=0.007). The sublevel analysis showed that the chondral injury incidence of group A (36.1%, 13/36) was significantly higher than that of group B (0) at 0-30°(χ2=15.864, P=0.000), but no significant difference was found between group A (95.6%, 43/45) and group B (86.7%, 39/45) at 45-90°(P=0.267). ConclusionIt has more risk of chondral injury to use Rigidfix femoral fixation device via the anteromedial approach than the tibial tunnel approach to reconstruct ACL.