The therapeutic effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) was determined by a number of factors. Comprehensive thorough analysis of clinical features, imaging results and treatment response can predict the potential efficacy and possible vision recovery for the patient, and also can optimize the treatment regime to make a personalized therapy plan. Precise medicine with data from genomics, proteomics and metabolomics study will provide more objective and accurate biology basis for individual precise treatment. The future research should focus on comprehensive assessment of factors affecting the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy, to achieve individualized precise diagnosis and treatment, to improve the therapeutic outcome of nAMD.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and to investigate the primary treatment tentatively. MethodsA systematic search of Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and the Wanfang Data was performed to identify all comparative studies that compared the outcomes of PDT alone, intravitreal VEGF inhibitors alone and combined intravitreal VEGF inhibitors and photodynamic therapy. Outcomes of interest included the regression and recurrence rate of polypoidal lesions, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), therapeutic times, and the occurrence rate of adverse events. 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 19 non-RTCs were identified. According to treatment methods, the data extracted was classified to 3 groups, analyzed with odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95%confidence interval (95%CI). ResultsMeta-analysis suggests that the regression rate of polypoidal lesions (OR=0.34, 0.07; 95%CI=0.13-0.88, 0.02-0.36) and BCVA (WMD=0.25, 0.11; 95%CI=0.14-0.36, 0.01-0.21) in combined therapy group were significantly better than those in PDT group and intravitreal VEGF inhibitors group (P < 0.05). The recurrence rate of polypoidal lesions in PDT group was significantly lower than intravitreal VEGF inhibitors group (OR=0.35, 95%CI=0.16-0.74, P=0.006). BCVA (P=0.025) and the occurrence rate of adverse events (OR=60.36, 95%CI=6.04-603.50, P=0.000 5) in intravitreal VEGF inhibitors group were significant better than PDT group. ConclusionsCombined treatment appeared to be superior to PDT alone or intravitreal VEGF inhibitors alone. Combined treatment takes priority over all others in the primary treatment of PCV.
ObjectiveTo analyze the concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) in aqueous humor of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) before and after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab. MethodsTwenty-five eyes of 20 PDR patients were collected as the PDR group. Twenty-five eyes of 21 senile cataract patients were collected as the control group. There were no statistical significance in gender (χ2=0.223), age (Z=-1.555) and intraocular pressure (Z=-0.225) between the two groups (P > 0.05). Samples of aqueous humor (0.1 ml) were collected just before and 7 days after the injection of ranibizumab in PDR group. Samples of aqueous (0.1 ml) humor were collected just before cataract surgery in control group. The concentrations of VEGF and PEDF in the aqueous humor were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. ResultsThe VEGF and PEDF concentration in the aqueous humor were reduced significantly after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in PDR group (Z=-4.072, -4.319; P < 0.05). The concentrations of VEGF and PEDF in the aqueous humor before intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in PDR group were significantly higher than the control group (Z=-5.228, 4.706; P < 0.05). The VEGF concentration in the aqueous humor after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in PDR group were similar to control group (Z=-1.557, P > 0.05). However, the concentration of PEDF in the aqueous humor after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in PDR group still higher than control group (Z=-2.475, P < 0.05). The ratio of VEGF/PEDF before and after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab was statistically different (Z=-2.058, P < 0.05), but was the same between PDR group and control group (Z=-0.456, -0.844; P > 0.05). The aqueous humor concentrations of VEGF and PEDF were not significantly correlated with each other, neither in PDR group (r=-0.195, -0.174; P > 0.05) nor in control group (r=-0.286, P > 0.05). ConclusionsAqueous humor concentrations of VEGF and PEDF are significantly elevated in eyes with PDR. Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab significantly decreased the VEGF and PEDF in the aqueous humor after 7 days.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab and (or) triamcinolone combined with laser photocoagulation for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) during one year period. MethodsThe data of 31 eyes from 31 consecutive patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO during one year follow-up visit were retrospectively analyzed. Mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) logMAR was (0.74±0.36) and mean central retinal thickness (CRT) was (484.48±164.81)μm at baseline. All patients received standardized clinical comprehensive examinations including vision, intraocular pressure and optical coherence tomography for diagnosis before treatment. All patients received intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab (0.05 ml) at first visit. The continue PRN treatment were based on the visual acuity changes and the optical coherence tomography findings. Eyes received combined triamcinolone acetonide 0.05 ml (40 mg/ml) and ranibizumab for macular edema recurrence after two injections of ranibizumab and received laser photocoagulation during 10-14 days after third injections of ranibizumab. Mean injection of ranibizumab was 3.52±2.01, 15 eyes with triamcinolone acetonide (0.84±1.21), 21 eyes with laser photocoagulation (0.97±0.95) and 12 eyes with three treatment. Compared the visual acuities and CRTs of the first and the last visits by statistical analysis. ResultsMean visual acuity improved significantly to 0.42±0.33 logMAR (t=6.611, P=0.000). Mean improvement of visual acuity was 2.90±3.07 lines. A gain of three or more logarithmic lines was evaluated in 20/31 eyes (64.52%) at the last visit. Mean CRT was (326.19±117.80)μm (t=4.514, P=0.000).Mean reduction of CRT was (333.58±134.17)μm. A decrease of 100μm of CRT was evaluated in 17/31 eyes (54.84%). No severe ocular and systematic side effect was found. ConclusionThe efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab and (or) triamcinolone combined with laser photocoagulation for macular edema secondary to BRVO were assured.
Diabetic macular ischemia (DMI) is one of the manifestation of diabetic retinopathy (DR). It could be associated with diabetic macular edema (DME), which may affect the vision of DR patients. FFA is the gold standard for the diagnosis of DMI, but with the advent of OCT angiography, a more convenient and diversified method for the evaluation of DMI has been developed, which makes more and more researchers start to study DMI. Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF has become the preferred treatment for DME. When treating with DME patients, ophthalmologists usually avoid DMI patients. But if intravitreal anti-VEGF should be the contradiction of DME is still unclear. To provide references to the research, this article summarized the risk factors, assessment methods and influence of DMI. This article also analyzed the existing studies, aiming to offer evidences to a more reasonable and effective treatment decision for DME individual.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) for retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). MethodsEleven patients (14 eyes) with RAP were enrolled in this retrospective clinical study. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and maximum retinal thickness (MRT) were detected by examination of visual acuity and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The average BCVA was 0.17±0.21, CRT was (382.71±219.07) μm, MRT was (746.36±268.29) μm. All eyes received 0.5 mg (0.05 ml) ranibizumab injection. Follow-up visits were performed monthly after injection. The mean follow-up time was (15.38±13.64) month. Injections were repeated if the eyes with retinal edema. The mean number of repetitive IVR was (3.7±1.0) times/eye (from 1 to 10 times). Changes in BCVA, CRT, MRT and complications were observed at the last follow up. ResultsAt the last follow-up, the mean BCVA was 0.28±0.26 (from 0.01 to 1.0). Of 14 eyes, visual acuity improved in 11 eyes, not changed in 2 eyes and decreased in 1 eye. The difference of BCVA was significant between before and after the treatment (t=3.167,P=0.007). The mean CRT was (166.14±52.79) μm, which was less than that of pre-treatment values (t=3.737,P=0.002). The mean MRT was (360.43±102.19) μm, which was less than that of pre-treatment values (t=6.106,P=0.000). No ocular or systemic adverse effects occurred. ConclusionIVR is an efficient and safe treatment for RAP, with visual acuity improvement, decrease of CRT and MRT.
Objective To study and compare the clinical efficacy between intravitreal conbercept injection and (or) macular grid pattern photocoagulation in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods Ninety eyes of 90 patients diagnosed as macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO were enrolled in this study. Forty-eight patients (48 eyes) were male and 42 patients (42 eyes) were female. The average age was (51.25±12.24) years and the course was 5–17 days. All patients were given best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, slit lamp with preset lens, fluorescence fundus angiography (FFA) and optic coherent tomography (OCT) examination. The patients were divided into conbercept and laser group (group Ⅰ), laser group (group Ⅱ) and conbercept group (group Ⅲ), with 30 eyes in each group. The BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) in the three groups at baseline were statistically no difference (F=0.072, 0.286;P=0.930, 0.752). Patients in group Ⅰ received intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml of 10.00 mg/ml conbercept solution (conbercept 0.5 mg), and macular grid pattern photocoagulation 3 days later. Group Ⅱ patients were given macular grid pattern photocoagulation. Times of injection between group Ⅰ and Ⅲ, laser energy between group Ⅰ and Ⅱ, changes of BCVA and CMT among 3 groups at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment were compared. Results Patients in group Ⅰ and Ⅲ had received conbercept injections (1.20±0.41) and (2.23±1.04) times respectively, and 6 eyes (group Ⅰ) and 22 eyes (group Ⅲ) received 2-4 times re-injections. The difference of injection times between two groups was significant (P＜0.001). Patients in group Ⅱ had received photocoagulation (1.43±0.63) times, 9 eyes had received twice photocoagulation and 2 eyes had received 3 times of photocoagulation. The average laser energy was (96.05±2.34) μV in group Ⅰ and (117.41±6.85) μV in group Ⅱ, the difference was statistical significant (P=0.003). BCVA improved in all three groups at last follow-up. However, the final visual acuity in group Ⅰ and group Ⅲ were better than in group Ⅱ (t=4.607, –4.603;P＜0.001) and there is no statistical significant difference between group Ⅲ and group Ⅰ (t=–0.802,P=0.429). The mean CMT reduced in all three groups after treating for 1 week and 1 month, comparing that before treatment (t=–11.855, –10.620, –10.254;P＜0.001). There was no statistical difference of CMT between group Ⅰand Ⅲ at each follow up (t=0.404, 1.723, –1.819, –1.755;P=0.689, 0.096, 0.079, 0.900). CMT reduction in group Ⅰ was more than that in group Ⅱ at 1 week and 1 month after treatments (t=–4.621, –3.230;P＜0.001, 0.003). The CMT in group Ⅲ at 3 month after treatment had increased slightly comparing that at 1 month, but the difference was not statistically significant (t=1.995,P=0.056). All patients had no treatment-related complications, such as endophthalmitis, rubeosis iridis and retinal detachment. Conclusions Intravitreal conbercept injection combined with macular grid pattern photocoagulation is better than macular grid pattern photocoagulation alone in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO. Combined therapy also reduced injection times comparing to treatment using conbercept injection without laser photocoagulation.
ObjectiveTo further compare the effect of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathologic myopia by meta-analysis. MethodsPertinent publications were identified through systemic searches of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrance Controlled Trials Register. All clinical comparative studies of IVB or PDT as initial treatment for CNV secondary to pathologic myopia were included. Meta analysis of these clinical trials was performed to analyze the effect of IVB and PDT for CNV secondary to pathologic myopia. Measurements included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT). ResultsA total of 6 comparative studies involving 351 eyes were included. There were 196 eyes in IVB group and 215 eyes in PDT group. Funnel plots, Egger linear regression and Begg method did not show publication bias. Compared with PDT group, at 3, 6 and 12 months after IVB treatment, BCVA significantly increased . However, change of CFT at 3, 6 and 12 months did not vary significantly between IVB group and PDT group (3 months: WMD=-22.49, 95% CI=-93.49 to 48.52, P=0.53; 6 months: WMD=-17.34, 95% CI=-56.00 to 21.31, P=0.38; 12 months: WMD=-5.32, 95% CI=-56.37 to 45.74, P=0.84). ConclusionPatients with CNV secondary to pathologic myopia experienced a significant benefit of visual improvement after IVB, but reduction in CFT after the IVB or PDT did not vary significantly.
Objective To compare the features of OCT angiography (OCTA) between neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) patients before and after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment. Methods A prospective cohort study. Twenty-nine patients (37 eyes) with nAMD (19 males and 10 females, aged 68.20±8.76) and 31 patients (34 eyes) with mCNV (9 males and 22 females, aged 43.10±11.80, with the mean diopter of −9.71±1.20 D) from Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University during May and December 2017 were included in this study. Ranibizumab or Conbercept (0.5 mg/0.05 ml) was intravitreally injected in all eyes. The patients were follow-up for 3−6 months. The OCTA was conducted before treatment and 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3−6 months after treatment. In order to ensure that the scanning position was the same, the tracking mode was adopted for each scanning. According to the OCTA images, the lesion area, parafoveal superficial vessel density and perfusion area were measured and analyzed contrastively between nAMD and mCNV patients. Results The mean lesion area before and 1 month after treatment in nAMD patients were 0.38±1.87 mm2 and 0.06±0.12 mm2, while in mCNV patients, those were 0.26±1.06 mm2 and 0.03±0.05 mm2, respectively. There were statistically significant differences (Z=4.181, 4.475; P＜0.001) in CNV lesion area before and 1 month after treatment between nAMD and mCNV patients. Compared with those before treatment, the absolute change (Z=1.853, P=0.064) and the percentage changes (t=2.685, P=0.010) of CNV lesion area 1 month after treatment in nAMD and mCNV patients show a statistical meaning. There were significantly decreases in both parafoveal superficial vessel density (F=8.997, P=0.003) and perfusion area (F=7.887, P=0.015) 3 months after treatment in nAMD patients, while decreases in parafoveal superficial vessel density (F=11.142, P=0.004) and perfusion area (F=7.662, P=0.013) could be detected 1 day after treatment in mCNV patients, before rising 1 month after treatment. Conclusions There are significantly differences in lesion area before and after the treatment of intravitreal anti-VEGF between nAMD and mCNV patients by OCTA examination. Moreover, the changes of both parafoveal superficial vessel density and perfusion area after anti-VEGF treatment are statistically different in two groups.
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of intravitreal injection of conbercept in the treatment of retinopathy of premature (ROP) and to analyze the factors related to the therapy.MethodsA retrospective study. A total of 57 patients (57 eyes) with pre-threshold type 1 (30 patients, 30 eyes), threshold ROP (21 patients, 21 eyes) and acute aggressive posterior ROP (APROP, 6 patients, 6 eyes)) from premature infants by retinal screening in Henan Provincial People’s Hospital during October 2017 and June 2018 were enrolled in this study. All children were received routinely intravitreal injected 10 mg/ml conbercept 0.025 ml (0.25 mg) within 24 hours after diagnosis. Fundus examination was performed 7 days after injection. The interval of examination was 1−3 weeks according to fundus conditions. The mean follow-up was 30.1±4.6 weeks. For patients with relapse or no response to treatment, repeated intravitreal injection of conbercept or laser photocoagulation therapy was given. The retinal blood vessels of the affected eyes were observed. Logistic stepwise regression analysis was used for the correlation test of multiple factors.ResultsAmong 57 eyes, 49 eyes and 8 eyes were treated with 1 or 2 times of intravitreal injection of conbercept. After 24 weeks of treatment, in 57 eyes, 26 eyes were cured (45.6%), 22 eyes improved (38.6%), 8 eyes relapsed (14.0%), and 1 eye aggravated (1.8%). The recurrence time was 12.9±4.5 weeks after the first injection, and the corrected gestational age was 49.0±6.7 weeks. There were significant differences in initial injection time, lesion range among the cure, improved and recurrence eyes (F=5.124, 7.122; P＜0.01, ＜0.01). Parameters of ROP condition, including ROP diagnosis (pre-threshold type 1, threshold and APROP), zone (zone 1 and 2), stage (stage 2 and 3) and plus lesions, were significant different among the cure, improved and recurrence eyes (χ2=11.784, 14.100, 6.896, 9.935; P＜0.01, ＜0.01, ＜0.05, ＜0.01). Logistic stepwise regression analysis showed that the recurrence rate was correlated with ROP zone, more likely recurrence at zone 1 than zone 2 (Wald=9.879, OR=27.333, P=0.002). No injection-related complications such as endophthalmitis, cataract and glaucoma were found during treatment and follow-up period.ConclusionsIntravitreal injection of conbercept is effective in the treatment of ROP without obvious adverse reactions. Lesion zoning is associated with recurrence after treatment.