Brain functional network changes over time along with the process of brain development, disease, and aging. However, most of the available measurements for evaluation of the difference (or similarity) between the individual brain functional networks are for charactering static networks, which do not work with the dynamic characteristics of the brain networks that typically involve a long-span and large-scale evolution over the time. The current study proposes an index for measuring the similarity of dynamic brain networks, named as dynamic network similarity (DNS). It measures the similarity by combining the “evolutional” and “structural” properties of the dynamic network. Four sets of simulated dynamic networks with different evolutional and structural properties (varying amplitude of changes, trend of changes, distribution of connectivity strength, range of connectivity strength) were generated to validate the performance of DNS. In addition, real world imaging datasets, acquired from 13 stroke patients who were treated by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), were used to further validate the proposed method and compared with the traditional similarity measurements that were developed for static network similarity. The results showed that DNS was significantly correlated with the varying amplitude of changes, trend of changes, distribution of connectivity strength and range of connectivity strength of the dynamic networks. DNS was able to appropriately measure the significant similarity of the dynamics of network changes over the time for the patients before and after the tDCS treatments. However, the traditional methods failed, which showed significantly differences between the data before and after the tDCS treatments. The experiment results demonstrate that DNS may robustly measure the similarity of evolutional and structural properties of dynamic networks. The new method appears to be superior to the traditional methods in that the new one is capable of assessing the temporal similarity of dynamic functional imaging data.
Currently, about one-third of patients with anti-epilepsy drug or resective surgery continue to have sezure, the mechanism remin unknown. Up to date, the main target for presurgical evaluation is to determene the EZ and SOZ. Since the early nineties of the last century network theory was introduct into neurology, provide new insights into understanding the onset, propagation and termination. Focal seizure can impact the function of whole brain, but the abnormal pattern is differet to generalized seizure. Brain network is a conception of mathematics. According to the epilepsy, network node and hub are related to the treatment. Graphy theory and connectivity are main algorithms. Understanding the mechanism of epilepsy deeply, since study the theory of epilepsy network, can improve the planning of surgery, resection epileptogenesis zone, seizure onset zone and abnormal node of hub simultaneously, increase the effect of resectiv surgery and predict the surgery outcome. Eventually, develop new drugs for correct the abnormal network and increase the effect. Nowadays, there are many algorithms for the brain network. Cooperative study by the clinicans and biophysicists instituted standard and extensively applied algorithms is the precondition of widely used clinically.