Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety interferon-α (IFN-α) combined with lamivudine vs. IFN-α alone in treating children with Hepatitis B. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on IFN-α combined with lamivudine in treating children with hepatitis B. Two reviewers screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results 8 RCTs were included, with comparable baseline. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared to the IFN-α alone group, the combined therapy group had higher negative rates of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg. There was no significant difference in the positive rate of anti-Hbe and the incidence of adverse reaction between the two groups. Conclusion Current evidence shows that IFN-α combined with lamivudine was more effective than IFN-α alone in treating children’s hepatitis B.
Objective To assess the efficacy of lamivudine in patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B.Methods MEDLINE, SCI, Current Content Connect, The Cochrane Library, and Chinese Biomedical Database were searched from the beginning to September 2005, and the references of eligible studies were manually screened. R.andomized controlled trials comparing lamivudine with non-antiviral interventions （ placebo, no treatment and standard care ） in patients with chronic hepatitis B were eligible for inclusion. Two investigators independently assessed the quality and extracted the data. Heterogeneity was examined by Chi-square test. Fixed and random effect meta-analysis were used to pool the data. Subgroup analyses were used in treatment course. Results Eleven R.CTs were included （ n = 1 237 ）. All reported the effect of lamivudine （100 mg/d） , and one of them included lamivudine （25 mg/d）. The treatment duration of 52 weeks and less than 26 weeks were reported in eight and three RCTs, respectively. Six RCTs adequately applied randomization, while other five RCTs were not reported in detail. Four RCTs adequately enforced allocation concealment, five RCTs enforced blinding bitterly. The others were not reported in detail. It was found by meta-analysis that, compared with the control, lamivudine （100 mg/d, 52 W） could significantly clear HBeAg [42.6% vs. 13% , RR 3.20, 95% CI （2.33, 4. 38）] and clearHBVDNA [71.78% vs. 20, 36%, RR3.42, 95%CI （2.80,4.19）], normalize ALT [65% vs. 34.9%, RR1.91, 95%CI （1.64,2.21）], achieve HBeAgseroconversion [16.1% vs. 7.29% , RR2.12, 95%CI （1.24,3.80） ] and histology response [57. 9% vs. 26.2%, RR 2. 17, 95% CI （ 1.67,2.81 ） ] ; Lanfivudine （100 mg/ d, 12 W） could effectively clear HBV DNA [ 50.7% vs 3.92% , RR 8.68, 95% CI （1.72,43.74 ） ] , but was not effective in loss of HBeAg, HBeAg seroconversion and normalization of ALT, Lamivudine （25 mg/d） could effectively clear HBV DNA [97.7% vs. 22.2% , RR 4.41, 95% CI （2.86,6.79） ] and improve histology response [59.3% vs. 30% , RR1.98, 95% CI （1.31,2.99 ） ], but was not effective in HBeAg seroconversion. Conclusions Lamivudine （100 mg/ d） is effective in clearing HBV DNA and HBeAg, normalizing ALT and achieving HBeAg seroconversion.
Objective To explore the relationship between the HBsAg positive patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and HBV DNA genotype. Methods By using PCR type-specific primers combined with sequencing of genotype, we analyzed the genotype of HBV DNA in the serum of 500 patients with positive HBsAg in our hospital. Among them, 150 cases suffered from HCC. Results Genotype B and C were both predominant genotypes in HBsAg positive patients. But in HCC group, the rate of genotype C was 65.33% （98/150）, which was significantly higher than that in non-HCC group (88/350, 25.14%), while genotype B, in contrast, was 28.67% （43/150） and 68.86% （241/350）， χ2=75.45， Plt;0.05. The distribution of HBV DNA genotype B or genotype C in different gender or different age groups were not statistically significantly different in cases of HCC (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Genotype C of HBV DNA is more common in patients with HCC, and maybe there is relationship between genotype C and the occurrence of HCC.
Objective To investigate the prevention of HBV reinfection in the perioperative period of liver transplantation on HBV-related diseases． Methods Published papers were collected and reviewed． Results HBV-related diseases were the main indications of liver transplantation．The prevention for HBV reinfection affects the survivals remarkably. Nowadays, a lot of medication have been used in the prevention of HBV reinfection， and the therapeutic regimens were different from each other. Conclusion Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for HBV-related disease． Appropriate prevention of HBV reinfection in the perioperative period of liver transplantation is important for the survivals of patients．
【Abstract】Objective To investigate the prevention and treatment for recurrence of hepatitis B after liver transplantation on HBV-related diseases. Methods Making a literature summarization based on published papers review.Results Acute and chronic HBV-related diseases are the main indications of liver transplantation.Recurrence rate of hepatitis B is from 80% to 100% in the untreated patients after liver transplantation,and it affects the survivals of patients seriously.It has become a focus to prevent and treat the recurrence of hepatitis B.After a series of explotation and application,there have been a lot of drugs of preventing and treating HBV reinfection, including hepatitis B immunoglobulin,interferon and nucleotide analog antivirus drugs(lamivudine, famcyclovir, adefovir),etc.The therapeutic characteristics of them are different. Their utilizations of dividing or alliance are developing rapidly.Conclusion Liver transplatation is an effective therapy for HBV-related disease. Anti-HBV treatments perioperation play an important role in the improvement of succeed of liver transplantation.
ObjectiveTo explore the relationship between liver transplantation procedure with or without preservation of retrohepatic vena cava and postoperative reinfection of hepatitis B virus.MethodsHepatitis B virus makers of 15 retrohepatic vena cava samples from hepatitis B virus active replicating recipients was detected using immunohistochemistry stain LSAB and HBV DNA hybridization in situ. Hepatitis B virus reinfection rate and survival rate after transplantation in classic group (20 cases) and piggyback group (7 cases) was analyzed retrospectively. ResultsHepatitis B virus makers including HBsAg and HBcAg and HBV DNA of all 15 retrohepatic vena cava samples, 10 from classic group and 5 from piggyback group, was negative. In classic group, 20 recipients were followedup 6-30 months, mean 18 months, only one case of hepatitis B recurrence was confirmed 22 months after operation; In piggyback group,7 recipients were followedup 5-12 months, mean 8 months, none of hepatitis B virus reinfection was encountered. Recurrence rate in classic group and piggyback group was 5.0%(1/20) and 0(0/7), respectively.ConclusionThis preliminary study indicated that the retrohepatic vena cava of hepatitis B virus active replicating recipients don’t have the residence and replication of hepatitis B virus particle. Orthotopic liver transplantation procedure with preservation of retrohepatic vena cava appears not to increase the hepatitis B virus reinfection rate in hepatitis B virus active replicating recipients after transplantation.
Objective By means of evidence-based clinical practice, to find more effective treatment for a hepatitis B related nephritis patient with renal failure. Methods The following databases as Up to Date (May 2011), The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2011), PubMed (1978 to 2011) and CNKI (1978 to 2011) were searched to identify systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of treating hepatitis B related nephritis with glucocorticoid, immunosuppressor or antiviral therapies, and the quality of collected clinical evidence was evaluated by using GRADEpro software. Results The glucocorticoid or combined immunosuppressors was not recommended for existing adverse effects and not acting on the remission of hepatitis B related nephritis and reduction of proteinuria. However, the antiviral therapy used alone was recommended for acting on the remission of hepatitis B related nephritis and the reduction of proteinuria. In view of adverse effects and expensive price of interferon, the nucleoside analogue antiviral agent was suggested. Considering the renal toxicity of adefovir and tenofovir, and possible drug-resistance of lamivudine, the entecavir (0.5 mg qd) was finally selected with patient’s agreement, and the supporting therapies such as lowering blood pressure, and protecting the kidney and liver were adopted continually. After one month treatment, 24-hour urinary protein got reduced, serum albumin got increased, kidney function got stable, and hepatitis B virus DNA quantity got reduced. Conclusion For treating hepatitis B related nephritis with kidney failure, entacavir can reduce 24-hour urinary protein, raise serum albumin, stabilize kidney function and reduce hepatitis B virus DNA in a short term, but its long-term efficacy still requires further studies.
Objectives To evaluate the effects of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) intrauterine injection before delivery on interrupting mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV). Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on HBIG intrauterine injection on interrupting mother-to-child transmission of HBV published between January 1992 and May 2012 were searched in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, CBM, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, etc. The studies were screened according to inclusive and exclusive criteria, the data were extracted, the quality was assessed by two reviewers independently, and meta-analysis, publication bias and sensitivity analysis was conducted using Stata software. Results The total 42 studies involving 7 212 infants were included. The randomized methods were asserted in all studies, three of which reported the details of randomization, one study mentioned blinded method, two studies mentioned incomplete outcome data, 13 studies had other potential threats to validity, no allocation concealment and selective outcome reporting was mentioned. Results of meta-analysis indicated that the infant HBV infection rates in the HBIG group and the control group were 8.971% and 25.470% (RR=0.359, 95%CI 0.303 to 0.425) at birth, 5.385% and 13.919% (RR=0.391, 95%CI 0.278 to 0.550) after half a year, 5.318% and 12.457% (RR=0.429, 95%CI 0.335 to 0.551) after one year; the infant anti-HBs rates in the HBIG group and the control group were 61.964% and 14.523% (RR=6.712, 95%CI 1.920 to 23.467) at birth, 77.754% and 66.311% (RR=1.209, 95%CI 0.989 to 1.478) after half a year. Funnel graphs showed that there was publication bias. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results except the infant anti-HBs protection after half-a-year follow-up were stable and consistent with the original results. Conclusion Injection of HBIG during pregnancy for HBV-carrying mothers can effectively reduce the occurrence of HBV whenever at birth, after half a year or after one year, and increase the infant anti-HBs protection rate at birth, but it is ineffective to improve anti-HBV protection rate after half a year. Owing to the low quality of the included studies and existence of biases, this conclusion should be cautiously put into clinical practice.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of adefovir monotherapy (ADF) versus adefovir-Matrine combination therapy (ADF+M) for chronic hepatitis B. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, CBM, CNKI, WanFang and VIP Database were searched from the date of their establishment to July 2010, and the references of all included studies were also traced so as to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADF versus ADF+M. Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook 5.0.2 by two reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were conducted by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 24 RCTs involving 2 092 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that at the end of the treatment for both six months and 12 months, respectively, the ADF+M group was superior to ADF group with a significant difference in both the HBeAg seroconversion rate as the primary outcome (six months: RR=2.05, 95%CI 1.53 to 2.74; 12 months: RR=2.13 95%CI 1.74 to 2.60) and the secondary outcome such as HBV-DNA negative conversion, HBeAg negative conversion, ALT normalization, HBV-DNA variation, complete response and HBsAg negative conversion, etc. Conclusion As the current evidence shows, ADF+M therapy is superior to ADF therapy for chronic hepatitis B. The significant difference can even be observed at the end of the treatment for six months. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the low quality of the included studies. High-quality, large-scale RCTs are needed to further prove the results.
Objective To review the efficacy and safety of Kushenin combined with Adefovir Dipivoxil for Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB). Method Randomized controlled trails of Kushenin combined with Adefovir Dipivoxil for CHB were gathered from PubMed, CBMdisc (1978 to 2009), and CSJD (1989 to 2009), while other relative researches were searched manually; every research was evaluated, and then analyzed with RevMan 5.0.0 software. Result Ten randomized controlled trials were included; among total 855 patients, 436 were in trial group and the other 419 were in control group. As the Meta-analysis showed, the therapeutic effect of kushenin combined with Adefovir Dipivoxil was better than that of Adefovir Dipivoxil in aspects of improving the negative rate of serum ALT (RR=1.28, 95%CI 1.17 to 1.40), the negative rate of serum HBV-DNA (RR=1.27, 95%CI 1.13 to 1.42), the negative rate of serum HBeAg (RR=1.80, 95%CI 1.32 to 2.44), and the conversion rate of HBeAg and anti-HBe (RR2.06, 95%CI 1.43 to 2.95). Conclusion Kushenin combined with Adefovir Dipivoxil in treating CHB can improve the conversion rate of HBeAg and anti-HBe and further take better therapeutic effect.