【Abstract】Objective To investigate the prevention and treatment for recurrence of hepatitis B after liver transplantation on HBV-related diseases. Methods Making a literature summarization based on published papers review.Results Acute and chronic HBV-related diseases are the main indications of liver transplantation.Recurrence rate of hepatitis B is from 80% to 100% in the untreated patients after liver transplantation,and it affects the survivals of patients seriously.It has become a focus to prevent and treat the recurrence of hepatitis B.After a series of explotation and application,there have been a lot of drugs of preventing and treating HBV reinfection, including hepatitis B immunoglobulin,interferon and nucleotide analog antivirus drugs(lamivudine, famcyclovir, adefovir),etc.The therapeutic characteristics of them are different. Their utilizations of dividing or alliance are developing rapidly.Conclusion Liver transplatation is an effective therapy for HBV-related disease. Anti-HBV treatments perioperation play an important role in the improvement of succeed of liver transplantation.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo investigate the causes of biliary tract complications after liver transplantation, and to put forward effective measures of prevention, diagnosis and treatment. MethodsThe literatures of recent years were reviewed and summarized. Results The causes of biliary tract complications after liver transplantation are very complex, and there are no standard preventive measures. Treatment differs according to causes. ConclusionOne of the most important causes leading to biliary complications is preservative and ischemic injury. Poorly operative techniques and blood supply to biliary tract are also disastrous. Improving T tube placement can reduce the incidence of biliary complications related with T tube. To prevent biliary complications, it is crucial to completely wash the biliary tract， avoid damaging the blood supply to donor biliary tract and manage perfect biliary mucosatomucosa anastomosis without tension. T tube cholangiography combined with noninvasive MRCP enables accurate depiction of the biliary tree and diagnosis of biliary complications. Doppler ultrosonography should be routinely applied postoperatively. Timely application of interventional radiological technique is a valuable nonoperative procedure for treatment of biliary complications. Meanwhile, biliary sludge or cholestasis and mixed infections of biliary tract should be handled actively and properly.
目的 评价肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗复发上皮性卵巢癌（EOC）的作用，分析影响生存时间的因素。 方法 按Cochrane系统评价方法，计算机检索PubMed、EMbase、Medline、Cochrane Library、循证医学数据库（EBMR）、中国生物医学文献数据库（CBM）、中国期刊全文数据库（CJFD）、清华同方等数据库，并手工检索相关领域杂志。检索时间从1985年1月1日－2011年11月30日，查找手术治疗复发EOC患者的回顾性、非随机前瞻性、病例对照研究，由两位研究者按照纳入排除标准筛选文献、评价质量并提取资料后，采用SPSS软件进行线性回归分析。 结果 共纳入48篇文献（回顾性文献40篇，非随机前瞻性文献7篇，病例对照研究1篇）共2 605例。简单线性回归分析结果显示满意切除比例与中位生存时间回归模型成立，有统计学意义（F=7.346，P=0.009），浆液性病理类型比例与中位生存时间回归模型成立，有统计学意义（F=5.537，P=0.025），残留病灶大小与中位生存时间回归模型成立，有统计学意义（F=4.249，P=0.045），多重逐步线性回归分析显示仅有满意切除比率对术后中位生存时间的影响有统计学意义（P=0.009）。 结论 二次肿瘤细胞减灭术主要适用于铂类敏感型可切除及孤立结节复发EOC患者，要获得明确二次肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗复发EOC对中位生存时间的影响，尚需进行大样本随机对照的研究。
Objective To explore the characteristics of diagnosis and treatment for the rectal cancer in the young patients （≤40 years）．Methods The domestic and abroad literatures about the research on the progress of rectal cancer in the young patients were reviewed, the clinical data of patients with rectal cancer were compared between the young patients and the other age patients, the characteristics of diagnosis and treatment for the rectal cancer in the young patients were summarized．Results The onsets of the young patients with rectal cancer were related to the diet，lifestyle, and genetic factors．Compared with the older patients, more later stage, higher percentage of poor differentiation, earlier lymph node metastasis were found in the young patients with rectal cancer．Rectal cancer of the young patients was often misdiagnosed and with a poor prognosis．Currently，surgery assisted with neoadjuvant therapy was generally acknowledged as a better method．Conclusions It has specificity in epidemiology, pathology, treatment, prognosis, and so on for rectal cancer in the young patients, but surgery needs further research．
Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of the total mesorectal excision （TME） and intersphincteric resection （ISR） for ultra-low rectal cancer and anal sphincter preservation surgery for anorectal cancer， and to evaluate the short term efficacy and postoperative anal function. Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical and follow-up data of 86 cases with TME＋ISR for ultra-low rectal cancer and anorectal cancer from January 2009 to December 2010 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were performed. Results Eighty-six patients were successfully performed the operation， the lower edge of tumor from the anus was 1-5 cm （average 1.63cm）； tumor diameter was 2-7 cm （average 3.4cm）. The tumors were high differentiation in 4 cases， moderately differentiation in 60 cases，and poorly differentiation in 22 cases. The pTNM stages were stageⅠin 12 cases， stageⅡA in 11 cases， stage ⅡB in 15 cases， stage ⅢA in 2 cases， stage ⅢB in 23 cases， stage ⅢC in 16 cases， and stage Ⅳ in 7 cases. There were postoperative anastomotic leakage in 3 cases， perianal infection in 2 cases （1 case received reoperation with permanent colostomy because of pelvic peritoneal infection caused by perianal severe infections）. Anastomotic bleeding and anastomotic stenosis were of 2 cases respectively. Rectovaginal fistula， inflammatory ileus， urinary retention， and abdominal infection were of 1 case respectively. Eighty-six patients were followed-up for 12-24 months， the mean time was 18 months. Liver metastases was found in 1 case in 7 months after operation， 2 cases dead in the 7th month and 12th month after operation respectively. Local recurrence were found in 3 cases （3.5%） in 1 year after operation. The survival rate of 1-year was 97.7% （84/86）. The times of defecation was 1-5 times a day. The Kirwan’s score level on function of control defecation was 1-2 grade. Conclusions TME＋ISR for low rectal cancer and anorectal cancer is a viable， safe， and radical operation type for preservation of anus. The short term efficacy is satisfactory.
Objective To validate the accuracy of the colorectal cancer model of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI-CCM), and to find out the relationship between clinical risk factors and the predictive value produced by ACPGBI-CCM. Methods The patients diagnosed definitely as colorectal cancer in the department of anal-colorectal surgery, West China hospital from April 2007 to July 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. And the predictive value of mortality for each patient was calculated by ACPGBI-CCM, then the difference of risk factors was compared by classifying the patients into lower risk group and higher risk group by making the median predictive mortality as a cut point. Results From April 2007 to July 2007, a total of 99 patients diagnosed definitely as colorectal cancer accepted treatment, and among which 67 patients included in this study were admitted whose average age was 60.09 years. And there were 34 male and 33 female patients; 15 right hemicolon cancer, 9 left hemicolon cancer, 43 rectal cancer; Dukes staging: A 0 case, B 37 cases, C 24 cases, D 6 cases. The observed mortality 30 days after operation was 0, whereas the predictive mortality was 0.77%-25.75% with a median value of 3.36%. Then the patients whose predictive mortality were ≤3.36% were grouped as lower risk group (34 cases), the others higher risk group (33 cases), and there was strikingly different predictive mortality between two groups 〔(8.86±4.51)% vs (1.76±0.68)%, P＜0.01〕. And between two groups, the age, internal medicine complications, preoperative chemotherapy, ASA grading, cancer resected, and operative time made predominant differences (P＜0.01); and the neoplastic complications, Dukes staging, TNM classification, postoperative pain showed differences, too (P＜0.05); however, the gender, history of abdominal operation, the distance of the neoplasm to anal edge, the cancer location, differentiated degree, postoperative hospitalization time, and total hospitalization time didn’t have any differences (Pgt;0.05). Furthermore, stratification analysis was made for risk factors, and it came out that there were great differences of predictive mortality for different age groups and ASA grading, having internal medicine complications or not, having chemotherapy or not, and for cancer resected or not, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.01); also different Dukes staging or differentiation could cause different mortality (P＜0.05); but the difference of mortality didn’t make any sense according to gender, having abdominal operative history or not, having neoplastic complications or not, different TNM staging and cancer location (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion The clinical applicability of the ACPGBI-CCM is ascertained in such a large volume single medical centre, but the ACPGBI-CCM overpredicts the mortality in this study which may be attributed to the different areas, nations, or the different cultures. The complications and the neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapy are further found out that they may be independent predictive factors of survival, and more research will be needed to prove this.
Objective To discuss the influence of the progress and result in rectal cancer operation through application of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in multi-disciplinary team (MDT). Methods The patients treated in MDT model and non-MDT model between June to September 2007 were respectively analyzed, and the index about pathologic change, histologic transform and operative result between the two groups were compared.Results In the index of pathologic change, the incidence of abdominal adherence (13.5%, 7/52), ascites (7.7%, 4/52) and latent malignant intestinal obstruction (5.8%, 3/52) in MDT model group were obviously less than non-MDT model group (P=0.000). In the index of histologic transform, texture of mesentery in MDT model group was more fragile than non-MDT model group (P=0.000). The incidence of edema of pelvic tissues in MDT model group were more than non-MDT model group (P=0.000). However, the differences between the incidence of edema of pelvic peritoneum and adherence of mesorectum in two groups were insignificant (Pgt;0.05). In the index of operative results, the operative duration and intra-operative bleeding in MDT model group were less than non-MDT model group (P=0.000). And the protection of pelvic autonomic nerve in MDT model group was better than non-MDT model group (P=0.000). Meanwhile, accuracy rate in prediction of radical resection with anus-preserving in both groups were in high level (92.3% vs 76.2%). Conclusion Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy has certain influence in rectal cancer operation, but the successful operations are performed by standard and correct procedures. Therefore, optimizing combined therapy in MDT model and constructing preoperative evaluation system with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, would be the next important focus.
Objective To explore the quality of life of colorectal cancer patients undergoing multi-disciplinary comprehensive treatment by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy combined with radical resection. Methods From May 2007 to August 2007, the patients diagnosed definitely as colorectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively, of whom accepted neo-adjuvant chemotherapy combined with surgery were included and evaluated by quality of life questionnaire-core 30 (QLQ-C30) of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), and there were 3 time points chosen for assessment which were pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy stage (point A), preoperative stage after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (point B), and one month after surgery (point C). Results A total of 57 patients with an average age of 56.33 years (41-69 years) were incorporated in this study, and among which there were 34 male and 23 female; and 10 right-sided hemi-colonic cancer, 4 left sided hemi-colonic cancer, 43 rectal cancer. The global health differences between the A and B point or A and C point were statistically significant (Plt;0.001) whereas no significant difference existed between B and C point (Pgt;0.05). For the functioning scales of physical, physical, role, cognitive, and social function, no statistically difference among A, B and C time point. Although there wasn’t any emotional difference existed between A and B point (Pgt;0.05), obvious differ between C and A or C and B point were showed out (Plt;0.005). And for symptom scales, no remarkable differences came out among A, B and C point for dyspnoea and constipation (Pgt;0.05); reversely, great differences were found for fatigue, pain, insomnia, appetite loss, and diarrhoea between C and A or C and B point (Plt;0.01), but nope for A and B in the 5 items of symptom (Pgt;0.05). And the score of nausea and vomiting presented significantly differences between A and B or B and C point (Plt;0.01), but nope for A and C in this item (Pgt;0.05). There came out distinct significantly for financial impact among A, B and C point with a worsen score from early to late stage (Plt;0.001). Conclusion The intervention of chemotherapy could worsen the quality of life during the treatment of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy combined with surgery which may be attributed to the side reaction, but such adverse reaction may not affect actually the postoperative subjective feeling; On the other hand, the colorectal surgery may not decrease the quality of life although which could lead more early postoperative uncomforting. However, it needs more researches to discuss about the contribution of different comprehensive treatment strategy to the quality of life as well as the cost-effective analysis.
Objective To evaluate the risk of management decision combined neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with operation for colorectal cancer by means of the colorectal cancer model of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI-CCM). Methods One hundred and eighty-one eligible patients (102 male, 79 female, mean age 58.78 years), which were pathologically proved colorectal cancer in our ward from July to November 2007, involved 62 colonic and 119 rectal cancer. The enrollment were assigned into multi-disciplinary team (MDT) group (n=65) or non-MDT group (n=116), according to whether the MDT was adopted, and the operative risk was analyzed by ACPGBI-CCM. Results The baseline characteristics of MDT and non-MDT group were coherent. The watershed of lower risk group (LRG) and higher risk group (HRG) was set as predictive mortality=2.07%. The time involving extraction of gastric, urethral and drainage tube, feeding, out-of-bed activity after operation in MDT group, whatever in LRG or HRG, were statistically earlier than those in non-MDT group (P＜0.05). The resectable rate in LRG was statistically higher than that in HRG (P＜0.05), and the proportion of Dukes staging was significantly different (P＜0.05) between two groups; Moreover, predictive mortality in HRG was statistically higher than that in LRG (P＜0.05), while actually there was no death in both groups. Conclusion Dukes staging which is included as an indispensable option by ACPGBI-CCM is responsible for the lower predictive mortality in LRG.Hence, the value of ACPGBI-CCM used to asses the morbidity of complications within 30 days postoperatively would be warranted by further research. The postoperative risk evaluation can serve as a novel routine to comprehensively analyze the short-term safe in the MDT.
Objective To explore application of preoperative examination in the colorectal cancer patients. Methods The preoperative examination data of patients diagnosed definitely as colorectal cancer at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from November 2006 to June 2007 was retrospectively study, and the application situation and relationship among all preoperative examination in the colorectal cancer patients were analyzed. Results According to the inclusion criteria, 438 colorectal cancer patients were included which involved 260 males and 178 females. Preoperative examinations included two to sixteen items, with an average of 10.61 items. According to correlation analysis, positive correlation existed among lung function and blood type ( r =0.161, P =0.001), tumor marker ( r =0.118, P =0.014), chest X-ray ( r =0.113, P =0.018), routine electrocardiogram ( r =0.198, P =0.000) , while lung function and immune and stress reaction exhibit a negative correlation ( r =-0.106, P = 0.027) with preoperative examinations. At the same time, immune and stress reaction had positive correlation to CT examinations of abdomen ( r =0.151, P =0.001) as well as endorectal ultrasound ( r =0.330, P =0.000). Using univariate analysis, the influence of tumor location ( P =0.012) and operative method ( P =0.004) on the number of examination items was significant. Conclusion Preoperative examination of colorectal tumor surgery mainly includes routine examination, neoplasm-related examination and important organs function detection. And three levels of preoperative menu can be set up in early stage. Establishment of normalization preoperative combined examination may be helpful to consummate preoperative evaluation and improve medical quality.