Objective To compare effectiveness of multiple metatarsal osteotomy versus first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis in treating severe metatarsal adductus hallux valgus deformity. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 25 patients with severe metatarsal adductus hallux valgus deformity admitted between June 2010 and May 2014 who met the selective criteria. Among them, 15 patients underwent multiple metatarsal osteotomy (osteotomy group), while 10 patients underwent first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis (fusion group). There was no significant difference between groups (P>0.05) in gender, age, disease duration, affected side, preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA), or metatarsal adduction angle (MAA). The osteotomy group underwent fixation with screws and/or staples fixation, while the fusion group utilized anatomic fusion plates and trans-articular compression screws. The study compared the following outcome indicators between groups: operation time, pre- and post-operative differences (change values) in AOFAS scores, VAS scores, and radiographic parameters (HVA, MAA), osteotomy healing outcomes, and recurrence of hallux valgus deformity. Results Both surgical procedures were completed successfully. The operation time was significantly shorter in the fusion group than in the osteotomy group (P<0.05). All patients were followed up 96-144 months (mean, 116 months). The follow-up time was (129.1±7.2) months in the osteotomy group and (104.4±8.0) months in the fusion group, with no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). X-ray films revealed the radiographic union in two groups, and the fusion time was significantly shorter in the fusion group than in the osteotomy group (P<0.05). At last follow-up, both groups demonstrated significant improvements in AOFAS and VAS scores compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05). However, the differences in the change values of AOFAS and VAS scores between groups were not significant (P>0.05). During follow-up, 3 cases (20%) of deformity recurrence occurred in the osteotomy group, while no recurrence was observed in the fusion group. There was no significant difference in the incidences of deformity recurrence between groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor severe metatarsus adductus hallux valgus deformities, both multiple metatarsal osteotomy and first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis can correct the deformity. The former preserves metatarsophalangeal joint mobility but demands high technical proficiency from the surgeon, involves relatively longer operation times, extended bone healing periods, and higher complication incidences. The latter procedure is relatively simpler, facilitates faster postoperative recovery, allows early weight-bearing, and yields more reliable outcomes, though it sacrifices first metatarsophalangeal joint mobility.
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of the repair and reconstruction of large talar lesions with three-dimensional (3D) printed talar components by biomechanical test.MethodsSix cadaveric ankle specimens were used in this study and taken CT scan and reconstruction. Then, 3D printed talar component and osteotomy guide plate were designed and made. After the specimen was fixed on an Instron mechanical testing machine, a vertical pressure of 1 500 N was applied to the ankle when it was in different positions (neutral, 10° of dorsiflexion, and 14° of plantar flexion). The pressure-bearing area and pressure were measured and calculated. Then osteotomy on specimen was performed and 3D printed talar components were implanted. And the biomechanical test was performed again to compare the changes in pressure-bearing area and pressure.ResultsBefore the talar component implantation, the pressure-bearing area of the talus varied with the ankle position in the following order: 10° of dorsiflexion > neutral position > 14° of plantar flexion, showing significant differences between positions ( P<0.05). The pressure exerted on the talus varied in the following order: 10° of dorsiflexion < neutral position < 14° of plantar flexion, showing significant differences between positions (P<0.05). The pressure-bearing area and pressure were not significantly different between before and after talar component implantations in the same position (P>0.05). The pressure on the 3D printed talar component was not significantly different from the overall pressure on the talus (P>0.05).ConclusionApplication of the 3D printed talar component can achieve precise repair and reconstruction of the large talar lesion. The pressure on the repaired site don’t change after operation, indicating the clinical feasibility of this approach.