Objective We aimed to describe the prevalence of metabolic syndrome, its epidemiological characteristics, and to analyse the relationship of waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and body mass index (BMI) with metabolic syndrome (MS) among staff at Southeast University. Methods The data from the overall physical examination of 1979 staff were analyzed.Results The crude prevalence of MS were 21.7%,26.4% and 14.2% in the whole population, men and women respectively. The standardized rates were 14.7%,19.0% and 9.4%. The prevalence of MS in men was significantly higher than that in women(Plt;0.05). Both abdominal obesity and visceral obesity were positively correlated with the prevalence of MS(r=0.295, 0.248, P=0.000). Conclusion The prevalence of MS among staff of Southeast University has shown a significant increase in 2006. WHR and BMI are both correlated with the prevalence of MS.
Objective To evaluate the correlation between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and metabolic syndrome (MS). Methods Total 666 elderly male patients admitted to West China Hospital for routine physical examination in May, 2010 were included in this study. The related laboratory tests of BPH and MS were taken. The correlation among BPH, lower urinary tract Symptoms (LUTS), prostate volume (PV), MS and its component diseases were analyzed. Results Hypertension was an important risk factor for BPH (OR=1.309, 95%CI 1.033 to 1.661), low HDL-C hyperlipidemia was a risk factor for IPSS scored over 7 points (OR=1.573, 95%CI 0.330 to 0.997), and the score of PV was positively correlated to obesity, hypertension, low HDL-C hyperlipidemia and MS (all Plt;0.05). Conclusion For the patient with BPH, MS and its component diseases mainly exert their effects on PV changes rather than LUTS.
Objective To explore the relationship between different diagnostic criteria (ATPIII2002, IDF2005 and CDS2007 criteria) for metabolic syndrome (MS) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods A total of 666 elderly males admitted to West China Hospital for routine physical examination were involved in this study in May, 2010. The diagnostic agreement rates of different criteria were compared, along with the relationship between different diagnostic criteria for MS and NALFD. Results The diagnostic agreement of CDS2007 criteria with either IDF2005 or ATPIII2002 criteria was good. However, the agreement of ATPIII2002 with IDF2005 was compromised. The prevalence of NAFLD in MS group was significantly higher than that of non-MS group (Plt;0.01). On the basis of CDS2007 criteria, there was significant correlation between NAFLD and MS (Plt;0.000). Conclusion There is a close relation between NAFLD and all three diagnostic criteria of MS. NAFLD is one of the most important risk factors of MS. The diagnostic agreement of CDS2007 criteria with the other two is good, and there is significant correlation between NAFLD and criteria CDS2007 of MS. CDS2007 is found to be of high accuracy and applicability in the diagnosis of MS in Chinese population including the elderly.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of lipid-modifying agents for metabolism syndrome.Methods We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMbase, the China Biological Medicine Database, VIP and CMAC to 2007. We also did some handsearching and additional searching. Randomized controlled trials of lipidmodifying therapy for metabolic syndrome were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the eligible studies and evaluated the quality of the included studies. Meta-analyses were performed for the results of homogeneous studies using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.9 software. Results A total of 11 studies involving 1 422 patients with metabolic syndrome were included. The results indicated that there was no significant difference in TG between rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. However, rosuvastatin was more effective than atorvastatin on HDL-c improvement. Atorvastatin decreased TG levels greater than simvastatin, but simvastatin was superior to atorvastatin in HDL-c improvement. Two trials comparing fenofibrate with placebo were heterogeneous for some outcomes: one found no significant difference in improvements to HOMA-index, but the other trial indicated that fenofibrate was superior to placebo in improving QUICKI. However, the two trials revealed that fenofibrate favorably affected TG [WMD= – 1.77, 95%CI (– 2.21, – 1.33)] and HDL-c [WMD= 6.62, 95%CI (2.07, 11.17)] compared with placebo. No significant differences among atorvastatin, fenofibrate, alone or in combination, were observed in the proportion of metabolic syndrome reduction [RR=0.99, 95%CI (0.84, 1.16); RR=1.03, 95%CI (0.88, 1.20); RR=1.01, 95%CI (0.87, 1.18)]. Atorvastatin plus fenofibrate was superior to atorvastatin alone in TG and HDL-c improvement. Simvastatin-fenofibrate combination produced greater effectiveness in improving of HDL-c and TG compared with simvastatin alone. The fenofibrateorlistat combination was similar to fenofibrate in reducing metabolic syndrome [RR=1.15, 95%CI (0.68, 1.95)] and TG improvement, but was more effective than fenofibrate in HOMA-index improvement. This review of the clinical trials shows that the majority of lipid-modulating drugs did not have favorable effects on FPG, BP, BMI and WC. Six studies reported side effects, showing that the side effects for lipid-regulating drugs were mild to moderate, and well tolerated.Conclusion Our results suggest that lipid-regulating drugs in general exhibit beneficial effects on TG and HDL-c, but not on blood glucose and central obesity. The therapeutic effects of lipid-regulating drugs on blood pressure and insulin sensitivity are uncertain and have no positive effects on FPG, BMI and WC. There is insufficient evidence in this review to recommend the use of lipid-modifying drugs for metabolic syndrome due to low methodological quality, small ssamplesize and limited number of the trials. More high-quality and large-scale randomized controlled trials are required.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thiazolidinediones for metabolic syndrome.Methods Up through 2007, we searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMbase, the China Biological Medicine Database, VIP and CMAC. We also handsearched relevant literature. Randomized controlled trials about usingthiazolidinedioes to treat metabolic syndrome were included. Two reviewers independently extracted the data from the eligible studies and evaluated the quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed for the results ofhomogeneous studies using RevMan 4.2.9 software. Results Ten randomized control trials involving 1,183 patients with metabolic syndrome met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was not carried out because of apparent heterogeneity. Five trials compared rosiglitazone and placebo, which of single study reported CVD events at the end of 9 month follow-up. The results suggested that no significant differences were found between the two groups in occurrence of CVD events (RR=0.50, 95%CI 0.25 to 1.00), such as myocardial infarction and urgent vessel revascularization after coronary stent implantation, in the patients with metabolic syndrome, while rosiglitazone significantly decreased the proportion of metabolic syndrome (RR=4.0, 95%CI 1.63 to 9.82) and HOMA-index (WMD=-0.80, 95%CI -0.90 to -0.70) as compared with placebo. Pioglitazone did not affect TG, significantly decreased HOMA-index (WMD=0.02, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.03), and increased HDL-c (WMD=0.02, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.03), compared with placebo. Pioglitazone plus glimepirde was better than rosiglitazone plus glimepiride in TG and HDL-c improvement, with no significant differences in improving BP, FPG, PPG, HbA1c, and HOMA-index for both treatments. The combination of rosiglitazone with metformin was similar to pioglitazone-metformin combination in improving FPG, PPG, HbA1c and HOMA-index, whereas pioglitazone plus metformin was superior to rosiglitazone plus metformin in improving TG and HDL-c. No differences between rosiglitazone-metformin combination and glimepirde-metformin combination were observed in improving FPG, PPG, and HbA1c, but rosiglitazone plus metformin significantly lowered HOMA-index and SBP/DBP more than glimepirde plus metformin. The results of included trails revealed that rosiglitazone and pioglitazone had no favorable effects on BMI and WC or resulted in weight gain. The adverse drug reactions for thiazolidinediones were mild to moderate, and well tolerated. Conclusion The results suggest that thiazolidinediones produce positive effects on blood glucose level and insulin sensitivity in the absence of favorable obesity effects or resulting in weight gain. Pioglitazone favorably affects HDL-c. Thiazolidinediones show a certain effect on decreasing the proportion of metabolic syndrome, but the therapeutic effect on BP is uncertain. Overall there is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of thiazolidinediones for metabolic syndrome due to low methodological quality, small sample size, and limited number of trials. More high-quality, largescale randomized controlled trials are required.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of metformin for metabolic syndrome. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, China Biological Medicine Database, VIP, and CMAC up to the year of 2007. Handsearches and additional searches were also conducted. Randomized controlled trials of metformin for metabolic syndrome were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data from eligible studies and evaluated the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed for the results of homogeneous studies by The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 4.2.9. Results Six trials involving a total of 2442 patients with metabolic syndrome were included. Meta-analysis was not performed due to the apparent heterogeneity. Metformin, compared with placebo, exhibited more favorable effects in reducing the proportion of patients with metabolic syndrome (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.60), the proportion of patients with low HDL-c (RR 1.61, 95%CI 1.16 to 2.23), wide waist circumference (RR 1.64, 95%CI 1.06 to 2.55), and high FPG (RR 1.55, 95%CI 1.17 to 2.05). Metformin was also more effective in improving FPG and insulin sensitivity. The addition of metformin to atenolol plus nitrendipine was superior to atenolol plus nitrendipine alone in reducing the proportion of patients with high TG (RR 5.57, 95%CI 1.56 to 19.84), abdominal obesity (RR 14.47, 95%CI 3.34 to 62.61), and IGT (RR 16.51, 95%CI 6.06 to 45.0). Compared with low-fat diet therapy, metformin was superior in improving FPG, 2-hour postload plasma glucose, and insulin sensitivity. No differences were observed between metformin and acarbose in the reduction of TG and FPG, but metformin was less effective than acarbose in improving 2-hour postload plasma glucose. No adverse drug reactions were reported. Conclusion Metformin has beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of high FPG, IGT, and abdominal obesity. It also proved beneficial in reducing the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and increasing insulin sensitivity. The therapeutic effects of metformin on blood pressure, obesity, and lipid profile are uncertain. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of metformin in the treatment of metabolic syndrome due to low methodological quality, small sample size, and limited number of trials. More high quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are required.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of gastric bypass (GBP) on metabolic syndrome (MS) and the related mechanisms. MethodsThe literatures addressed the effect of GBP on glucose metabolism and blood pressure were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsIt showed that GBP achieved durable level of blood glucose, remission of dylipidemia and hypertension, however, which occurred before significant weight loss. The changes of many factors such as food intake, gastrointestinal hormones, adipocytokines, fat distribution might be involved in GBP to improve MS. ConclusionGBP seems to achieve the control of MS as a primary and independent effect, rather than secondary to the treatment of overweight.
Objective To analyze the causes of missed diagnosis of sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome ( SAHS) . Methods 42 missed diagnosed cases with SAHS from May 2009 to May 2011 were retrospectively analyzed and related literatures were reviewed. Results The SAHS patients often visited the doctors for complications of SAHS such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, etc. Clinical misdiagnosis rate was very high. Lack of specific symptoms during the day, complicated morbidities, and insufficient knowledge of SAHS led to the high misdiagnosis rate and the poor treatment effect of patients with SAHS. Conclusion Strengthening the educational propaganda of SAHS, detail medical history collection, and polysomnography monitoring ( PSG) as early as possible can help diagnose SAHS more accurately and reduce missed diagnosis.
ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) in health check-up population of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from 2011 to 2012 and to discuss the relationship between SCH and metabolic syndrome (MS). MethodsThose who received thyroid function tests and health examination in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from 2011 to 2012 were enrolled in the study. The data of medical history, blood pressure, height, weight, thyroid function, TG, HDL-C, FPG were collected. All data were analyzed by SPSS 18.0 software. ResultsA total of 11 976 persons (7 488 male and 4 488 female) received thyroid function tests. There were 1 820 persons (884 males and 936 females, 15.20%) who suffered from SCH. The SCH prevalence was significantly higher in females (20.86%) than that in males (11.81%) (P < 0.01). The people over 60 years old had the highest SCH prevalence. There were 1 145 persons (1 005 males and 140 females) suffered from MS among all 11 976 persons. The MS prevalence was significantly higher in males (13.42%) than that in females (3.12%) (P < 0.01). The SCH prevalence of the MS group was higher, which in the health group was lower (P < 0.01). The TSH level in the MS group was higher, while it was lower in the health group. ConclusionThe prevalence of SCH is higher in health check-up population; and SCH apparently increases the risk of morbidity of MS.
In 2014, The International Diabetes Federation (IDF), American Diabetes Association (ADA), International Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD), and Chinese Diabetes Society (CDS) published several guidelines and consensuses in the clinical diagnosis, treatment and comprehensive management of diabetes mellitus. In addition, guidelines and consensuses published by the American Stroke Association (ASA), American National Lipid Association (ANLA), Chinese Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery (CSMB) and European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) also included some contents related to the management and control of diabetes mellitus. In order to further strengthen the clinical management and treatment of diabetes mellitus, this paper reviewed the important advantages of clinical practice guidelines and consensuses published in 2014 in the field of diabetes mellitus.