ObjectiveTo analyze the influence of different surgical methods on survival and relapse-free survival in colorectal liver metastases. MethodsClinical data of 71 cases of colorectal liver metastases who treated in PLA General Hospital from January 2002 to may 2013 were collected retrospectively, to analyzed the effect of different surgical methods on survival and relapse-free survival of this kind of cases. ResultsAll of primary lesions underwent radical resection. And for the liver metastases, 20 cases didn't received any intervention (non-intervention group), 20 cases underwent resection of liver metastases, 20 cases underwent radiofrequency ablation, and 11 cases underwent radiofrequency ablation and resection of liver metastases (all 61 cases who received intervention were classified to intervention group). Results of Cox proportional hazards model showed that, in the condition of controlling other confounding factors, intervention can improve the survival (HR=1.724, P=0.043) and relapse-free survival (HR=0.701, P=0.048) of cases of colorectal liver metastases, cases who received intervention had better survival situation and the relapse-free survival situation. ConclusionFor cases of colorectal liver metastases, in condition of radical operation for colorectal cancer, the intervention for liver metastases can prolong the survival time and relapse-free survival time.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)/high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) of preoperation (L/H value for short) and the pathological staging of colorectal cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 187 patients with colorectal cancer who treated in PLA General Hospital from July 2009 to June 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThere were statistical significance in L/H value among different TNM stagings, N stagings, and M stagings (P<0.05):L/H value of TNM Ⅳ staging was higher than those of TNM Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ staging, L/H values of N1 staging and N0 staging were lower than that of N2 staging, L/H value of M1 staging was higher than that of M0 staging. However, there was no statistical significance in L/H value among different T stagings of colorectal cancer (P>0.05). Logistic regression results showed that L/H value were positively associated with TNM staging (OR=4.34, 95% CI:2.837-6.644, P<0.000 1), T staging (OR=1.72, 95% CI:1.175-2.512, P=0.005 3), N staging (OR=2.15, 95% CI:1.422-3.254, P=0.000 3), and M staging (OR=3.04, 95% CI:1.733-5.332, P=0.000 1) of colorectal cancer, and patient with higher L/H value took more risk of progression of tumor, lymph node metastases, and distant metastasis. ConclusionsRaise of preoperative L/H value is an independent risk factor for the progression of TNM staging, T staging, N staging, and M staging in colorectal cancer.