Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ddNACT) and conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cNACT) for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing ddNACT regimen with cNACT regimen for breast cancer. The time limit for retrieval was from establishment to March 1st, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literatures, extracted data and assessed risk bias of included studies; then, meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 15.0 software. Results A total of 13 RCTs were included, including 3 258 patients, of which 1 625 patients received ddNACT and 1 633 patients received cNACT. The results of meta-analysis showed that the ddNACT regimen could improve the pathological complete response rate (pCR, P<0.001), objective response rate (ORR, P<0.001), and disease free survival (DFS, P=0.037) as compared with the cNACT regimen, there was no significant difference in the overall survival (OS) between the two groups (P=0.098). The incidences of grade 3 or 4 oral stomatitis (P=0.005) and neurotoxicity (P<0.001) were higher and the incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was lower (P=0.025) in the patients with ddNACT regimen, there were no significant differences in grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (P=0.152), grade 3 or 4 anemia (P=0.123), chemotherapy completion rate (P=0.161) and breast conservative surgery rate (P=0.186) between the two groups. Patients with hormone receptor (HR) negative (HR–) were more likely to get pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P<0.001). ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the use of anthracycline/taxane-based ddNACT regimen in LABC patients can improve the pCR, ORR, and DFS as compared with cNACT regimen. The pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the patients with HR– is higher than that with HR+. Prophylactic use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor could significantly reduce the incidence of neutropenia, and most patients are tolerant to ddNACT regimen, 2 regimens have similar chemotherapy completion rates.
Objective To study the long-term effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on advanced breast cancer. Methods The CAF neoadjuvant chemotherapy 〔CTX 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), 5-FU 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), and ADM 30 mg/m2 (1st day) every 3 weeks〕 was carried out in 31 breast cancer patients (stageⅢ,Ⅳ) for 2 cycles before operation, compared with 30 patients (stage Ⅲa) whose therapies were never done and operations could be feasible. Results The overall response rate was 87.1%(27/31). The stages of 19 patients among 31 (61.3%) declined (6 patients to stage Ⅲa, 8 to stageⅡb, 4 to stageⅡa, 1 to stage 0, 1 to complete response and none to pathological complete response). The diseasefree survival time of the patients was 56.3 months which was obviously longer than that of the patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (43.5 months, P＜0.05). The 5-year diseasefree survival rate of the patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 38.7% which was a little higher than that (33.3%) of the patients without the chemotherapy, and the two groups had no significant difference. Conclusion The neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce the stages of patients with advanced breast cancer, obviously prolong the diseasefree survival time of patients, and reduce or delay recurrence or metastasis.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium (S-1) combined with surgery in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.MethodsWe searched EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to February 2017, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing S-1 combined with surgery in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 971 advanced gastric cancer patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing S-1 combined with surgery group was superior to the control group in R0 resection rate (OR=2.75, 95%CI 1.91 to 3.95, P<0.000 01), 2 year survival rate (OR=1.72, 95%CI 1.01 to 2.93, P=0.05) and 3 year survival rate (OR=1.64, 95%CI 1.12 to 2.41, P=0.01), while there were no statistical differences in response rate (OR=1.33, 95%CI 0.70 to 2.51, P=0.39), 1 year survival rate (OR=1.50, 95%CI 0.64 to 3.53, P=0.35) and the incidence of postoperative complications (OR=1.00, 95%CI 0.66 to 1.51, P=0.98).ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy containing S-1 combined with surgery can improve the R0 resection rate, 2-year survival rate and 3-year survival rate without increase postoperative complications rate. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo investigate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone may affect recent anal function in patients with rectal cancer.MethodsThe structured data from the December 3, 2018 version of Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA) of West China Hospital were extracted . The follow-up investigation was performed within 2 weeks from December 3, 2018 to December 16, 2018 by the telephone. The postoperative anal function of patients with rectal cancer was evaluated by the lower anterior resection symptom (LARS) score questionnaire.ResultsA total of 209 patients with rectal cancer treated by the total mesolectal excision in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of West China Hospital were included. One hundred and thirty-six patients of them were only treated with TME, while the other 73 patients were treated by the TME and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. As for the baseline data of the 2 groups, there was no difference in the age, body mass index, gender, surgical procedure, differentiation degree or anastomotic position (P>0.050), while the pathological staging (P=0.022) and postoperative recovery time (P<0.001) had the significant differences between these 2 groups. The postoperative 1-year LARS score was not associated with the gender, age, body mass index, pathological stage, physical comorbidity, neoadjuvant chemotherapy or time of postoperative recovery (P>0.050), but which was associated with the heart disease (P=0.019) or position of anastomosis (P=0.005). Moreover, the multivariate analysis showed that the higher anastomosis position was a protective factor for the LARS after 1 year (OR=0.706, P=0.003).ConclusionsThere is no significant difference in postoperative anal function between patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or not . It suggests that neoadjuvant chemotherapy has no more additional adverse effects on postoperative anal function in patients either.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. MethodThe literatures about the research progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer were reviewed. ResultsThe neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the advanced gastric cancer could significantly improve the R0 resection rate, improve the long-term survival rate, and reduce the risk of death.The course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer without distant metastasis generally was 6-9 weeks, and then according to the results of the curative effect evaluation to decide whether to undergo surgery treatment.Further the clinical research and improvement of chemotherapy sensitivity detection method were helpful to the unity of the standard of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ConclusionsThe curative effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer is clear.But there is no uniform standard on such as indications, chemotherapy regimens, medication time, and curative effect evaluation index, and so on.It is still needed the further research of multicenter and large clinical trials.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of TEC and CEF regimen in preoperative chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer. MethodsA total of one hundred breast cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy were divided into TEC group (n=50) and CEF group (n=50) by the pairgroup method and received surgical therapy after three courses of chemotherapy. The efficacy and toxicity of preoperative chemotherapy of patients in two groups were analyzed. ResultsFour patients with stage ⅢB breast cancer quit from CEF group after two courses of treatment because of the worse satisfaction. Clinical complete remission (cCR) was 7 cases, clinic partial remission (cPR) was 34 cases, stable disease (SD) was 9 cases, therefore, the remission rate (RR) was 82.0% (41/50), and reduction rate of tumor was 64.0% (32/50) in TEC group. cCR was 2 cases, cPR was 32 cases, SD was 12 cases, thus the RR was 680% (34/50), and reduction rate of tumor was 40.0% (20/50) in CEF group. The clinical efficacy and reduction rate of tumor of patients in TEC group were significantly superior than those in CEF group (Plt;0.05). The negative conversion ratio of lymph nodes were 54.1% (20/37) and 57.1% (20/35) in TEC group and CEF group, which was not statistically different (Plt;0.05). The occurrence of hair loss and leukopenia of patients in TEC group were significantly higher than those in CEF group (Plt;0.05), while the differences in thrombocytopenia, low concentration of hemoglobin, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, cardiac toxicity, and neurotoxicity were not significant (Pgt;0.05). ConclusionTEC regimen is better than CEF regimen in the efficacy and safety of neo-adjuant therapy for patients with breast cancer, and well tolerated.
ObjectiveTo observe the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer, and to analyze the cause of the prediction error.MethodsData from 157 breast cancer patients who underwent NAC before surgery in Mianyang Central Hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 were analyzed. MRI parameters before and after NAC and pCR conditions were collected to analyze the parameters that produced false positives and false negatives.ResultsOf the 157 patients, 37 (23.6%) achieved pCR after NAC, and 33 (21.0%) achieved radiation complete remission (rCR) after NAC. The accuracy of MRI prediction was 70.7% (111/157), the sensitivity was 82.5% (99/120), and the specificity was 32.4% (12/37). A total of 25 cases did not achieve rCR, but postoperative evaluation achieved pCR (false positive), 21 cases achieved rCR, but postoperative evaluation did not achieve pCR (false negative). Diameter of tumor, peritumoral oedema, and background parenchymal enhancement were associated with MRI false positive prediction (P<0.05); gland density and tumor rim enhancement were associated with MRI false negative prediction (P<0.05).ConclusionMRI can be used as an important method to predict pCR after NAC in breast cancer patients, and its accuracy may be related to diameter of tumor, peritumoral oedema, background parenchymal enhancement, gland density, and tumor rim enhancement.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and find the mechanism of multidrug resistance. MethodsTwenty patients with gastric cancer and 31 patients with colorectal cancer underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then operations. The preoperative specimens were stained by immunohistochemical techniques for testing p53,multidrug resistanceassociated protein (MRP), glutathione S transferase（GST）, telomerase. Resection specimens were evaluated for chemotherapy effect by routine histology; at the same time, the postoperative morbidity and mortality were observed. ResultsIn 51 patients, the response rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 27.45%(14/51),so multidrug resistance was a kind of common phenomena in gastrointestinal carcinomas. The postoperative morbidity was 15.69%(8/15), the main operation complication was infection,the mortality was 1.96%(1/51),only one person died from severe infection.The expression rate of p53, MRP, GST, telomerase was 58.0%,51.0%,66.7%,74.0%respectively, the location of p53 was at cell nucleus,location of MRP,GST was at cell memberane and cytoplasm,location of telomerase was at cytoplasm.The response rate had nothing to do with age, sex and metastasis. But it was related with p53 and telomerase expression. ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is an effective, safe therapy. But the rate of drug resistance is high in gastrointestinal carcinomas, and the response rate is related to p53, telomerase expression.
【Abstract】Objective Through using neoadjuvant chemotherapy of different circles combined colorectal cancer operations under multi-disciplinary team (MDT), we evaluate effective treatment strategies that suit to colorectal cancer patients in this country. Methods The retrospective study reviewed patients with colorectal cancer treated in general surgery department Ⅲ in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from October 2006 to April 2007. According to the circle times of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the patients were divided into single-circle group, double-circle group and triple-circle group. And comparing the difference of treatment time, effect index of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and operative results used these stratagies. Results The difference between the time from the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to the operation in three groups had no statistical significance （Pgt;0.05）, which were （5.64±2.00） d in single-circle group, (5.80±3.74） d in double-circle group, （6.22±2.76） d in triple-circle group. According to the treatment effects, CEA value decreased during pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in each groups （Plt;0.01）. Subjective reception such as hemafecia, anal tenemus and defecation obstruction in double-circle group and triple-circle group were obviously improved than that in single-circle group （Plt;0.01）. Evaluating the tumor condition, the ratio of CR and PR in double-circle group and triple-circle group was higher than that in single-circle group （Plt;0.01）. According to the adverse effect, WBC value of double-circle group and triple-circle group decreased during pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, their difference had statistical significance （Plt;0.01）. The difference of WBC pre- and post- neoadjuvant chemotherapy in single-circle group decreased fewer than that in double-circle group and triple-circle group （Plt;0.01）. Nausea and vomit response in triple-circle group were obviously more serious than that in single-circle group and double-circle group （Plt;0.01）. But abdominal distention and diarrhea response had no difference among three groups （Pgt;0.05）. Through our survey, used different neoadjuvant chemotherapy circle, patients in single-circle group and double-circle group were completely accepted within full confidence; but receptance of strategy in triple-circle group was 66.7％(12/18）. All operations were successful. The difference of postoperative aerofluxus time between single-circle group and double-circle group had statistical significance （Plt;0.05）. The difference of postoperative intake time, between triple-circle group and single-circle group, between triple-circle group and double-circle group, had statistical significance （Plt;0.05）. But wound recover time among three groups had no obvious difference （Pgt;0.05）. Conclusion Analyzing neoadjuvant chemotherapy circles, time between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and operation, treatment effect and operation results, it is a feasible and secure colorectal cancer multi-discipinary strategy for patients in West China that choose the treatment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with double-circle and short preparation time.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and the difference of efficacy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) between the patients with triple positive breast cancer (TPBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression breast cancer. MethodsThe patients with TPBC and HER2 overexpression breast cancer admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2019 to July 2021 who met the inclusion conditions of this study were retrospectively collected, and the differences of clinicopathologic characteristics and the efficacy after NACT were compared between the patients with TPBC and HER2overexpression breast cancer. Meanwhile the risk factors affecting the efficacy of NACT were analyzed by logistic regression according to the risk factors of pCR based on the statistically significant indicators of univariate analysis and the indicators related to clinical characteristics. The HER2 overexpressing breast cancer was positive HER2, negative estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), and the TPBC was positive HER2, ER, and PR. The pathological complete response (pCR) was used to evaluate the efficacy, which was defined as ypT0/isypN0. ResultsA total of 105 patients were enrolled in this study, including 57 patients with TPBC and 48 patients with HER2 overexpression breast cancer, as well as 50 patients with pCR and 55 patients with non-pCR. ① Compared with patients with TPBC, the patients with HER2 overexpression breast cancer had the higher proportions of Miller-Payne system grade 4–5, partial response, pCR, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >2.77 (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences in other characteristics such as age, family history of breast cancer, histological grade, T and TNM stages, lymph node metastasis, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, Ki-67 expression, and surgical method between them (P>0.05). ② The results of logistic multivariate analysis showed that the later T stage, the lower Ki-67 expression, the lower NLR, and the positive ER and PR statuses were not easy to achieve pCR after NACT (P<0.05). ConclusionsAccording to the results of this study, the efficacy of patients with HER2 overexpression breast cancer receiving NACT is more likely to achieve pCR than that of patients with TPBC. Positive hormone receptors (ER and PR), later T stage (stage 3–4), lower Ki-67 expression, and lower NLR (≤2.77) might be a worse efficacy after NACT for patients with breast cancer.