Objective To assess the effect of different thrombolytic agents, and different regimens in acute ischaemic stroke. Methods A systematic review of all the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. RCTs were identified from the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, Embase (1980 to 1997), handsearching Japanese and Chinese journals, and personal contact with pharmaceutical companies. We included randomised and quasi-randomised trials in patients with confirmed acute ischaemic stroke comparing different doses of a thrombolytic agent, or different thrombolytic agent, or the same agent given by different routes. Results Eight trials involving 1 334 patients were included. Concealment of allocation was generally adequate. All the trials were conducted in Japan. Different doses (of tissue plasminogen activator or urokinase) were compared in six trials. Different agents (tissue plasminogen activator versus urokinase,or tissue-cultured urokinase versus conventional urokinase) were compared in three trials. Few data were available for functional outcomes. A higher dose of thrombolytic therapy was associated with a five-fold increase in fatal intracranial haernorrhages (odds ratio 5.02, 95% confidence interval 1.56 to 16.18). There was a non-significant trend towards more early deaths or clinically significant intracranial haemorrhages in higher dose group. No difference in late deaths or extra-cranial haemorrhages was shown between low and higher doses. However, very few of these events occurred. No difference was shown between the different thrombolytic agents tested. Conclusions There is not enough evidence to conclude whether lower doses of thrombolytic agents might be safer or more effective than higher doses in acute ischaemic stroke. It is not possible to conclude whether one agent might be better than another, or which route of administration might be best.
ObjectiveTo investigate the main influence factors of microbubble-enhanced sono-thrombolysis by an orthogonal array experimental design (OAD) and to confirm the optimal parameters of microbubble-enhanced sono-thrombolysis in vitro. Methods The peripheral blood was collected from 50 female Sprague Dawley rats to prepare the standard plasma, and then 100 μL standard plasma and 25 μL thrombin (0.15 U/μL) were mixed and incubated in 37℃ water bath for 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours respectively to prepare corresponding standardized thrombus. The physical parameters for the designed experiments included transmit powers of ultrasound (factor A: 5%, 25%, 50%, and 100%), microbubble volume (factor B: 50, 100, 200, and 400 μL), urokinase (UK) concentration (factor C: 100, 200, 400, and 800 U/mL), and thrombolysis time (factor D: 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes), respectively. Then an OAD based on four parameters and four levels [L16(45)] was employed to optimize the thrombolysis conditions. The ultrasound frequency was 1.82 MHz. HE staining and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were used to observe the clots before and after thrombolysis. The thrombolysis rate was measured. ResultsHE staining and SEM observation showed that the fibrin was dissolved after thrombolysis. According to the OAD, the optimal parameter combination was C4-D4-A1-B4, indicating UK concentration 800 U/mL, thrombolysis time 40 minutes, transmit power of ultrasound 5%, and microbubble volume 400 μL, respectively. The four factors above had significant influence on thrombolysis (P lt; 0.05), and UK concentration was the most significant. There were significant differences in thrombolysis between different thrombolysis time (P lt; 0.05). ConclusionUnder the condition of fixed ultrasound frequency, microbubble-enhanced sono-thrombolysis efficiency is better in lower transmit power of ultrasound, higher UK concentration, longer thrombolysis time, higher microbubble volume, and shorter thrombolysis time
Objective To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of transcatheter directed thrombolysis （TDT） approach in treatment for deep venous thrombosis （DVT） of lower limbs and as compared with trans-dorsal pedis vein thrombolysis （TPVT） approach. Methods The clinical data of 437 patients with acute DVT （184 males and 253 females） at the age of （43±12） years （range 19-76 years） from July 2008 to January 2012 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were analyzed retrospectively. Patients in the group TDT received TDT were 293 cases， 32 inferior vena cava filters were implanted. Patients in the group TPVT received TPVT were 65 cases， 4 inferior vena cava filters were implanted. Results The resolution time of thrombus in the group TDT was shorter than that in the group TPVT （6 d versus 9 d， P＜0.05）. The circumference difference of leg or upper leg before and after treatment in the TDT group was significantly greater than that in the TPVT group （P＜0.05）. The rate of venous patency was （65.2±15.4）% and preservation rate of valvular function was （78.2±12.6）% in the group TDT， and which was （63.8±16.3）% and （91.1±10.7）% in the group TPVT， respectively. The differences of venous patency rate was not statistically significant（P＞0.05） between two groups， but the prevervation rate of valvular function was significant difference （P＜0.05） .Hematomas in 3 cases and gross hematuria in 4 cases were observed， and displacement of inferior vena cava filter occurred in 1 patient in the group TDT. The gums bleed or gross hematuria in 5 cases were observed in the group TPVT. Conclusions Both TDT and TPVT can effectively relieve symptoms. TDT can shorten the course of disease， but itincreases functional damage of the deep vein valvular.
Objective To study the effect of the intracavity thrombolysis, aspiration of debris, percutaneous transcathete angioplasty (PTA) and percutaneous transtuminl angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) on treating peripheral arterial obliterans disease (PAOD). Methods From May 1994 to May 2008, interventional treatment was performed in 285 patients with PAOD. Intracavity thrombolysis and aspiration of debris were performed in 63 patients suffering from acute arterial occlusion. Intracavity thrombolysis and PTA were performed in 61 patients suffering from arteriostenosis combined with acute occlusion. Intracavity thrombolysis, PTA and PTAS were performed in 161 patients suffering from chronic arteriostenosis occlusion. Results Total success rate was 98.25% (280/285). The success rate in intracavity thrombolysis and aspiration of debris was 96.83% (61/63), with 88.89% (56/63) of the blood vessels restored, 7.94% (5/63) of the blood vessels partially restored, and another 3.17% (2/63) failed. The success rate in intracavity thrombolysis and PTA was 85.25% (52/61). The success rate in PTA and PTAS was 98.14% (158/161). The total complication rate was 7.02% (20/285), of them the local thrombolysis and thromboclasis accounting for 7.94% (5/63), the local thrombolysis and PTA accounting for 14.75% (9/61), the PTA and stent implantation accounting for 3.73% (6/161). Conclusion Percutaneous transluminal treatment for stenotic and occlusive lesions of peripheral artery can effectively keep the blood vessel unobstructed for a long time and raise the haemodynamics index remarkably.
Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with vena cava filter on deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremity.Methods The clinical data of 65 patients with DVT of lower extremities from January 2008 to August 2009 were analyzed retrospectively, whose course of diseases were not more than 7 d and clinical type included central type and mixed type. Thirty-two cases were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with vena cava filter, while administrating treatment of anticoagulation and activating blood circulation to dissipate blood stasis, which were named as study group. Thirty-three cases were treated traditionally with thrombolysis, anticoagulation, and activating blood circulation to dissipate blood stasis, which were named as control group. The course of therapy was continued 10-14 d, then the efficacy in two groups patients was evaluated. Results It was (7.35±1.42) cm that circumference difference before treatment between affected extremties and unaffected extremties in study group, which of 3, 7, and 14 d after treatment was (4.21±1.12) cm， (2.87±0.98) cm, and (1.22±1.02) cm, respectively. Circumference difference between before and after treatment had significant difference in study group (Plt;0.01). It was (6.97±1.27) cm that circumference difference before treatment between affected extremties and unaffected extremties in control group, which of 3, 7, and 14 d after treatment was (5.72±1.31) cm, (4.58±0.88) cm, and (3.18±1.24) cm, respectively. Circumference difference between before treatment and 3, 7, and 14 d after treatment had significant difference in control group (Plt;0.05 or Plt;0.01). Circumference difference before treatment in two groups had no significant difference (Pgt;0.05). Circumference difference after treatment at different time points in two groups was significantly different, respectively (Plt;0.01). Circumference difference after treatment at different time points in study group was significantly less than that in control group, respectively (Plt;0.01). After 14 d, complete recanalization rate （71.88%, 23/32） and cure rate (71.88%, 23/32) of iliofemoral vein in study group were significant higher than that (36.36%, 12/33) in control group (Plt;0.01). No pulmonary embolism occurred. Conclusion In terms of ideal therapy targets of DVT of lower extremity, the catheterdirected thrombolysis combined with vena cava filter is obviously superior to traditional thrombolysis treatment.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical efficacy and safety of reteplase in prehospital thrombolysis for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 62 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated in our hospital between September 2010 and December 2012.They were randomly divided into two groups:the treatment group with 22 patients given reteplase thrombolysis therapy in the prehospital ambulance and/or emergency department,and the control group with 40 patients receiving thrombolytic therapy in the hospital.Then,we compared 60-minute and 120-minute recanalization rate,the rate of complicating with various kinds of adverse reactions and the composite end-point event rate between the two groups. ResultsSixty minutes and 120 minutes after thrombolysis,the clinical judgment recanalization rate in the treatment group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05).Four weeks after hospitalization,the rate of complicating with various kinds of hemorrhage,hypotension and death rate in the two groups had no statistical difference (P>0.05). ConclusionPrehospital thrombolysis treatment for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction has a better clinical efficacy and is worth popularizing in basic unit hospitals.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the additional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and conventional treatment (CT) for treatment primary deep vein thrombosis. MethodsDatabases such as CNKI, WanFang Data, Pubmed, EMBASE.com, Medline, CBM, CSJD, CJFD, and the Cochrane Library were electronically searched from the date of their establishment to 30 June, 2013, and the relevant literatures and conference proceedings were also manually searched to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on comparison of additional CDT versus CT for primary deep vein thrombosis. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and accessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Then the meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.1 software. Publication bias was assessed by STATA software. A meta-regression model was used to describe between study variability. ResultsTwo RCTs including 3 literatures contain 224 patients reporting data on safety and efficacy of CDT versus CT were included. There were no publication bias (Begg'S test, Z=1.02. P > 0.05;Egger'S test, t=0.98, P > 0.05). The results of meta-analysis showed that:in 6 months after surgery iliofemoral vein patency rate of CDT group was higher than that of CT group (OR=3.62, 95% CI:1.51-8.64, P=0.004), in 6 months after surgery CDT group with a lower rate than CT group of the iliofemoral vein occlusion and (or)venous reflux rate (OR=0.24, 95% CI:0.11-0.53, P=0.000), and the incidence rate of PTS in 24 months after surgery in CTD group was less than that of CT group (OR=0.55, 95% CI:0.31-0.96, P=0.040). There were no statistically significant of the major complications after surgery between CDT group and CT group (OR=1.34, 95% CI:0.12-15.69, P=0.810). But the incidence rates of minor complications and total complications after surgery in CT group were lower than those of CDT group (OR=13.67, 95% CI:4.08-45.83, P < 0.00 01 and OR=11.67, 95% CI:4.40-30.99, P < 0.000 01). ConclusionsCDT is a effective and positive way to treat early deep venous thrombosis especially in terms of the patency of vascular and prevent the occlusion and PTS. Due to the limitation of the included studies, large sample size, multicenter, and high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion, such as the ATTRACT Study. The intracavitary therapy could be applied to clinic combining individual conditions of patients.
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of low-(10 mg) and high-dose (20 mg) of recombinant tissue typeplasminogen activator (rt-PA) catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower limb ischemia by using meta-analysis. MethodsThe literatures of randomized clinical trials (RCT) concerning low-versus high-dose rt-PA catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower limb ischemia study were searched using the national and international electronic databases.The literatures were screened and quality evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and analyzed by using the Cochrane Center the RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 4 RCT studies, with a total of 360 patients (192 patients in low dose group and 168 patients in high-dose group) were included.No statistical difference were noted in low-versus high-dose group with regard to ankle-brachial index (RR=0.20, 95%CI=-0.43-0.02, P=0.07), 30 days amputation-free survival (RR=1.00, 95%CI=0.94-1.08, P=0.91), 6 months the probability of restenosis (RR=1.00, 95%CI=0.60-1.67, P=1.00), and the incidence of groin hematoma (< 5 cm, RR=1.24, 95%CI=0.56-2.77, P=0.59).But the incidence of bleeding and the incidence of stress ulcer in low-dose group were lower than those in high-dose group (RR=2.38, 95%CI=1.10-5.15, P=0.03;RR=2.49, 95%CI=1.21-5.13, P=0.01). ConclusionTwo doses of rt-PA treatment of limb ischemia similar efficacy, but the incidence of low-dose regimen of complications is significantly lower than the high dose regimen.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) through three different approaches combined with iliac venous endovascular therapy for acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) complicated with Cockett syndrome of the lower extremities. MethodThe clinical data of 87 patients with CDT through three different approaches (small saphenous vein group, popliteal vein group, and posterior tibial vein group) combined with iliac venous endovascular therapy for DVT complicated with Cockett syndrome of the lower extremities were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThe lower extremity swelling of all the patients were disappeared obviously within 72 h after surgery, there was no death related surgery and pulmonary embolism. The limb edema reduction rates had no significant differences among the small saphenous vein group, popliteal vein group, and posterior tibial vein group﹝(77±13)% versus (82±12)% versus (77±18)%, P > 0.05﹞. The recanalization rates of thrombolysis had no significant differences among the above three groups﹝(86.5±10.6)% versus (92.0±7.7)% versus (87.3±7.8)%, P > 0.05﹞. The time required for the cannulation in the posterior tibial vein group was significantly shorter than that of the small saphenous vein group or popliteal vein group﹝(15.14±3.62) min versus (32.62±9.36) min or (42.79±13.30) min, P < 0.01﹞. All the patients were performed by balloon dilatation and iliac vein stenting. Eighty-seven cases were followed-up for 1-24 months, the primary patency rate of iliac venous was 100%. ConclusionsCDT with iliac venous endovascular therapy is an effective method in treatment of acute DVT with Cockett syndrome. CDT through posterior tibial vein is an easier and effective method with less complications and time. This way could be acceptable in basal hospital.
ObjectiveTo investigate the therapeutic evaluation of catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with multiple minimally invasive techniques of endovascular in the treatment of lower extremity atherosclerotic occlusive disease (ASO). MethodsClinical data of 64 ASO patients who were treated in our hospital from June 2011 to October 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were divided into two groups according to the therapies:33 patients were treated by catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with multiple minimally invasive techniques of endovascular (combination group), and the other 31 patients were only treated by multiple minimally invasive techniques of endovascular (intervention group). Comparison of the clinical indexes was performed between the 2 groups, including vascular patency rate, stent implantation rate, operation time, ankle-brachial index (ABI), saturation of blood oxygen (SO2) of toes, temperature of foot skin, amputation rate, and hospitalization expense. ResultsIn the same group (combination group and intervention group), compared with the time point of before operation, the clinical indexes of the ABI, SO2 of toes, and temperature of foot skin were higher after operation (P<0.05). At the same time point of before or after operation, there were no significant difference between the 2 groups in ABI, SO2 of toes, and temperature of foot skin (P>0.05). The vascular patency rate of combination group was higher than that of intervention group[97.0% (32/33) vs. 83.9% (26/31)], P<0.05. But the stent implantation rate[18.2% (6/33) vs. 64.5% (20/31)], amputation rate[3.0% (1/33) vs. 16.1% (5/31)], operative time[(2.0±0.5) h vs. (4.0±1.1) h], and hospitalization expense of patients who got successful limb salvage[(8 500±1 200) yuan vs. (34 000±2 100) yuan] of combination group were all lower or shorter than those of intervention group (P<0.05). After operation, there were no complication happened in the patients who got successful limb salvage of combination group (n=32) and intervention group (n=26). In postoperative 6 months, the lower extremity arteries in patients who got successful limb salvage of combination group and intervention group were all examined by color ultrasonography, and they were unblocked. The lower extremity arteries of the patients with stent implantation in the 2 groups suffered with no obvious stenosis or occlusion. ConclusionsCatheter-directed thrombolysis combined with multiple minimally invasive techniques of endovascular can become one of the surgical treatment methods for ASO, which characterized by minimally invasive operation, effective treatment, and low cost.