The authors studied retrospectively clinical data of seventy cases with breast cancer during pregnancy and lactation.They were treated and diagnosed by operation and pathology.Primary factors influencing prognosis were analyzed.It was demonstrated that 5year survival rate of the patients were significantly influenced by clinical stage , month of pregnancy and lactation, time of symptoms, type of operation, type of pathology, histological grade of malignancy, recurrence and metastasis, and estrogen receptor status (Ｐ＜0.05).Age and termination of pregnancy had no beneficial effect on survival (Ｐ＞0.05).The prognosis of pregnant and lactating breast cancer was poorer than ordinary breast cancer.Their 5year survival rate were 55.7% and 74.3%, respectively. After they were matched for stage and for age, no difference in survival was found.Early diagnosis and radical operation combined with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy have better prognosis.The method can shorten time of treatment and improve survival rate.Termination of pregnancy has not been shown to improve survival and shall not be advised routinely.Future pregnancy may be detrimental and shall be discouraged.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the safety of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in pregnancy. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, VIP, and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies on the safety of LMWH in pregnancy from inception to March 30th, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 77 RCTs and 13 cohort studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that LMWH increased the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage (RR=1.50, 95%CI 1.00 to 2.25, P=0.05). However, there was no significant difference. The incidence of hematological adverse events was different from the results of RCTs and cohort studies. The results of RCT subgroup analysis showed that LMWH increased ecchymosis at the injection site (RR=1.60, 95%CI 1.24 to 2.08, P=0.000 4). However, the incidence of overall skin system adverse events did not increase significantly. LMWH reduced the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events (RR=0.18, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.46, P=0.000 3). LMWH failed to increase the occurrence of fetal congenital malformations, digestive system, central nervous system, skeletal system, and systemic adverse events. ConclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that LMWH is relatively safe to use during pregnancy. However, whether it increases postpartum hemorrhage and hematological adverse events is unclear. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectiveThis study aims to compare different references for the fetal risk of drugs used in pregnancy to provide evidence for the safety of drug use in pregnancy.MethodsFour drug databases, including Lexicomp, Micromedex, TERIS, and Reprotox, as well as two books of drugs in pregnancy edited by Briggs and Schaefer, were searched. Descriptive analysis was performed regarding the definition of pregnancy recommendations and the specific content of medication.ResultsThe six references employed slightly different approaches to drugs in pregnancy, however, all of them included summaries of the risk in pregnancy, data of crossing the placenta, and human and animal data. The databases of Micromedex, TERIS, and a book edited by Briggs had their risk classification systems for drug use during pregnancy. For specific drugs, the summary of different information in pregnancy was different, the amount and content of listed evidence varied, and there was no evaluation of the quality and relevance of evidence among the references.ConclusionsThere is no consensus on the risk assessment of drugs in pregnancy. Risk classification systems for drugs in pregnancy are still an important method for determining the fetal risk of drugs. The existing references merely list studies of drugs in pregnancy, without comprehensive quality assessment. A methodological study of assessment of the risk of drugs in pregnancy is required.
ObjectivesUsing systematic literature review to analyze the effects of levetiracetam (LEV) on neonatal safety during early pregnancy.MethodsThe scope of the literature must be English literature, published from 1997 to 2018. Meta-analysis was performed by random effects models.ResultsSeven literatures were included. A total of 672 cases exposed to LEV in treatment group and 772 234 cases in control groups were selected for meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in neonatal malignancy between treatment group and control group［OR=1.05, 95% CI (0.54, 2.02), P=0.37］. Further, we evaluated the effect of LEV monotherapy and polytherapy on neonatal safety, a total of 464 monotherapy cases and 632 polytherapy cases respectively were selected for meta-analysis. The results showed that there was no significant difference between these two therapies in neonatal malignancy ［OR=0.54, 95% CI(0.31, 0.96), P=0.32］.ConclusionsAs the papers we included, levetiracetam in the treatment of epilepsy during pregnancy is relatively safe for newborn.
Objective To systematically review the association between periodontal disease during pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods PubMed, Web of Science, CBM and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect studies on periodontal disease and GDM from inception to October 23, 2021. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 11 studies were included, involving 2 910 pregnant women. The results of meta-analysis showed that pregnant women with periodontal disease during pregnancy reported more GDM than normal pregnant women (OR=1.81, 95%CI 1.31 to 2.50, P=0.000 3). Conclusion The current evidence suggests that there is a positive association between periodontal disease during pregnancy and the risk of GDM. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo explore the relationship between the diet during pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and analyze the effect of GDM on weight gain, outcome and complication of mother and infant. MethodsWe selected 128 GDM pregnant women and 267 non-GDM pregnant women who were investigated by semi-quantitative food frequency method during September 2009 to March 2011. Then, we collected relevant information and the data were analyzed by t-test and chi-square test. ResultsThere were statistically significant differences between the two groups in total calorie, carbohydrate, fat and protein intakes per day (P<0.05). In general, the rates of insufficient weight gain and excessive weight gain during pregnancy in the GDM group were significantly higher than the non-GDM group (P<0.05), while proper weight gain rate was significantly lower (P<0.01). The risk of hydramnion, intrahepatic cholestasis and pregnancy-induced hypertension in the GDM group was significantly higher than the non-GDM group (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between the two groups in premature delivery, cesarean section or premature membrane ruptures (P>0.05). Apgar scores were significantly different at minute 1 and 5 between the infants in the two groups (P<0.05). The incidence of fetal death, malformation, mild neonatal asphyxia and fetal macrosomia in the GDM group was significantly higher than the non-GDM group (P<0.05). No significant differences between the two groups in low birth weight infant, cord entanglement and fetal distress were detected (P>0.05). ConclusionGDM can lead to high incidence of poor outcome and complication. It is vital to strengthen the examination and keep balanced dietary structure, in order to reduce the complication and improve the health of mother and child.
ObjectiveTo explored the influence of disease changes, weight gain, eosinophil levels and other factor in pregnancy women with asthma. MethodsCase records of gestational asthma patients produced in the obstetrics department of Peking University People's Hospital from October 2010 to October 2020 were collected, and refer to electronic medical records of clinics (pre-pregnancy and pregnancy). According to the disease control (asthma related unplanned respiratory clinics, emergency or hospitalization), patients were divided into pregnancy stable group and pregnancy fluctuation group. The basic characteristics, pre-pregnancy asthma control, weight gain during pregnancy and peripheral blood eosinophil level before labor were retrospectively analyzed. The cause of asthma attacks, clinical characteristics and distribution of gestational time in pregnancy fluctuations were described. Peripheral blood eosinophil levels in different period during pregnancy in the stable group were analyzed. ResultsTotally 124 cases of natural pregnancy singleton were enrolled in the study. The age was (32.3±3.9) years old. There were 71 patients in stable group and 53 patients in fluctuation group. The proportion of pre-pregnancy instability in the fluctuating pregnancy group was higher than that in the stable pregnancy group (P<0.05). The proportion of intermittent medication before pregnancy was higher in the fluctuating pregnancy group than in the stable pregnancy group (P<0.05). Peripheral blood eosinophil count before labor and the number of cases with eosinophil count≥0.15×109/L before labor were higher in the fluctuation group (all P<0.05). The proportion of hypertentive diseases in pregnancy and fetal distress in uterus were higher in the fluctuation group (all P<0.05). The common cold was the common trigger factor (38.2%) and asthma recurrences occur between 13 and 36 weeks of gestation (65.8%) in fluctuation group. In further analysis of subgroup (the stable group), peripheral blood eosinophil count in early pregnancy (P<0.05) and pregnant metaphase (P<0.05) were higher than before delivery. The number of cases with eosinophil count>0.15×109/L in pregnant metaphase (P<0.05) was higher than before delivery. ConclusionsAsthma fluctuates during pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. It is very important and critical that asthma control before pregnancy, weight gain management and eosinophil level monitoring of patients with asthma during pregnancy. The whole management is imperative in women with asthma during pregnancy.
目的 探讨不典型胎盘早剥的临床特点。 方法 对2008年5月－2009年5月收治的55例胎盘早剥患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。其中产前漏诊30例，疑诊15例，确诊10例。胎盘早剥的产前确诊率为18.2%，漏诊率为54.5%。所有患者均经产后证实。 结果 重度子痫前期（25.5%）、胎膜早破（12.7%）是胎盘早剥的主要发病诱因；阴道流血（52.7%）、腰腹痛（47.3%）及胎心异常（36.4%）是其常见的临床表现。胎盘早剥者，剖宫产率、胎儿窘迫及早产率均增加。 结论 不典型胎盘早剥病情隐匿。后壁胎盘、早剥面积小及B型超声检查阴性是漏诊的主要原因。对此患者应提高认识，动态监测，及时处理，以改善母婴结局。