Objective To compare the curative effect of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) with MilliganMorgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) for acute incarcerated hemorrhoids. Methods A retrospective study of 103 patients with acute incarcerated hemorrhoids treated by surgery was performed. The patients were divided into PPH group (n=58) and MMH group (n=45) according to the different operation program who underwent. Operative time, pain score of VAS, time required for anodyne, postoperative complications, hospital stay, and hospital charges were compared. Results The symptoms were both relieved in two groups patients. Although the hospital charges of patients in MMH group were fewer, the patients in PPH group had advantages of shorter operative time, less postoperative pain, lower requirement for anodyne, fewer complications (edema of anal edge), and shorter hospital stay (Plt;0.01). Conclusion PPH is as safe and effective as MMH, and furthermore its short-term therapeutic effect is better than MMH.
【摘要】目的 探讨分段整形提缩注射术治疗脱肛痔的临床疗效。方法 175例重度环状痔, 沿肛缘弧形切除结缔组织外痔以整形肛门, 再于结扎痔核基底及其上端黏膜下层注射消痔灵注射液,并进行疗效观察。结果 术后肛周水肿(72 h)、疼痛(24及72 h)明显减少； 术后4周临床治愈145例,好转23例,总有效率为96.0%； 所有患者均随访3~6个月，未见复发。结论 选择分段整形提缩注射术既比较彻底地去除了痔核使之不易复发，又整形了肛门，保护其大小和功能, 该术式可成为治疗脱肛痔的较理想术式。
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect and the incidence of postoperative complications of Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoids combined with reducing tension of alary incision in the treatment of annular mixed hemorrhoids.MethodsProspectively collected 120 patients with annular mixed hemorrhoids who received treatment from the Department of Colorectal Surgery of Bazhong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicinel during the April, 2016 to October, 2018. All of the 120 patients with annular mixed hemorrhoids were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group, with 60 patients in each one group. Patients in the experimental group was treated with Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoids combined with reducing tension of alary incision, while patients in the control group with conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoid.ResultsIn the experimental group, 49 cases were cured, 11 cases showed obvious effect; in the control group, 39 cases were cured, 20 cases showed obvious effect, and 1 case was effective. The curative effect in experimental groups was better than that of the control group (Z=–2.090, P=0.037), and the effective rates of these two group were both 100% in total. The mean healing time was (19±3) d (14–21 d) in the experimental group and (21±3) d (14–24 d) in the control group, respectively, which was better in the experimental group (Z=–13.636, P<0.001). Experimental group with lower score of wound pain, hemafecia, and anal margin edema, which were much better than control group on 1 d and 3 d after operation (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant differences on incidence of uroschesis and recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsMilligan-Morgan hemorrhoids combined with reducing tension of alary incision in the treatment of annular mixed hemorrhoids has good clinical effect and deserves clinical application.
ObjectiveTo observe the therapeutic efficacy of ultrasonic scalpel flap-retentiong surgery combined with automatic hemorrhoid ligation for the treatment of four degree mixed hemorrhoids. MethodsThe patients with four degree mixed hemorrhoids admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2023 to June 2023 were included as the study subjects, then were randomly averagely divided into an observation group (underwent ultrasonic scalpel flap-retentiong surgery combined with automatic hemorrhoid ligation) and a control group (underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy) by a random number table method. The therapeutic efficacy, total hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, wound healing time, hospitalization costs, postoperative pain score, bleeding score, wound edema score, postoperative complications (anal stenosis, urinary retention, anal incontinence), and recurrence were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 100 patients with four degree mixed hemorrhoids treated in this hospital were included, with 50 patients in each group. There were no statistically significant differences in the general information such as the gender, age, disease course, body mass index, hematochezia, and tumor prolapse between the two groups (P>0.05). ① The overall therapeutic efficacy both the observation group and the control group was well (100% versus 96.0%, Fisher exact test, P=0.495). ② The observation group had less total hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization costs, and wound healing time as compared with the control group (P<0.05). ③ The differences in the interaction effects of the time-group for the points of postoperative pain, bleeding, and wound edema were not statistically significant (χ2=6.668, P=0.083; χ2=5.500, P=0.139; χ2=6.204, P=0.102). However, the main effects of group (χ2=5.073, P=0.024; χ2=7.107, P=0.008; χ2=8.857, P=0.003) and time (χ2=188.526, P<0.001; χ2=212.472, P<0.001; χ2=185.110, P<0.001) showed statistically significant differences. The points of postoperative pain, bleeding, and wound edema in the observation group were statistically lower than thoes in the control group (χ2=9.323, P=0.002; χ2=18.133, P<0.001; χ2=6.232, P=0.013). ④ The incidences of postoperative urinary retention and anal stenosis in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P=0.046 and 0.031, respectively), there were no statistically significant differences in the incidences of incontinence and postoperative recurrence between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFrom the preliminary research results of this study, ultrasonic scalpel flap-retentiong surgery in combination with automatic hemorrhoid ligation has a better efficacy in treating four degree mixed hemorrhoids, with a smaller wound, faster healing, higher safety, and fewer complications.
目的观察吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术(procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids，PPH)治疗老年女性患者直肠前突的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析我科2004年10月至2010年8月期间经PPH治疗的63例老年女性直肠前突患者的手术经过及术后疗效。结果本组63例患者手术均顺利，手术时间13～35 min (平均21 min)，住院时间3～7 d (平均5 d)，无直肠阴道瘘、肛周脓肿等并发症发生。术后2周均行肛门指诊，2例有轻度炎症，给予对症治疗1周后炎症消失。3例吻合钉未完全脱净，少量残留，给予取出残钉后不适症状消失。术后随访0.5～5年（平均3年），随访率为95.24%(60/63),临床症状完全消失61例，治愈率为96.83%； 症状好转2例，对好转的2例行排粪造影检查，前突均明显减轻，且便秘症状较前有所缓解。结论PPH治疗老年女性直肠前突安全、有效，便秘症状缓解明显，是一种适合临床应用的手术方式。
目的 探讨在局部麻醉下行痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术（procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids，PPH）治疗重度内痔的可行性及临床应用价值。方法 笔者所在医院科室从2005年起对32例Ⅲ度及Ⅳ度脱垂性内痔（含1例混合痔）患者均采用苯巴比妥＋氢溴酸东莨菪碱＋利多卡因肛管直肠环形局部浸润麻醉行PPH术，对其麻醉效果、手术时间、术中及术后疼痛、尿潴留、术后感染、肛门狭窄、住院时间、治疗满意度等进行分析。结果 32例患者均顺利完成手术，有1例术中改行低位连续硬膜外麻醉，1例辅加镇静剂及镇痛剂。术后28例对疼痛能耐受，4例需镇痛药物；1例患者有肛门坠胀感；所有患者伤口均一期愈合，无尿潴留、术后感染、出血、肛门狭窄等并发症发生；31例对疗效满意，有1例感肛门坠胀，行温水坐浴及痔疮膏纳肛治疗1周后缓解。住院时间3～6d，平均4d。32例患者均进行有效随访，随访时间2～4个月，平均3个月，无大便失禁或复发，肛门控便能力均可。结论 局部麻醉下行PPH术治疗重度内痔是一种安全可行的手术方法，麻醉操作护理简单，疗效确切，术后并发症少，术后恢复快，并可减少医疗费用。
Objective To compare the postoperative anorectal pressure after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) in treatment of patients with mixed hemorrhoid of Ⅲ-degree. Methods In total of 112 patients with mixed hemorrhoid of Ⅲ-degree who underwent PPH (n=60) or MMH (n=52) in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between March 2014 to March 2015 were prospectively enrolled, the type of surgery was according to patients’ individual choice. In 6 months after operation, all patients under-went the examination of anorectal manometry which including rectal anal inhibitory reflex, rectal resting pressure, anal resting pressure, maximal anal contractive pressure, and anal canal length of high pressure belt. Results In 6 months after operation, the positive rate of rectal anal inhibitory reflex 〔88.3% (53/60) vs. 61.5% (32/52)〕 , anal resting pressure 〔(56.42± 2.25) mm Hg vs. (46.31±2.58) mm Hg〕, and anal canal length of high pressure belt 〔(3.35±0.12) cm vs. (2.29±0.23) cm〕 of PPH group were all significantly higher than those of MMH group (P＜0.05), but there was no statistical significance between PPH group and MMH group in rectal resting pressure 〔(5.51±1.26) mm Hg vs. (5.39±1.85) mm Hg〕 and maximal anal contractive pressure 〔(156.64±9.78) mm Hg vs. (155.32±8.53) mm Hg〕, P>0.05. Conclusion PPH and MMH are all effective to treat mixed hemorrhoids of Ⅲ-degree, but PPH is more positive in protection of anal function.
ObjectiveTo explore the effects of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) combined with partial internal anal sphincterotomy (Abbreviation: PPH+sphincterotomy) on postoperative wound margin edema and anal function in patients with severe mixed hemorrhoids.MethodsEighty-five patients with severe mixed hemorrhoids admitted to this hospital from February 2017 to February 2018 were selected as the study subjects, then they were divided into a PPH group (n=42) and PPH+sphincterotomy group (n=43) according to the different treatment methods. The patient in the PPH group was treated with the PPH, while in the PPH+sphincterotomy group was treated with the partial internal anal sphincterotomy on the basis of the PPH group. The clinical efficacy, degree of pain, edema of wound margin, anal function, and the recurrence rate of symptoms were observed in two groups.Results① There were no significant differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, course of disease, grading of internal hemorrhoids, and symptoms between the two groups (P>0.05). ② The total effective rate of the PPH+sphincterotomy group was significantly higher than that of the PPH group [100% (43/43) versus 90.48% (38/42), χ2=4.297, P=0.038]. ③ The VAS score of the PPH+sphincterotomy group was significantly lower than that of the PPH group on the 3rd and 7th day after the treatment (P<0.05), the VAS score of each group at the 3rd or 7th day after the treatment was significantly lower than that before the treatment (P<0.05), and it was significantly lower on the 7th day than that on the 3rd day after the treatment (P<0.05). ④ The postoperative wound margin edema in the PPH group was more serious than that in PPH+sphincterotomy group (χ2=20.237, P<0.001), and the score in the PPH group was significantly higher than that in the PPH+sphincterotomy group (t=13.514, P<0.001). ⑤ The resting pressure of anal canal after the treatment was significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05), and the diastolic pressure of anal canal after the treatment was significantly higher than that before the treatment (P<0.05) in the two groups. The resting pressure of anal canal in the PPH+sphincterotomy group was significantly lower than that in the PPH group and the diastolic pressure of anal canal was significantly higher than that in the PPH group (P<0.05) after the treatment. ⑥ In addition, the total recurrence rate of symptoms at 1 year in the PPH+sphincterotomy group was significantly lower than that of the PPH group [6.98% (3/43) versus 23.81% (10/42), χ2=4.647, P=0.031].ConclusionPPH+sphincterotomy could effectively relieve symptoms of severe mixed hemorrhoids, improve clinical efficacy, and reduce recurrence rate.