ObjectivesTo systematically review the epidemiological characteristics of frailty in Chinese elderly population.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect studies on the epidemiological characteristics of frailty in China from January, 1978 to December, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, and then, meta-analysis was performed by using OpenMetaanalyst software.ResultsA total of 29 studies, involving 64 306 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the prevalence of frailty in Chinese community was 12.8% (95%CI 0.105 to 0.152), in Chinese hospital was 22.6% (95%CI 0.130 to 0.270), and in nursing home was 44.3% (95% CI 0.222 to 0.664). In the subgroup analysis by gender: male prevalence in community was 9.2% (95%CI 0.074 to 0.110), female was 12.9% (95%CI 0.100 to 0.157). Prevalence of male in hospital was 23.3% (95%CI 0.124 to 0.342), Prevalence of female was 17.9% (95%CI 0.122 to 0.237). In the subgroup analysis by region: the prevalence of frailty in north China was 13.4% (95%CI 0.093 to 0.175), in east China was 13.6% (95%CI 0.083 to 0.189), and in Taiwan province and HongKong was 9.8% (95% CI 0.078 to 0.199). In the subgroup analysis by age: the prevalence of frailty among the elderly aged 65 to 74 was 12.2% (95%CI 0.037 to 0.206), and 33.2% (95%CI 0.136 to 0.527) among the elderly aged 75 to 84, and 46.8% (95%CI 0.117 to 0.820) among the elderly aged above 85. For investigation based on time periods, the prevalence of frailty was 9.1% (95%CI 0.078 to 0.104) from 2003 to 2010, and 14.4% (95%CI 0.111 to 0.177) from 2011 to 2018.ConclusionsThe prevalence of frailty in China is high. Economic underdevelopment is higher in more developed regions. The prevalence in hospital population is higher than that in community population. The prevalence of female in community and rural is higher than male. The higher ages has higher prevalence. The prevalence of frailty from 2011 to 2018 is higher than from 2003 to 2010. As no uniform screening tools exist, the results of this study requires further validations by high quality research.
Objective To develop the short version of the elderly disability assessment scale (EDAS-SF), and to evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods We conducted a face-to-face investigation in five rural communities in Suining and three urban communities in Chengdu city for elderly adults. We consulted gerontologists and rehabilitation physicians through an internet survey. Proper items were selected from the EDAS according to the results from the following statistical methods: critical ration, Cronbach’s α, correlation coefficient and exploratory factor analysis. Based on these work, the EDAS-SF was developed. The Cronbach’s α was used to assess the internal reliability and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the construct validity of the EDAS-SF. Results A totally of 916 elderly adults were surveyed, among which, 887 finished the questionnaire, accounting for 96.8%. The mean age of the studied population was 70.8±6.9 years old. Finally, seven items were chosen for the EDAS-SF which included mental function, organ function, communication, activity, self-care, family function, economic and social function. The Cronbach’s α of the scale was 0.836. Except for the " economy and social function” dimension and the " communication” dimension, the Cronbach’s α of other dimensions were higher than 0.8. EDAS-SF was proved to have good internal reliability. In addition, the CFA indicated that the theoretical model of the EDAS-SF was well fit to the data of the checking sample, which meant EDAS-SF had good construct validity. Conclusion The current study develops the short version of elderly disability assessment scale. The internal reliability and construct validity of the EDAS-SF are good.
Sarcopenia, characterized by the progressive loss of muscle mass and function, predominantly afflicts older adults. This condition is a notable risk factor for functional impairments, increased incidence of falls and fractures, and can escalate to mortality. Timely intervention is crucial to mitigate disability and minimize complications during hospitalization. The development of these guidelines adhered to an internationally recognized standard protocol. This involved framing clinical queries, pinpointing key outcomes, systematically gathering evidence, and appraising this evidence through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Subsequently, a consortium of experts convened to deliberate over the evidence, culminating in the formulation of these recommendations.
Sarcopenia, a skeletal muscle degenerative condition, is inextricably linked to the physiological processes of aging. Sarcopenia is characterized by a reduction in muscle mass, a decline in muscle strength, and/or deterioration of physical function. Comprehensive interventions are essential for the management of sarcopenia. This patient version of guideline has been developed by adapting the " Comprehensive intervention for sarcopenia among older adults: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline." This patient version of guideline is designed to enhance health education and promote the widespread adoption of comprehensive intervention strategies for sarcopenia.
Sarcopenia, a skeletal muscle degenerative condition, is inextricably linked to the physiological processes of aging. Sarcopenia is characterized by a reduction in muscle mass, a decline in muscle strength, and/or deterioration of physical function. Comprehensive interventions are essential for the management of sarcopenia. The team from the National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics has authored the "Comprehensive intervention for sarcopenia among older adults: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline" which discuss the specific contents of exercise, nutrition, and drug interventions for sarcopenia. This article provides a comprehensive interpretation of the guidelines to facilitate their dissemination, promotion, and application.
The development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines is a sophisticated and systematic process, often requiring multidisciplinary efforts. The traditional approach to developing and updating clinical practice guidelines is usually time-consuming. These limitations obstacle the effective use of guideline recommendations and efficient transformation of most recent research evidence into practice. The MAGIC system is a novel method system for rapid creation and dissemination of high-quality clinical recommendations, including rapid creation of trustworthy recommendations, thus ensuring the scientific and efficient production of clinical practice guidelines; facilitating rapid dissemination and dynamic updating of clinical practice guidelines through recommendation release system (i.e., MAGICapp); and helping promote the production of relevant high-quality original research evidence by identifying the insufficiency of evidence in the process of creation of guideline recommendations. Ultimately, a complete closed-loop digital and trustworthy evidence ecosystem is developed. In order to further promote the effective transformation of research evidence into guideline recommendations, MAGIC China Center was established. We anticipate that the Center will assist the further development and effective use of clinical practice guideline in China.
China is facing the serious situation of 2019-novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection. The health care institutions have actively participated in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease. Proper regulation of in-hospital policy may help control virus spreading. We developed seven key clinical questions about the prevention and control of 2019-novel coronavirus infection in hospital, and provided recommendations based on the best available evidence and expert experience. We interpreted the recommendations for better feasibility in Chinese hospital. The current recommendations provide evidence and reference for the domestic medical institutions to reasonably adjust the hospital workflow during 2019-nCoV infection period..
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemics, universities take responsibility for the health of their students and epidemic control. Our urgent recommendation focuses on four key questions of emergency management in universities following rigorous evidence-based approaches and provides timely suggestions to university managers, academic faculties and student affairs managers. We recommend universities during the COVID-19 epidemics should: 1) suspend offline lectures; 2) provide proper health education on the disease; 3) encourage face masks, however oppose using N95 masks on the campus; 4) encourage hand hygiene and provide sanitizing products on the campus.