Objective To analyze the therapeutic effect of the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage on lumbarspondylolisthesis. Methods From February 2003 to March 2006, 37 lumbar spondylolisthesis patients were treated with this operation, including21 males and 16 females and aging 3969 years.The affected lumbars were L3(3cases)，L4(23 cases), and L5(11 cases). According to the Meyerdingevaluating system, 12 cases were lassified as degree Ⅰ, 20 cases as degree Ⅱ,and 5 cases as degree Ⅲ. Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index were measured before operation, and 2 weeks and 3 months after operation. Results All patients were followed up 336 months. There were statistically significant differences in Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index between before operation and 2 weeks after operation (P＜0.05),and no statistically significant differences between 2 weeks and 3 months afteroperation(P＞0.05). According to Dewei Zhou’s creterior for scoring, the results were excellent in 27 cases， good in 8 cases，and fair in 2 cases. Theexcellent and good rate was 94.6%. All of the embedded osseous were fused. Thefusing time was from 3 to 8 months (mean 3-9 months). There were no breakageof screw and rod. The position and configuration of the whole cages were good. Conclusion Applying the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage may achieve synergism in the treatment of lumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis. Above procedure is served as solid internal fixationand offers a satisfactory reduction, and can improve the fusion rate of the spine. So it is an ideal procedure and worthily recommended method for treatment oflumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis.
Objective To summarize research progress on application of Cup-cage reconstruction in revision of chronic pelvic discontinuity (CPD) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Relevant literature at home and abroad in recent years was reviewed to summarize the principles of the Cup-cage reconstruction, preoperative patient assessment, intraoperative skills, clinical and radiological effectiveness, limitations, and postoperative complications. Results For the treatment of CPD, the Cup-cage reconstruction achieved long-term acetabular cup bone ingrowth, CPD healing, and biologic fixation of the prosthesis by restoring pelvic continuity. Preoperative evaluation of the surgical site and general condition is necessary. The main intraoperative objectives are to reconstruct pelvic continuity, restore the center of rotation of the hip, and avoid neurovascular injury. Current studies have demonstrated significant clinical and radiological effectiveness as well as acceptable prosthesis survival rates after operation. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence regarding the staging of CPD, the optimal surgical approach and internal fixation, and the factors influencing postoperative prosthesis survival remain undefined. Conclusion Cup-cage reconstruction can be an effective treatment for CPD after THA, but there is still a need to explore CPD staging, Cup-cage approach and internal fixation, and influencing factors on prosthesis survival.
Objective To evluate the clinical outcome of autograftsof ilium and interbody fusion cage or bone morphogenetic protein(BMP)／artificial bone material／ cage in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods From January 1997 to January 2004，114 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation． There were 45 males and 69 females with an average age of 43 years ranging from 32 to 61 years. Of 114patients, 85 cases were classified as degree Ⅰ, 24 cases as degree Ⅱ and 5 cases as degree Ⅲ. The patients were divided into three groups accordingto the material used for interbody fusion: autografts of ilium (group A, n=42), interbody fusion cages(group B, n=36), and BMP／artificial bone material／ cage (group C, n=36)．The clinical and radiographic results of the patients were compared among three groups． Results All patients were followed from 13 to 30 months with an average of 15 months． There were no statistically significant differences in surgical time, blood loss, and disc space height of preoperation(P＞0.05) among three groups. No severe complication occurred in the three groups(P＞0.05). The excellent and good rates in groups A，B and C were 81.0％, 80.6％, and 83.3％ respectively, showing no statisticallysignificant difference(P＞0.05)．The fusion rate of group C(97.0%) was significantly higher than those of group A(81.0%) and group B(83.3%) (P＜0.05) after 1 year of operation．And the average loss of disc space height in groups B and C was significantly lower than that in group A(P＜0.05). Conclusion Higher fusion rate and lower loss of disc space height can beobtained in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis with BMP／artificial bone materiel.It is an effective method in the treatment of spondylolisthesis.
Objective To observe the effect of threaded titanium cage and transpedical screw for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods Eighteen patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were adopted in this study. Among them, there were 8 males and 10 females, aged from 43 to 62 years old .Roentgenogramshowed that there were 6 cases of Ⅰ° spondylolisthesis, 11 cases of Ⅱ° and 1 case of Ⅲ°. All patients were treated with cages for intervertebral fusion after total laminectomy and pedicle screws for the reduction. Results The cases were followed up from 6 to 12 months with an average of 11 months. The clinical results were excellent in 13 cases and good in 5 cases. All patients achieved successful fusion and bony union . There were no pedicle screw loosening or broken or peripheral nerve dysfunction in this series. Conclusion This method has been proved to be an effective and reliable procedure for treatment of lumbar spondylolithesis. It produces a high fusion rate and clinical success.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical outcomes of acetabular revision using a metal reconstruction cage. MethodsBetween October 2006 and October 2013, 16 patients (16 hips) underwent acetabular revision with a metal reconstruction cage. There were 4 males and 12 females, with the mean age of 62.7 years (range, 49-78 years). The time from total hip arthroplasty to revision was 3-15 years (mean, 8.2 years). The causes for revision were aseptic acetabular loosening in 15 cases, and femoral periprosthetic fracture (Vancouver type B3) in 1 case. According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) classification, there were 12 cases of type III and 4 cases of type IV; according to the Paprosky classification, there were 12 cases of type IIIA and 4 cases of type IIIB. Harris score was used for hip function evaluation, and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain in the thigh. X-ray films were taken for imaging evaluation. ResultsHealing of incision by first intention was obtained in all patients. Deep venous thrombosis occurred in 1 patient, and was cured after anticoagulation therapy. No complications of infection, neurovascular injury, and prosthetic dislocation were found. Sixteen patients were followed up 6.8 years on average (range, 2-9 years). The Harris score was significantly increased from preoperative 42.44±4.66 to 91.88±3.28 at last follow-up (t=–106.30, P=0.00). Two patients had mild pain in the thigh, but pain disappeared at 1 year after operation. At immediate after operation, the abduction angle was 37-54° (mean, 42.9°). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and teardrop line was (33.67±12.19) mm for preoperative value and was (20.67±9.63) mm for postoperative value, showing significant difference (t=–9.60, P=0.00). The distance between acetabular rotation centre and lateral teardrop was (34.98±12.30) mm for preoperative value and was (40.04±6.61) mm for postoperative value, showing significant difference (t=–3.15, P=0.00). X-ray film results showed bony fusion at the osteotomy sites at 4 to 12 months after operation. No continuous radiolucent line, prosthetic dislocation, or osteolysis was found, and bony ingrowth was observed in all patients. No patient received re-revision due to prosthetic loosening. ConclusionThe metal reconstruction cage for acetabular revision can achieve good effectiveness for patients with serious bone defect.
Objective To evaluate the security and effectiveness of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) cage in reconstruction of spinal stabil ity after resection of spinal tumor. Methods Between January 2008 and December2009, 11 patients with spinal tumor underwent surgical resection and strut graft with n-HA/PA66 cage. There were 6 males and 5 females with an average age of 44.5 years (range, 16-61 years). The average disease duration was 6.8 months (range, 2-14 months). The locations of lesions included cervical spine (2 cases), thoracic spine (6 cases), and lumbar spine (3 cases). Among them, there were 5 metastatic carcinomas, 2 giant cell tumors, 1 osteoblastsarcoma, 1 chondrosarcoma, and 2 non-Hodgkin lymphoma. According to Frankel criteria for nerve function classification, there were 1 case of grade A, 3 cases of grade B, 2 cases of grade C, 2 cases of grade D, and 3 cases of grade E. Results Incisions healed by first intention in all patients, no operative or postoperative compl ication occurred. Four cases of metastatic carcinoma died of primary disease during 5-9 months after operation. Seven cases were followed up 14.4 months on average (range, 10-18 months). All patients gained significant improvement of the neurological function at 3 months after operation. All cases obtained bone fusion and good spinal stabil ity without displacement and subsidence of the n-HA/PA66 cage. The intervertebral height of the adjacent segments was (110.5 ± 16.1) mm at 3 months after operation and (109.4 ± 16.2 ) mm at the final follow-up, showing significant differenecs when compared with the preoperative height [(97.5 ± 15.4) mm, P lt; 0.05], but no significant difference between 3 months after operation and the final follow-up. In 2 patients undergoing surgery via anterior approach, bilateral pleural effusion on both sides occurred and were cured after closed thoracic drainage. During the follow-up, 2 cases (1 chondrosarcoma and 1 giant cell tumor) relapsed and underwent reoperations. Conclusion n-HA/PA66 cage can provide satisfactory bone fusion and ideal spinal stabil ity without increasing the risk of recurrence and compl ications during the surgical treatment of spinal tumors. It is an idealselection for reconstruction of spinal stability.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness between anterior cervical Zero-profile interbody fusion device (Zero-P) and anterior cervical plate device (plate cage benezech, PCB) for cervical disease. MethodsBetween February 2011 and January 2013, 98 patients with cervical spondylosis who accorded with the inclusion criteria were treated with Zero-P in 49 cases (group A) and with PCB in 49 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease type, disease duration, and disease segments between 2 groups (P>0.05). The Cobb angle, short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36 scale), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, postoperative dysphagia cases, neck disability index (NDI), and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were compared between 2 groups. ResultsThe operation time and intraoperative blood loss of group A were significantly less than those of group B (t=4.089, P=0.000;t=3.587, P=0.001). The patients were followed up 3-36 months (mean, 18.5 months). No loosening or breaking of internal fixation and bone absorption or collapse occurred in the other patients except 2 patients who suffered from screw loosening at 3 months after operation. Within 6 months after operation, dysphagia occurred in 8 cases (16.33%) of group A and in 13 cases (26.53%) of group B, showing significant difference (χ2=10.616, P=0.001). At last follow-up, JOA score, VAS score, NDI, SF-36 scale, and Cobb angle were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P<0.05);the other indexes of group A were significantly better than those of group B (P<0.05) except SF-36 scale and Cobb angle (P>0.05). The excellent and good rate of JOA score was 81.63% in group A and 71.43% in group B, showing significant difference (χ2=4.346, P=0.037). ConclusionZero-P and PCB can get good results in treatment of cervical disease, but the Zero-P is better than PCB in reducing postoperative dysphagia because less wounds and strong stability.
Objective To evaluate the surgical procedure of reinforced acetabular cage with caudal flange in reconstruction of pelvic defect after acetabular tumor resection. Methods Between June 2003 and December 2009, 25 patients with Harrington class III pelvic defect underwent reconstruction with a reinforced acetabular cage with caudal flange and total hip arthroplasty (THA). There were 13 males and 12 females with an average age of 51.2 years (range，13-73 years). The main cl inical manifestations included hip pain and buttock pain, with a median disease duration of 6 months (range, 1-96 months). Pathological findings showed 18 cases of metastasis, 3 cases of multiple myeloma, 1 case of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, 1 case of grade I chondrosarcoma, 1 case of giant cell tumor, and 1 case of chondroblastoma. For the patient with chondroblastoma, THA with LINK RIBBED system was used. An artificial total hip system made in China was used in 6 patients and LINK SP II system was used in the other 18 patients. Results No patients died perioperatively. Deep infection and hip dislocations occurred in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. At last follow-up, 8 of 18 patients with metastasis died of cancer and the average survival time was 11 months. The other 10 who were al ive were followed up 15 months on average. One patient with multiple myeloma died of pulmonary infection at 21 months after operation and the other 2 with multiple myeloma and 1 with lymphoma were al ive with an average follow-up of 17 months. The patient with grade I chondrosarcoma and patient with chondroblastoma were followed up 58 and 12 months, respectively, without recurrence. Recurrence occurred in the patient with giant cell tumor at 19 months afteroperation. Loosening of implant occurred in 3 patients because of local tumor recurrence. For the 23 patients at 6 months after operation, the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) 93 score was 81% (range, 57%-93%). Conclusion Reinforced acetabular cage with caudal flange could be used together with THA for reconstruction of Harrington class III pelvic defects after acetabular tumor resection, and low incidence of postoperative compl ication and good functional outcome could be expected.
Objective To assess the mid-term effectiveness of anterior decompression and fusion with nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) cage in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Methods A retrospective study was made on 48 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent anterior decompression and fusion with n-HA/PA66 cage between August 2008 and January 2010. There were 33 males and 15 females with an average age of 54.5 years (range, 42-72 years). The disease duration was 3-12 months (mean, 6 months). The affected segments included 35 cases of single segment (C3, 4 in 7, C4, 5 in 18, and C5, 6 in 10) and 13 cases of double segments (C3-5 in 7 and C4-6 in 6). Of 48 patients, 28 was diagnosed as having intervertebral disc protrusion, 12 as having ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, and 8 as having vertebral osteophyte; 35 patients underwent single segmental anterior corpectomy and fusion, and 13 patients underwent single segmental anterior discectomy and fusion. The pre- and post-operative radiographs (cervical anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and three-dimensional CT scans) were taken to measure the segmental height and lordosis angle. Brantigan et al assessment standard and visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were used to evaluate the graft fusion and the improvement of clinical symptoms, respectively. Results All patients were followed up for 46 months on average (range, 36-54 months). No cage breaking, displacement, or sliding was found. At last follow-up, 36 cases were rated as Brantigan grade E, 10 cases as grade D, and 2 cases as grade C; the fusion rate was 96%. Both segmental height and lordosis angle were corrected significantly at immediate and 6 months after operation and last follow-up than those before operation (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found among different time points after operation (P gt; 0.05). At last follow-up, the cage subsidence was (1.3 ± 1.0) mm. The VAS and JOA scores at 6 months after operation and last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P lt; 0.05), and the scores at last follow-up were superior to ones at 6 months after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The mid-term effectiveness of anterior decompression and fusion with the n-HA/PA66 cage in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy is satisfactory because it can effectively restore and maintain segmental height and lordosis angle and promote osseous fusion.
Objective To summarize the effect of cage height on outcomes of lumbar interbody fusion surgery and the importance of the cage height selection. Methods The related literature was widely reviewed to summarize the research progress on the complications caused by inappropriate height of the cage and the methods of selecting cage height. Results Inappropriate height of the cage can lead to endplate injury, cage subsidence, internal fixation failure, adjacent segmental degeneration, over-distraction related pain, insufficient indirect decompression, instability of operation segment, poor interbody fusion, poor sequence of spine, and cage displacement. At present, the selection of the cage height is based on the results of the intraoperative model test, which is reliable but high requirements for surgical experience and hard to standardize. ConclusionThe inappropriate height of the cage may have an adverse impact on the postoperative outcome of patients. It is important to develop a selection standard of the cage height by screening the related influential factors.