In this paper, a heart rate variability analysis system is presented for short-term (5 min) applications, which is composed of an electrocardiogram signal acquisition unit and a heart rate variability analysis unit. The electrocardiogram signal acquisition unit adopts various digital technologies, including the low-gain amplifier, the high-resolution analog-digital converter, the real-time digital filter and wireless transmission etc. Meanwhile, it has the advantages of strong anti-interference capacity, small size, light weight, and good portability. The heart rate variability analysis unit is used to complete the R-wave detection and the analyses of time domain, frequency domain and non-linear indexes, based on the Matlab Toolbox. The preliminary experiments demonstrated that the system was reliable, and could be applied to the heart rate variability analysis at resting, motion states. etc.
Objective To investigate the learning curve of laparoscopic assisted rectal cancer radical resection of a surgeon and share the experience of laparoscopic surgery. Methods The date of 119 consecutive patients who were suffered operation by same team during January 2010 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The learning curve and its stages were obtained by using weighted moving average method, cumulative sum analysis(CUSUM), risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM)and Matlab software. The effects of each stage, such as operative time, intraoperative bold loss, harvested lymph node numbers, distal margin to the edge of tumor, complications after operation, hospital stay days, and the first time take soft food were compared, and the experience of laparoscopic assisted surgery for rectal cancer was summarized. Results Our learning curve was divided into three periods, the cutting point was around 36th and 80th cases, respectively. There was no significant difference between the 3 stages in general data, however when comparing the operative time, loss of blood, harvested lymph node numbers, the distal margin to the edge of tumor, hospital stay and total complications, the last period were best and the first stage were worst. Conclusions The learning curve can be divided into three stages, the exploration, mastery and proficient period. Our term, fixed and with rich experience in laparotomy, completed our first exploration period at about 36th patients and the second stage is around 80th cases. And the short term effect of each period’s had gradually improved with master of laparoscopic technique.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach (DAA) and by posterolateral approach, and to investigate the application value of DAA in one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty. Methods The clinical data of 65 patients who underwent one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty by DAA or posterolateral approach between June 2010 and November 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. DAA was used in 34 cases (group A) and posterolateral approach was used in 31 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in the gender, age, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin level, etiology, disease duration, preoperative Harris score, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score between 2 groups (P>0.05) with comparability. The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood transfusion volume, hospitalization time, early postoperative complications, Harris score, and VAS score were recorded and compared between 2 groups. The simple Likert scale method was applied to evaluate the patient satisfaction, and the imaging evaluation was used. Results The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood transfusion volume, and hospitalization time of group A were significantly less than those of group B (P<0.05). The patients were followed up 15-48 months (mean, 25.3 months) in group A and 12-51 months (mean, 27.6 months) in group B. The overall incidence of complications related to surgery in group A (10.29%) was significantly lower than that of group B (19.35%) (χ2=8.769, P=0.023). The acetabular anteversion and abduction angle were in the normal range of 2 groups except 1 hip (1.47%) of group A had a higher acetabular anteversion than normal value. Unstable fixed prosthesis happened in 1 hip of groups A and B respectively, and the remaining femoral calcar had no obvious bone resorption and fixed stably. The Harris score and VAS score at each time point after operation of 2 groups were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05), and the differences between the time points after operation were also significant (P<0.05). The Harris score at 1 and 3 months after operation and the VAS score at 3 days after operation of group A were significantly better than those of group B (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found at last follow-up between 2 groups (P>0.05). According to the simple Likert scale method to analyze patient satisfaction, comprehensive satisfaction of group A (97.1%, 33/34) was significantly higher than that of group B (67.7%, 21/31) (χ2=10.343, P=0.001). Conclusion The application of DAA in one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty can significantly relieve the pain, accelerate the recovery of hip joint function, and improve the patient satisfaction. But in clinical application, more attentions should be paid to strictly grasp the indications and prevent the early complications. The long-term effectiveness needs to be further observed.
Objective To compare the short-term effectiveness of staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty via different approaches. Methods Thirty-two patients (64 hips) with bilateral hip disease were treated with total hip arthroplasty between January 2012 and December 2014. There were 20 males and 12 females with the mean age of 45.3 years (range, 30-67 years). There were avascular necrosis of femoral head in 14 cases, developmental dislocation of the hip in 12 cases, ankylosing spondylitis in 4 cases, osteoarthritis in 2 cases. All patients were treated with total hip arthroplasty; and the direct anterior approach (DAA) or direct lateral approach (DLA) was chosen for the unilateral hip randomly. The length of incision, operation time, total blood loss volume, the time of first postoperative activity, and the acetabular anteversion angle were compared. The Harris score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and incidence of complication were compared between 2 groups. Results All incisions healed at stage Ⅰ. All patients were followed up 20-53 months (mean, 39.6 months). The length of incision, total blood loss volume, the time of first postoperative activity were significantly shorter in DAA group than in DLA group (P<0.05). The operation time was significantly longer in DAA group than in DLA group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in acetabular anteversion angle between 2 groups (t=1.122, P=0.266). The incidence of complication were 25.00% and 15.63% in DAA group and DLA group, respectively, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.869, P=0.536). The Harris score in DAA group significantly increased at 3 and 9 months after operation than in DLA group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference at 18 months after operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The VAS score was significantly lower in DAA group than in DLA group at 1 day, 3 days, and 1 week after operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference at 4 and 8 weeks between 2 groups (P>0.05). The prosthesis did not loosen and sink during the follow-up. Conclusion Total hip arthroplasty via DAA can reduce operation related complication and speed up the recovery of hip function at the early stage after operation. However, the lateral cutaneous nerve injury is the most common complication.
Objective To discuss whether age has an influence on short-term effect of intersphincteric resection (ISR) for elderly (≥75 years old) patients with ultra-low rectal or canal cancer or not. Methods From February 2016 to February 2017, 196 patients with ultra-low rectal or canal cancer received ISR in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Center of West China Hospital were eligible to include in this study, then they were divided into ≥75 years old group and <75 years old group according to the patients’ age. The intraoperative index, postoperative index, and complications rate were compared between these two groups. Results There were 113 cases in the ≥75 years old group, 83 cases in the <75 years old group, the baselines such as the gender composition, body mass index, tumor histology type, differentiation degree, tumor size, and distance from the anal margin had no significant differences ( P>0.05), but the preoperative anaesthetized ASA grade, proportions of pulmonary insufficiency, hypoproteinemia, anemia, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiac insufficiency of the ≥75 years old group were significantly higher than those of the <75 years old group (P<0.05). The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and total complications rate had no differences between these two groups (P>0.05), the first exhaust time, the first eating time, the first defecation time, the first ambulation time, and hospitalization time of the ≥75 years old group were significantly longer than those of the <75 years old group (P=0.023, 0.037, 0.019, 0.020, and 0.012, respectively). There were no significant differences in the incidences of the anastomotic leakage, perianal infection, intestinal obstruction, and wound infection between these two groups (P>0.05). All the 196 patients were followed-up with an average follow-up of 7 months, there were 4 cases of recurrent patients, of which 3 were in the ≥75 years old group and 1 in the <75 years old group; there were 3 cases of death, of which 2 were in the ≥75 years old group and 1 in the <75 years old group. Conclusions Short-term recovery of elderly patients with ultra-low rectal or canal cancer is slower than younger patients because of poor preoperative conditions. ISR surgery is still safe and effective for elderly patients with ultra-low rectal or canal cancer and postoperative complications rate has no obvious increase, but it needs a surgeon’s skilled operation technology and multi-disciplinary team cooperation.
Objective To investigate effects of fast track surgery (FTS) combined with laparoscopy on perioperative inflammatory mediators, immune indices, and clinical short-term recovery effect in patient with colorectal cancer. Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. The patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu from July 2014 to March 2017 were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into FTS group and traditional group by the random digital table. The FTS mode and the traditional method were adopted during the perioperative period in the FTS group and the traditional group respectively. The inflammatory mediators such asC reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) and cellular immune indexes such as CD4, CD8 and CD4/CD8 on the preoperative 1 d, postoperative 1 d, 3 d and 7 d, as well as the index of clinical short-term rehabilitation were compared between these 2 groups. Results ① Eighty-four patients were included in this study, there were 43 patients in the FTS group and 41 patients in the traditional group. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics and the surgical-related indicators between the two groups (P>0.050). ② There were no significant difference in the levels of CRP and IL-6 between the two groups at different time points (P>0.050). The change trend of CRP and IL-6 levels in FTS group and traditional group before and after operation were the same, the CRP and IL-6 levels at the first day after operation were significantly higher than those on 1 d before operation (P<0.001), but on the 7th day after operation decreased significantly. ③ There were no significant difference of CD4, CD 8 and CD4/CD8 levels between the two groups at different time points (P>0.050). The CD4 decreased significantly in 2 groups at the first day after operation (P<0.050), it began to rise on the 3rd day after operation and was close to the preoperative level on the 7th day after operation, but the increase in the traditional group was smaller. The changes of CD8 level at different time points before and after operation were not significant in two groups (P>0.050). The changes of CD4/CD8 ratio at different time points before and after operation were not significant in two groups (P>0.050), only the first day after operation of FTS group was significantly lower than that in preoperative 1 d (P<0.001), and on the third day after operation, it increased significantly and was close to the level of 1 day before operation. ④ The time of the first postoperative anal exhaustion or defecation in the FTS group was significantly shorter than that in the traditional group (P<0.001). The overall incidence of postoperative complications and the incidence of hypoproteinemia in the FTS group were significantly lower than those in the traditional group (P<0.050). Conclusion Compared with traditional perioperative management in combination with laparoscopic surgery, FTS combined with laparoscopic surgery has no effects on postoperative inflammatory mediators and immune parameters in patient with colorectal cancer, and it could reduce complications, reduce traumatic stress, and accelerate postoperative recovery for patient with colorectal cancer.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and short-term outcome of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for the middle-lower rectal cancer in municipal hospital.MethodsThe pathological data of 94 patients with middle-lower rectal cancer (49 cases underwent laparoscopic TME, while 45 cases received open TME), who treated in The First People’s Hospital of Ziyang from Jan. 2015 to Jun. 2017, were retrospectively collected and analyzed.ResultsTwo patients (4.1%) in laparoscopy group were converted to open surgery. Compared with the laparotomy group, the laparoscopic group had significantly less volume of intraoperative bleeding, shorter abdominal incision, earlier time to the first flatus and liquid diet, and lower rate of 30-day postoperative complication (P<0.05), but had longer operative time (P=0.033). While there were no significant difference on postoperative stay, the specimen length, distal margin, and number of harvested lymph nodes between the 2 groups (P>0.05).ConclusionLaparoscopic TME is a feasible, safe, and minimally invasive technique for middle-lower rectal cancer, and produce more favourable short-term outcome than open surgery in municipal hospital.
ObjectiveTo compare oncologic and short-term outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study using a prospectively collected database. Patients’ records were obtained from Gansu Provincial Hospital between July 2015 and October 2017. Eighty patients underwent robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (R-TME group) and one hundred and sixteen with the same histopathological stage of the tumor underwent an laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (L-TME group). Both operations were performed by the same surgeon. Results The time to the first passage of flatus ［(3.28±1.64) d vs. (6.01±2.77) d, P<0.001］, the time to the first postoperative oral fluid intake ［(4.46±1.62) d vs. (6.28±2.74) d, P<0.001） and the length of hospital stay ［（11.20±5.80）d vs. (14.72±6.90) d, P=0.023］ of the R-TME group was about 3 days faster than the L-TME group. The incidence of postoperative urinary retention (2.50% vs 7.76%, P=0.016) was significantly lower in the R-TME group than the L-TME group. However, the intraoperative blood loss of the R-TME group was more than the L-TME group ［(175.06±110.77) mL vs. (123.91±99.61) mL, P=0.031, ）. The operative time, number of lymph nodes harvested and distal margin were similar intergroup（P>0.05）. The total cost was higher in the R-TME than in the L-TME group ［(85 623.91±13 310.50) CNY vs. (67 356.79±17 107.68) CNY, P=0.084), however, this difference was statistically insignificant. ConclusionsCompared with the L-TME, the R-TME has the same oncologic outcomes and rapid postoperative short-term recovery. However, the long-term outcome of the R-TME remains to be further observed.
ObjectiveTo compare the short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD).MethodsClinical data of 29 patients receiving LPD and 27 patients receiving OPD in the department of hepatobiliary surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from March 2016 to December 2018 were collected. Note that both LPD and OPD were performed by the same chief surgeon. Effectiveness and safety of LPD were compared with those of OPD.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, sex, body mass index, total bilirubin level, direct bilirubin level, preoperative morbidities, focus size, TNM stage and ASA grade between the LPD group and the OPD group (P>0.05). The operative time of the LPD group was significantly longer than that of the OPD group ［(482±86 ) min vs. (349±73) min, P<0.01］. Patients in the LPD group had shorter postoperative anal exhaust time than that in the OPD group ［(3.3±0.8) d vs. (5.3±1.0) d , P<0.05］. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay after operation, blood loss in operation, transfusion, second operation, death and postoperative complications between the LPD group and the OPD group (P>0.05).ConclusionsThe preliminary results of this study suggest that compared with OPD, LPD can shorten the postoperative anal exhaust time but not increase the incidence of postoperative complications and blood loss in operation. Nevertheless, this conclusion is needed to be validated by clinical studies with large sample size.
ObjectiveTo compare the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic transanal pull through surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.MethodsRelevant literatures were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, Embase, CNKI, CBM, Wan-fang database, and VIP databases from Jan. 2009 to Jul. 2019, all the relevant trial documents ［included randomized controlled trial and non randomized controlled trial］ were collected for comparison of laparoscopic transanal pull through surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery on the clinical efficacy of rectal cancer patients, the qualified literatures were screened in strict accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria, and Stata12.0 software was used for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 19 articles were included in the literature with 2 683 patients were included among them. Meta analysis results showed that, compared with the conventional laparoscopic surgery group, in laparoscopic transanal pull through surgery group, operation time [WMD=–6.78, 95% CI was (–11.96, –1.60), P<0.01], intraoperative blood loss [WMD=–14.94, 95% CI was (–23.48, –6.40),P<0.01], postoperative exhaust time [WMD=–13.55, 95% CI was (–18.24, –8.85), P<0.01], postoperative hospitalization time [WMD=–1.60, 95% CI was (–2.00, –1.21), P<0.01], incidence of postoperative overall complication [OR=0.50, 95% CI was (0.38, 0.67), P<0.01], and incidence of incision infection [OR=0.19, 95% CI was (0.08, 0.45), P<0.01] reduced. Those differences were not significant, such as intraoperative lymph node resection [WMD=–0.02, 95% CI was (–0.44, 0.40), P=0.92], incision margin distance of tumor [WMD=0.13, 95% CI was (–0.30, 0.55), P=0.56], and incidence of anastomotic fistula [OR=0.97, 95% CI was (0.62, 1.50), P=0.87].ConclusionsLaparoscopic transanal pull through surgery has more safe, effective, and reliable effects than conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. It has further research value, but there may be inevitable bias and other effects in the included literatures, so more randomized controlled clinical trials are needed in the future.