ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of digital three-dimensional (3D) printing osteotomy guide plate assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients with femoral internal implants. Methods The clinical data of 55 KOA patients who met the selection criteria between July 2021 and October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 26 cases combined with femoral implants were treated with digital 3D printing osteotomy guide plate assisted TKA (guide plate group), and 29 cases were treated with conventional TKA (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, side, Kellgren-Lawrence classification, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, knee range of motion, and other baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, postoperative first ambulation time, surgical complications; VAS score, knee HSS score, knee range of motion before operation, at 1 week and 3 months after operation, and at last follow-up; distal femoral lateral angle, proximal tibial medial angle, hip-knee-ankle angle and other imaging indicators at last follow-up were recorded and compared between the two groups. ResultsThe operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative first ambulation time in the guide plate group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). In the control group, there were 1 case of incision rupture and bleeding and 1 case of lower limb intermuscular venous thrombosis, which was cured after symptomatic treatment. There was no complication such as neurovascular injury, incision infection, or knee prosthesis loosening in both groups. Patients in both groups were followed up 12-26 months, with an average of 16.25 months. The VAS score, HSS score, and knee range of motion improved at each time point after operation in both groups, and further improved with time after operation, the differences were significant (P<0.05). The above indicators in the guide plate group were significantly better than those in the control group at 1 week and 3 months after operation (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at last follow-up (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the distal femoral lateral angle, the proximal tibial medial angle, and the hip-knee-ankle angle in the guide plate group were significantly better than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of digital 3D printing osteotomy guide plate assisted TKA in the treatment of KOA patients with femoral implants can simplify the surgical procedures, overcome limitations of conventional osteotomy guides, reduce surgical trauma, achieve individualized and precise osteotomy, and effectively restore lower limb alignment and knee joint function.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraoperative mesenchymal chemotherapy with 5-FU implants in radical gastrectomy of advanced gastric cancer. Methods From January 2008 to September 2009， 102 patients with historically proven advanced gastric cancer were enrolled in our department and were allocated to undergo either radical gastrectomy and intraoperative mesenchymal chemotherapy with 5-FU implants 800 mg（treatment group， n=51）， or radical gastrectomy alone （control group， n=51）. The postoperative complications and recurrence rate between two groups were compared. Results There were no significant differences on the volume of abdominal cavity drainage， count of white blood cells， albumin level， and gastrointestinal adverse events between the two groups （P＞0.05）. After a median follow-up of 28 months， the local recurrence rate was lower among patients in treatment group than that in control group （16.3% vs. 39.1%， P＜0.05）， the survival rate of 3-year was higher in treatment group than that in control group （85.8% vs. 67.3%， P＜0.05）. Conclusions Compared with the control group， there are no significant adverse reactions on patients with advanced gastric cancer who were implanted fluorouraci1 implants during operation， which can reduce local recurrence rates and improve the survival rates.
In recent years, bone implant materials such as titanium and titanium alloys have been widely used in the biomedical field due to their excellent mechanical properties and good biocompatibility. However, in clinical practice, bacterial adhesion to the material surface and postoperative infection issues may lead to implantation failure. Based on the antibacterial mechanism, this review elaborated on the antibacterial surface design of titanium implants from the aspects of anti-bacterial adhesion, contact sterilization and photocontrol sterilization. Surface modification of titanium or titanium-based alloy implants with different techniques can inhibit bacteria and promote osseointegration. Thus, the application range of multifunctional titanium-based implants in the field of orthopedics will be expanded.
Objective To investigate the research progress of drug-loaded antibacterial coating of orthopedic metal implants in recent years. Methods The recent literature on the drug-loaded antibacterial coating of orthopedic metal implants were reviewed. The research status, classification, and development trend of drug-loaded antibacterial coating were summarized. Results The drug-loaded antibacterial coating of orthopedic metal implants can be divided into passive release type and active release type according to the mode of drug release. Passive drug release coating can release the drug continuously regardless of whether the presence of bacteria around the implants. Active drug release coating do not release the drug unless the presence of bacteria around the implants. Conclusion The sustained and stable release of drugs is a key problem to be solved in various antibacterial coatings research. The intelligent antibacterial coating which release antibiotics only in the presence of bacteria is the future direction of development.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of resorbable membrane and non-resorbable membrane in dental implant to guide bone regeneration.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the efficacy of resorbable membrane and non-resorbable membrane in dental implant to guide bone regeneration from inception to February 20th, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 22 RCTs involving 1 995 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the resorbable membrane group was superior to non-resorbable membrane group in terms of repair success (RR=1.21, 95%CI 1.17 to 1.26, P<0.000 01), the bone thickness (MD=0.40, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.43, P<0.000 01), bone graft thickness(MD=0.40, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.46, P<0.000 01), patient satisfaction (RR=1.19, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.36, P=0.009), histological evaluation in bone contact (MD=4.82, 95%CI 0.14 to 9.50, P=0.04) and the total mineralized tissue (MD=3.73, 95%CI 0.32 to 7.14, P=0.03). They also had lower adverse reaction rate(RR=0.28, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.39, P<0.000 01) and changes of bone defect width from preoperative to 6 months postoperatively (MD=−0.62, 95%CI −0.93 to −0.31, P<0.000 01) with statistically significant differences. However, there was no significant difference in histological evaluation of non-mineralized tissue(MD=−2.48, 95%CI −5.81 to 0.85, P=0.14) between two groups.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the resorbable membrane has better repairing effects, for which helps to promote the development of bone and bone graft, reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, which has good safety and effectiveness. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusion.
Objective To observe the clinical manifestations, therapeutic efficacy and results of bacterial culture of seven patients of scleral buckle (SB) infection after scleral bulking surgery. Methods Seven patients (seven eyes) underwent SB removal for SB infections were enrolled in this study. The patients included four males (four eyes) and three females (three eyes). The patients aged from 12 to 69 years, with a mean age of 42.7 years. There were four right eyes and three left eyes. The duration (interval between primary surgery and SB removal) ranged from two weeks to ten years, with a mean of 47.5 months. Six patients were concurrent with systemic disease. All the patients were examined for visual acuity, slit lamp microscope and indirect ophthalmoscope examination. Some patients also received external eye examination and fundus photography. Whether SB exposure or not and the clinical manifestations were observed. SB removal was performed in all the patients and the SB were sent to the laboratory for bacterial culture. The follow-up time ranged from two weeks to eight months, with a mean of 3.2 months. Whether infections recurrence and retinal detachment or not were observed. Results SB exposure was in three eyes. Obvious ocular pain and swelling, conjunctival hyperemia and visible yellow-white discharge in the conjunctival sac were presented in two eyes; irritation and discharge were in one eye. No SB exposure was in four eyes. Ocular pain and swelling, conjunctival hyperemia and visible yellow-white discharge in the conjunctival sac were presented in two eyes. Repeated subconjunctival hemorrhage and diplopia were presented in one eye. Visual acuity decline, conjunctival sac discharge and total retinal detachment were in one eye. All patients had no intraocular inflammation. The infection was controlled after SB removal and the retina was attached during the follow-up. The bacterial culture were all positive, which included Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylcoccus epidermidis and Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, Gram positive corynebacterium, Aspergillus flavus, Kocuria roseus, Streptococcus oralis, Maxwell Corynebacterium. Conclusions The clinical manifestations of SB infection and the pathogenic microorganisms are variable. SB removal can control the infection.
Objective To observe the inhibitory characteristics of silver nanoparticles (AgNP) on bacterial biofilms and investigate their inhibitory effect on biofilm formation on three common orthopedic biomaterials. Methods The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) of AgNP were determined by microplate dilution assay. Biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) were cultured on three orthopedic biomaterials (titanium alloy, titanium oxide, and stainless steel) and intervened with AgNP at concentrations of 32, 16, 8, 4, 2 and 0 μg/mL to determine the MBICs on the three materials. The effects of AgNP on biofilm formation were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and measuring optical density. Results The MIC and MBIC of AgNP in the microplate assay were both 16 µg/mL. The MBICs of AgNP on biofilm formation in titanium oxide, titanium alloy, and stainless steel were 16 μg/mL, 32 μg/mL, and 32 μg/mL, respectively. Among the three materials, the lowest optical density was observed on titanium oxide, while the highest was on titanium alloy. Conclusions AgNP has strong antibacterial biofilm characteristics and can prevent the formation of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in vitro. Biofilm formation is most pronounced on titanium alloy, least on titanium oxide, and intermediate on stainless steel.
Along with the wide application of silicone gel implants in augmentation mammaplasty, more complications appeared. The author reported 24 cases of complicationssince 1989, including one case of heamtoma, one case of infection, two cases of injury of the sensory nerves to the nipple, four cases of asymmetric breast (as ymmetry in position and size), three cases of deformed appearance, six cases of constracture of the fibrous coating membrane, one case of rupture of prosthesis,one case of sinus formation and three cases of abnormal milk secretion. The causes of the complications and their prevention were discussed.
Meniscus injury has been one of the most common knee injuries in current society. The research on artificial meniscus implants as substitutes in meniscus reconstruction therapy has become global focus in order to solve clinical problems such as irreparable meniscus injury and symptoms after full or partial meniscectomy. At present, researches on artificial meniscus implants mainly focus on biodegradable meniscus scaffolds and non-biodegradable meniscus substitutes. Although the commercialized meniscal implants, such as CMI®, Actifit® and NUsurface®, have been applied in the clinical, none of them can perfectively restore or permanently replace the natural meniscus tissue, effectively solve the symptoms after meniscectomy, and prevent cartilage degenerative diseases. The research progress, application, advantages and disadvantages of different kinds of artificial meniscus implants are reviewed in this manuscript, and the prospect is provided.
ObjectiveTo summarize the related research progress of antibacterial modification of orthopaedic implants surface in recent years. Methods The domestic and foreign related literature in recent years was extensively consulted, the research progress on antibacterial modification of orthopaedic implants surface was discussed from two aspects of characteristics of infection in orthopedic implants and surface anti-infection modification. Results The orthopaedic implants infections are mainly related to aspects of bacterial adhesion, decreased host immunity, and surface biofilm formation. At present, the main antimicrobial coating methods of orthopaedic implants are antibacterial adhesion coating, antibiotic coating, inorganic antimicrobial coating, composite antimicrobial coating, nitric oxide coating, immunomodulation, three-dimensional printing, polymer antimicrobial coating, and “smart” coating. Conclusion The above-mentioned antibacterial coating methods of orthopedic implants can not only inhibit bacterial adhesion, but also solve the problems of low immunity and biofilm formation. However, its mechanism of action and modification are still controversial and require further research.